Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JohnnyRingo

(21,053 posts)
Tue Jun 2, 2026, 01:50 PM 10 hrs ago

Trump and the Pentagon are fighting for AI weaponry.

Trump & Hegseth want AI machines that kill without hesitation, ethics, or moral compass.

The companies capable of developing such arms are queasy about being responsible for war crimes if it gets out of control and they want nothing to do with it. Even a number of top brass in the Pentagon have expressed misgivings about the lack of guardrails to ensure innocents aren't killed.

Hegseth doesn't give a crap about morals, liability, or guardrails. He just wants to point a finger at people and have them die at his command. Him & Trump figure AI will fit right in with their "Dept of War"

This is the excerpt from my local on the matter:

[img][/img]

[img][/img]

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump and the Pentagon are fighting for AI weaponry. (Original Post) JohnnyRingo 10 hrs ago OP
Oh Goody! Skynet! FalloutShelter 10 hrs ago #1
That cartoon is perceptive bucolic_frolic 10 hrs ago #2
solves the "billionaire survivalists" security problem rampartd 10 hrs ago #3
Killer drones are already with us. JohnnyRingo 2 hrs ago #4
of course, maybe "autonomous drone?" rampartd 2 hrs ago #5

bucolic_frolic

(56,035 posts)
2. That cartoon is perceptive
Tue Jun 2, 2026, 01:59 PM
10 hrs ago

The moral aspects of novel weaponry has surfaced over the centuries. Supposedly a great theological debate pre-Crusades was whether it was permissible for knights to kill people.

There were British Generals prior to WWII who opposed Churchill's development of SOE tactics. Limpet bombs, and others, were novel at the time and some say decisive in winning the war.

There is a YouTube video that says we turned the Battle of the Bulge when we used some novel weapon, it was some kind of cluster shell that exploded mid-air and dropped shrapnel straight downward. Some debated its morality at the time. I seem to recall Ike was none to keen.

So increased lethality is nothing new. That doesn't make it moral.

rampartd

(5,238 posts)
3. solves the "billionaire survivalists" security problem
Tue Jun 2, 2026, 02:21 PM
10 hrs ago

the reason our billionaires have avoided going post apocalyptic is because they can not trust their human servants, specifically their security teams.

killer drones are on the way.

JohnnyRingo

(21,053 posts)
4. Killer drones are already with us.
Tue Jun 2, 2026, 09:39 PM
2 hrs ago

The issue is when killer drones start thinking for themselves based on available data.
Pandora's Box.

rampartd

(5,238 posts)
5. of course, maybe "autonomous drone?"
Tue Jun 2, 2026, 09:52 PM
2 hrs ago

the day is coming when we must learn to duck these things.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump and the Pentagon ar...