Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Norbert

(7,867 posts)
Sat May 2, 2026, 09:02 AM May 2

Idiot: If it weren't for Gettysburg, Robert E Lee would have won (the Civil War).

I give it a year before the revisionist 'historians' have the South as the Winners.

This entire thing is ridiculous, but Lee also demonstrated extremely poor generalship at Gettysburg that resulted in a third of his Army becoming casualties. He also didn’t take over command of the Army of N. VA until 14 months after the war started.

Ron Filipkowski (@ronfilipkowski.bsky.social) 2026-05-02T10:35:57.422Z
50 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Idiot: If it weren't for Gettysburg, Robert E Lee would have won (the Civil War). (Original Post) Norbert May 2 OP
He knows nothing about history except for a few names. Haggard Celine May 2 #1
Pootin SheltieLover May 2 #4
Yep, he's the only one with any brains, and he Haggard Celine May 2 #7
Yup! SheltieLover May 2 #8
And his looney versions of history PatSeg May 2 #25
Dupe oops PatSeg May 2 #26
There's a long list of who is running things. wnylib May 2 #39
Loser Whip-poor-will May 2 #2
Lee got his ass kicked in his first combat command Mysterian May 2 #3
Lee's only concern was protecting his plantation and his Virginia buddies . haele May 2 #44
Kegbreath disgusts actual fighting men Mysterian May 2 #48
So he is asking edhopper May 2 #5
I think it was a combination of the Union win at Gettysburg and Haggard Celine May 2 #9
Right you are edhopper May 2 #23
Disagree ITAL May 2 #27
The funny thing is Iran is doing to Trump what the South should have done edhopper May 2 #24
If it weren't for losing, he would have won. n/t Mister Ed May 2 #6
"The amateurs discuss tactics: the professionals discuss logistics. " - Napoleon Bonaparte Girard442 May 2 #10
Yes, but then he tried to ram the ramparts, and storm the airports . . . hatrack May 2 #11
Yes,... and General Lee drove around the Gettysburg War Battlefield,... magicarpet May 2 #32
If it hasn't been for the Indians Dan May 2 #12
Look around. The Confederacy seems to have won. Kid Berwyn May 2 #13
Traitor rooting for a traitor dalton99a May 2 #14
"Nice ballroom you're planning there TACO, be a real shame if somethin' happened to it!"--General Sherman RedWhiteBlueIsRacist May 2 #15
Lee never won outside of Virginia. Sneederbunk May 2 #16
The Western theater is where Grant showed his stuff Martin Eden May 2 #19
And the 20th Maine, who did the fighting Mysterian May 2 #20
Yes, Jeff Daniels was great in that role in the movie Martin Eden May 2 #22
Pander pander pander Oneironaut May 2 #17
The Civil War was a numbers game Lee couldn't win Kaleva May 2 #18
General Bonespurs has spoken Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2 #21
TRANSLATION: Bigot in Chief Mourns South's Loss of Civil War B.See May 2 #28
Lee's leadership averted a much worse tragedy at the Bowling Green Massacre. Girard442 May 2 #29
Robert E. Lee: I will send an army uphill over 2 miles of open ground against an entrenched position Prairie Gates May 2 #30
Sounds like Putin's plan for Ukraine and his for Iran. doc03 May 2 #31
This is a very, very sick man. legallyblondeNYC May 2 #33
"If it weren't for the fact they lost, the South could have won! Big strong men with tears in their eyes struggle4progress May 2 #34
And, If McLellan Hadn't Been Such A Tool.... ProfessorGAC May 2 #35
Doubtful Cirsium May 2 #38
Silly ProfessorGAC May 2 #43
Why do that? Cirsium May 2 #45
the lost cause Cirsium May 2 #36
US Grant nailed it: anamnua May 2 #41
Speaking of the lost cause mythos anamnua May 2 #42
Written by Robbie Robertson of The Band Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2 #46
agreed Cirsium May 2 #47
History from the dumbest president ever elected. spanone May 2 #37
Lee got his ass handed to him by the Minnesota 1st regiment NickB79 May 2 #40
"I give it a year before the revisionist 'historians' have the South as the Winners" Abolishinist May 2 #49
No the won't cast the South as winners SocialDemocrat61 May 3 #50

Haggard Celine

(17,939 posts)
1. He knows nothing about history except for a few names.
Sat May 2, 2026, 09:08 AM
May 2

He talks about these people and makes up whole stories about them on the fly. It's fucking ridiculous for a President to be acting like that. And I can't help but wonder who is running things. Trump's not doing it, obviously, so who is making the decisions?

PatSeg

(53,668 posts)
25. And his looney versions of history
Sat May 2, 2026, 04:43 PM
May 2

don't even resemble any theatrical movie. He's clearly writing history from his own weird imagination.

wnylib

(26,567 posts)
39. There's a long list of who is running things.
Sat May 2, 2026, 06:53 PM
May 2

It depends on the category.

Economy -- corporate CEOs and oligarchs

Energy -- oil companies and their investors

Immigration -- Stephen Miller

DOJ -- Trump's vendetta whims and whoever agrees to carry them out

Etc.

Mysterian

(6,670 posts)
3. Lee got his ass kicked in his first combat command
Sat May 2, 2026, 09:12 AM
May 2

when he ventured into Western Virginia. But his star kept rising because he was budies with Jeff Davis.

haele

(15,630 posts)
44. Lee's only concern was protecting his plantation and his Virginia buddies .
Sat May 2, 2026, 08:08 PM
May 2

He could care less about the rest of the Confederacy, and it pretty much showed.
Thing is, when you look at it without all the Lost Cause / Gone With the Wind romanticism, most of the other Confederate Generals pretty much had the same attitude. Their Plantation Home, their Clan, their State.
There were few plantation outsiders in the Confederate military leadership - and they were the few that kept the Confederate military on its feet as long as it was able to...with the help of way too many Union Officers who had pretty much bought their position (through money or politics) rather than actually ever fought or studied strategy before.
So long as he had money behind him, Pete Kegsbreath would have fit in well with most of the "Gentlemen Officer Corps" of the Civil War.

Mysterian

(6,670 posts)
48. Kegbreath disgusts actual fighting men
Sat May 2, 2026, 08:40 PM
May 2

He was a National Guard infantry officer who chose not attend Ranger School (as infantry officers are expected) and he acts like he's Audie Fucking Murphy. He is a repulsive braggart and obvious phony whom soldiers with courage and integrity can see right through.

edhopper

(37,543 posts)
5. So he is asking
Sat May 2, 2026, 09:19 AM
May 2

why the South couldn't secede and become a separate slave owning country? He would prefer that?

I don't think it was bad generalship on Lee's part (they almost out flanked the Union on Little Round Top and Culp's Hill), I think it was an act of desperation. Winning Gettysburg meant they could move towards Washington and sue for peace. Lee knew that the South could not continue the war much longer.

Haggard Celine

(17,939 posts)
9. I think it was a combination of the Union win at Gettysburg and
Sat May 2, 2026, 09:50 AM
May 2

the fall of Vicksburg, which happened at the same time. After that, the South had few options. If Lee had been such a wonderful general, he would've surrendered soon after. People just kept dying and suffering for no damn reason at all. Lee became a symbol of the romanticised, glorious Lost Cause. White people in the South, and some in the North, invented this mythology of an antebellum South with virtuous planters who treated their slaves with dignity and they were hardly slaves, they had so much freedom and were so happy. Lee's biggest mistake was leaving the U.S. Army and taking command of Southern forces. How long would the war have lasted if Lee hadn't switched sides?

edhopper

(37,543 posts)
23. Right you are
Sat May 2, 2026, 04:34 PM
May 2

Gone With The Wind a big culprit. Hollywood did many more movies about the noble South than the Union side.

And Lee, being an US Army General was a traitor. His loyalties should have been to the country, but he said he would take the side of Virginia. Shows he did not believe in the South, just a man who thought his State was more important.

ITAL

(1,396 posts)
27. Disagree
Sat May 2, 2026, 04:47 PM
May 2

If he'd been a wonderful general he wouldn't have fought as he did.

Unlike many here, I do think Lee was a very good general -- but he was a good tactical general. Give him some ground and he could generally find the best way to position his troops and figure out way to be successful. Grant knew this, so he used Lee's strategy against him and just bled him to death. Grant was a great strategic general (and a great tactical general).

Lee needed to be more like Washington to win the war. Washington was a great strategic general but an average tactical one (he lost more battles than he won). He realized the most important thing in an insurgency is not to be defeated - not to win. Lee didn't come to that conclusion until much too late (he sort of realized it by the time the war got to Petersburg, but by then he was bottled up in a siege)..

edhopper

(37,543 posts)
24. The funny thing is Iran is doing to Trump what the South should have done
Sat May 2, 2026, 04:38 PM
May 2

not try to win, but wear your opponent down until they lose the will and the consent of the population to fight anymore.

Girard442

(6,926 posts)
10. "The amateurs discuss tactics: the professionals discuss logistics. " - Napoleon Bonaparte
Sat May 2, 2026, 09:51 AM
May 2

It would have been nigh unto impossible for the South to overcome their logistical obstacles. Lee couldn't fix that by being a brilliant strategist -- if he even was.

hatrack

(65,213 posts)
11. Yes, but then he tried to ram the ramparts, and storm the airports . . .
Sat May 2, 2026, 10:12 AM
May 2

It was all downhill from there.

magicarpet

(19,480 posts)
32. Yes,... and General Lee drove around the Gettysburg War Battlefield,...
Sat May 2, 2026, 05:05 PM
May 2

.... in his brand new bright red Chevy Corvette convertible burning donuts. Instead of getting down to the business of winning the war he was instead out for a joy ride just showing off. This is why he lost the war at Gettysburg.

(So DJ said from the stage the other day.)

Kid Berwyn

(25,155 posts)
13. Look around. The Confederacy seems to have won.
Sat May 2, 2026, 10:35 AM
May 2

Supreme Kort has returned the country to 1866 and it looks like they're aiming for a return to 1860.

RedWhiteBlueIsRacist

(2,310 posts)
15. "Nice ballroom you're planning there TACO, be a real shame if somethin' happened to it!"--General Sherman
Sat May 2, 2026, 11:32 AM
May 2

Martin Eden

(15,921 posts)
19. The Western theater is where Grant showed his stuff
Sat May 2, 2026, 01:37 PM
May 2

Last edited Sat May 2, 2026, 03:01 PM - Edit history (1)

For the most part, Lee was a better general than the Union had in the Eastern theater, but he also had great subordinates like Jackson and Longstreet.

Lee made a terrible mistake at Gettysburg on the 3rd day with his assault on the Union center under General Meade, who had just taken over from Hooker. Subordinate general Warren helped save the Union army on the 2nd day with his actions to reinforce the left flank at Little Roundtop.

Martin Eden

(15,921 posts)
22. Yes, Jeff Daniels was great in that role in the movie
Sat May 2, 2026, 03:01 PM
May 2

My favorite character was the Irish sargeant, especially when he talked about the "true aristocracy" of the mind.

While we remember the heroics of the 20th Maine, we also should not forget the sacrifice of the 1st Minnesota. General Warren, desperate to buy time while reinforcements were being moved to Little Roundtop, grabbed the commander of the Minnesota regiment as a thousand or more rebel troops approached. Warren said "See those Colors? Take them!"

The 262 Minnesotans plunged in and fought valiantly, buying precious time. In five minutes, 215 of them fell. The 82% casualty rate still stands as the U.S. Army’s largest loss of life of any unit.

Oneironaut

(6,327 posts)
17. Pander pander pander
Sat May 2, 2026, 11:45 AM
May 2

So sick of the biggest idiots in this country being pandered to in a way that’s completely obvious to anyone with a brain.

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(137,800 posts)
21. General Bonespurs has spoken
Sat May 2, 2026, 01:51 PM
May 2

About as bad as his claim, Pickett's charge would have been successful if he weren't attacking uphill.

B.See

(8,913 posts)
28. TRANSLATION: Bigot in Chief Mourns South's Loss of Civil War
Sat May 2, 2026, 04:48 PM
May 2

... and no doubt, all of "the Blacks" who couldn't vote and might still be working fields for nothing to this day.

Cryin my fkn soup.

Prairie Gates

(8,505 posts)
30. Robert E. Lee: I will send an army uphill over 2 miles of open ground against an entrenched position
Sat May 2, 2026, 04:52 PM
May 2

with massed artillery on the hottest day of the year. Oh, they will also have to cross a couple of fence lines that will slow them down and that have been sighted to the half centimeter by the enemy cannon.

Smart guy, this Lee.

The entire traitor army was high on their own supply.

struggle4progress

(126,746 posts)
34. "If it weren't for the fact they lost, the South could have won! Big strong men with tears in their eyes
Sat May 2, 2026, 06:03 PM
May 2

are coming up to me and saying so!"

ProfessorGAC

(77,371 posts)
35. And, If McLellan Hadn't Been Such A Tool....
Sat May 2, 2026, 06:12 PM
May 2

....the war might have lasted 2 months.
But, he was a tool & that didn't happen.
Lee screwed up at Gettysburg, so the loss was his fault.
He would have won except HE lost at Gettysburg.

Cirsium

(4,127 posts)
38. Doubtful
Sat May 2, 2026, 06:35 PM
May 2

It does a great disservice to the memory of the brave patriotic heroes who defeated the despicable traitors to credit the victory to Lee's supposed mistakes.

Cirsium

(4,127 posts)
45. Why do that?
Sat May 2, 2026, 08:12 PM
May 2

Why the one word dismissal? This is an important topic. What exactly is it that you think is silly about my post? I'd like to hear your thoughts.

Cirsium

(4,127 posts)
36. the lost cause
Sat May 2, 2026, 06:31 PM
May 2

Enough already with the "lost cause" bs and the hero worship of Lee.

The defeat of the slave power was the country's finest moment. Lee was a traitor. His military prowess is vastly over-rated.

anamnua

(1,527 posts)
41. US Grant nailed it:
Sat May 2, 2026, 07:16 PM
May 2
I felt like anything rather than rejoicing at the downfall of a foe who had fought so long and valiantly, and had suffered so much for a cause, though that cause was, I believe, one of the worst for which a people ever fought, and one for which there was the least excuse.

anamnua

(1,527 posts)
42. Speaking of the lost cause mythos
Sat May 2, 2026, 07:19 PM
May 2

it has a relatively recent expression in that appalling piece of schmaltz 'The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down'. I can't understand how a fine liberal like Joan Baez could have touched this with a forty foot bargepole.

Cirsium

(4,127 posts)
47. agreed
Sat May 2, 2026, 08:17 PM
May 2

The romanticization of the "Old South" is disgusting. The plantation tourism business is another example.

NickB79

(20,412 posts)
40. Lee got his ass handed to him by the Minnesota 1st regiment
Sat May 2, 2026, 07:01 PM
May 2

Named because Minnesota was the first state to send troops to fight for the United States in the Civil War. They took a staggering 80% casualty rate in Gettysburg because they were given a suicide mission when the Union line almost broke, but still held it, counterattacked, and took the Confederate battle flag. We still have it here, and refused to return it to Virginia every time they asked.

Someone tell Trump how Minnesota saved the Union, since he hates our state so much.

https://www.civilwarmed.org/1st-minnesota-at-gettysburg/

Abolishinist

(3,067 posts)
49. "I give it a year before the revisionist 'historians' have the South as the Winners"
Sat May 2, 2026, 09:07 PM
May 2

Reminded me of 'The Man in the High Castle', streaming I believe on Prime. Based on the novel by Philip K. Dick.

I started watching several months ago, it was a 'treadmill' thing, but I switched to something else after the first several episodes of Season 2. I really need to get back to this, it was really different and I need to know how it ends.

"The Man in the High Castle is an American dystopian alternate history television series created for the streaming service Amazon Prime Video, depicting a parallel universe where the Axis powers of Nazi Germany and the Empire of Japan rule the world after their victory in World War II.

Set in 1962, the series' main setting is a parallel universe where the Axis powers have won World War II in 1946 after Giuseppe Zangara assassinates the president-elect of the United States, Franklin D. Roosevelt, in 1933. A series of developments follow that include the Germans dropping a nuclear weapon on Washington, D.C. (now renamed 'District of Contamination') in late 1945.

After this, the Japanese launch a ground invasion of the U.S. West Coast. The American federal government subsequently surrenders, though it takes another year for the Axis and their American collaborators to pacify the country. The Germans build concentration camps for the enslavement and eventual extermination of Jewish Americans and African Americans and commit massacres in cities such as Cincinnati."

SocialDemocrat61

(8,094 posts)
50. No the won't cast the South as winners
Sun May 3, 2026, 11:02 AM
May 3

but as victims which is what so many do when they don't have moral, ethical or factual grounds to stand on.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Idiot: If it weren't for ...