Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Whovian

(2,866 posts)
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 08:17 AM Jan 2013

West Point study on ‘violent far right’ shows ‘dramatic rise’ in attacks

A report published by the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point Military Academy on Jan. 15 discusses the potential dangers of “violent far-right” organizations, which has angered some conservatives that believe the military should focus on international threats.

The executive summary of the paper, “Challengers from the Sidelines: Understanding America’s Violent Far-Right,” claims that “since 2007, there has been a dramatic rise in the number of attacks and violent plots originating from individuals and groups who self- identify with the far-right of American politics.”

Written by Arie Perliger, Director of Terrorism Studies at the Combating Terrorism Center and an Assistant Professor at the Department of Social Sciences at West Point, the paper asserts that three distinct ideologies exist in the “American violent far right.” Those are “a racist/white supremacy movement, an anti-federalist movement and a fundamentalist movement,” the last of which “includes mainly Christian Identity groins such as the Aryan Nations.”

“Findings indicate that…it is not only feelings of deprivation that motivate those involved in far right violence, but also the sense of empowerment that emerges when the political system is perceived to be increasingly permissive to far right ideas,” it later reads.

The rise in attacks in the 21st century were significant, as “Although in the 1990s the average number of attacks per year was 70.1, the average number of attacks per year in the first 11 years of the twenty-first century was 307.5, a rise of more than 400%.”

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/19/west-point-study-on-violent-far-right-shows-dramatic-rise-in-attacks/#.UPvLPMD3Qjw.facebook

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
West Point study on ‘violent far right’ shows ‘dramatic rise’ in attacks (Original Post) Whovian Jan 2013 OP
Dark Atom Berlum Jan 2013 #1
Cool pic! Just made it my desktop background. LAGC Jan 2013 #5
On IPad now. nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #18
foreign and domestic madrchsod Jan 2013 #2
But they are still allowed to thrive malaise Jan 2013 #15
Thanks for posting this Coolest Ranger Jan 2013 #3
This is one reason geckosfeet Jan 2013 #4
Yup. LAGC Jan 2013 #6
Correct. oldbanjo Jan 2013 #7
I'm sure they're calling it self-defense too. nt Pale Blue Dot Jan 2013 #8
Probably. But I don't care what you call it if you attack me. I will defend myself appropriately. geckosfeet Jan 2013 #14
EXACTLY what they would say. nt Pale Blue Dot Jan 2013 #17
+1 1-Old-Man Jan 2013 #13
Timely report. Needs more attention. freshwest Jan 2013 #9
"Christian Identity groins"? Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2013 #10
That has me scratching my head too. n/t A Simple Game Jan 2013 #12
Probably 'groups' mistyped as 'groips' (u next to i on the keyboard) muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #20
Oh how Republicans hate the light of truth. gtar100 Jan 2013 #11
THIS!! tblue37 Jan 2013 #16
well fortified, and ready Great Caesars Ghost Jan 2013 #19

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
2. foreign and domestic
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 08:50 AM
Jan 2013

the far right organizations have killed hundreds over the years in this country.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,622 posts)
20. Probably 'groups' mistyped as 'groips' (u next to i on the keyboard)
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 05:38 PM
Jan 2013

and auto-correct then picking the wrong thing, without decent proof-reading. It's certainly 'groups' in the paper.

gtar100

(4,192 posts)
11. Oh how Republicans hate the light of truth.
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 11:28 AM
Jan 2013

Why would they be against a report that identifies violent groups in America? Seems like an important thing to know. It should be factual and non-partisan in its approach but the identity of the groups inevitably will be about causes and political positions. Their reaction to this report just goes to show they care more for their ideology than an America that is safe and free of violence and the threat of violence.

tblue37

(65,829 posts)
16. THIS!!
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 01:07 PM
Jan 2013

[font size = +1]“Findings indicate that…it is not only feelings of deprivation that motivate those involved in far right violence, but also the sense of empowerment that emerges when the political system is perceived to be increasingly permissive to far right ideas,” it later reads<emphasis added>

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»West Point study on ‘viol...