General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOn THIS EDITION of CHUCK GRASSLEY'S HOT MIC, it's "What would be wrong if they said Biden won?"
MeidasTouch
@meidastouch.com
🚨 HOT MIC: Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) was caught asking staff during questioning of Trump judicial nominees: What would be wrong if they said Biden won?
Multiple people in the room heard it. GOP staffers were reportedly panicking, according to sources familiar.
ð¨ HOT MIC: Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) was caught asking staff during questioning of Trump judicial nominees: âWhat would be wrong if they said Biden won?â
— MeidasTouch (@meidastouch.com) 2026-04-29T22:15:33.572Z
Multiple people in the room heard it. GOP staffers were reportedly panicking, according to sources familiar.
progressoid
(53,321 posts)whathehell
(30,530 posts)because of his age -- He asked a good question.
RetiredParatrooper
(209 posts)I want him an answer, under oath, why he believed that Mike Pence might not be at the election certification on J6.
MineralMan
(151,480 posts)That's pretty strong evidence of his win, I believe.
calimary
(90,513 posts)And Biden didnt have to cheat like YOU did, Donald. And YOU are still in full cheat mode, to this very hour.
Ill admit, you still have your fans, but that number is shrinking By The DAY.
LetMyPeopleVote
(181,261 posts)As more presidential nominees refuse to answer questions about the 2020 election results, its worth understanding why this keeps happening.
If Trump nominees acknowledge Trumpâs 2020 loss, heâll pull their nominations. If they peddle conspiratorial nonsense under oath, they risk alienating key senators.
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-04-23T20:09:14.265Z
The result is 15 months of mind-numbing confirmation hearing exchanges â including Kevin Warsh's hearing this week.
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/why-so-many-trump-nominees-keep-flubbing-a-simple-question-who-won-in-2020
We saw fresh evidence of the phenomenon earlier this week, when Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts asked Kevin Warsh, the nominee to serve as the next chair of the Federal Reserve, whether Warsh was willing to acknowledge the reality of Trumps 2020 defeat. He was only willing to say that the Senate had certified the results of the election, which was a rather pitiful dodge.
ELIZABETH WARREN: Did Donald Trump lose the 2020 election?
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2026-04-21T14:54:39.440Z
KEVIN WARSH: Uhm, we try to keep politics if I'm confirmed out of the Federal Reserve
WARREN: I'm just asking a factual question
WARSH: I believe this body certified the election
WARREN: That's not the question I'm asking
MS NOWs Hayes Brown explained, If Warsh is unwilling to address a factual matter like the results of the 2020 election, it does nothing to ease the concerns Warren and others have about his resolve to maintain independence in the face of far more complex issues......
But for the nominees themselves, a different kind of problem hangs overhead: If they tell the truth and concede that Trump lost in 2020, the response would get back to the White House and the president could pull their nominations in response to the perceived betrayal. If, however, they overtly deny reality while under oath, they would present themselves to senators as anti-election conspiracy theorists, which might put their confirmations in jeopardy, given that a handful of GOP senators have expressed discomfort with supporting election deniers.
The result is a series of frustrating and ongoing confirmation hearing exchanges, which will very likely continue for the remainder of Trumps presidency.