Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

orangecrush

(31,182 posts)
Thu May 21, 2026, 02:16 PM 5 hrs ago

The Dred Scott Court has been resurrected

what was the Dred Scott Court

The Dred Scott Court refers to the U.S. Supreme Court of 1857, which issued the infamous Dred Scott v. Sandford decision. It ruled that enslaved Black people were not citizens and could not sue in federal court, a devastating catalyst that helped spark the American Civil War.

Wikipedia
+2
The Background
In 1846, an enslaved man named Dred Scott and his wife, Harriet, sued for their freedom in Missouri courts. Their claim was based on the fact that their enslaver had taken them to live in free states (Illinois) and free territories (the Wisconsin Territory, where slavery was banned by the Missouri Compromise) before returning to Missouri.

National Archives (.gov)
+3
The Ruling
On March 6, 1857, the Supreme Court—led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney—delivered a landmark 7-2 decision against Scott. The Court made three main rulings:

Britannica
+1
Denial of Citizenship: The Court held that people of African descent, whether enslaved or free, were not citizens of the United States and therefore lacked the legal standing to sue in federal court.
Property Rights: The Court determined that an enslaved person was property, and the government could not deprive any citizen of their property without "due process of law".
Invalidation of the Missouri Compromise: Because Congress could not constitutionally ban slavery in the territories, the 1820 Missouri Compromise was declared unconstitutional, effectively permitting slavery to spread across all federal territories.

National Archives (.gov)
+4
Historical Impact
The decision is widely considered the worst in the history of the Supreme Court and is frequently described as the Court's "greatest self-inflicted wound". By attempting to settle the issue of slavery in favor of the South, the Court instead outraged abolitionists, fractured the nation, and deepened the political crisis that led to the Civil War.

Wikipedia
+2

Democrats must take on the modern day Dred Scott Court.

South Carolina is eliminating the only Black majority seat.

Term limits on Justices now.

Expand the Court from 9 to 13 Justices.

Ro Khanna (@rokhanna.bsky.social) 2026-05-21T18:11:13.263Z



Long past time to drive a stake through the stinking corpse of the Confederacy.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Dred Scott Court has been resurrected (Original Post) orangecrush 5 hrs ago OP
Current SCOTUS Snackshack 2 hrs ago #1
Adding 4 justice now means Trump appoints 4 more justices MadameButterfly 2 hrs ago #2
The Rehnquist 5 started this current mess in 2000 DemocracyForever 2 hrs ago #3
Bookmarking. Will try to respond after about 6pm Pacific or on the weekend. nt gulliver 2 hrs ago #4
A must do. Passages 1 hr ago #5

Snackshack

(2,597 posts)
1. Current SCOTUS
Thu May 21, 2026, 04:47 PM
2 hrs ago

Is far worse than the Taney court ever was.

My 3 glaring examples of why.

1st- 2024 immunity ruling. Resulting in all we have seen since Jan 2025.
2nd- Shadow docket approval of ICE, which open the door to what we witnessed in Minneapolis.
3rd- Shadow docket approval of DOGE that we now know stole 500mil Americans SS data... and the abrupt shutdown of USAID which we are currently seeing ebola capitalize on in the DRC.

MadameButterfly

(4,165 posts)
2. Adding 4 justice now means Trump appoints 4 more justices
Thu May 21, 2026, 05:05 PM
2 hrs ago

What does that solve? Usually Ro Khanna is smart. Don't even mention expanding the court right now or they might do it.
Yeah, a court with 7 Trump appointed justices. That would end any chance of democracy prevailing.

DemocracyForever

(185 posts)
3. The Rehnquist 5 started this current mess in 2000
Thu May 21, 2026, 05:05 PM
2 hrs ago

when they stopped the legal Florida vote count, left 160,000 votes located in the largest and most heavily democratic voting counties in Florida uncounted and appointed W who then appointed Roberts and Alito, 2 of the 6 current GOP extremists on the SCOTUS.. According to a post 2000 election analysis done by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, most of the uncounted Florida votes were cast by low income African American women. Low income African American women voted overwhelmingly for Al Gore.

It's long past time for Congress to enforce Article 3 Section 2 of the U.S. constitution which gives Congress the authority to regulate the SCOTUS. We need to go past court expansion and term limits and take away any and all cases having to do with elections from the now highly partisan, GOP controlled SCOTUS majority. They've now proven for 25 years that they're there to do the GOP's election stealing dirty work.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Dred Scott Court has ...