Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pat_k

(13,865 posts)
Thu May 21, 2026, 02:22 PM 5 hrs ago

Stop calling it an f-ing "settlement"


https://apnews.com/article/irs-trump-settlement-tax-returns-police-capitol-riot-fc73eb5f35481bb6d8892ac1e14e98bd

...The lawsuit claims the government’s “Anti-Weaponization Fund” is an illegal slush fund that Trump will use to “finance the insurrectionists and paramilitary groups that commit violence in his name.” It describes the fund’s creation as “the most brazen act of presidential corruption this century” and calls for dissolving it.
...
The fund stems from a settlement of Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS over the leak of his tax returns.


For the love of journalistic integrity, stop calling this a settlement. There was no "controversy" to settle. Suing yourself and then "settling" with yourself with OUR tax dollars isn't just the most corrupt act by a president this century, it is the most corrupt act in our history. Heather Cox Richardson is spot on on this:



23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stop calling it an f-ing "settlement" (Original Post) pat_k 5 hrs ago OP
Ari Melber called it a "Thug" Fund. yellow dahlia 4 hrs ago #1
At least WAPO had the decency to put it in quotes. pat_k 4 hrs ago #7
Weisman called it theft. GoodRaisin 3 hrs ago #10
If Trump robbed a bank at gunpoint, everyone would just call it a "settlement." Irish_Dem 4 hrs ago #2
The next president better check that he hasn't made off with fort knox gold a la Marcos. pat_k 3 hrs ago #8
100% certain trump has already made off with some gold Irish_Dem 3 hrs ago #9
or shot someone on Fifth Avenue MadameButterfly 2 hrs ago #18
Part of his presidential duties. Irish_Dem 2 hrs ago #20
Essentially it's an extortion payout...nt Wounded Bear 4 hrs ago #3
It's not even that because there was no threat. pat_k 4 hrs ago #4
Understand it was a setup. Start a bogus "threat" of a lawsuit and then settle out of court... Wounded Bear 4 hrs ago #5
Yep. Add the con about hey, the IRS cannot audit me for that crime AND Justice matters. 4 hrs ago #6
Well said! The judge herself noted clearly that there was NO "settlement." spooky3 3 hrs ago #11
Al least The Prospect makes this clear... pat_k 2 hrs ago #14
"Cop beaters" slush fund.......Sheldon Whitehouse Bengus81 3 hrs ago #12
One or two cops were killed. MLWR 3 hrs ago #13
Officer Brian Sicknick's death the following night was clearly a direct result pat_k 2 hrs ago #19
Cop killers reward money. BattleRow 1 hr ago #22
"Anti Law Enforcement Slush Fund" RB77 1 hr ago #23
Judge is taking the position that the lawsuit does not include any settlement LetMyPeopleVote 2 hrs ago #15
"there is no settlement of record" pat_k 2 hrs ago #17
SETTLEMENT MY ASS! BBbats 2 hrs ago #16
Amen. SergeStorms 2 hrs ago #21

pat_k

(13,865 posts)
7. At least WAPO had the decency to put it in quotes.
Thu May 21, 2026, 03:00 PM
4 hrs ago

Yeah, it's an editorial... I would sure love to see the quotes used in other reporting.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/05/21/congressional-republicans-can-block-trump-weaponization-fund/

The Trump administration’s creation of a $1.776 billion fund of taxpayer money under the president’s control to pay favored individuals outside the judicial process is drawing bipartisan condemnation. “From all outward appearances, this doesn’t pass the smell test,” said Sen. John Curtis (R-Utah). “We’re considering legislative options,” added Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pennsylvania). “You can’t do that.”

...The “Anti-Weaponization Fund” announced this week is part of the “settlement” of President Donald Trump’s lawsuit against the IRS over the leak of his tax returns by a contractor in 2019 and 2020.

pat_k

(13,865 posts)
8. The next president better check that he hasn't made off with fort knox gold a la Marcos.
Thu May 21, 2026, 03:29 PM
3 hrs ago

Although, at this rate, it would be superfluous with all he is stealing from public coffers in plain sight.

I just can't stop thinking that he wants to personally "check" gold reserves for the same reason they do everything (i.e., preemptively accuse others of doing that which you are doing, or plan to do).

Irish_Dem

(82,386 posts)
9. 100% certain trump has already made off with some gold
Thu May 21, 2026, 03:32 PM
3 hrs ago

Or is working out how to do it.

pat_k

(13,865 posts)
4. It's not even that because there was no threat.
Thu May 21, 2026, 02:30 PM
4 hrs ago

It was crystal clear that NO amount of "briefing" could turn this nonsense "controversy" into a valid lawsuit. The felon/would-be blackmailer in this case had NOTHNG.

Wounded Bear

(64,654 posts)
5. Understand it was a setup. Start a bogus "threat" of a lawsuit and then settle out of court...
Thu May 21, 2026, 02:36 PM
4 hrs ago

And yes, trump was basically both parties in the "lawsuit." It was all a scheme to steal money from taxpayers.

Justice matters.

(10,090 posts)
6. Yep. Add the con about hey, the IRS cannot audit me for that crime AND
Thu May 21, 2026, 02:52 PM
4 hrs ago

oh yeah, ALL the other market manipulations on a daily basis OH AND BTW, add all my corrupt SPAWN to that coerced corrupt scheme... hey, peons, you can't even TRY to find that criminal gangsters family guilty of robbing every investor AND every taxpayer blind!!

spooky3

(38,878 posts)
11. Well said! The judge herself noted clearly that there was NO "settlement."
Thu May 21, 2026, 03:46 PM
3 hrs ago

Words do have meanings.

pat_k

(13,865 posts)
14. Al least The Prospect makes this clear...
Thu May 21, 2026, 04:28 PM
2 hrs ago

... in the body of the article. The title leaves something to be desired tho.

Wish the judge has simply dismissed, as would have been the most obvious course of action. I suppose she wanted to create an indisputable record to withstand appeal. What is truly horrific about this is that such "caution" is only necessary because six black-robed traitors have hijacked SCOTUS.

https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/ideas/law/the-weekly-constitutional/73630/trump-irs-extraordinary-settlement-with-own-government

The extraordinary ‘settlement’ agreement between Trump and his own government

The first remarkable feature, which this Weekly Constitutional blog has covered before, is that there was not really a dispute between the parties capable of being adjudicated by the courts. The judge in this case doubted that the court had jurisdiction to hear a suit brought by one person against entities he effectively controlled.

The judge could have then struck out the case for want of jurisdiction, but she instead wanted to hear the arguments of the parties on the point. The deadline for those submissions was this week. But Trump and his fellow plaintiffs—his son and his corporation—did not make any submissions. They “settled” the case instead.

And this brings us to the second remarkable feature: the extraordinary nature of the supposed “settlement”. Here, the starting point is that in the eyes of the court there is no settlement. According to the court record—the docket is publicly available here—the suit has been withdrawn. The plaintiffs have simply dropped the case.
...
Many things can be done by a contract, the legal device by which parties can agree to have obligations and rights which they otherwise would not have at law. Sometimes agreements, including those for settling litigation, can contain complex and imaginative provisions. But what is being done here is something else.

This “settlement” agreement is setting out the sort of thing which is normally done by primary legislation. It is taking taxpayers’ money and creating the means by which parties not connected to the litigation can benefit from payments by that money. This is not about litigation or its settlement: this is fiscal policy by other means.






MLWR

(1,081 posts)
13. One or two cops were killed.
Thu May 21, 2026, 04:20 PM
3 hrs ago

Insurrection is a felony; that makes a death felony murder.

pat_k

(13,865 posts)
19. Officer Brian Sicknick's death the following night was clearly a direct result
Thu May 21, 2026, 05:04 PM
2 hrs ago

... of the attack. We should all remember the names and circumstances of all who committed suicide in the subsequent weeks and months, particularly that of Officer Jeffrey Smith.

There is no doubt in my mind that the level of abuse by "fellow Americans" they endured played a direct role:

Officer Howard Liebengood (U.S. Capitol Police)

Officer Jeffrey Smith (D.C. Metropolitan Police), who died by suicide after a head injury sustained during the Riot

Officer Kyle DeFreytag (D.C. Metropolitan Police)

Officer Gunther Hashida (D.C. Metropolitan Police)

LetMyPeopleVote

(182,138 posts)
15. Judge is taking the position that the lawsuit does not include any settlement
Thu May 21, 2026, 04:28 PM
2 hrs ago

The lawsuit was void due to a lack of a "case or controversy" and is not mentioned in the motion to dismiss. The court is in effect ruling that this settlement is not part of the lawsuit and has no force or effect.



NEWS A federal judge closes Trump's lawsuit against the IRS, noting there's "no settlement of record" because DOJ never mentioned one on the docket. We'll see if that upends the $1.776B fund to Trump's allies.




Again, the court had no jurisdiction in this case due to a lack of a case or controversy. There will be some litigation on this "settlement"

pat_k

(13,865 posts)
17. "there is no settlement of record"
Thu May 21, 2026, 04:37 PM
2 hrs ago

Time for more journalists to do their damn jobs and make it clear there is no settlement. It's a corrupt plan to appropriate tax dollars without seeking congressional approval.

More theft in plain sight.

Like all the other criminal impoundments and expenditures they perpetrate by fiat, they know that even the trumpublicans in Congress would be unlikely to go along with acts so broadly condemned by the public.


.

BBbats

(313 posts)
16. SETTLEMENT MY ASS!
Thu May 21, 2026, 04:28 PM
2 hrs ago

IT'S A GODDAMN OUT & OUT IN YOUR FACE MIDDLE FINGER TO EVERY USA CITIZEN!
With A whopping side order of "What Da Fuck You Gonna Do About It!" delivered with sick evil glee!
Right in your face Muthafucka's! With a Kiss My Ass added for good measure!
But your Social Security & Medicaid & Medicare & Disability & SNAP?
They're "Entitlements" that scum like you are taking out of their pockets!
None of that's going to exist by the end of this administration.
Oh! I forgot! There isn't going to be an end to this administration!

SergeStorms

(20,822 posts)
21. Amen.
Thu May 21, 2026, 05:06 PM
2 hrs ago

It's robbery, plain and simple. It's robbery and every godamned republican in our government is an accessory!

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Stop calling it an f-ing ...