Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 10:48 AM Jan 2013

Krugman: Be Ready To Mint That Coin

Be Ready To Mint That Coin

Should President Obama be willing to print a $1 trillion platinum coin if Republicans try to force America into default? Yes, absolutely. He will, after all, be faced with a choice between two alternatives: one that’s silly but benign, the other that’s equally silly but both vile and disastrous. The decision should be obvious.

For those new to this, here’s the story. First of all, we have the weird and destructive institution of the debt ceiling; this lets Congress approve tax and spending bills that imply a large budget deficit — tax and spending bills the president is legally required to implement — and then lets Congress refuse to grant the president authority to borrow, preventing him from carrying out his legal duties and provoking a possibly catastrophic default.

And Republicans are openly threatening to use that potential for catastrophe to blackmail the president into implementing policies they can’t pass through normal constitutional processes.

Enter the platinum coin. There’s a legal loophole allowing the Treasury to mint platinum coins in any denomination the secretary chooses. Yes, it was intended to allow commemorative collector’s items — but that’s not what the letter of the law says. And by minting a $1 trillion coin, then depositing it at the Fed, the Treasury could acquire enough cash to sidestep the debt ceiling — while doing no economic harm at all...So if the 14th amendment solution — simply declaring that the debt ceiling is unconstitutional — isn’t workable, go with the coin.

- more -

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/07/be-ready-to-mint-that-coin/



73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Krugman: Be Ready To Mint That Coin (Original Post) ProSense Jan 2013 OP
I hope the design is ready to go, he only needs to mint a couple or three. RomneyLies Jan 2013 #1
the design should be Obama giving Congress (or Boehner) the finger TeamPooka Jan 2013 #33
I still say it should have Ronald Reaga's face on it RomneyLies Jan 2013 #43
I vote for Reagan's face too. Liberalynn Jan 2013 #49
The scene of the Boston Tea Party on the back might be most appropriate, though. RomneyLies Jan 2013 #50
Kind of a wink and a nod to those really responsible Liberalynn Jan 2013 #73
lol.. Cha Jan 2013 #70
why even bother with the 14th amendment? unblock Jan 2013 #2
congress could close the coin loophole at any time paulkienitz Jan 2013 #16
obama would veto it. unblock Jan 2013 #18
"Game it out" ewagner Jan 2013 #3
Wouldn't the SC have to declare the debt ceiling unconstitutional? notadmblnd Jan 2013 #57
The way I saw it happening ewagner Jan 2013 #72
The Fed might not take this coin "on deposit". banned from Kos Jan 2013 #4
it doesn't go into circulation unblock Jan 2013 #20
The money created out of "thin air" buys real assets like Treasuries banned from Kos Jan 2013 #24
those real assets at best but produce legal tender unblock Jan 2013 #25
The thin air money is backed by real assets and banned from Kos Jan 2013 #28
real assets that are backed by... money minted/printed by treasury. unblock Jan 2013 #40
a coin that is legal tender IS legal tender. TeamPooka Jan 2013 #34
Anyone else think it's funny that you can just make yourself a trillion-dollar coin? TwilightGardener Jan 2013 #5
The law was passed during Clinton's administration RomneyLies Jan 2013 #8
Yep.. Cha Jan 2013 #71
That would be a nightmare for cashiers everywhere slackmaster Jan 2013 #6
Yes. Also a nightmare if you wanted a Mountain Dew out of the machine TwilightGardener Jan 2013 #9
Those things always give change in Susan B. Anthony or Sacajawea dollar coins slackmaster Jan 2013 #10
BREAKING: Man buried under mountain of dollar coins (nt) Jeff In Milwaukee Jan 2013 #12
lol TeamPooka Jan 2013 #35
Imagine going to the local 7-11 and buying a Moon Pie and an RC Cola with it! Buns_of_Fire Jan 2013 #26
Don't even bother with the 14th, it's legally dubious at best. SpartanDem Jan 2013 #7
Put the image of Ronald Reagan on one side and ... Ganja Ninja Jan 2013 #11
Word! Brother Buzz Jan 2013 #36
+1 harun Jan 2013 #42
They should mint two of them Jeff In Milwaukee Jan 2013 #13
What a feeling....... Nye Bevan Jan 2013 #22
Absolutely Jeff In Milwaukee Jan 2013 #39
Anybody Got Change for the Soda Machine? n/t Yavin4 Jan 2013 #14
It may be benign... once. lumberjack_jeff Jan 2013 #15
Default talk is rubbish. No coin needed foxtrotzulu Jan 2013 #17
Paul Krugman won the Nobel Prize for Economics and he seems to think that one may be needed. Nye Bevan Jan 2013 #23
It would be horrifically stupid. AgingAmerican Jan 2013 #32
maybe you should trot back to fox zulu..... TeamPooka Jan 2013 #37
+9999999999 AgingAmerican Jan 2013 #64
:) TeamPooka Jan 2013 #67
Republican lips are watering! moondust Jan 2013 #19
Normally, I would argue against such sneaky shenanigans. Nye Bevan Jan 2013 #21
Ben Stiller? bongbong Jan 2013 #27
I agree. They should mint it for $1,000,000,000,000.03. marble falls Jan 2013 #29
Whose face should be on it? dragonlady Jan 2013 #30
Ronald Reagan. Panasonic Jan 2013 #48
For the "face" on the coin - haele Jan 2013 #31
John Maynard Keynes would be a perfect face for the coin. :) caveat_imperator Jan 2013 #41
Hmmm... Jeremy Renner as the high strung sidekick or Mark Ruffalo as the extroverted sidekick? Initech Jan 2013 #53
It should definitely be floated by "anonymous leakers." David__77 Jan 2013 #38
That $1 trillion dollar coin is interesting, but it's not something we should seriously BlueCaliDem Jan 2013 #44
He is right on OccupyManny Jan 2013 #45
They should mint 10 of them.... Rosco T. Jan 2013 #46
In which case he should probably invest in one of these. Just to be safe. Nye Bevan Jan 2013 #55
But be careful with it ThoughtCriminal Jan 2013 #47
Reminds me of that Simpsons episode with the trillion dollar bill that Burns stole... Drunken Irishman Jan 2013 #51
"If it's a crime to steal a trillion dollars and hand it over to Cuba then I'm guilty!" Initech Jan 2013 #52
Whose face should get put on it? Incitatus Jan 2013 #54
Truman. Drunken Irishman Jan 2013 #56
Reagan Faryn Balyncd Jan 2013 #58
jane fonda elehhhhna Jan 2013 #59
K & R !!! WillyT Jan 2013 #60
Krugman is dead wrong. MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #61
Once Again... SPOT ON !!! WillyT Jan 2013 #63
Link to the White House's site online petition here: Amonester Jan 2013 #62
It should have Dick Cheney's face on it, along with his quote, "Deficits don't matter." (nt) scarletwoman Jan 2013 #65
Kicked and Recced Larrymoe Curlyshemp Jan 2013 #66
KnR for Krugman's really interesting idea. Any ideas for the design? Lame Duck? Hekate Jan 2013 #68
Money out of thin air, yet the poor have to suffer program cuts. Fire Walk With Me Jan 2013 #69
 

RomneyLies

(3,333 posts)
1. I hope the design is ready to go, he only needs to mint a couple or three.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 10:54 AM
Jan 2013

When the debt ceiling is raised, borrow the money, buy back the coins, and lock them up in Ft. Knox until the next time the idiots in Congress hold the economy hostage.

TeamPooka

(24,475 posts)
33. the design should be Obama giving Congress (or Boehner) the finger
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 01:32 PM
Jan 2013

because the GOP Congress deserves it.

 

RomneyLies

(3,333 posts)
43. I still say it should have Ronald Reaga's face on it
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 02:00 PM
Jan 2013

But a hand flipping the bird on the obverse side would be nice.

Cha

(299,389 posts)
70. lol..
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 03:44 AM
Jan 2013

yeah, let the Coin reflect the times. rofl The teabaggers deserve all the derision they get.

unblock

(52,883 posts)
2. why even bother with the 14th amendment?
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 10:59 AM
Jan 2013

at a minimum, the 14th amendment path requires a protracted legal dispute and and conceivably a rationalization for impeachment.

minting the trillion dollar coin is pretty clear-cut in its legality and arguably is exactly what congress is "ordering" the president to do if it authorizes spending and refuses to authorize more debt -- the logical solution is simply to print more money, or in this case, mint more money.

paulkienitz

(1,297 posts)
16. congress could close the coin loophole at any time
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 12:41 PM
Jan 2013

so the constitutional fight is what's needed long term.

unblock

(52,883 posts)
18. obama would veto it.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 12:47 PM
Jan 2013

but i agree that if republicans can manage to get both houses of congress and the white house, they could pass a law preventing the trillion-dollar coin solution.

on the other hand, i don't see the 14th amendment as helping much. it lets treasury pay existing debt but not raise new debt. so perhaps it buys some time but not much. eventually we can't have to issue new debt and then what?

ewagner

(18,964 posts)
3. "Game it out"
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 11:01 AM
Jan 2013

I'm not being flippant but I think that's what has been done in the White House but I haven't seen it done here.

What I'm talking about is "gaming out" the possible moves for each scenario. I'm particularly interested in the two mentioned by Krugman: minting the coin and the 14th amendment solutions.

The White House has already said that they won't use the 14th amendment solution which makes me believe they gamed it out and found a dead end or higher-than-acceptable risk element in it. I'm suspecting that "the game" would go something like this:

President announces that debt ceiling is unconstitutional
President orders borrowing of $$$
Repubs file suit against the President
Repubs seek restraining order
Repubs file articles of impeachment
Law suit and impeachment drag through court system
Impeachment moves faster
crisis ensues
Country Credit rating goes down
Interest rates go up
Impeachment dies in Senate
Supreme Court assumes jurisdiction
Supreme Court rules ??????????

All in all...not a pretty scenario. If anybody believes the House Repubs would sit back and accept a declaration by the President that the Debt Ceiling was unconstitutional, they don't know how these nut cases are.

Have they done the same with the minting-the-coin scenario? Are they even taking it seriously?

Your comments are solicited.

ewagner

(18,964 posts)
72. The way I saw it happening
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 07:50 AM
Jan 2013

...was that the President had to create a "cause of action" that someone else filed suit on...that suit would work it's way through the courts...and yes, the Supreme Court would eventually decide upon the constitutionality of the question/cause of action.

 

banned from Kos

(4,017 posts)
4. The Fed might not take this coin "on deposit".
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 11:04 AM
Jan 2013

The Fed alone decides how much money goes into circulation.

unblock

(52,883 posts)
20. it doesn't go into circulation
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 12:49 PM
Jan 2013

and i can't see any fed, certainly not one headed by bernanke, accepting default over accepting a trillion-dollar coin legally minted.

keep in mind that this is a fed that routinely creates money out of thin air.

 

banned from Kos

(4,017 posts)
24. The money created out of "thin air" buys real assets like Treasuries
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 01:04 PM
Jan 2013

or MBS.

This silly coin is nothing but $80 worth of metal.

unblock

(52,883 posts)
25. those real assets at best but produce legal tender
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 01:09 PM
Jan 2013

which is no more or less silly than the trilliion-dollar coin.

how is a trillion dollars worth of cash produced through treasuries or mbs and better than a trillion-dollars worth of cash produced by minting it? yes, effectively it increases the money supply but that's really what congress does when it authorizes the spending in the first place.

 

banned from Kos

(4,017 posts)
28. The thin air money is backed by real assets and
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 01:20 PM
Jan 2013

the trillion dollar coin is not. They sell the assets later to retire the thin air money. Poof! It leaves just as easily as it was created.

Only the Fed can increase the money supply anyway.

unblock

(52,883 posts)
40. real assets that are backed by... money minted/printed by treasury.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 01:48 PM
Jan 2013

there's nothing fundamentally different about a $10 bill or a nickel or a trillion-dollar coin.

it's all backed by nothing more or less than the full faith and credit of the federal government.

which is the same thing that is legal tender for retiring all those real assets.

TeamPooka

(24,475 posts)
34. a coin that is legal tender IS legal tender.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 01:36 PM
Jan 2013

it does not matter how much the metal is worth.
The costs to make a penny are more than a penny.
We make $10 coins with $1600 of gold in it so your argument is baseless.


TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
5. Anyone else think it's funny that you can just make yourself a trillion-dollar coin?
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 11:14 AM
Jan 2013

I don't know why, this just cracks me up.

 

RomneyLies

(3,333 posts)
8. The law was passed during Clinton's administration
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 11:21 AM
Jan 2013

and Treasury opposed it being passed because it was so poorly worded and gave vast power to the Treasury Secretary.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
9. Yes. Also a nightmare if you wanted a Mountain Dew out of the machine
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 11:25 AM
Jan 2013

and all you had was this stupid trillion dollar coin.

Buns_of_Fire

(17,332 posts)
26. Imagine going to the local 7-11 and buying a Moon Pie and an RC Cola with it!
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 01:18 PM
Jan 2013

Lord, they look at me strangely enough when I do it with a couple of Sacajewea dollars...

Of course, this is all hypothetical. It would have fallen out of my pocket and gotten lost in the cushions of the couch LONG before I'd have a chance to spend it.

SpartanDem

(4,533 posts)
7. Don't even bother with the 14th, it's legally dubious at best.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 11:18 AM
Jan 2013

But here is you have a clear loophole that you can drive a Mack truck through.

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
13. They should mint two of them
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 11:42 AM
Jan 2013

And Obama should buy a pair of loafers...

Shoes so expensive even my wife wouldn't buy them!

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
22. What a feeling.......
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 12:51 PM
Jan 2013

just to walk around the Oval Office a couple of times with a couple of trillion dollar coins jingling in your pocket!

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
39. Absolutely
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 01:47 PM
Jan 2013

I was in Mexico several years ago, and the exchange rate was such that a $100 travellers check converted to 250,000 pesos. I told my wife, "I don't care if it IS worthless, having a quarter million in ANYBODY'S currency feels awesome!

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
15. It may be benign... once.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 12:07 PM
Jan 2013

If it becomes a practice, it is not. Alternatively, he could print one million, million-dollar coins. This is big money, and it adds to the money supply even if it's not in circulation.

 

foxtrotzulu

(3 posts)
17. Default talk is rubbish. No coin needed
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 12:45 PM
Jan 2013

The US Government is not in any danger of default. Income is (approx.) 200 billion/month. Debt service is (approx) 35 billion/month. There is no need to mint a special coin and create a false crisis to service the debt.

Yes, we would have a 114 billion/month short-fall. Yes, some tough choices would need to be made about what parts of government to stop funding. But there is no real danger of default.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
23. Paul Krugman won the Nobel Prize for Economics and he seems to think that one may be needed.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 01:00 PM
Jan 2013

What are your economic credentials?

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
32. It would be horrifically stupid.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 01:31 PM
Jan 2013

Last edited Tue Jan 8, 2013, 12:13 AM - Edit history (1)

It could easily trigger global economic collapse. There would be a worldwide run on T bills, which are heavily used as collateral in world financial markets. That's just one of the side effects.

moondust

(20,101 posts)
19. Republican lips are watering!
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 12:49 PM
Jan 2013

Mmmmmm, trillion dollar coin! Richer faster! Richer faster! Richer faster! Richer faster!

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
21. Normally, I would argue against such sneaky shenanigans.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 12:50 PM
Jan 2013

But the Congressional Republicans are not normal. They are reckless, scary people who are more than prepared to hold the country to ransom, wreck our credit rating, and sabotage the economy, just to score some cheap political points against President Obama and ingratiate themselves with the Tea Party morons.

So yes, mint it. Also, I am looking forward to seeing whose face will be on it. And I am also looking forward to the inevitable Hollywood movie in which Ben Stiller tries to steal it.

dragonlady

(3,577 posts)
30. Whose face should be on it?
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 01:22 PM
Jan 2013

I was thinking about that just this morning. What important American figure hasn't yet been on any kind of currency? I'd go for Teddy Roosevelt.

 

Panasonic

(2,921 posts)
48. Ronald Reagan.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 08:27 PM
Jan 2013

As a compromise to the Republicans. Since only three will be minted, and it'll stay in the vault of the Treasury - nobody can get to it. Locked down like Fort Knox.

The obverse? Reagan's wrinkled butt.

And it's legal tender.

haele

(12,776 posts)
31. For the "face" on the coin -
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 01:26 PM
Jan 2013

Grover Norquist with a Mad Hatter's hat. Seal/Motto: Non Bathonie satis exiguus (yes, I used Google translate - my high school latin is very, very rusty)

Obverse side, the Mad Hatter's Tea Party, including Norquest, Boener, McConnell, and Ayn Rand as Alice.


Haele

caveat_imperator

(193 posts)
41. John Maynard Keynes would be a perfect face for the coin. :)
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 01:50 PM
Jan 2013

I'd love to see Smedley Butler's face on our money one day as well.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
44. That $1 trillion dollar coin is interesting, but it's not something we should seriously
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 02:01 PM
Jan 2013

look in to.

The GOP's true masters, as we here (not the trolls, but the true DUers here) all know, is Big Business, foreign and domestic. When Big Business sees the GOP are going to eviscerate their bottom line and not raise the debt ceiling to pay debts already incurred, they will come down on them like raging tigers.

All President Obama has to do is not negotiate. Stand firm and tell them, "Raise the debt ceiling". That's it.

For the doubters here, remember he promised he wouldn't keep tax cuts for the top 2% the last time they held the U.E. benefits hostage (and just before Christmas, too, those assholes) and forced him to extend them. He kept his promise as we've seen in the last fiscal slope deal.

He has said, steadfast, that he will not debate on the debt ceiling. I believe he is dead serious.

OccupyManny

(60 posts)
45. He is right on
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 08:19 PM
Jan 2013

The debt is all funny money. Average Americans shouldn't care. We need more spending and investments in infrastructure and education.

Rosco T.

(6,496 posts)
46. They should mint 10 of them....
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 08:22 PM
Jan 2013

... defuse the GOPigs for a while, let PBO keep 9 of them in his desk. Ready to be deposited.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
51. Reminds me of that Simpsons episode with the trillion dollar bill that Burns stole...
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 08:48 PM
Jan 2013


And then it ended up in the hands of Castro.

Initech

(100,424 posts)
52. "If it's a crime to steal a trillion dollars and hand it over to Cuba then I'm guilty!"
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 08:56 PM
Jan 2013

"And if its a crime to bribe a jury so help me I'll soon be guilty of that!!!!!"





 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
59. jane fonda
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 11:32 PM
Jan 2013

can't image anyone who'd pissoff the republics more than Jane Fonda










Maybe Karl Marx...but they wouldn't know who he was

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
61. Krugman is dead wrong.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 11:38 PM
Jan 2013

It would stop a perfectly good opportunity to shock-doctrine the little people.

Regards,

Third-Way Manny

Hekate

(91,728 posts)
68. KnR for Krugman's really interesting idea. Any ideas for the design? Lame Duck?
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 03:28 AM
Jan 2013

There would not be enough room for all the zeroes, would there? The trillion would have to be spelled out...

Krugman says the face should be Boehner's without question. I think that on the back in place of the proud eagle there should be a duck with a busted wing.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Krugman: Be Ready To Mint...