General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump May Not Turn Over Official Records
What part of "NO KINGS" do these morons not understand?
https://politicalwire.com/2026/04/02/trump-may-not-turn-over-official-records/
Trump May Not Turn Over Official Records
April 2, 2026 at 7:53 am EDT By Taegan Goddard
The finding is an indication Trump will be reluctant to give all of his official records to the National Archives at the end of his term, as presidents have done for nearly a half-century under the Presidential Records Act of 1978.
malaise
(297,255 posts)a serious question - who does he think he is?
Lock up this out of control lunatic.
Emile
(42,848 posts)JohnnyRingo
(20,956 posts)I forget when that was though.
Norbert
(7,826 posts)Kid Berwyn
(24,821 posts)
malaise
(297,255 posts)Take that to the bank 😀
Kid Berwyn
(24,821 posts)It will be a great and historic day.
Ding Don.
All gone.
malaise
(297,255 posts)no_hypocrisy
(55,165 posts)Likely torn up and in the bowels (pun intended) of the WH plumbing.
ToxMarz
(3,017 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(24,709 posts)... in one of the bathrooms attached to Aileen Cannon's office and apartment suite.
Yonnie3
(19,538 posts)We'll have to "force ourselves" into the situation because of crime.
"We're gonna have to do something when it comes World Cup time, and we're gonna have to force ourselves upon them, which we have the right to do, because we don't want to have any crime, we don't want to have any problems,"
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/california/2026/04/01/trump-says-government-will-have-to-force-ourselves-on-la-world-cup/89424116007/
A saying comes to mind "What goes around comes around."
Moostache
(11,244 posts)angrychair
(12,402 posts)We were not asking. He needs a reminder of who is actually in charge here.
aggiesal
(10,875 posts)karynnj
(61,053 posts)the archivist should have already had lawyers prepare legal papers to demand everything that should be turned over to them. They should be served as soon as someone else is sworn in.
MineralMan
(151,460 posts)The trick is that most pages just say, "This Page Is Intentionally Blank."
Scrivener7
(59,920 posts)Johonny
(26,421 posts)And Melania's panties will get touched again. LOL
SergeStorms
(20,724 posts)Probably because the level of corruption and lawlessness within his maladministration are off the scale? 🤔
themaguffin
(5,301 posts)progressoid
(53,294 posts)I am shocked! He's never shown a disregard for the law before. And when he does make a little "mistake" he is held to account!
.
.
.
.
.
.
ChicagoTeamster
(1,128 posts)They're going to be crafting defenses of all his illegal acts (mostly everything he does) because that's what he's going to instruct them to do.
He thinks everything is his. Hence his statements about taking women, taking Kharg Island, his rapist talk.
He didn't just take the documents, he even took artifacts loaned to the US government from other countries that happened to be on display at the white house during his tenure. Ancient Israeli pottery lamps belonging to the Israeli Antiquities Authority, loaned to the White House in 2019 for a Hanukkah event, became stranded at Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate aftser he took them upon leaving office.
underpants
(196,932 posts)The Justice Department has assigned its civil rights division to investigate Cassidy Hutchinson, a former White House aide who outraged President Trump four years ago after her testimony before Congress implicated him in the violence that erupted at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, according to four people familiar with the matter.
ChicagoTeamster
(1,128 posts)Are they the only division that still has attorneys that haven't all resigned?
struggle4progress
(126,529 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(181,094 posts)The Justice Departments new legal interpretation, if upheld, could give the president the green light to hoard records.
Groups warn of risk that Trump âwill keep or destroyâ presidential records
— (@chitraraj.bsky.social) 2026-04-07T18:57:38.345Z
#Donaldtrump
opr.news/2a2629582604...
Download Now
s.opr.news/cc0e61fa2bal
https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/groups-warn-of-risk-that-trump-will-keep-or-destroy-presidential-records
Thats what two nonprofit groups told a federal court in Washington on Monday, in a legal complaint seeking a declaration that the Presidential Records Act is constitutional. The complaint was prompted by a bold new claim to the contrary by the Trump Justice Departments Office of Legal Counsel.
The American Historical Association and American Oversight said in their complaint that they filed the lawsuit to stop the unconstitutional actions of the government, ensure the President and his administration abide by the recordkeeping obligations required by federal law, and to preserve the historical record that belongs to the American people, before it is forever lost.
American Oversight is one of the groups that is separately suing for the release of former special counsel Jack Smiths report on his classified documents case against President Donald Trump. The DOJ dropped Trumps federal criminal cases due to his 2024 election win, but a Trump-appointed judge has still sought to keep Smiths report secret. ....
On top of seeking a court declaration that the act is constitutional, the groups also want a ruling that the National Archives and Records Administration must comply with the act and must make relevant records publicly available as the act requires. Also among the groups requests is that Trump be barred, after his current term is up, from retaining, destroying, disposing, or otherwise handling Presidential records in a manner not in accordance with the act, and to turn over all presidential records in his possession to NARA as required by the act.
The government will have an opportunity to respond in court.
This act was passed to stop Nixon from destroying Presidential records. Like Nixon, trump will destroy all records that are not favorable to him.
Historic NY
(40,107 posts)on Jan 21 the first order to destroy that 747
no_hypocrisy
(55,165 posts)Just askin' . . . . .