General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGraham Platner-REMOVE THE CAP !
Good on him for pointing out that a simple fix for social security is to just remove the cap. There have been a lot of democratic representatives who have tried to get this message through, but it always seems to fall to the wayside.
Its one of the most important and effective messages the Democratic Party has. Really powerful in its simplicity.
Hopefully , REMOVE THE CAP , will be a message that all democratic representatives will push. Push to the point that it becomes a national meme.
displacedvermoter
(5,235 posts)ALBliberal
(3,442 posts)way back in the Air America days. Quick and easy fix.
Renew Deal
(85,469 posts)mopinko
(74,245 posts)and the billionaires arent going to pay more, cuz they dont get wages.
a better way to do it wd b to expand it to other forms of income, ie capital gains.
Bluetus
(3,312 posts)The rich have dealt themselves every loophole in the book. When you look at ALL taxes, the morbidly rich pay a MUCH lower effective rate than working people.
There is no valid argument for capping their income for these programs. They have gotten rich off the backs of working people.
Dave says
(5,498 posts)Great if you're rich. Not so great if you're not. Difficult and hard if you're poor.
Torchlight
(7,238 posts)LeftInTX
(34,959 posts)I thought this was about a cap on his head!
druidity33
(6,954 posts)I thought the same thing. I'm thinking who cares if he's balding? Then i'm thinking... he cant have another tattoo on his head can he?
BlueCaliDem
(15,444 posts)he's got a good head of hair. A nice crop.
Captain Stern
(2,255 posts)Most estimates show the removing the cap on SS would extend the program's solvency by a few years.
But eventually, workers are going to have to start paying more in, or recipients are going to have to have their benefits reduced.
Emile
(44,127 posts)Cosmocat
(15,521 posts)with a list of other sensible reforms.
The party should workshop it, find what makes the most sense and EVERY LAST D should sign off on and it, and make it one of the priorities they sell universally.
This is both the right thing and a serious problem that needs fixed AND something that be very popular.
MichMan
(17,631 posts)Ever since SS was created, the amount paid out monthly has been linked to how much people paid in. Is his plan to decouple that ?
Qutzupalotl
(15,881 posts)The aim is to raise or eliminate the cap on earnings that are subject to SS tax, currently in the low six digits, and adjusted annually. So a billionaire and a mid-level manager currently pay in to the system at the same rate. By raising or eliminating the cap, we would subject more billionaire earnings to SS tax. Payouts would stay coupled to what you paid in.
Exp
(1,071 posts)Miguelito Loveless
(6,056 posts)Make ALL income, including passive income subject to it.
MichMan
(17,631 posts)What about SS payments themselves?
Miguelito Loveless
(6,056 posts)income under a set value, and index for inflation.