Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

drray23

(8,757 posts)
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 10:50 AM 6 hrs ago

The us solicitor, sauer is completely insane.

I am listening to his supreme court arguments. I am amazed they could find a guy willing to argue insane things on behalf of a child molester.

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The us solicitor, sauer is completely insane. (Original Post) drray23 6 hrs ago OP
He's just yelling his arguments crazylikafox 6 hrs ago #1
Performing for an audience of one RainCaster 6 hrs ago #7
That voice rivals kennedy jr spanone 6 hrs ago #2
I know he can't help it, but its horrible to listen to him. milestogo 6 hrs ago #3
More irritating is how fricking fast he talks. spanone 6 hrs ago #6
Like all good con-men peppertree 4 hrs ago #19
Both of them could benefit from a permanent throat malady dalton99a 5 hrs ago #9
He's throwing lots of shit against the wall. He's very difficult to understand due to his circular answers & arguments. AnotherMother4Peace 6 hrs ago #4
Thats because he does not have a case. drray23 6 hrs ago #5
He makes the lesser justices look smart. milestogo 5 hrs ago #10
POS is a hardcore Trump cultist dalton99a 6 hrs ago #8
It seemed like only Alito and perhaps thomas were sympathetic tishaLA 5 hrs ago #11
If the "Originalists" arguments... GiqueCee 5 hrs ago #17
Coke Can Thomas is STILL mad he was born black peppertree 4 hrs ago #21
Doesn't mean he won't win lame54 5 hrs ago #12
He argued the immunity case and won V850i 5 hrs ago #13
Presidential immunity for official actions was established by a 1973 OLC memo... CaptainTruth 3 hrs ago #25
Sauer used to be a fairly regular guest on Thom Hartmann's show not fooled 5 hrs ago #14
So -- here's a question AverageOldGuy 5 hrs ago #15
Trumps own allegiance isnt to this country its to fucking Putin Volaris 4 hrs ago #22
He also has "allegiance" to the UK (via Scotland) BumRushDaShow 3 hrs ago #28
She will go to Tiffany's...the jeweler not the step daughter 😬 MLAA 3 hrs ago #29
Hard to listen to, hard-to-follow reasoning Seinan Sensei 5 hrs ago #16
At one point, they weren't. maxsolomon 4 hrs ago #18
The law to make them citizens wasn't passed until 1924 (n/m) Soul_of_Wit 4 hrs ago #23
His is amoral, unprincipled and unethical. City Lights 4 hrs ago #20
What sad EnergizedLib 4 hrs ago #24
Where is this being streamed or broadcast? LearnedHand 3 hrs ago #26
Im watching cnn via sling. Nt drray23 3 hrs ago #27
Hes doing the only thing he can Boo1 3 hrs ago #30

RainCaster

(13,712 posts)
7. Performing for an audience of one
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 11:02 AM
6 hrs ago

The court will see right through that. The questions they ask will be telling.

AnotherMother4Peace

(5,125 posts)
4. He's throwing lots of shit against the wall. He's very difficult to understand due to his circular answers & arguments.
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 11:00 AM
6 hrs ago

drray23

(8,757 posts)
5. Thats because he does not have a case.
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 11:01 AM
6 hrs ago

No logical coherent argument to rely upon so he is all over the place and naturally, some of it is contradictory.

tishaLA

(14,777 posts)
11. It seemed like only Alito and perhaps thomas were sympathetic
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 11:23 AM
5 hrs ago

To his ridiculous arguments, which were basically to assert what the plain text of the Constitution doesn't say what it says.

It really shows how phony this absurd concept of the conservatives being "textualists" or "originalists" is: it's a completely threadbare position that they're willing to twist to make the text and origin mean whatever fits their agendas.

GiqueCee

(4,258 posts)
17. If the "Originalists" arguments...
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 12:02 PM
5 hrs ago

... had any validity at all, there would be no Amendments, nor a process to enact them. They're so full of shit their eyes are brown.

peppertree

(23,343 posts)
21. Coke Can Thomas is STILL mad he was born black
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 12:38 PM
4 hrs ago

And he's on a lifelong mission to punish humanity for it - unless you're rich enough to bribe him, of course.

V850i

(125 posts)
13. He argued the immunity case and won
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 11:54 AM
5 hrs ago

That was even more insane IMHO than this case. There are some gray areas here that he can point to, while the immunity claim he made up out of whole cloth as did the SC with their ruling and the written majority opinion. I subscribe to a podcast called Oral Arguments which I listen to for most of their cases, that immunity one was a real whopper. This one isn’t as wild but yeah Sauer is reaching and trying to muddy the water with much of his arguments.

CaptainTruth

(8,200 posts)
25. Presidential immunity for official actions was established by a 1973 OLC memo...
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 01:29 PM
3 hrs ago

...& was reexamined & reaffirmed in 2000 by the OLC (Executive Branch Office of Legal Counsel).
It's been DOJ policy & practice since the original memo, issued in the wake of Nixon, more than 50 years ago. (See Mueller for a notable example.) OLC opinions, like the immunity memo, have been considered binding on Executive Branch agencies unless overturned by the courts.
Nothing was made up out of whole cloth for the 2024 SCOTUS decision, the legal & Constitutional arguments for it, in addition to the policy & practice, were 50 years old at that point.
Of course... where were these details published by our media? Nowhere that I saw. I only know because I've been paying attention to the consequences of that 1973 memo for decades.

not fooled

(6,680 posts)
14. Sauer used to be a fairly regular guest on Thom Hartmann's show
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 11:56 AM
5 hrs ago

He sounded just as insane then, making his con arguments usually on economic subjects. Hartmann would gut him every time.

AverageOldGuy

(3,835 posts)
15. So -- here's a question
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 11:56 AM
5 hrs ago

What does Trump say about DUAL CITIZENSHIP -- people who are citizens of two contries?

Much of the argument today revolves around citizenship and allegiance to a specific country. Where is the allegiance of a dual citizen?

Melanoma and her anchor baby Barron both have dual citizenship -- US and Slovenia. Wonder where she will go when Trump croaks (I'd like to get the answer to that question tomorrow).

Volaris

(11,704 posts)
22. Trumps own allegiance isnt to this country its to fucking Putin
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 12:50 PM
4 hrs ago

That prima facia makes the rest of this an absolute absurdity, I cannot believe the court even considered hearing this farce to begin with.
I want 13 Justices on that bench and I don't really care if WE are the ones that have to ditch the filibuster to do it.

BumRushDaShow

(169,752 posts)
28. He also has "allegiance" to the UK (via Scotland)
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 01:43 PM
3 hrs ago

where his mother got off the boat from... at least per some of the arguments (I think from Barrett as it came near the end of the arguments, when the CSPAN feed had cut off but the SCOTUS feed was actually still going but with no annotations regarding who was speaking, where an example was given of a baby born in the U.S., born from a mother from Ireland, would automatically be a citizen of Ireland too, and IIRC, the same "ancestry" option is available within the UK).

MLAA

(19,745 posts)
29. She will go to Tiffany's...the jeweler not the step daughter 😬
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 01:48 PM
3 hrs ago

Edited to add: Her 2nd stop would be a cathedral to thank God.

Seinan Sensei

(1,545 posts)
16. Hard to listen to, hard-to-follow reasoning
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 11:58 AM
5 hrs ago

Was he arguing at one point that Native Americans should not be guaranteed US citizenship?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The us solicitor, sauer ...