Spirit Airlines is not just a canary in a coal mine. It's part of a pile of dead birds.

[GoneOffShore]

This from a Facebook friend, who has allowed it to be shared in full.
If you're on there, seek out Eric Gubelman, also Jim Wright on Threads aka Stone Kettle.

The Soviet Union didn’t collapse because it ran out of tanks. It collapsed because it couldn’t keep bread cheap.
There’s an old Soviet joke: They pretend to pay us, and we pretend to work—but the bread must always be there. It wasn’t clever so much as true. You could fake production quotas, falsify reports, misallocate entire sectors of the economy—but you could not fake the one thing people touched every day. When bread became scarce or expensive, the system stopped being theoretical. It became real, and people stopped believing it.
There’s always a number a system cannot afford to let move. For the Soviets, it was bread. You could botch five-year plans, mismanage industry, lie about harvests—but if bread slipped, the entire fiction came under pressure.
In the United States, that number isn’t bread. It’s fuel—not just gasoline at the pump, but diesel, jet fuel, the entire invisible layer that moves everything else. When that number spikes, the system stops performing and starts revealing.
Today, the revelation came in the form of Spirit Airlines. Not a beloved institution, not a national champion—just a budget airline built on thin margins, tight timing, and a model that works only as long as the inputs behave. Which is exactly the point. Fragile systems don’t break first; fragile components do.
Spirit didn’t collapse because of one bad quarter or one bad executive decision. It collapsed because a business designed to operate at the edge met a shock it could not absorb. And that shock wasn’t random. Fuel prices don’t double because of mood swings. They double because something in the world breaks.
We’ve seen the pattern before. In 2022, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine sent energy markets into panic. Prices surged—not because a president controls oil, but because war rewrites supply, risk, and expectation all at once. That’s the baseline reality: presidents don’t set prices. But they shape the conditions under which shocks happen, and how large they are when they arrive.
The confrontation with Iran didn’t emerge from nowhere. It followed the dismantling of the Iran nuclear deal—an imperfect but functioning framework that constrained escalation. That structure was abandoned and replaced with pressure, then improvisation, and eventually force. Once you remove structure, the only tool left is escalation. And escalation has a cost—not in rhetoric, but in markets, in shipping lanes, in insurance, in fuel.
That’s how a geopolitical decision moves. Not in a straight line, but through a chain: instability to risk, risk to price, price to exposure. By the time it reaches something like Spirit Airlines, it doesn’t look like foreign policy anymore. It looks like a business failure. But it’s the system telling the truth about itself.
Ultra-low-cost carriers live on the edge by design. They expand access and suppress prices, but they do it without cushion. When fuel doubles, they don’t bend; they go first. You can call that market discipline. You can call it bad luck. But you can’t call it disconnected.
Presidents don’t control the price of oil. But they are not spectators to the conditions that send it soaring. When stability is treated as optional—when alliances are discarded without replacement, when strategy gives way to impulse—the next shock is more likely, and more violent when it comes.
You don’t feel that all at once. You feel it at the margins. A budget airline disappears. A route vanishes. A price ticks upward. The system becomes a little less forgiving.
And then, gradually and without announcement, the margin is where you live.

[raccoon]

1. That is genius. That one's a keeper.

[Roy Rolling]

2. Just reading a book...

“Blueprint for Revolution” about recent revolutions worldwide. Written by a guy from the former Yugoslavia whose life was suddenly upended by political corruption and subsequent collapse.

One thing it mentions is the importance of single items citizens value that are ignored by out-of-touch, “let them eat cake” politicians.

Things like bread in the former USSR, and now diesel fuel in the USA. It exposes the impotence of a government whose reputation and branding is specifically constructed to be macho warriors. Like Hogbreadth and OranJello.

Shattering the myth is what opens the door to change.

[OldBaldy1701E]

9. "Shattering the myth is what opens the door to change."

Yes, but it means little if the group does not act on it.

[perdita9]

3. The free hand of the market

This used to be a Republican talking point. They couldn't do anything about X because of the " free hand of the market" economic theory. They used it to absolve their failures for making life affordable.

I notice they stopped using it a while ago, probably because it stopped working and moved over to blaming immigrants, trans people and democrats for all of their problems.

Distraction works until it doesn't.

[WSHazel]

6. This has little to do with free markets

The Trump Administration’s terrible policies are destroying industries. Spirit is not going to be the last company to be destroyed by Trump if this war is not ended soon.

[IronLionZion]

7. MAGA are such job creators. They made fuel prices great again.

[Zelda_Orchid]

8. Oil an gas subsidies equal painting the leaves on the trees & the grass green

[DAngelo136]

10. We Were Warned About This Over Fifty Years Ago

From the movie: "Three Days of The Condor"

The exchange between Turner (Robert Redford) and Higgins (Cliff Robertson) is telling not only because of the positions of the characters but also the motives and insight into the American character. In the light of todays events, can you say Higgins was wrong?

[Johnny2X2X]

11. People keep comparing this spike to 2022

But there's one massive difference, the 2022 spike was because of Russia invading Ukraine, this spike is because of our own actions, because of the US attack on Iran. We brought this on ourselves.