Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

In It to Win It

(12,922 posts)
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 10:36 AM 8 hrs ago

🚨 SCOTUS strikes down Trump's attack on birthright citizenship

The fact that this is news is a terrible sign of where we are in politics.

Final #SCOTUS ruling is birthright citizenship.

For a 6-3 majority (Thomas, Alito & Gorsuch, dissenting), Chief Justice Roberts *strikes down* President Trump's executive order purporting to limit which individuals born in the United States would automatically be US citizens; preserves status quo:

Steve Vladeck (@stevevladeck.bsky.social) 2026-06-30T14:35:03.237Z

Justice Kavanaugh dissented from the majority's constitutional holding, so it's 5-4 on that. But he agreed that the executive order violates the existing federal *statutes,* so the underlying judgment is 6-3.

Steve Vladeck (@stevevladeck.bsky.social) 2026-06-30T14:37:11.900Z

BREAKING: The Supreme Court holds that the Fourteenth Amendment protects birthright citizenship, blocking Donald Trump's executive order to end it.

Roberts has the opinion for the court, which is 5-4 on the constitutional question and 6-3 on whether federal law protects birthright citizenship.

Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) 2026-06-30T14:38:21.103Z

The Supreme Court strikes down Trump's attack on birthright citizenship. By a 5–4 vote, it holds that the 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship to children born of unauthorized and temporary immigrants. Roberts and Barrett join the three liberals. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...

Mark Joseph Stern (@mjsdc.bsky.social) 2026-06-30T14:35:46.109Z

BREAKING: Supreme Court rejects Trump effort to limit birthright citizenship. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...

Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney.bsky.social) 2026-06-30T14:36:02.395Z

Birthright Citizenship is in. The court strikes down Trump's executive order. It's 6-3, with Roberts, the liberals, Kav and ACB. Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch dissent.

ElieNYC (@elienyc.bsky.social) 2026-06-30T14:36:00.381Z

it's actually 4 - Kavanaugh says the order doesn't violate the Constitution

Leah Litman (@leahlitman.bsky.social) 2026-06-30T14:39:48.972Z

BREAKING: The Supreme Court rules 6-3 to strike down Trump’s bid to eliminate birthright citizenship as part of his attack on immigration in all forms.

The ruling affirms unanimous lower court decisions that blocked the effort for violating the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause.

Democracy Docket (@democracydocket.com) 2026-06-30T14:36:04.360712081Z
38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
🚨 SCOTUS strikes down Trump's attack on birthright citizenship (Original Post) In It to Win It 8 hrs ago OP
🇺🇸 underpants 8 hrs ago #1
ketchup Justice matters. 6 hrs ago #37
I'll take all the good news I get... Wounded Bear 8 hrs ago #2
Figures this, at the end of their decisions. bluestarone 8 hrs ago #3
The fact there is any dissent is sickening Johnny2X2X 8 hrs ago #4
+1 dalton99a 8 hrs ago #11
Best comment I've seen on this yet. Pinback 6 hrs ago #36
Link OneBlueDotS-Carolina 8 hrs ago #5
Even with our recent wins, it's still disheartening EnergizedLib 8 hrs ago #6
So four justices think an EO can change the Constitution? spanone 8 hrs ago #7
Yup. 😑 In It to Win It 8 hrs ago #8
An executive order they agree with, issued by a president they support? Yes. tanyev 8 hrs ago #9
Winner, winner, chicken dinner! YodaMom2 7 hrs ago #31
Shocking indeed malaise 8 hrs ago #14
What's EO larwdem 7 hrs ago #24
Executive Order Totally Tunsie 7 hrs ago #25
Ok. Executive order larwdem 7 hrs ago #26
6-3 or 5-4 malaise 8 hrs ago #10
Both Johnny2X2X 8 hrs ago #13
Thanks malaise 8 hrs ago #15
So Kavanaugh is saying Trump just didn't do it correctly ToxMarz 7 hrs ago #19
He said Trump violated the law as written Sympthsical 7 hrs ago #20
He's saying Congress can change it Johnny2X2X 7 hrs ago #23
Essentially 4 justices said we've been reading the 14th amendment wrong for over 160 years Buckeyeblue 8 hrs ago #12
Imagine that! hadEnuf 8 hrs ago #16
They'll take turns orthoclad 6 hrs ago #34
It's been a mixed bag this cycle MustLoveBeagles 8 hrs ago #17
It's now official. Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch & Kavanaugh are absolute traitors. Wiz Imp 8 hrs ago #18
Gotta appreciate the inversion Sympthsical 7 hrs ago #22
ding.this. AllaN01Bear 7 hrs ago #21
keep your powder dry DonCoquixote 7 hrs ago #27
The Nazis copied the Nuremberg laws from the US orthoclad 6 hrs ago #33
Stephen Miller must be apoplectic right about now Coldwater 7 hrs ago #28
Lucky his pee pee is not in jail. Justice matters. 6 hrs ago #38
Good. Drop that in the "Well duh!" file. But that in no way makes up for all their disastrous rulings. paleotn 7 hrs ago #29
Some journalist should ask Kavanaugh "So, if the Congress passes a law saying that all women who gave birth while jls4561 7 hrs ago #30
Wait til next year, after the midterms, orthoclad 6 hrs ago #32
I have a feeling they will The Wizard 6 hrs ago #35

bluestarone

(22,582 posts)
3. Figures this, at the end of their decisions.
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 10:38 AM
8 hrs ago

Only because the fuckers knew this was a bridge to far, even for them!! They help TSF, just by hearing this, then delaying it.

Johnny2X2X

(24,612 posts)
4. The fact there is any dissent is sickening
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 10:39 AM
8 hrs ago

It's literally written in plain English in the Constitution. This isn't some interpretation of related text to some issue, it is as plain as could be,
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

The fact we have fascists on the SCOTUS who read that and are willing to pretend it doesn't mean what it says is just disgusting.

Pinback

(13,732 posts)
36. Best comment I've seen on this yet.
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 01:12 PM
6 hrs ago

Maybe one day they’ll say corruption is illegal. Hah, who am I kidding?

EnergizedLib

(3,237 posts)
6. Even with our recent wins, it's still disheartening
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 10:42 AM
8 hrs ago

5-4 isn’t exactly convincing or resounding.

YodaMom2

(250 posts)
31. Winner, winner, chicken dinner!
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 12:24 PM
7 hrs ago

Does anyone actually think that all of the rulings that dramatically expand the power of the Executive would happen if it was President Kamala Harris in office? Not a chance…

Johnny2X2X

(24,612 posts)
13. Both
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 10:52 AM
8 hrs ago

6-3 on the Trump order, 5-4 on birthright citizenship. Kavanaugh basically split his vote.

ToxMarz

(3,194 posts)
19. So Kavanaugh is saying Trump just didn't do it correctly
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 11:37 AM
7 hrs ago

but still could find another way to do it?

Sympthsical

(11,320 posts)
20. He said Trump violated the law as written
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 11:40 AM
7 hrs ago

But that the 14th Amendment would not prohibit Congress from rewriting the statute to allow for that kind of executive order.

Johnny2X2X

(24,612 posts)
23. He's saying Congress can change it
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 11:42 AM
7 hrs ago

Basically he voted that Trump's executive order is not valid, but that Congress could tweak birthright citizenship if they wanted. My guess it's a way of putting his hand out signaling he can be bought since the SCOTUS ruled bribery is fine.

It's disgraceful that anyone can read the actual text of the Constitution and say it doesn't say what it clearly says.

Buckeyeblue

(6,492 posts)
12. Essentially 4 justices said we've been reading the 14th amendment wrong for over 160 years
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 10:51 AM
8 hrs ago

That is fucking insane.

orthoclad

(5,237 posts)
34. They'll take turns
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 12:54 PM
6 hrs ago

on "rational" decisions to cya, but in the end look what they accomplish.

Look behind the curtain. Undoing T's tariffs was hailed as a defeat and victory, but who made out? All the big corps who got refunds from the taxpayers. And the gougers who blamed prices on tariffs.

Wiz Imp

(10,865 posts)
18. It's now official. Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch & Kavanaugh are absolute traitors.
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 11:15 AM
8 hrs ago

What else would you call Justices who appaarently believe that the Constitution says what THEY want it to say and 250 years of Sureme Court Justices who disagree with them can just go fuck themselves? These 4 need to be removed anyhow, anway.

Sympthsical

(11,320 posts)
22. Gotta appreciate the inversion
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 11:42 AM
7 hrs ago

Self-proclaimed textualists who can't read a single sentence of extremely clear text.

DonCoquixote

(13,993 posts)
27. keep your powder dry
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 12:05 PM
7 hrs ago

You know Trump will still try to strike it down, especially as a way to bolster Vance or Miller. The truth is , there are nto only many in this "nation" that would feel fine in antebellum days, but the techbros would unleash things that would make Robert E. Lee go "wait a minute!"

Yes there ARE people in this nation that are full bore fascist.

orthoclad

(5,237 posts)
33. The Nazis copied the Nuremberg laws from the US
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 12:51 PM
6 hrs ago

But they thought the US racial codes were too extreme and watered down the one-drop rule.

Think about that.

paleotn

(23,104 posts)
29. Good. Drop that in the "Well duh!" file. But that in no way makes up for all their disastrous rulings.
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 12:18 PM
7 hrs ago

One of the top 5 things for Dems to do when we retake power. Pack the GD court no matter what it takes. There is no reason it must to stay at 9.

Some suggestions...

https://journals.law.harvard.edu/lpr/2019/05/06/the-supreme-court-has-been-expanded-many-times-before-here-are-four-ways-to-do-it-today/

jls4561

(3,335 posts)
30. Some journalist should ask Kavanaugh "So, if the Congress passes a law saying that all women who gave birth while
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 12:20 PM
7 hrs ago

residing in Trump properties can no longer claim their children are citizens, would that be constitutional?”

https://www.pbssocal.org/shows/to-the-contrary/clip/ttc-extra-russian-birth-tourism-trump-properties-qj0wgl

On a personal note, the clip is from a PBS show that I enjoyed. It was hosted by Bonnie Erie. It irritates the hell out of me that Charli Sykes has appropriated that name for his sub stack.

The Wizard

(13,951 posts)
35. I have a feeling they will
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 01:01 PM
6 hrs ago

make a very bad ruling at the last minute. They are well versed in verbal gymnastics and mendacity.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»🚨 SCOTUS strikes ...