Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I could not have taken a100 dollar monthly tax hike (Original Post) arely staircase Jan 2013 OP
if you pay into social security... Mona Jan 2013 #1
how so arely staircase Jan 2013 #2
Because the payroll tax cut was apparently the one tax cut they didn't want to extend/alter. n/t W_HAMILTON Jan 2013 #3
Not to defend Obama, but the payroll tax cut that was just ended was the same mistaken payroll tax coti Jan 2013 #25
Yes... W_HAMILTON Jan 2013 #30
Good! We have to fund Social Security and it should have never been cut in the first place. TheKentuckian Jan 2013 #36
Youre kidding, right?? darkangel218 Jan 2013 #28
No. n/t W_HAMILTON Jan 2013 #29
You probably just got a big tax hike jfern Jan 2013 #4
Yeah. W_HAMILTON Jan 2013 #6
payrol.ss.cuts arely staircase Jan 2013 #7
To the rate that people have paid since the 1980s. It's worth it to have Social Security JDPriestly Jan 2013 #12
yes arely staircase Jan 2013 #19
I would have taken an 8% reduction in yearly income. Which would have meant me having to find JaneyVee Jan 2013 #5
Our minivan is paid for, so there was always going to be a roof over our heads. Kennah Jan 2013 #8
SHOTGUN! JaneyVee Jan 2013 #15
I'm somewhat serious in the belief we may see tent cities of people living out of their vans Kennah Jan 2013 #21
1300 bucks a year arely staircase Jan 2013 #9
Hey! We who are now retired used to pay those 1300 bucks a year more than you will pay. JDPriestly Jan 2013 #13
Yes, I gotta agree. RebelOne Jan 2013 #32
I was told earlier that the $150-$200 that would probably leave each paycheck alcibiades_mystery Jan 2013 #10
100 dollar hit arely staircase Jan 2013 #11
We who were not born yesterday paid the rates that would have come back. JDPriestly Jan 2013 #14
I don't think it's an issue of people not wanting to pay taxes Kennah Jan 2013 #16
No, it's an issue of people NOT living that close to the edge Occulus Jan 2013 #17
Perhaps I was unclear, but I was not talking about one percenters. Kennah Jan 2013 #20
thats me arely staircase Jan 2013 #18
Buy we did it. We did not have a lot of the things people have today -- cell phones, etc. JDPriestly Jan 2013 #22
Our sons cannot fathom, 15.85 % home loan interest SoCalDem Jan 2013 #23
Read Elizabeth Warren some time Kennah Jan 2013 #24
Totally agree ... mrsadm Jan 2013 #26
the arrogant lefties like every single Democrat in Congress Enrique Jan 2013 #33
time for the 1% to pay for Iraq and Afghanistan. shoulda listened to us. dipshits. bubbayugga Jan 2013 #27
don't look at your next paycheck Enrique Jan 2013 #31
Don't count your chickens (or Benjamins) before they've hatched n2doc Jan 2013 #34
While I understand that your on the edge Nikia Jan 2013 #35

Mona

(135 posts)
1. if you pay into social security...
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 03:09 AM
Jan 2013

...You're still looking at a tax hike, if I understand things correctly?

That will hit me pretty hard

coti

(4,612 posts)
25. Not to defend Obama, but the payroll tax cut that was just ended was the same mistaken payroll tax
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 05:37 AM
Jan 2013

cut Obama put in place to begin with.

W_HAMILTON

(7,835 posts)
30. Yes...
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 01:53 PM
Jan 2013

...but the Bush tax cuts were an even bigger, more costly mistake, yet he supported making most of them permanent.

As I've said elsewhere, the payroll tax cut should have been left in effect and offset by raising the taxable threshold (or some other means, if you prefer).

As it stands, this so-called "win" for the Democrats will result in almost every low and middle class tax payer paying higher taxes this year than they did the previous year due to the payroll tax cut not being extended and no other meaningful tax cuts being proposed in exchange for allowing this temporary tax cut to lapse.

TheKentuckian

(25,020 posts)
36. Good! We have to fund Social Security and it should have never been cut in the first place.
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 07:33 PM
Jan 2013

It is this exact line of reasoning that makes any tax cut a drown the government in a bathtub poison pill.

What is it you want government to do? How will you resource this mission?

A win from here would end the payroll tax and the Bush cuts and would accept the defense sequester but would turn it around a spend it for ten years on infrastructure while deleting the sequester on the spending side to start, while permanently taking the bottom bracket to about 8%.

Not that winning was a possibility.





W_HAMILTON

(7,835 posts)
6. Yeah.
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 03:28 AM
Jan 2013

By my count, if you make $60,000/year, your monthly tax bill just went up $100/month.

Due to not extending the payroll tax cut, basically any low or middle class person will see their taxes go up. You will pay the same income tax rate as last year and a higher payroll tax rate. Nice deal, huh?

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
12. To the rate that people have paid since the 1980s. It's worth it to have Social Security
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 03:56 AM
Jan 2013

when you get older. That is a small price to pay.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
5. I would have taken an 8% reduction in yearly income. Which would have meant me having to find
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 03:17 AM
Jan 2013

a new place to live. If that's even possible.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
15. SHOTGUN!
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 04:02 AM
Jan 2013

Btw, my above figure came from a fiscal cliff calculator someone posted here on DU. Not sure of the accuracy being the proposals have changed so many times.

Kennah

(14,234 posts)
21. I'm somewhat serious in the belief we may see tent cities of people living out of their vans
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 04:25 AM
Jan 2013

VW Splitties and Loafs of the 60s turned into Caravans, Astros, or a Relay in my case.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
13. Hey! We who are now retired used to pay those 1300 bucks a year more than you will pay.
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 03:59 AM
Jan 2013

It wasn't so bad, and the country was in much better shape.

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
32. Yes, I gotta agree.
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 02:06 PM
Jan 2013

I am retired now and I am happy that I paid that money into Social Security. At least I have some money coming in monthly.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
10. I was told earlier that the $150-$200 that would probably leave each paycheck
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 03:42 AM
Jan 2013

Was just, y'know, some extra cash I could use to go out to eat a couple of more time!

The fucking arrogance of some of these supposed lefties is astounding.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
14. We who were not born yesterday paid the rates that would have come back.
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 04:00 AM
Jan 2013

I can't believe the reactions of people to paying their taxes. We paid them. I'm glad you don't have to, but we managed to survive while paying the higher rates.

Kennah

(14,234 posts)
16. I don't think it's an issue of people not wanting to pay taxes
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 04:05 AM
Jan 2013

I think it's an issue of people living at the edge and tipping over if they paid more taxes

Occulus

(20,599 posts)
17. No, it's an issue of people NOT living that close to the edge
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 04:13 AM
Jan 2013

and being unable to relate to the problems of those who must, by accident or malicious design.

Kennah

(14,234 posts)
20. Perhaps I was unclear, but I was not talking about one percenters.
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 04:21 AM
Jan 2013

I was talking about working people whose taxes would have gone up. Nevertheless, even if we would have tipped over, and we're already living at the edge, selling stuff to eat, keep the utilities turned on, rent paid, I was one saying, "Hit the gas Thelma." Maybe if there's a bit more of a crash, then shit will get real come 2014.

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
23. Our sons cannot fathom, 15.85 % home loan interest
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 05:07 AM
Jan 2013

or wage freezes like we had in our young lives..and high (for us) taxes..

It's all relative, I guess...and things that are now considered to be necessities, would have been wildly extravagant splurges for us..

times change and I guess expectations do as well..

So many of the "must-haves", we have never indulged in, so we would not miss them if we could suddenly not afford them..

Kennah

(14,234 posts)
24. Read Elizabeth Warren some time
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 05:36 AM
Jan 2013

Consumers have NOT gone nuts spending themselves into oblivion. In some areas, like consumer electronics, spending has risen, but in other areas, like clothing, spending has fallen. It's been overall fairly static, including wages, but the price of housing has skyrocketed.

Besides, if we're talking about the federal budget, very clearly it's been the unfunded wars and a military budget that is larger than the next 10 militaries of the world that has brought us here. Not people with their cell phones.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
33. the arrogant lefties like every single Democrat in Congress
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 06:08 PM
Jan 2013

when the Democratic Party unanimously voted against the Bush tax cuts, twice.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
34. Don't count your chickens (or Benjamins) before they've hatched
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 06:38 PM
Jan 2013

Cantor et all seem prepared to blow it all up.

Nikia

(11,411 posts)
35. While I understand that your on the edge
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 06:43 PM
Jan 2013

I can't help but think of the area where I grew up that has a large contingent of people voting against any tax increase. Almost every tax levy has been voted down in the past 10 years because of them. As a result the schools and town infrastructure and services have gone to hell. Yes, factories have closed and the ones that stay or have come in pay a lot less. They are poorer, which is why revenue is less. More of them are saying, we can't afford more taxes as the school buildings, bridges, and roads fall apart. They say we can't afford more taxes as wild animals overrun the town because the city no longer hires for someone to do that. They cut the police department as heroin and meth dealers come in and thefts, including armed robberies increase. They cry for someone to do something, but we couldn't possibly afford to pay more taxes.
I am sorry that you can't afford more taxes, but unfortunately less tax revenue has consequences.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I could not have taken a1...