Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

YoungDemCA

(5,714 posts)
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 04:39 PM Jan 2013

Obama says rural voices need to be heard in gun debate

(Reuters) - President Barack Obama urged gun control advocates to listen to views of rural Americans who use guns for hunting and said bridging a cultural divide in attitudes to gun ownership will be critical to his administration's push to curb gun violence.

"If you grew up and your dad gave you a hunting rifle when you were 10, and you went out and spent the day with him and your uncles, and that became part of your family's traditions, you can see why you'd be pretty protective of that," Obama said in an interview with The New Republic magazine published on Sunday on its website.


snip:
"Part of being able to move this forward is understanding the reality of guns in urban areas are very different from the realities of guns in rural areas," Obama said.

"So it's trying to bridge those gaps that I think is going to be part of the biggest task over the next several months. And that means that advocates of gun control have to do a little more listening than they do sometimes," he said.


http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/27/us-obama-guns-idUSBRE90Q0BA20130127

Rather timely, in light of the recent threads on rural voters as well as all the gun threads.
163 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama says rural voices need to be heard in gun debate (Original Post) YoungDemCA Jan 2013 OP
i think he gets there is a rural urban gap here and weapons are seen differently depending where loli phabay Jan 2013 #1
+1, n/t RKP5637 Jan 2013 #2
+1 n/t wandy Jan 2013 #65
+1. Honeycombe8 Jan 2013 #99
Yep, don't know anyone who has a problem with hunters as long as that's their true intent. Hoyt Jan 2013 #3
Strategic assault weapons? loose wheel Jan 2013 #156
Tell it to these gun dealers/profiteers Hoyt Jan 2013 #157
Guns do not make people agressive... loose wheel Jan 2013 #158
I bet your hunting party did look like that if you think Michigan Milita is a Hoyt Jan 2013 #159
Not much different... loose wheel Jan 2013 #162
Who cares? Confederate flags, Tbag flags, guns and white racists aren't my kind of organization. Hoyt Jan 2013 #163
Now, is someone using DU as a sounding board for these speechs? leveymg Jan 2013 #4
Oh, you mean the post where Bill Clinton said much the same... Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #98
Staff and speech writers. leveymg Jan 2013 #125
Well, why didn't I think of those two trains running. Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #129
. . . before you crossed the tracks? ;-) leveymg Jan 2013 #135
My comment wasn't meant to be mean spirited. And obviously it wasn't funny. Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #136
We're even, then. leveymg Jan 2013 #139
Magic! I'm having it right now! Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #141
Okey dokey jsr Jan 2013 #5
+ a million quinnox Jan 2013 #9
The guy in the middle looks like my uncle. He has two STEM PhDs Recursion Jan 2013 #28
well, pardon me if I say jazzimov Jan 2013 #49
The guy on the left looks like my cousin... Drunken Irishman Jan 2013 #70
Was that supposed to be a smackdown? BeyondGeography Jan 2013 #75
No. Just a reminder that we don't know dick about those 3 guys Recursion Jan 2013 #85
LOL, on that same topic, what is your point? Smart people are not gun nuts??? Logical Jan 2013 #114
Um, what does the guy in the middle have between his legs there? Is that a white cane for the blind? Electric Monk Jan 2013 #29
its a golf club quinnox Jan 2013 #31
It IS a Golf club. bvar22 Jan 2013 #103
I thought it was a needle,... TeeYiYi Jan 2013 #131
They're Americans too, lol. Obama gets it. reformist2 Jan 2013 #30
On a more serious note... Benton D Struckcheon Jan 2013 #35
Well if hunting is the purported purpose of the image Riftaxe Jan 2013 #43
depends on what they are hunting for. squirrels dont need anything powerful. loli phabay Jan 2013 #53
Even a .22 will skin the squirrel for you Riftaxe Jan 2013 #67
nothing tastes better than buffalo style squirrel wings i highly recommend them. loli phabay Jan 2013 #89
another bit of impressive "getting it" that President Obama has Kali Jan 2013 #6
Obama's smart enough to know that liberal can get carried away very easily on this issue. reformist2 Jan 2013 #32
What a weird thing to say. NO ONE is trying to take away your hunting rifles. JaneyVee Jan 2013 #7
thats deer rifles. an ar is better for stuff like hogs or coyotes or just used target shooting. loli phabay Jan 2013 #8
99% of all guns will kill a hog or coyote. JaneyVee Jan 2013 #11
Not for a feral pig obamanut2012 Jan 2013 #144
A Barrett 50 Cal is even better why F around with a pea shooter stultusporcos Jan 2013 #14
not as mobile and a lot more expensive both to buy and for the ammo. loli phabay Jan 2013 #15
You must not be a very good shot and need multiple clips to hit a critter stultusporcos Jan 2013 #22
yeh but the barrett is a pain to hump through the woods and you dont need the range loli phabay Jan 2013 #23
Well, to become a good shot one should practice. Glassunion Jan 2013 #47
NOW we are talking - what guitar would you go with? nt jmg257 Jan 2013 #66
Les Paul. nt Glassunion Jan 2013 #76
Aww - sweet! I have a brother-in-law who says he'll trade me his '58 Historic VOS jmg257 Jan 2013 #78
I'm looking for a couple of LP Standards to add to the collection Glassunion Jan 2013 #80
LOL- you aint kidding. Well - I hope you find a nice one you can afford! Good luck! nt jmg257 Jan 2013 #81
Anything Paul Reed Smith. xoom Jan 2013 #118
Another sweet choice..bud at work has beaut he wouldn't live without. jmg257 Jan 2013 #120
If I really wanted a Barrett, I'd go with the REC7 derby378 Jan 2013 #91
I don't see a prius in the top 10 of owned cars Riftaxe Jan 2013 #45
There Prius all over Alaska. Arctic Dave Jan 2013 #57
All over would be a bit presumptious Riftaxe Jan 2013 #68
You can find a Prius in any town in Alaska connected by roadway. Arctic Dave Jan 2013 #77
but they are pretty crap for dirt roads and when it snows. loli phabay Jan 2013 #92
I'm guessing you don't live in NY or California. They're EVERYWHERE. JaneyVee Jan 2013 #90
Surely you've seen the posts here that talk about banning all guns... Honeycombe8 Jan 2013 #102
no, by and large, we already know what the hicks and idiots think quinnox Jan 2013 #10
You know, I can't imagine why rural voters are turned off by our party Recursion Jan 2013 #13
when you are dealing with the folks pictured in post #5 quinnox Jan 2013 #18
Looks like my uncle, who I bet is smarter than both of us Recursion Jan 2013 #19
so, there are always exceptions quinnox Jan 2013 #27
How do you know that? obamanut2012 Jan 2013 #147
consider this a disparaging personal attack that has been hidden by a jury Kali Jan 2013 #41
lol Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2013 #61
You are my hero/heroine (nt) Recursion Jan 2013 #106
Ahh so it's the looks Riftaxe Jan 2013 #48
Ozzy Osbourne? quinnox Jan 2013 #60
Well, bvar22 Jan 2013 #84
Do you really think those guys are rural? Sissyk Jan 2013 #127
I think so, too obamanut2012 Jan 2013 #148
You have no idea those guys are rural obamanut2012 Jan 2013 #146
i dont expect anything different from citidiots as we hicks call the city folk loli phabay Jan 2013 #20
citidiots Fla_Democrat Jan 2013 #24
your welcome ;) loli phabay Jan 2013 #25
Those who critique the farmer and hunter, with their mouth full. nt msanthrope Jan 2013 #37
Not really fair, there is a lot involved Riftaxe Jan 2013 #51
And then Ruralites wonder why they don't get the respect they think they deserve Lordquinton Jan 2013 #74
no interest in getting respect from the citidiots just want them to stay off my property loli phabay Jan 2013 #94
About as bad as the rural folk theKed Jan 2013 #107
+1 Go Vols Jan 2013 #39
Where I live we have a term one syllable shorter... "citiots". n/t cherokeeprogressive Jan 2013 #56
Why should urban people even want to talk with someone like you. MightyMopar Jan 2013 #95
and yet you seem to be the one who is bigoted. i just know that assholes live everywhere. loli phabay Jan 2013 #100
I'm the bigot who has to keep his mouth shut while they talk about "Martin Luther Coon" day MightyMopar Jan 2013 #104
+ 0.896. Most of self-described rural hunters pack when they go to city. Hoyt Jan 2013 #113
What the hell are you talking about??? antigone382 Jan 2013 #137
You really don't think the bigots in say Georgia don't carry a pistol when the go to Atlanta? Hoyt Jan 2013 #138
I don't know and neither do you. Saying "most" do when you have no clue is irresponsible. antigone382 Jan 2013 #142
I'm sure I am correct. If someone is into AR15s, etc, highly likely they need a gun Hoyt Jan 2013 #143
And how the hell do you know that most rural people are into AR-15s??? antigone382 Jan 2013 #153
Keep up with the discussion, that what this is about. Hoyt Jan 2013 #154
You mean the discussion where you approved of a post that equated rural people to the Taliban? antigone382 Jan 2013 #155
Your calling us rural folks bigots nick of time Jan 2013 #132
Because there are no jobs obamanut2012 Jan 2013 #149
I live in a rural area&they won't vote Dem because they're proud racist anti-intellectual homophobes MightyMopar Jan 2013 #93
good luck feeding the cities without the rural lands. you should move to the city if you think its loli phabay Jan 2013 #97
Much of our food come from corporate farms manned by Mexicans or the immigrants du jour MightyMopar Jan 2013 #109
Tell us. Sissyk Jan 2013 #128
I wondered that, too obamanut2012 Jan 2013 #151
i would imagine he is having to look it up. Sissyk Jan 2013 #152
Yeah, I'm sure you live in a rural area. nick of time Jan 2013 #134
What an ignorant and bigoted post. nt Skip Intro Jan 2013 #96
+1000. nt. nick of time Jan 2013 #133
So, rural voters=hicks and idiots obamanut2012 Jan 2013 #145
Panderland whatchamacallit Jan 2013 #12
No, Leadership, with a capital L. bluestate10 Jan 2013 #64
When did listening and paying attention become pandering? loyalsister Jan 2013 #122
I still think a tax added on ammunition would be a step in the correct direction for even rural... Tikki Jan 2013 #16
There is currently an 11% Federal tax on all guns and ammo Recursion Jan 2013 #21
There is added taxes on taxes to many consumer items...I believe that most hunters.... Tikki Jan 2013 #46
It may have the in intended consequence of deterring people who you refer to Glassunion Jan 2013 #54
Then maybe learning to shoot should be at 'shooting ranges' and let the free market determine.. Tikki Jan 2013 #63
That doesn't adress your idea of higher ammunition costs. Glassunion Jan 2013 #79
I'll be blunt...the idea would be to make ammunition, ultimately, only available... Tikki Jan 2013 #111
If I were a mass killer using a rifle Duckhunter935 Jan 2013 #55
I shoot scores of $2 rounds at the range so I can "shoot sharply" that one round. Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #105
Post removed Post removed Jan 2013 #17
I think a lot of people feel a need for a gun because of the dead children in cities. hedgehog Jan 2013 #34
Stop drug war nt tama Jan 2013 #58
Nah, they are just sane enough to properly place the blame Riftaxe Jan 2013 #59
transfer of guns forthemiddle Jan 2013 #26
that's a good example of the kind of question that needs to be addressed in a hedgehog Jan 2013 #33
The giving of firearms as a gift theKed Jan 2013 #112
The stereotyping of rural voters here is sickening riqster Jan 2013 #36
I live in a rural area and the stereotypes are mostly true MightyMopar Jan 2013 #101
I worked in a rural district last year tabbycat31 Jan 2013 #140
Unpossible! Liberals aren't bigoted, esp. toward rural whites. Unheard of on DU! Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #115
Despite the complaining in this thread, this is exactly the tact a leader is suppose to take. phleshdef Jan 2013 #38
re: tact versus tack cthulu2016 Jan 2013 #50
LOL. Not really sure what you are getting at. phleshdef Jan 2013 #62
He is right. mainer Jan 2013 #40
It should be about being sensible, I grew up in rural area, family of hunters, Thinkingabout Jan 2013 #82
If society is going to make progress on this issue (as we have on many other social issues), Moses2SandyKoufax Jan 2013 #42
As a rural gun owner Oneka Jan 2013 #72
You got that right. Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #117
What an odd, passive headline... AP's was more accurate. cthulu2016 Jan 2013 #44
Crimony pete shenmue Jan 2013 #52
Well played Pres. Heimer Jan 2013 #69
Be nicer if Obama would devote this much attention to poverty Demo_Chris Jan 2013 #71
Would be nice if many DUers would pay such attention as well. Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #116
Yeah, but there it is. Demo_Chris Jan 2013 #121
I agree goodness I agree. aptal Jan 2013 #123
You are so right amandabeech Jan 2013 #160
Unfortunately he is correct....... Swede Atlanta Jan 2013 #73
You know, when people get that bent out of shape, amandabeech Jan 2013 #161
Thank You, President Obama....and KUDOS bvar22 Jan 2013 #83
I agree with you, and K&R Populist_Prole Jan 2013 #86
Please, like rural gun lovers haven't been catered to up the wazoo already. MotherPetrie Jan 2013 #87
+1 Moses2SandyKoufax Jan 2013 #88
Obama = Bill CLinton = moderate rethugs/DLCr's. Peregrine Took Jan 2013 #108
That's a great gun post. longship Jan 2013 #110
The difference between urban and rural gun owners... krispos42 Jan 2013 #119
we HAVE listened to them Skittles Jan 2013 #124
"I need a hunting rifle in case there's a deer in the elevator." n/t Ian David Jan 2013 #126
LOL! mmonk Jan 2013 #130
He's right. And suburban voices, and voices from other kinds of communities. slackmaster Jan 2013 #150
 

loli phabay

(5,580 posts)
1. i think he gets there is a rural urban gap here and weapons are seen differently depending where
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 04:41 PM
Jan 2013

You are.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
3. Yep, don't know anyone who has a problem with hunters as long as that's their true intent.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 04:52 PM
Jan 2013

Unfortunately, too many say they are hunters while tucking a gun in their pants or wherever when visiting the city, or stocking up on guns marketed as tactical/strategic/assault weapons.

 

loose wheel

(112 posts)
156. Strategic assault weapons?
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 01:32 PM
Jan 2013

Seriously. A strategic assault weapon is something like a large bomber (B-1, B-2, Super fortress, that sort of thing) or an intercontinental ballistic missile.

What your calling an assault weapon is extremely useful thing when your trying to get rid of prairie dogs or rabbits in the crops.

Weapons are nothing more than tools. Any tool in the wrong hands can create havoc.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
157. Tell it to these gun dealers/profiteers
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 01:47 PM
Jan 2013


www.strategicguns.com/

http://www.haleystrategic.com/training.php

www.strategictacticalgroup.com/train_schedule.html

To name a few selling TOOLS of mass destruction to people who obviously aren't interested in shooting rabBits, prarie dogs, etc. Training with targets that resemble people ain't preparing you to control varmits on the farm -- which my granddad did with a .22 quite well.


I guess these Michigan Militia members are training to shoot rabbits in the garden:





Confirming my experience, guns may also make people more aggressive:

http://huntingindiana.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=campfire&action=print&thread=8427


Yeah, they are just "tools" . . . . . .
 

loose wheel

(112 posts)
158. Guns do not make people agressive...
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 06:14 PM
Jan 2013

...any more than a spoon makes people hungry.

Also, the Michigan militia is an organized and recognized organization. Some of their courses are recognized as acceptable to achieve an EMT liscense.

I've seen hunting parties for deer that looked just about like that. Their hunting method guarantees kills but have always been highly distasteful to me. I hunt with a similar weapon, but I prefer stalk hunting.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
159. I bet your hunting party did look like that if you think Michigan Milita is a
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 07:48 PM
Jan 2013

"recognized organization" by anyone other than the SPLC. You guys crack me up.

 

loose wheel

(112 posts)
162. Not much different...
Thu Jan 31, 2013, 10:36 AM
Jan 2013

The hunters used larger caliber semi-auto rifles.

The Michigan militia is active in disaster response and search and rescue, for which they train. The Michigan Militia actively works with the American Red Cross and has been used in five operations including natural disasters and searcha and rescue.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_Militia

I know of at least one individual that was able to become an EMT because of them.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
163. Who cares? Confederate flags, Tbag flags, guns and white racists aren't my kind of organization.
Thu Jan 31, 2013, 11:14 AM
Jan 2013



 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
98. Oh, you mean the post where Bill Clinton said much the same...
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 09:37 PM
Jan 2013

Never thought I'd see the day when Clinton and Obama were using DU to "sound" out gun and cultural topics.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
135. . . . before you crossed the tracks? ;-)
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 02:05 PM
Jan 2013

My original comment wasn't meant to be teasing or provocative, at all. Really.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
28. The guy in the middle looks like my uncle. He has two STEM PhDs
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 05:39 PM
Jan 2013

And holds 20 patents.

He also shoots his AR on his farm. Your point is?

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
70. The guy on the left looks like my cousin...
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 07:36 PM
Jan 2013

He barely graduated high school and is now a tea-party Republican who believes Obama is a Muslim, communist who wants to take their guns.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
85. No. Just a reminder that we don't know dick about those 3 guys
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 09:09 PM
Jan 2013

Statistically, at least one of them is probably a Democrat.

 

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)
29. Um, what does the guy in the middle have between his legs there? Is that a white cane for the blind?
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 05:40 PM
Jan 2013

I don't think blind people should own guns, for safety reasons...

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
103. It IS a Golf club.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 09:46 PM
Jan 2013

I live way out in The Woods with lots of rural gun owners,
and I don't know any who carry golf clubs.
These guys look more like Suburban Rambo Wannabes than anybody I know out here living off the Land.
These look like the the kind of guys who leave the comforts of the city once a year,
hit the Woods
get drunk,
and shoot at anything that moves,
all the while thinking they are Great White Hunters.


These people scare those of us who actually live out here.

Benton D Struckcheon

(2,347 posts)
35. On a more serious note...
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 05:51 PM
Jan 2013

...someone here pointed out there's a Federal tax on guns & ammo that pays for stuff the Fish & Wildlife service does. Those of you who count yourselves environmentalists, think about this: large swatches of land were preserved from development for hunters. They were the original preservationists.
There's a lot to think about here, and calling each other names ain't gonna get us nowhere.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
43. Well if hunting is the purported purpose of the image
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:22 PM
Jan 2013

the guy on the left has chosen a low caliber, likely illegal for it.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
67. Even a .22 will skin the squirrel for you
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 07:27 PM
Jan 2013

best to stick to pellet guns, a 9mm like that one would make hunting a squirrel pointless. If your hunting squirrels hopefully it would only be for the skin, because they define the definition of "gamey" and you need a lot of them for a meal.

Kali

(56,829 posts)
6. another bit of impressive "getting it" that President Obama has
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 05:05 PM
Jan 2013

I don't necessarily agree that only rural hunters should be the ones to have guns (I tend to go with the constitution on this right) but just the fact that an urban politician could see and say something like that is kind of impressive to me.

It is interesting who he is suggesting needs to listen, too.

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
32. Obama's smart enough to know that liberal can get carried away very easily on this issue.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 05:43 PM
Jan 2013

I'm already hearing/reading serious liberals talking about getting rid of the 2nd Amendment. O_O
 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
7. What a weird thing to say. NO ONE is trying to take away your hunting rifles.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 05:07 PM
Jan 2013

I don't see an AR-15 on this top 10 hunting rifle list: http://www.americanhunter.org/articles/best-deer-rifles-today/

 

loli phabay

(5,580 posts)
8. thats deer rifles. an ar is better for stuff like hogs or coyotes or just used target shooting.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 05:09 PM
Jan 2013
 

stultusporcos

(327 posts)
22. You must not be a very good shot and need multiple clips to hit a critter
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 05:25 PM
Jan 2013

The Barrett has all the stopping power you will need to kill hogs and coyote's.

I swear I don't know how the west was settled with just a plain old Winchester 1873 lordy how did they stop all them critters and injuns with a lever action rifle!!!

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
47. Well, to become a good shot one should practice.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:28 PM
Jan 2013

Let say you want to sight in and practice with 100 rounds.


Barrett .50 m107a1 = $13,289
100 rounds of .50 = $480
Total = $13,769

AR15 .223 = $850
100 rounds of .223 = $77
Total = $927

If I could afford a Barrett I'd rather spend my money on a new Chevy Sonic
If I could afford a new AR I'd rather spend my money on a new guitar.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
78. Aww - sweet! I have a brother-in-law who says he'll trade me his '58 Historic VOS
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 08:18 PM
Jan 2013

for my Taylor 815. (he doesn't like the neck and is getting a new Standard)

Had a couple Traditionals come and go, and a couple studios, but that VOS should be a keeper!
You are definitely much further along then I am though...I hope you get one you want!


Cheers!

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
80. I'm looking for a couple of LP Standards to add to the collection
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 08:20 PM
Jan 2013

But damnit they ain't cheap.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
81. LOL- you aint kidding. Well - I hope you find a nice one you can afford! Good luck! nt
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 08:21 PM
Jan 2013

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
120. Another sweet choice..bud at work has beaut he wouldn't live without.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 10:27 PM
Jan 2013

Always a bit much $$ for me, but Im sure I bought & traded enough Gibsons gretsch and Fenders away that 1 would have been worthwhile.

derby378

(30,262 posts)
91. If I really wanted a Barrett, I'd go with the REC7
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 09:27 PM
Jan 2013

AR platform, but chambered in 6.8 SPC. Range, muzzle velocity, stopping power. Uses a gas piston, too, so it should be about as reliable as a decent AK.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
45. I don't see a prius in the top 10 of owned cars
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:26 PM
Jan 2013

presumably owned for transportation...we should ban them too

You tend to not see them very much in states with any noticeable weather differences between seasons. Even if you could force it to start, it would probably be shit in 6"+ of snow.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
68. All over would be a bit presumptious
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 07:30 PM
Jan 2013

considering the sales to non government agencies is abysmal, what is their rating as petrol only vehicles.

 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
77. You can find a Prius in any town in Alaska connected by roadway.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 08:14 PM
Jan 2013

There are more Prius then sports cars in Alaska.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
102. Surely you've seen the posts here that talk about banning all guns...
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 09:40 PM
Jan 2013

and generally deride anyone who owns a gun? The posts about "gun-nuts" as being anyone who owns a gun or supports the 2nd Amendment? Anyone who has a gun in the home for defense?

There is a faction of the left that does in fact want to ban all guns, although those people are few, and that will never happen. But it makes rural people leery of any proposal by the left to control guns.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
10. no, by and large, we already know what the hicks and idiots think
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 05:12 PM
Jan 2013

About this, don't we.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
18. when you are dealing with the folks pictured in post #5
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 05:20 PM
Jan 2013

By and large, it is the proper response. There is a whole lot more than a grain of truth in the stereotypes of what many of the country bumpkin folk believe and think about this topic.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
19. Looks like my uncle, who I bet is smarter than both of us
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 05:21 PM
Jan 2013

He has two PhD's from Rice, one in physics and one in mathematics.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
27. so, there are always exceptions
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 05:38 PM
Jan 2013

If you really think any of those guys in the pic are on that level of intellectual achievement, I got some great unspoiled land to offer you, real cheap. On Mars.

obamanut2012

(29,369 posts)
147. How do you know that?
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 06:26 PM
Jan 2013

You don't.

Lots of good old boys and gals have advanced degrees, as well as smarts. Stereotypes are not only odious, but often wrong.

Kali

(56,829 posts)
41. consider this a disparaging personal attack that has been hidden by a jury
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:19 PM
Jan 2013

from one of the people you just insulted.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
48. Ahh so it's the looks
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:30 PM
Jan 2013

Were you the guy at the '86 Ozzie concert in Kingston with the no fat chicks T-shirt? Trying to put a face to the moniker....

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
84. Well,
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 08:58 PM
Jan 2013

Last edited Sun Jan 27, 2013, 09:49 PM - Edit history (1)

..should we assume that the stereotype of the castrated, corpo slave, cubicle dwelling, pasty faced, pear shaped, weak, latte drinking, whiney assed, smug, Limousine Liberal city dweller is accurate too?

Sissyk

(12,665 posts)
127. Do you really think those guys are rural?
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 12:37 PM
Jan 2013

I know rural people. Those are suburban wanna-be hunters out for a day in the country. Hell, probably not even the country. Woody side of the country club golf course probably.

obamanut2012

(29,369 posts)
146. You have no idea those guys are rural
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 06:25 PM
Jan 2013

They could very easily be from either the city or suburbs or exurbs.

You have no idea they are idiots.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
51. Not really fair, there is a lot involved
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:34 PM
Jan 2013

in driving half a mile down to the local Taco Bell to procure food too...You have to find the keys, and the adjustment of the sun visor is crucial (dang sun keeps moving), and that even barely touches the skills need to shift a gear or properly operate the vehicle!

Lordquinton

(7,886 posts)
74. And then Ruralites wonder why they don't get the respect they think they deserve
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 07:54 PM
Jan 2013

just for "living tougher"

Who do you think buys the food farmers grow? We're all interconnected, and I see far more mud being slung from the rural folks and when it gets hurled back they are merely the victims of intolerant liberals.

 

loli phabay

(5,580 posts)
94. no interest in getting respect from the citidiots just want them to stay off my property
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 09:33 PM
Jan 2013

And stop blocking my drriveway to go hiking. Fed up getting them towed for parking on my property.

theKed

(1,235 posts)
107. About as bad as the rural folk
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 09:57 PM
Jan 2013

who disparage the city folk. On their computer. On the internet.

 

MightyMopar

(735 posts)
95. Why should urban people even want to talk with someone like you.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 09:34 PM
Jan 2013

I bet when your kid is deathly sick you can't get to a major city fast enough.

I've found that rural people are far more bigoted and close minded than urban people. Wonder why rural people kids are leaving the small towns in droves?

 

loli phabay

(5,580 posts)
100. and yet you seem to be the one who is bigoted. i just know that assholes live everywhere.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 09:38 PM
Jan 2013
 

MightyMopar

(735 posts)
104. I'm the bigot who has to keep his mouth shut while they talk about "Martin Luther Coon" day
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 09:47 PM
Jan 2013

In most rural areas one can't even admit one is a Democrat. To live in a city, one has to be somewhat open minded just to survive, in rural areas most people live a in a bubble of disreality. Most of these rural people have more in common with the Taliban than with progressive Dems or even old mainstream Republicans.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
113. + 0.896. Most of self-described rural hunters pack when they go to city.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 10:03 PM
Jan 2013

They fear all those minorities, and stuff. Point is, most don't have their guns just for hunting, or varmits.

Our DUers may be different from the Tbaggers, but their support of guns sure sounds much the same at times.

Above does not apply to those who leave their guns on their farm, where they belong.

antigone382

(3,682 posts)
137. What the hell are you talking about???
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 04:08 PM
Jan 2013

Could you please provide a statistic for the number of hunters who carry their guns into the city with them? Or did you just make it up because it confirms your prejudices? I've lived most of my life in rural areas and I have never heard of anyone carrying their guns with them into the city when they go.

I support stricter gun control laws but some of the broad brush comments in this thread are beyond ridiculous. For crying out loud, people who live in the country aren't cave trolls. We wear shoes and we have TV and even the Internet now and then. And for the record, there are people of color in rural areas as well. I know black, Latino, and Native Cherokee people in my hometown, I know people in interracial relationships, I know gays and lesbians, I know people of all political and religious stripes, in one of the poorest and most rural areas of the state of Tennessee.

Rural areas are where some of the richest parts of American culture--music and dance styles, rich foodways, crafts & other skills, vernacular architecture, and story-telling are all present here.

And you can't make a broad brush attack and then disclaim any responsibility for its bigotry by saying it doesn't apply to the few who don't conform to it.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
138. You really don't think the bigots in say Georgia don't carry a pistol when the go to Atlanta?
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 04:24 PM
Jan 2013

You can't be serious.

Hey, I have a bunch of banjos and can milk a cow, but I know the yahoos who are into guns too.

antigone382

(3,682 posts)
142. I don't know and neither do you. Saying "most" do when you have no clue is irresponsible.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 06:04 PM
Jan 2013

Offer a statistic or retract the claim. Or I guess I can just assume that you have no problem throwing around assertions that have no basis in known fact, and keep that in mind for future discussions.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
143. I'm sure I am correct. If someone is into AR15s, etc, highly likely they need a gun
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 06:11 PM
Jan 2013

close by to feel comfortable.

antigone382

(3,682 posts)
153. And how the hell do you know that most rural people are into AR-15s???
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 07:15 PM
Jan 2013

That is another unfounded assumption piled on top of the first one.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
154. Keep up with the discussion, that what this is about.
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 08:28 PM
Jan 2013

Do I have to point everything out to you, even if it is a given or obvious?

antigone382

(3,682 posts)
155. You mean the discussion where you approved of a post that equated rural people to the Taliban?
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 01:20 PM
Jan 2013

That comment didn't mention anything about variations in attitudes towards or use of guns. It was part of a larger sub-thread filled with broad-brush attacks against people who don't live in the city (and admittedly, some unnecessary swipes at urban people too).

The bottom line is that I have lived in rural areas most of my life and I've studied rural sociology so I know that these attacks are crap. Adding unfounded assertions that you *still* have not backed up with any concrete facts was the last straw for me.

I would gladly support people who can speak from their experience in cities to discredit silly stereotypes of them as well. But I only have so much time to post and I'm going to prioritize the intellectual defense of the places and people that I know and love, as they are more regularly misrepresented and stereotyped here.

 

MightyMopar

(735 posts)
93. I live in a rural area&they won't vote Dem because they're proud racist anti-intellectual homophobes
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 09:28 PM
Jan 2013

They think Democrats would be weak for even reaching out to them. I bet if the government did come for their guns, most of their families and neighbors would be secretly happy. I talked to one yesterday who said she would never need a passport because would never want to travel outside the USA. Our limited resources are better spent on urban people, women and minorities than appeasing people who will never join us. Most rural voters have more in common with the Taliban than with progressive Dems.

 

loli phabay

(5,580 posts)
97. good luck feeding the cities without the rural lands. you should move to the city if you think its
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 09:36 PM
Jan 2013

Utopia.

 

MightyMopar

(735 posts)
109. Much of our food come from corporate farms manned by Mexicans or the immigrants du jour
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 09:58 PM
Jan 2013

or from Mexico itself or even from China. There's nothing really special about about white rural farmers anymore. I grew up in rural America and live there now because it's cheap to run some businesses in the country because rent and wages are pitiful low, but education and skills are also very low.

Sissyk

(12,665 posts)
128. Tell us.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 12:44 PM
Jan 2013

Why don't you tell us where this fictional rural area is that you supposedly live.

obamanut2012

(29,369 posts)
151. I wondered that, too
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 06:30 PM
Jan 2013

After the anti South OP of earlier today.

I've lived in the rural South most of my life, and never never heard or saw most of the stuff in this and that other thread. For some, Southern=militia or white power group member. It's insane.

Sissyk

(12,665 posts)
152. i would imagine he is having to look it up.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 07:33 PM
Jan 2013

Then he will come back and tell us where he is. lol!

For such a liberal board, the south bashing is some of the worst I have seen any where.

obamanut2012

(29,369 posts)
145. So, rural voters=hicks and idiots
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 06:23 PM
Jan 2013

OMG.

This would include my two very educated parents, both of whom vote Democratic?

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
64. No, Leadership, with a capital L.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 07:12 PM
Jan 2013

The President is saying what any reasonable person understands. Rural people view gun ownership differently from urban people. In order to get gun laws that work, the discussion must include both groups. I don't own a gun and don't see any reason to own one, but my view shouldn't be forced upon my rural siblings, who do own guns.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
122. When did listening and paying attention become pandering?
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 11:39 PM
Jan 2013

He gives a damn what people think. Have we become so cynical that we now consider it pandering if a politician takes an interest in a culture they have not lived?

Tikki

(15,140 posts)
16. I still think a tax added on ammunition would be a step in the correct direction for even rural...
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 05:17 PM
Jan 2013

gun/rifle/shotgun owners. Making each bullet count should be as important as owning a weapon....
and if you just want to target practice you should pay to play..


Tikki

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
21. There is currently an 11% Federal tax on all guns and ammo
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 05:23 PM
Jan 2013

It funds most state Interior and Fish & Wildlife departments

Tikki

(15,140 posts)
46. There is added taxes on taxes to many consumer items...I believe that most hunters....
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:27 PM
Jan 2013

are sharp shooters (not much waste) and more expensive ammunition will
discourage wanna~bees from just shooting to shoot.



Tikki

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
54. It may have the in intended consequence of deterring people who you refer to
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:39 PM
Jan 2013

as sharp shooters from practicing.

I was asked recently how many rounds I needed to kill a deer. My reply was thousands. The first few thousand are for practice the last 1 is for the deer (actually elk in my case).

I am taxed every time I go out and play my guitar for money. I am also taxed every time I buy strings. Now I will go through several sets of strings just for practice. If they were taxed through the roof I would choose not to practice. Thus hurting my performance when the time came to play.

Tikki

(15,140 posts)
63. Then maybe learning to shoot should be at 'shooting ranges' and let the free market determine..
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 07:12 PM
Jan 2013

which ranges are the most affordable.
For many of us ammunition conservation is a health and safety and environmental issue.


Tikki

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
79. That doesn't adress your idea of higher ammunition costs.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 08:19 PM
Jan 2013

The price of the range is whatever, but the ammunition would still be expensive for even the best shooter to practice with.

All of the best shooters in the world fire thousands of rounds in practice before hunting or competing.

Your idea would dissuade hunters and competitors from practicing.

Tikki

(15,140 posts)
111. I'll be blunt...the idea would be to make ammunition, ultimately, only available...
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 10:00 PM
Jan 2013

through and at shooting ranges where all shooting except actual hunting (during season, limited amount of ammunition)
including learning to shoot would be conducted.
The free-market would determine the cost....the American way, eh?

I don't want you to have free reign over my turf if you are totting a gun around. Weapons have consequences
..not just accidentally to health and life but, also, environmentally.

Tikki



 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
55. If I were a mass killer using a rifle
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:40 PM
Jan 2013

a few dollars in taxes is really going to stop me

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
105. I shoot scores of $2 rounds at the range so I can "shoot sharply" that one round.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 09:54 PM
Jan 2013

Response to YoungDemCA (Original post)

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
34. I think a lot of people feel a need for a gun because of the dead children in cities.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 05:49 PM
Jan 2013

All too often, young kids are caught in cross fire between older teens and adults. People shooting at other people they know personally are not a hazard to anonymous suburbanites unless they happen to get caught in the crossfire, too. Yes, I know there are such things as house invasions and hold-ups, but it seems to me most gun crimes involve someone settling a personal dispute.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
59. Nah, they are just sane enough to properly place the blame
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:46 PM
Jan 2013

really sucks during a which hunt, which is why rural America should be ignored.

forthemiddle

(1,459 posts)
26. transfer of guns
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 05:37 PM
Jan 2013

So will the background checks legislation bypass this type of transfer? In If it does that would alleviate a lot of the trepidation from rural voters.
Guns have been handed down for generations yet I understood that under new background check previsions they would no longer be allowed.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
33. that's a good example of the kind of question that needs to be addressed in a
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 05:44 PM
Jan 2013

very clear fashion. A similar situation is giving a new firearm as a gift at Christmas or birthday to a teenager. Lots of hunting rifles are given as gifts. Quite seriously, provisions need to be made to accommodate these customs.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
36. The stereotyping of rural voters here is sickening
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 05:55 PM
Jan 2013

If that sort of thing were directed at, say, women or blacks, all y'all would be marching with torches and pitchforks. But it's apparently OK to dehumanize people who live in rural areas.

And Liberals wonder why so many country folks vote Red. Bigoted fucks, if I weren't well informed, I'd vote against Dems too after all the abuse they hand people like me.

 

MightyMopar

(735 posts)
101. I live in a rural area and the stereotypes are mostly true
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 09:39 PM
Jan 2013

When I moved to a small town because of work, they asked how could I be a Democrat because I wasn't black, wasn't gay and worked hard.

tabbycat31

(6,336 posts)
140. I worked in a rural district last year
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 05:01 PM
Jan 2013

And while some of the stereotypes are true, that is not the case for all rural voters.

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
38. Despite the complaining in this thread, this is exactly the tact a leader is suppose to take.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:01 PM
Jan 2013

President Obama already put forward a set of gun control proposals that include assault weapon bans and mag limits and a ton of other regulations, studies and proposals that we need. A big chunk of this country is against any gun control whatsoever. Barack Obama is their President too. This is their country too. And unless he can win over the constituencies of a considerable number of Republicans and rural Democrats on some of these measures he has proposed, then theres very little chance of any of this stuff getting passed, even the stuff that both sides would normally agree on if politics weren't in the way.

I don't know why so many other liberals get offended when this President acts like the level headed statesman that he is. I guess I should be glad they are keyboard warrior-ing on DU instead of having an actual leadership role in government, otherwise this government would get even less done than it already does.

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
50. re: tact versus tack
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:33 PM
Jan 2013

Just a FYI for folks reading the thread.

An approach to action, a plan, a technique are called something that sounds like tact, and tact is like tactic so it is perfectly sensible that many of us hear the term as "tact," by the term is actually '"tack," referring to a path taken by a sailing ship realtive to the positioning of its sail(s), like "tacking into the wind."

A case where the obvious ("tact" appears to make a lot of sense) happens not to be right.

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
62. LOL. Not really sure what you are getting at.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 07:02 PM
Jan 2013

But I was using tact as in "Acute sensitivity to what is proper and appropriate in dealing with others, including the ability to speak or act without offending."

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/tact

mainer

(12,554 posts)
40. He is right.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:10 PM
Jan 2013

Our family is split down the middle on this issue. One son lives in a rural area, where hunting and farming is part of the culture. Kids there grow up understanding that guns are tools, and they understand and respect them.

The other son can't understand the necessity of guns, is afraid of them, and thinks the whole country should be disarmed.

There's no bridging that gap in opinion, either around our family dinner table, or in this country. I can see both sides of the issue, and it behooves Democrats to be open to hearing from rural voters as well.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
82. It should be about being sensible, I grew up in rural area, family of hunters,
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 08:33 PM
Jan 2013

Still participate in hunting and do not see any reason to use weapons of war and high capacity magazines to hunt. In fact everyone around would be making fun of the hunter who needed to shoot numerous times and did nit get the game. The hunter who needs the large capacities needs practice and training. There are other issues also with mental health, video games and movies, perhaps the paint ball games also. Do guns, ammo and magazine size need to be regulated, sure does, the only ones who needs weapons of war is military and law enforcement. Don't blame those who sees the need for regulation, we are not in the mass shootings, get mad at the crazy portion who are guilty, they will be the ones who caused gun regulation. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!!!!

Moses2SandyKoufax

(1,290 posts)
42. If society is going to make progress on this issue (as we have on many other social issues),
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:21 PM
Jan 2013

it might be a better strategy to just ignore those conservative rural voices. Focus on the suburban women who are either indifferent to this issue, or who's minds can be changed. The rural demographic is shrinking, and mostly hostile toward our goals anyway.

Oneka

(653 posts)
72. As a rural gun owner
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 07:47 PM
Jan 2013

i am sure glad that we live under a constitution, where a simple majority, can not impose it's will on the despised minority, where constitutionally protected, individual, rights are concerned.

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
44. What an odd, passive headline... AP's was more accurate.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:25 PM
Jan 2013

The operative verb is to listen, not to be heard. The call is for gun-control people to act differently (to listen), not for rural voices to speak louder or more clearly.

(Reuters) - President Barack Obama urged gun control advocates to listen to views of rural Americans who use guns for hunting and said bridging a cultural divide in attitudes to gun ownership will be critical to his administration's push to curb gun violence.

shenmue

(38,598 posts)
52. Crimony pete
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:34 PM
Jan 2013

A voice of intelligence and fairness in the gun debate? Careful, some people can't handle that.

 

Demo_Chris

(6,234 posts)
71. Be nicer if Obama would devote this much attention to poverty
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 07:41 PM
Jan 2013

Poverty, wealth and income inequality, healthcare costs, drug costs, ending the war on drugs, ending the war in Afghanistan, ending the Patriot act, ending Free Trade, repairing our infrastructure, bringing these banksters to justice, taxing the god-dammed wealthy, JOBS...

You know, the shit that EVERYONE wants and that doesn't require a constitutional convention to accomplish.

But hey, that's just me being me.

aptal

(304 posts)
123. I agree goodness I agree.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 12:31 AM
Jan 2013

I have been thinking this for weeks.

IMO, it is the least of our problems.

We have people dying on the streets of poverty, inability to get healthcare, etc... and they are making this their staple issue.

 

amandabeech

(9,893 posts)
160. You are so right
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 08:36 PM
Jan 2013

about the President and about folks here on DU.

JOBS! And decent ones.

It seems that no one in politics cares what happens here to most people.

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
73. Unfortunately he is correct.......
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 07:50 PM
Jan 2013

I grew up in a rural community in the inter-mountain west where people had guns, primarily for hunting. Even though crime continues to be relatively low, many have begun to position firearms in their homes and businesses to protect themselves from "bad guys".

As I have engaged with some of my former classmates, neighbors, etc. on the issue of gun control, I realize they have all bought into the idea that Obama is out to get them. While they generally agree that reasonable gun control measures such as universal background checks are a good idea they say that they would agree to that if the President was a Republican. But they firmly believe that Barack is going to come get their guns and make them do what? Work on a plantation? I don't know. The exchanges are chaotic and it is clear to me they are delusional but are energized by Rush, Hannity and the rest.

 

amandabeech

(9,893 posts)
161. You know, when people get that bent out of shape,
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 08:40 PM
Jan 2013

something else is bothering them.

I'm from a rural area in the Midwest, and lots of people feel that the country that they grew up in, which they liked, isn't the same and they haven't even been consulted on the change.

I understand what they're talking about, but it's hard for me to put it into words.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
83. Thank You, President Obama....and KUDOS
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 08:50 PM
Jan 2013

from this rural Liberal Democratic gun owner
who has attempted to make this very point on DU despite the shit storms whipped up by those in a hysterical frenzy.




<snip>
"I am one of the many, many responsible Liberal Democrats who owns guns,
and will continue to do so. We support Common Sense, effective regulation.
Some people should never have access to fire arms.
[font size=3]Gun Regulation would also need to take into account the vast difference between Urban Dwellers, and those of us who live Out Here. [/font]---bvar22

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2049560

Peregrine Took

(7,583 posts)
108. Obama = Bill CLinton = moderate rethugs/DLCr's.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 09:58 PM
Jan 2013

Can't stand either one of them. Had to hold my nose to vote for them.

longship

(40,416 posts)
110. That's a great gun post.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 10:00 PM
Jan 2013

Thank you very much.

I live in a very rural (national forest) area. Guns for hunting are basically standard. Many people I know hunt for food, with deer and wild turkey at the top of the menu. If people did not hunt here we would be overcome with deer and many would just starve.

Hunting here is good ecology, and it feeds many rural people who don't have the luxury of an investment account.

I do not have a gun, and I do not hunt. But that's my choice. Nevertheless, I have to support gun ownership being fairly liberally interpreted.

Nota bene: I will not get into over parsing that last statement. But, the words "fairly" and "liberally" may be a clue. Nor will I get into a flame war here.

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
119. The difference between urban and rural gun owners...
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 10:27 PM
Jan 2013

...is that the percentage of gun owners in cities that use them to hunt is much smaller than in rural areas.

If you own guns and live in a major city or urban peripheral area, then you probably have them for self-defense/home defense purposes. Your guns will therefore be optimized for that purpose.

Examples: semi-automatic handguns, mid-power revolvers, compact semiautomatic rifles in light calibers, compact pump-action and semi-auto shotguns, and pistol-caliber carbines.

If you own guns and live in a rural area or small rural town, or a modest city surrounded by rural land, then you probably have them primarily for hunting/recreational purposes, with self defense a secondary consideration. Your guns will probably be optimized for hunting&recreation with secondary self-defense usage, or you'll have several guns optimized for hunting/recreation and one or two for self-defense.

Examples: long-barreled, high-powered revolvers, bolt-action or semiautomatic rifles with long barrels in medium to heavy calibers, lever-action rifles with medium-length barrels in medium to heavy calibers, long-barreled pump and break-action shotguns.

Suburban owners probably have a more even mix. They tend to vacation to hunting areas.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama says rural voices n...