Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWe could only get 57 votes to convict a President who tried to overthrow the government but we're su
Link to tweet
?s=21
Mikel Jollett
@Mikel_Jollett
We could only get 57 votes to convict a President who tried to overthrow the government but we're supposed to GOVERN with a filibuster which requires 60 votes?
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We could only get 57 votes to convict a President who tried to overthrow the government but we're su (Original Post)
soothsayer
Feb 2021
OP
triron
(22,240 posts)1. Point taken!
Poiuyt
(18,272 posts)2. Good post, but there are still a couple of Democrats who want to keep the filibuster.
It won't be easy eliminating it.
magicarpet
(19,427 posts)3. No,... no,. It is possible....
Just ask Joe Manchin,... he knows how it is done.
Timewas
(2,780 posts)4. This entire
Political system and process is a huge joke, but it is not really very funny.
triron
(22,240 posts)5. Seemingly moreso now.