Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'Smoking Gun': Tar Sands Report Eviscerates Industry Claims
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/01/08-1As climate justice campaigners in the US ramp up their efforts to block the Keystone XL pipeline and First Nation activists foment a global 'Earth-centered' movement in Canada, scientists say a new study "conclusively" proves that tar sands oil is both highly carcinogenic and that toxic contamination in Alberta, Canada covers a much wider area than previously acknowledged.
Researchers involved in the independent but government-funded study say the report eviscerates claims by the industry that heightened levels of toxins found in Alberta could be "naturally occurring."
"
The research, published Monday in the US journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, shows that since tar sands production began in earnest in 1978, deposits of PAHspolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, carcinogens that rank among the top 10 hazardous substances on the US Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry have increased 2.5 to 23 timesto the point that some lakes are as contaminated as urban lakes.
(More at the link.)
14 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Smoking Gun': Tar Sands Report Eviscerates Industry Claims (Original Post)
Fire Walk With Me
Jan 2013
OP
And tar sands spills are FAR worse than regular oil spills to even attempt a clean up.
JaneyVee
Jan 2013
#1
Yep. Anti-Keystone XL pipeline activists point out that "all pipelines eventually leak".
Fire Walk With Me
Jan 2013
#3
and when CNOOC (China) completes its buy of Nexen (huge CN oil co. with assets
elehhhhna
Jan 2013
#8
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)1. And tar sands spills are FAR worse than regular oil spills to even attempt a clean up.
It's heavier, thicker, & sinks to the bottom. Plus the carcinogens you've mentioned.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)3. Yep. Anti-Keystone XL pipeline activists point out that "all pipelines eventually leak".
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)8. and when CNOOC (China) completes its buy of Nexen (huge CN oil co. with assets
int he sands AND the Gulf of Mexico), be sure that all enviro. (and employee) safety intitatives will be gone, gone, gone.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)2. But, but, but ... profits!
jillan
(39,451 posts)4. It's a good time to re-watch Gasland. HBO had it on the other nite and it just
pissed me off even more watching it the second time!
Is *this* how we really want to live?
arikara
(5,562 posts)5. Idle No More
The people are talking about protecting Mother Earth, and the big chiefs who don't get it are discussing resource revenue sharing with Chairman Harper. The people have finally reached their tipping point and more will be joining with them.
edit grammar
WillyT
(72,631 posts)6. HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!!
broiles
(1,455 posts)7. This is finally getting the attention it deserves
thanks to all the activists that have heroically persisted.
countryjake
(8,554 posts)9. kickety
TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)10. K&R
glinda
(14,807 posts)11. K&R n/t
Melissa G
(10,170 posts)12. kick
and rec
spanone
(141,602 posts)13. k&r...
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)14. Kick