General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMore Fox Stupidity: Eric Bolling: Schools ‘pushing the liberal agenda’ by teaching algebra
(The Raw Story) - Fox News host Eric Bolling on Wednesday accused some schools of pushing the liberal agenda for teaching an algebra lesson about the distributive property.
During a segment about indoctrination in schools, Bolling reminded viewers of a 2009 video of children chanting, Mmm. Mmm. Mmm. Barack Hussein Obama, which outraged conservatives at the time.
But even worse is the way some textbooks are pushing the liberal agenda, the Fox News host explained, pointing to an algebra worksheet that Scholastic says gives students nsight into the distributive property as it applies to multiplication.
Distribute the wealth! Bolling exclaimed, reading the worksheet. Distribute the wealth with the lovely rich girl with a big ole bag of money, handing some money out.
Co-host Kimberly Guilfoyle explained that the algebra worksheet had put her on high alert for the liberal agenda in her 6-year-old sons curriculum.
Snip
I would say the ignorance on display here here is astounding, but in all honesty, Im not astounded. This seems pretty par for the course when it comes to Fox.
This is a blatant example of exploiting the ignorance of viewers by taking a concept with a name that is similar to a concept that conservatives fear (wealth redistribution) and associating it even though they have absolutely NOTHING to do with each other and vilifying education in the process.
The Distributive Property is an elementary concept in algebra that refers to rules of placement and has no relation what so ever to wealth redistribution.
http://abaldwin360.tumblr.com/post/40184438090/fox-newss-eric-bolling-schools-pushing-the-liberal
samsingh
(17,598 posts)spanone
(135,832 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)our current state of education.
p
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Aristus
(66,369 posts)Yep, that's probably next...
JHB
(37,160 posts)WooooOOOOoooooo!
The words jabr (JAH-ber) and muqubalah (moo-KAH-ba-lah) were used by al-Khowarizmi to designate two basic operations in solving equations. Jabr was to transpose subtracted terms to the other side of the equation. Muqubalah was to cancel like terms on opposite sides of the equation. In fact, the title has been translated to mean "science of restoration (or reunion) and opposition" or "science of transposition and cancellation" and "The Book of Completion and Cancellation" or "The Book of Restoration and Balancing."
Jabr is used in the step where x - 2 = 12 becomes x = 14. The left-side of the first equation, where x is lessened by 2, is "restored" or "completed" back to x in the second equation. Muqabalah takes us from x + y = y + 7 to x = 7 by "cancelling" or "balancing" the two sides of the equation. Eventually the muqabalah was left behind, and this type of math became known as algebra in many languages.
It is interesting to note that the word al-jabr used non-mathematically made its way into Europe through the Moors of Spain. There an algebrista is a bonesetter, or "restorer" of bones. A barber of medieval times called himself an algebrista since barbers often did bone-setting and bloodletting on the side. Hence the red and white striped barber poles of today.
It always amuses me to know that when Christian Europe was in the throes of the Dark Ages, living lives of ignorance, superstition, fear, & mistrust, the Arab world was excelling in mathematics, medicine, astronomy, engineering, architecture, etc.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)about the history of intelligent design. It's worth watching all the way through, but the Arabic-related stuff is in the 2nd half:
tnlurker
(1,020 posts)truth2power
(8,219 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)that they've now traded places?
Aristus
(66,369 posts)We may be about to switch back.
Right-wing Christian fanaticism is debasing scientific education is this country, while overseas, liberal and moderate Muslims are starting to gain ascendancy over the fundamentalist fanatics. We'll see what happens...
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)They were called the "ark ages" because renascence Italians didn't know much about it, kinda like darkest Africa. There was still a lot of innovation going on at the time, they were just under lots of pressure by plagues, and invaders (the Moors you were talking about) we've found out a lot about the time frame sense the 1600s
Response to Aristus (Reply #20)
Post removed
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)everyone knows that the that mathematic concept was named after some white guy in Europe by the name of Albert, Prince of Gebra!
Sadiedog
(353 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)It means coming together. What kind of a rugged individualist can endorse that message? What would Ayn Rand say?
And how will Pam Geller all the other sectarian and racist bigots preach their massage of hate and igorance if we know that Arab Muslims made scientific and mathematical breakthroughs at the same time that Europeans wallowed in a giant pig sty during the dark ages?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)"The book of coming together and reducing".
Though the Muslims got most of their math from the Hindus, themselves.
I went to High School in East Berlin , then under communist control . And guess what ? we had "liberal " algebra on our class schedule ! Who would have thunk then that pure math is a political matter , not a science one . Guess we did not have Faux News around to know better .
Initech
(100,076 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)was something said by a previous Democratic Vice President and quoted by someone with a lisp.
mimi85
(1,805 posts)made my day. Algorithm. Guess I'm easy to please today. After listening to news about yet another school shooting, I desperately needed a laugh!
starroute
(12,977 posts)So he's not just responsible for "algebra."
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I love math history.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Along with all those star names--Algol, Aldebaran, and AlChemy-->chemistry.
And of course Arabic numerals. (Although I think they stole the idea of the zero from the Hindus.)
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Including a section called "Naming Rights" in the latter half
yardwork
(61,608 posts)before being invented for a third time in India.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=what-is-the-origin-of-zer
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)yardwork
(61,608 posts)The beginnings of civilization, for one thing.
regnaD kciN
(26,044 posts)...and their Weapons of Math Instruction!
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Initech
(100,076 posts)liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)That's all kids need!
Maybe Eric failed Algebra.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)lpbk2713
(42,757 posts)The faux outrage just keeps on coming.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)"distribute the wealth" doesn't really make sense, and doesn't have anything to do with the distributive property as far as I can tell.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)intaglio
(8,170 posts)The "Distributive Property" describes how multiplication has this property but division does not.
2 x (3 + 4) = (2 x 3) + (2 x 4)
but 2 / (3 + 4) =/= 2/3 + 2/4
Recursion
(56,582 posts)There's actually some elegant stuff you can do with compilers for curried languages based on that.
But, yeah, as a complex operation (inversion composed with multiplication) it's not generally distributive.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,316 posts)because there's nothing about 'wealth' in any of the sums, which are pure numbers. Whoever wrote the worksheet seems to have decided to troll the Fox News types by saying "'distribute'? Well, the only thing that comes in is 'distribute the wealth'!" And I would question whether the fun of waiting for complaints to come in is worth the possibility of confusing the pupils, some of whom are going to ask "why is this talking about 'wealth'?"
Flatpicker
(894 posts)The thought of using money as the backdrop for the assignment gives the kids a concept they can visualize when remembering the distributive property.
It's a memory aid I think.
JHB
(37,160 posts)Effectively, Eric Bolling has made himself proof that the financial industry is populated by grasping dumbasses (a proposition which apparently is still in doubt in "pro-business" and FOX circles).
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)We fight it all the time in Oklahoma, if they had their way these kids would come out of school unable to think at all.
An article in Huffington showed the list and it was very telling. If I remember correctly only one Red state showed up average, none above average.
I could not find the link or I would share it.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)A worksheet on the distributive property titled "Distribute the Wealth" (which doesn't really relate to the distributive property at all) is, to say the least, kind of puzzling.
MedicalAdmin
(4,143 posts)... that are set up by text book companies. And as we all know those companies pay attention to such intellectually vapid bodies such as the Texas Textbook Commission (or whatever they are calling it these days).
And some of the guidelines that might have affected this are: must have a theme, must have be able to have a graphic attached that matches the theme, must have a unique theme, must have a theme that can be related to something in the students lives.
Thus the use of money and the play on words. Actually that looks like a pretty good worksheet to me.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I tutor math and make my own worksheets; I like the actual problems on that one.
AlinPA
(15,071 posts)Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)I disagreed with Buckley on virtually every issue, but I respected his intelligence and knowlege.
THIS is what his party has become: a party that prides itself on its ignorance and hate.
Viking12
(6,012 posts)Next, thing you know....transfer of wealth, sex changes, the list is endless
wandy
(3,539 posts)Just going to need more signs like this.....
http://www.google.com/imgres?q=15+is+this+many+walmart+sign&hl=en&sa=X&tbo=d&biw=1280&bih=879&tbm=isch&tbnid=5DlImJUq9PvMcM:&imgrefurl=http://www.funnysigns.net/shopping-for-dummies/&docid=JlMp0L9BvC0N7M&imgurl=&w=400&h=315&ei=lSbvUOSaKIL7qAHlk4C4Bg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=442&vpy=126&dur=392&hovh=199&hovw=253&tx=144&ty=114&sig=111695121554140341362&page=1&tbnh=147&tbnw=175&start=0&ndsp=30&ved=1t:429,r:2,s:0,i 0
Yes, I know it's a hoax.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/signs/expresslane.asp
At least for now.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)to be that stupid? Next we'll be hearing that water isn't made up of Hydrogen and Oxygen, and that Chemistry is a liberal invention to take God out of our water supply.
Dirty Socialist
(3,252 posts)Sweatshop Math: Multiplying by zero and minute fractions.
VA_Jill
(9,971 posts)How dumb do you have to be to work at Faux Noise? Never mind, don't answer that.
TxDemChem
(1,918 posts)But I never thought math lessons, especially for non-word problems, could be a problem. They will make anything into an outrage! Crazy
mgardener
(1,816 posts)"Simplifying Using the Distributive Property Lesson
The Distributive Property is an algebra property which is used to multiply a single term and two or more terms inside a set of parentheses. Take a look at the problem below.
2(3 + 6)
Because the binomial "3 + 6" is in a set of parentheses, when following the Order of Operations, you must first find the answer of 3 + 6, then multiply it by 2. This gives an answer of 18.
2(3 + 6)
2(9)
18 "
These people are certifiable.
how stupid do they want our kids to be?
And how stupid are the adults that watch them?
caseymoz
(5,763 posts)I guess there's no limit to laughs to be found in WingnutLand.
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)Lucky Luciano
(11,256 posts)...for these morons and their believers.
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Post removed
Mutatis Mutandis
(90 posts)as to the reactionary troll's outrage.
This all said, income inquality will be one of the chief reasons for the collapse of Pax Americana. It is one of the ultimate societal pathologies.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Amazingly, Kimberly Guilfoyle is CA Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D)'s ex-wife. He sure dodged a bullet there!
BlueNoteSpecial
(141 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)...because algebra, usually first presented in Jr High or first year of high school, is one of the first classes which they actually develop the ability to think! Eric Bolling, from Foxed up News, simply doesn't support teaching children to think. Perhaps he was helping his youngster with his algebra lesson and that word stuck out to him like a sore thumb, since he sees everything through his red-tinted winger glasses? Wonder what he would have to say about science? Bet he's a Creationist too.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)"get their ... antiperspirant from a health food store"
frikkin' commie pinkos, what next, co-ops?
Botany
(70,504 posts)Algebra comes from Egypt ........
in Egypt they have the Muslim Brotherhood
Algebra = radical Islamic terrorists trying to kill Americans
adieu
(1,009 posts)a * (b + c) = (a * b) + (a * c). That's all.
Commutative property of addition and multiplication (nothing to do with communism):
a + b = b + a; a * b = b * a
Associative property of addition and multiplication (nothing to do with unionizing or forming a subversive group)
(a + b) + c = a + (b + c); a * (b * c) = (a * b) * c
These are properties of the operands, addition (+) and multiplication (*).
Oh, and a, b, and c are elements for which the operands apply. (Generally, we consider a, b, and c to be elements of a number field like the complex numbers or the real numbers, or even an integral domain like the integers.)
ladjf
(17,320 posts)Bill USA
(6,436 posts)recommended.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)institutionalized.
davesliberal1977_gg
(22 posts)Honestly, what ISN'T a "liberal agenda" to those fools? It's because of these idiots, that our schools are being dumbed down more and more. At this rate, students won't learn algebra until they're in college. Jeez.
ck4829
(35,076 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Some things you just can't make up.
santamargarita
(3,170 posts)Ignorance is Strength means that in keeping the people ignorant of the facts, distracted or numbed down.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)How do you respond to something so stupid?
drm604
(16,230 posts)That's pretty friggin stupid.
rocktivity
(44,576 posts)If only Bolling had contained his outrage long enough to read the entire worksheet. Is He smarter than a fifth grader?
rocktivity
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)consult a sixth grader first
drm604
(16,230 posts)So I guess it's not quite as stupid as we thought, but it's still a stupid thing to rail against and I doubt that it was created with any intention of pushing a political viewpoint.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,316 posts)They have nothing to do with the concept or exercise. At best, the pupils will ignore them; at worst, they could get confused by them. As I said in #61, I'd guess the author did it to annoy right wingers.
JHB
(37,160 posts)They never stop to think "y'know, even if that's true, it's not working very well."
Beartracks
(12,814 posts)Why know things yourself when you can just be told stuff instead?
===================
Beartracks
(12,814 posts)... of an ignorant viewership. I've come to the conclusion, however, that most of them are ignorant as well.
They do not need microphones.
======================
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)That ought to be pretty obvious.
It was invented by Arabs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebra >>>>>> الجبر al-jabr translates to "restoration"
Iris
(15,657 posts)Robb
(39,665 posts)And they're good at it. We were pretty stupid by comparison, I've decided.
Iris
(15,657 posts)I read that wrong. The co-host said she is becoming more aware of the liberal agenda in her 6 year old's curriculum.
Robb
(39,665 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)http://suite101.com/article/algebra-taught-in-first-grade-a87424
It's not advanced, of course, but it's more than we ever did.
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)We now know that this includes algebra too.
Initech
(100,076 posts)By teaching kids about the distributive property - a critical element to be able to pass algebra - somehow we are teaching our kids socialism because it's akin to distributing wealth?
What are they smoking and where might I obtain some?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)not about teaching kids the distributive property.
Rex
(65,616 posts)to society.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)I bet they think physics tell the future. (Well, it does, probably).
grantcart
(53,061 posts)and it sounds so much like Aljezeera.
Dumbing down of America continues unabated.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)Fox News is not against "teaching algebra".
Fox News is not claiming that "Schools pushing the liberal agenda by teaching algebra".
We can be better than Fox. It's not hard. It starts with things like honest headlines.
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)The rest of the title is from the article.
kentauros
(29,414 posts)then perhaps our SBoE has finally done something right!
samsingh
(17,598 posts)they really should move to iraq or algeria
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/11/eric-bolling-the-five-liberal-agenda-math-homework_n_2455583.html
yardwork
(61,608 posts)and they were never found! Why the nerve of us liberals!!
What is Bolling's explanation for why Bush said that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? Does he have a spin on Colin Powell's presentation too?
maggiesfarmer
(297 posts)No, I'm not suggesting that Fox is right regarding the school promoting a liberal agenda, but honestly, I'd believe the creator of the worksheet was trying to tweak the noses of some conservatives. The Raw Story author is correct, the concept of multiplicative distribution has nothing to do with political/economic concepts of redistribution. However, the worksheet author is the one who appears to be trying to draw the connection, not Baldwin. It's also interesting that beyond the graphic and the headline, the worksheet has nothing to do with monetary distribution (e.g. it doesn't have word problems testing the mathematical concept based on "distributing the wealth" -- it appears the graphic and headline are completely unrelated.
Fox does a great job of spinning stories and finding small details to get their base fired up and this is an example. It's not an example of ignorance of the mathematical concept, however.
if anyone at DU finds a follow up story that tracked down the worksheet author and got their comments, please link it back here.
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)Thank you.
maggiesfarmer
(297 posts)stated my post the way I did.
Assuming you carefully read and considered that article before posting it here, you had a choice to either:
1. create a thread, with a link to the article with your thread title the same misleading information that The Raw Story used
2. create a thread, with a link to the article with a more accurate title (e.g. Fox makes a big deal out of an algebra worksheet)
3. not create a thread
I was only acknowledging that you went for #1. it's possible that my assumption is incorrect and that you didn't consider the aspects of the situation that I pointed out before posting -- not a cardinal sin by any means.
peace
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)So be it.