Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(23,325 posts)
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 02:37 PM Feb 20

I Like Beer UPDATE: Boof Boy worries that paying back the tariff money Trump extorted from Americans might be hard

Kavanaugh, a Trump appointee, wrote a dissent where he broke with conservative Justices John Roberts, Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch and complained that the court did not consider the implications of how the Trump administration will refund the ill-gotten tariff money.

He wrote, “So the Court’s decision is not likely to greatly restrict Presidential tariff authority going forward. But the Court’s decision is likely to generate other serious practical consequences in the near term.”

+“One issue will be refunds,” he predicted. “Refunds of billions of dollars would have significant consequences for the U. S. Treasury. The Court says nothing today about whether, and if so how, the Government should go about returning the billions of dollars that it has collected from importers.”

Recalling when the case was presented to the sitting court, he added, “But that process is likely to be a ‘mess,’ as was acknowledged at oral argument.”

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-tariff-loss-brett/

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I Like Beer UPDATE: Boof Boy worries that paying back the tariff money Trump extorted from Americans might be hard (Original Post) Miles Archer Feb 20 OP
He just let the damage go on. He should've made his decision earlier. Walleye Feb 20 #1
Not likely to restrict going forward?... lame54 Feb 20 #2
So an illegal application of a statute should continue because it would be too complicated Ocelot II Feb 20 #3
Every crook has a new angle to plead in court bucolic_frolic Feb 20 #5
"Sure, my client shot somebody in the back ten times, but there's no way to undo that!" struggle4progress Feb 20 #13
Alcohol is another fat tariff that diminished trade bucolic_frolic Feb 20 #4
"...going forward..." MoseShrute Feb 20 #6
crying in his malt liquor. B.See Feb 20 #7
So, when does the government cease charging the tariffs on incoming goods? GoodRaisin Feb 20 #8
Judge worries that crook can't pay back money he stole. Hugin Feb 20 #9
It's a pathetic whine for a so-called judge to make muriel_volestrangler Feb 20 #10
That's his "legal" argument? progressoid Feb 20 #11
We should pay for Trump's illegal tariffs? yellowcanine Feb 20 #12

Ocelot II

(130,572 posts)
3. So an illegal application of a statute should continue because it would be too complicated
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 02:41 PM
Feb 20

to fix the mess the illegal application caused in the first place?

bucolic_frolic

(55,180 posts)
5. Every crook has a new angle to plead in court
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 02:45 PM
Feb 20

"It's too difficult to obey the law, your Honor. Can't we just ignore it for a little while longer?"

bucolic_frolic

(55,180 posts)
4. Alcohol is another fat tariff that diminished trade
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 02:44 PM
Feb 20

Now we can't sell whiskey in Canada because no consumer will touch it

MoseShrute

(131 posts)
6. "...going forward..."
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 02:50 PM
Feb 20

The Extremes only look at the impact of their decisions when it suits their agenda. Did they look at the impact of Citizens United?

GoodRaisin

(10,924 posts)
8. So, when does the government cease charging the tariffs on incoming goods?
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 03:10 PM
Feb 20

They have to be stopped before refunding can be addressed. It didn’t sound like Krasnov plans to stop the current tariffs, just change the authority he uses to charge them.

Hugin

(37,849 posts)
9. Judge worries that crook can't pay back money he stole.
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 03:15 PM
Feb 20

I pretty much never expected to see that headline… Ever.

muriel_volestrangler

(106,226 posts)
10. It's a pathetic whine for a so-called judge to make
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 04:07 PM
Feb 20

"Oooh, fixing this crap would be haaaard!!! Why don't I just pretend my best pal The Rapist can get away with it, like he has so many times before, thanks to me?"

Whoever taught him ethics must be rolling in their grave.

progressoid

(53,195 posts)
11. That's his "legal" argument?
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 04:36 PM
Feb 20

Sound more like something one would hear on from the sofa bunch on Fox News.

yellowcanine

(36,795 posts)
12. We should pay for Trump's illegal tariffs?
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 04:45 PM
Feb 20

Okay Brett. You first. You’re the one with the big salary and the lifetime appointment.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I Like Beer UPDATE: Boof ...