General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Enabling Act of 1933
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-enabling-actFiendish Thingy
(23,828 posts)There can be no comparable enabling act under American law.
(Please dont bother with a cynical they will just do it reply)
Gerrymandering doesnt even come close to what Germany did in 1933, and it wont save the republicans from the bloodbath coming in November.
Cirsium
(4,065 posts)"The Enabling Act allowed the Reich government to issue laws without the consent of Germanys parliament."
"German judges did not challenge the Enabling Act. They viewed Hitler's government as legitimate and continued to regard themselves as state servants who owed him their allegiance and support."
"The Supreme Court did nothing to challenge the legitimacy of this measure."
To live in this process is absolutely not to be able to notice itplease try to believe meunless one has a much greater degree of political awareness, acuity, than most of us had ever had occasion to develop. Each step was so small, so inconsequential, so well explained or, on occasion, 'regretted,' that, unless one were detached from the whole process from the beginning, unless one understood what the whole thing was in principle, what all these 'little measures' that no 'patriotic German' could resent must some day lead to, one no more saw it developing from day to day than a farmer in his field sees the corn growing. One day it is over his head.
One doesn't see exactly where or how to move. Believe me, this is true. Each act, each occasion, is worse than the last, but only a little worse. You wait for the next and the next. You wait for one great shocking occasion, thinking that others, when such a shock comes, will join with you in resisting somehow. You don't want to act, or even talk, alone; you don't want to 'go out of your way to make trouble.' Why not? Well, you are not in the habit of doing it. And it is not just fear, fear of standing alone, that restrains you; it is also genuine uncertainty.
Many, many times since it all happened I have pondered that pair of great maxims, Principiis obsta and Finem respice 'Resist the beginnings' and 'Consider the end.' But one must foresee the end in order to resist, or even see, the beginnings. One must foresee the end clearly and certainly and how is this to be done, by ordinary men or even by extraordinary men? Things might have changed here before they went as far as they did; they didn't, but they might have. And everyone counts on that might.
excerpts from They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933-45
Milton Mayer
?si=QfRqCLKcXW0O-Y92
Kaleva
(40,411 posts)Hitler might not have been able to rise to power had President Hindenburg not been old and very likely senile.
Hindenburg was popular with the German public , as shown by his landslide win over Hitler in the 1932 presidential election, and more importantly, he had the full support of the German military .
Hindenburgs legacy has been mythologized to suggest that he was either a puppet of Hitler or was supportive of the authoritarian ruler, according to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum.
Historical evidence suggests a more complex portrait of a man who rejected democratic principles and used dictatorial, if legal, powers in an attempt to govern, but also of a man who lacked the strength or conviction to powerfully oppose Hitlers rise to power.
In 2020, Hindenburg was removed from Berlins honorary citizen list, citing his role in Hitlers rise and his anti-civil liberty decrees.
https://www.history.com/articles/paul-von-hindenburg#Rise-of-the-Nazi-Party