General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMore And More Of America's PhDs Are On Welfare
Even worse, according to The Chronicle of Higher Education:
The number of people with graduate degrees master's degrees and doctorates who have had to apply for food stamps, unemployment or other assistance more than tripled between 2007 and 2010. Of the 22 million Americans with master's degrees or higher in 2010, about 360,000 were receiving some kind of public assistance, according to the latest Current Population Survey released by the U.S. Census Bureau in March 2011.
http://www.businessinsider.com/infographic-from-phd-to-food-stamps-2013-1
Welfare or post-doc -- pretty similar.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)(about 1.7%)?
Um, OK. So 98.3% of people with advanced degree don't need food stamps.
yardwork
(61,608 posts)A Master's degree can include an online business administration degree, for instance. In fact, I would be curious to know how many of the people with advanced degrees who are getting government assistance received their degrees from for-profit online degree mills.
The actual percentage of PhDs who obtained their degrees from accredited institutions who are on government assistance is probably extremely small.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)just joking.
for your enjoyment:
I go to college
That makes me so cool
I live in a dorm
And show off by the pool
I join the right clubs
Just to build an impression
I block out thinking
It won't get me ahead
My ambition in life
Is to look good on paper
All I want is a slot
In some big corporation
John Belushi's my hero
I lampoon and I ape him
My news of the world
Comes from Sports Illustrated
I'm proud of my trophies
Like my empty beer cans
Stacked in rows up the wall
To impress all my friends
No, I'm not here to learn
I just want to get drunk
And major in business
And be taught how to fuck
Win! Win!
I always play to win
Wanna fit in like a cog
In the faceless machine
[Chorus]
I'm a terminal terminal terminal preppie
terminal terminal terminal preppie
terminal terminal terminal terminal
terminal terminal terminal terminal
I want a wife with tits
Who just smiles all the time
In my centerfold world
Filled with Springsteen and wine
Some day I'll have power
Some day I'll have boats
A tract in some suburb
With Thanksgivings to host
[Chorus]
I'm a terminal terminal terminal preppie
terminal terminal terminal preppie
terminal terminal terminal preppie
jody
(26,624 posts)which there will be no demand.
That continues today particularly at the undergraduate level.
I cringe when I'm in a restaurant and engage the waiter/waitress in their college pursuits.
Too often I find out they are pursuing an undergraduate degree for which PhDs can't find a job.
ebbie15644
(1,214 posts)We also helped pay for school. I would have some of them want us to pay for them to be a "violin" player. I remember having to tell many of the high school kids I worked with that they could "minor" in something but that could not be their major because they couldn't get a job in that field. I think there is a mixture of parents and the school not preparing these kids for employment. They don't understand that the goal of going to school is to find work in order to support yourself.
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)Universities aren't corporate farm clubs.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)The young gentleman or lady was expected to acquire social graces, meet socially suitable persons of the opposite sex, acquire a nodding acquaintance with culture, and then return to the family business. It would be unusual if the education was directly useful in the business.
The exception was if the young gentleman or lady were going into the professions of education, nursing, medicine, law, theology, engineering, etc., or if one attended graduate school and became a professor.
Unfortunately, the obsolete model of higher education for cultural purposes is being sold to prospective students who are not scions of the bourgeoisie and who actually need education that is solidly career oriented.
yardwork
(61,608 posts)In fact, most highly paid CEOs have undergraduate degrees in Humanities like English or History. Those degrees are "solidly career oriented."
In contrast, obtaining a technical degree in a rapidly-changing field is setting oneself up for failure. Technical degrees become obsolete very quickly. People need a well-rounded education that provides skills in writing, critical thinking, logic, and and understanding of history. With that kind of background people are well-prepared for a wide range of fields, can return to school for advanced degrees as needed, and are well-prepared for the rapidly changing reality of today's job market.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)http://www.usnews.com/education/best-graduate-schools/top-business-schools/articles/2012/05/14/where-the-fortune-500-ceos-went-to-school
Most CEOs are solidly bourgeois -- e.g. Zuckerberg grew up in Dobbs Ferry, attended Phillips Exeter Academy, majored in CS and Psych at Harvard.
yardwork
(61,608 posts)A person who wants to become a CEO would do better to major in English at an accredited college or university than to obtain a technical degree at a for-profit online diploma mill. The first approach puts the person in a good position to obtain an advanced degree in business or law or another field that is useful to their goal of becoming a leader.
Becoming a CEO requires a lot of networking and yes, people from wealthy, connected backgrounds have a lot of advantages. However, in the U.S. there are plenty of stories of people who went from rags to riches. In the U.S. you don't have to be "landed gentry" to make a lot of money, if that is your goal.
There's a whole world of opportunities other than CEP for those who have other goals. I majored in history as an undergraduate, obtained a master's degree in a science, and have a good job.
Orrex
(63,212 posts)Science or history?
yardwork
(61,608 posts)Orrex
(63,212 posts)Most people who earn degrees aren't so fortunate despite hard work, determination and creativity.
yardwork
(61,608 posts)In my lifetime this country has gone from a place where hard-working people generally could get and keep jobs to a dog-eat-dog culture where even very highly skilled, hard working people get laid off just so that the stock market can go up a couple of pennies. The rich have become obscenely wealthy and powerful and everybody else's standard of living has dropped greatly when you take into account the anxiety and pressures that 99% of us live with every day just so Mitt Romney can make a few hundred million more every year.
Orrex
(63,212 posts)My wife got into an argument with some people on our town's FB page not long ago. All of the other people in the discussion, by their own admission, are retired and living on nice pensions, and they mock this "younger generation" for having it so easy.
My wife pointed out that they were able to send three or four kids through college while owning their own homes and two or more cars all while working low-tech manufacturing jobs 40 hours per week. Of course, that's nearly impossible now because such jobs are vanishingly rare, and many jobs demand college degrees even if those degrees are irrelevant to the job.
yardwork
(61,608 posts)"You boomers don't have any savings because you spent it all on things like traveling around the world." I pointed out that I haven't traveled much at all, and I live in a much more modest home than the one she just sold for a 900% profit. (Yes that number is correct. My parents' house recently sold for nine times what they paid for it in 1972.) In contrast, my current home is worth considerably less than I paid for it in 2007. Nor do I have hundreds of thousands stashed away in retirement accounts. Nor have I ever owned a sailboat, as my parents did at one time. Nor do I buy a new car every couple of years, as they did. And in fact, when I think about it, my mother has done far more luxury travel than I ever will.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)A history major should certainly understand inflation.
http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl?cost1=1&year1=1972&year2=2012
Making 1.63 times over 40 years is about 2% per year real return on investment.
yardwork
(61,608 posts)FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Inflation will eventually bail you out on a nominal value basis. It will only take a few years of late '70s like stagflation.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)You need not pose the false choice of "to major in English at an accredited college or university than to obtain a technical degree at a for-profit online diploma mill."
MIT, Stanford, Cal Tech, Berkeley, Michigan, Cornell, etc. are prefectly respectable universities that offer technical degrees.
yardwork
(61,608 posts)My posts have been rebuttals to the right-wing talking points that U.S. higher education is useless to most students. It's the right-wingers who are forcing the issue. They want to defund public universities and push students toward the for-profit diploma mills run by their cronies.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)has been for years.
And, of course, lots of Yalies go on to be highly paid CEOs (present company excepted ).
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)yardwork
(61,608 posts)hedgehog
(36,286 posts)then climbing the management ladder. It's not that taking history at Yale prepares someone to run a company, it's being accepted at and graduating from Yale that assures managers that the person is one of them.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)ebbie15644
(1,214 posts)to support yourself and once you can do that, then take classes like violin or photography but don't spend THOUSANDS of dollars and come out of college to work at McDonald's because you don't have a marketable degree.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)become the best violin builder possible then there would be some value to society of the person training.
ebbie15644
(1,214 posts)leftstreet
(36,108 posts)Sounds like they made Good Choices
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)Shouldn't people be able to make a living at what they want to do? How does this square with the laws of diminishing returns?
Keep on moving them goalposts, Mr. Friedman.
blueclown
(1,869 posts)Sounds like advice from somebody who has been extremely lucky in their career-seeking goals.
yardwork
(61,608 posts)The conventional wisdom that undergraduate degrees in the Humanities are useless is completely wrong. In fact, they teach people critical thinking and writing skills that are essential for every kind of career, particularly high-paying leadership positions.
The fact that it is difficult for a PhD in English to find a tenure-track position at a university does not mean that an undergraduate degree in English is useless. Those two things are completely different.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)except for the one job I had with the military.
yardwork
(61,608 posts)Do you really think that they are useless to you? If you had it to do over, would you have chosen different majors?
Orrex
(63,212 posts)Most universities certainly distinguish math from art history, for instance.
yardwork
(61,608 posts)Definition here:
In modern times liberal arts is a term which can be interpreted in different ways. It can refer to certain areas of literature, languages, philosophy, history, mathematics, psychology, and science.[3] It can also refer to studies on a liberal arts degree program. For example, Harvard University offers a Master of Liberal Arts degree, which covers biological and social sciences as well as the humanities.[4] For both interpretations, the term generally refers to matters not relating to the professional, vocational, or technical curricula.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_arts_education
A lot of people think that "liberal arts" has something to do with being politically "liberal" or is reserved only for study of the humanities like literature and art. In fact, the liberal arts include math and science. It's the traditional undergraduate course of study in a four year college.
Orrex
(63,212 posts)But I won't dispute your citation.
Of course, that means that it's so broad a term that it means just about anything and therefore just about nothing, so that's a problem in its own right...
yardwork
(61,608 posts)This definition has been around for several thousand years so it seems to be working ok.
Orrex
(63,212 posts)My degree is in English, which PSU itself describes as a liberal arts degree, even if it's not a degree in Liberal Arts.
But now that you've pointed it out, I want to re-check my own recollection. Maybe they do group Math under liberal arts, though that's not how I remember it.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)then I could at least use them at my job to wipe down urinals.
Yes, if I had to do it over again, I would have majored in accounting.
Or I should have gotten a PhD in economics.
Orrex
(63,212 posts)In my experience, most people who suffer misfortune are the victims of circumstances wholly beyond their control. In every case, a diagnosis of "they made bad choices" is entirely unhelpful and is intended to make the victim feel like an irresponsible fuck-up in addition to feeling helpless and overwhelmed.
Bravo to you.
Rather than kicking the victim in the face, perhaps you might offer actual, concrete steps to overcome the problems that they're confronting? A person with a leaky roof and a broken furnace and a dead transmission doesn't really benefit from being told that they should have made different college choices 20 years ago, yet a distressingly large contingent of DUers seems gleefully eager to step right up and tell them how foolish they are.
Bravo to you.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)or application in that field. Unfortunately, too many people get into fields without thinking about or caring about what they plan to accomplish. A person that studied ancient civilizations will contribute more to society than an average engineer if the ancient civ person has a vision and passion for what she or he wants to accomplish.
jody
(26,624 posts)no reward at the end.
Bad choice for whatever reason.
A few decades ago, a PhD had value in the marketplace but today there are too many diploma mills for doctorates and in fields that have little market value.
IMO things are going to get worse.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Did I miss something in the math there?
The article says about 1 in 7 Americans is on assistance, and if my math is correct, its less than 2 in 100 for those holding advanced degrees.
Again, am I missing something?
aristocles
(594 posts)I have a master's degree and a doctorate in Classical Languages. I had intended to teach Classics at a university. At the time there were very very few university-level positions that would last for more than a year or two. I started to take computer science courses. I became an programmer, entry level. I moved on to software sales and made more that $100,000 per year for over ten years. I started and sold two computer-related businesses. I retired at 55. Now I occasionally work as a consultant.
My brother earned a master's degree and a doctorate, also in Classics. He obtained a non-tenure-track lecturer position at a major East coast university. That lasted 3 years. He then obtained certification in project management and worked for a defense contractor for several years. He now runs a publishing firm.
I have never regretted the years I spent studying Classics. I have been working since I was 16. On my 16th birthday, a Saturday, my father took me out to find a job. I did. As a stock boy at a department store. I've been a soda jerk. A truck driver. During grad school I worked as a security guard.
Good employment depends on initiative, creativity, and flexibility.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)aristocles
(594 posts)Response to aristocles (Reply #6)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
yardwork
(61,608 posts)I read post #6 as a refutation of right-wing talking points. Here's a person describing their experience with how a degree in the Humanities has been useful to them. How is that deserving of scorn?
Response to yardwork (Reply #19)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
yardwork
(61,608 posts)He or she has probably been told all their life that their degree in Classics was going to be useless. They may be a little defensive about it by now.
Response to yardwork (Reply #25)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
yardwork
(61,608 posts)the post differently than I was.
aristocles
(594 posts)The first company I worked for as a programmer preferred to hire music and philosophy graduates as programmers.
Response to aristocles (Reply #24)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
Orrex
(63,212 posts)Maybe, but in my experience not nearly as much as upon blind luck, office politics, and the bottom line decisions made by people who have no idea who you are.
blueclown
(1,869 posts)Luck is 95% of the equation.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Well below the rate for those without such degrees.
Lydia Leftcoast
(48,217 posts)But that all fell apart with the Reagan revolution.
You see, liberal arts majors haven't been indoctrinated into the Religion of the Bottom Line Above All Else. They ask questions. They take things other than the numbers into consideration.
Bad, bad liberal arts majors.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)to regurgitate slogans are what is marketable in America. Keep your eyes down, do as you're told, and above all, never, ever complain or question the decisions made by your betters.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)...mostly a vocational education
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Not sure the level of concern presented matches the data presented.
As one who holds an MA and a PhD, received in the late 80s, I have trouble accepting the conclusions being drawn in this thread.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... these guys would be millionaires cause we'd really have an adversary
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Many people on SNAP are actually employed, just not making enough money to feed their children. And unemployment is actually an insurance payment. Since when are insurance payments "welfare?"
blueclown
(1,869 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)And what used to be known as Welfare - direct cash assistance to individuals based on need.
JPZenger
(6,819 posts)Way too many PhDs have been produced in the humanities.
Most colleges have switched to using adjuncts instead of hiring tenure-track professors. Many of these adjunct positions pay very poorly, and offer no benefits. Many of these adjuncts are running between 3 different colleges every day trying to earn enough money to make a living and pay off their student loan debts.
Many of these adjuncts probably earn incomes that make them eligible for public food assistance.
aristocles
(594 posts)I had a friend who obtained his Classics PhD when I did.
He spent 12 years teaching Classics at California universities. Low pay, and each year at a different school. He persevered nevertheless.
He's now president of a university.
yardwork
(61,608 posts)It's a crime how fixed term faculty are being treated. Another reason why we need a labor movement in this country.
obliviously
(1,635 posts)When I got my Doctorate in rodent psychology.
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)due to student loans. My husband's are horrible, I don't know how we pay them but we do, it is a house payment. To teach at a major school you need a Ph.D. from a major school, very pricey.....
a la izquierda
(11,795 posts)as I just received a job offer. Thank god.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)BS Biology 1979,
Juris Doctor, 1985.
Neither of those degrees have enabled me to obtain a single job in either law or biology.
And the sad part is that my parents made me major in them, so I could get a "good job".
They made the false assumption that certain degrees make you employable, and others do not.
What I really wanted to do was get a BFA in Painting. It would have been just as useful.
yardwork
(61,608 posts)I know a number of people who majored in Computer Science because they thought it would guarantee them job security. Now they are all being laid off from jobs they hate anyway.
jody
(26,624 posts)The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)very sad
DonRedwood
(4,359 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)That's why this stat irks me (and others). These are presumably some of the most intelligent people on the planet and even they have unemployment.
That sucks.
And don't tell me they simply studied the "wrong" things. Sorry but at the PhD level, its not wrong. We need people to be educated in all of these areas. ALL of them.
How shortsighted we are that we're quibbling whether this number is too high or not, or whether they were "wrong" to get these degrees.
Its just wrong that we can't employ them. Anywhere. For anything.