General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhovian
(2,866 posts)hlthe2b
(113,973 posts)May she somehow shame all the other reluctant DEMS to stand up and reverse these trends.
CTyankee
(68,202 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)I love the pic and quote in the OP! Absolutely LOVE it!!!
Please PLEASE may her integrity rub off on her colleagues
homegirl
(1,965 posts)Left Coast2020
(2,397 posts)Her message would resonate with people...hands down! I would love to have her as our first female president. But don't you wonder what she is thinking now that she is a Senator? With recognition?
xchrom
(108,903 posts)myrna minx
(22,772 posts)k and r

HCE SuiGeneris
(14,997 posts)sheshe2
(97,634 posts)We are very proud to call her our Senior Senator from MA. She is going to do wonderful things for America.
Moving Forward!
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)The Powell memo lays out the last 30 years of the right wing agenda in detail.
It is the blueprint that has been followed assiduously.
Bill Moyers Comments Here
http://billmoyers.com/content/the-powell-memo-a-call-to-arms-for-corporations/
Read the Powell memo here
http://reclaimdemocracy.org/powell_memo_lewis/
lastlib
(28,275 posts)eppur_se_muova
(41,945 posts)I had read this earlier, and was just rereading it recently -- had printed it out for someone who needs to read it but isn't open to progressive views -- it's been sitting unread until I picked it up again. Rereading it, I had to stop halfway through because it was making me so angry that these SOBs have gotten everything they wanted, and ruined so many lives to do it. It's been going on for DECADES and yet you still can't get most Americans to notice what's going on, to acknowledge it, or if they've been indoctrinated by the RW, to even acknowledge that it's wrong.
I am one of the 'professoriate' referred to in that article, and thought I was doing OK given the circumstances -- but never could get more than a 1-yr position. Then when the Bu**sh** Recession really began to tighten I found myself unemployed for an extended period. I chalked it up to the economy -- the big bust under Bu**sh**, the further collapse after 9/11, the deepening recession that set in like gangrene after the ruinous Bu**sh** tax cuts and trillion-dollar wars. But in the process of interviewing for jobs over more than a decade I have learned about how funding has declined for every department at every state univ. or college I have visited, while the admins. at those institutions appear to have swallowed hook, line, and sinker the RW arguments that these schools should be run on a free-market business model -- probably the worst idea in education ever (I still remember how it raised my hackles when the Newt gave so much publicity to this idea back in the 90's). When I first read this article I could find not one single point which contradicted anything I had experienced first hand or learned from other faculty second- or third-hand. News in recent years -- usually banished to the minor corners of the M$M, but visible here on DU -- has confirmed the success of big donors with corporatist, anti-democratic agendas (such as the Koch Brothers and Adelson) to warp the priorities of univ. hires and even curricula to their purposes.
When most people use the word 'theory', what they really mean is 'hypothesis'. This particular "conspiracy theory" has advanced well beyond a mere hypothesis -- it now has an accumulated body of evidence to confirm it. For those who have experienced its consequences at first hand, there can be no doubt it is real.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
ProSense
(116,464 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)She didn't "get it" when she was kicked out of Washington after her faux pas of instigating the CFPB - she clearly can't read social cues from Important People.
Now she continues to embarrass herself by partisan attacks like the one in the OP. Doesn't she realize that Republicans and the Third Way have feelings too? These kind of attacks, like her shameless support for returning the filibuster to a state that prevented everything from being blocked all of the time, will only lead to more mistrust.
Somebody needs to tell that woman that we need to do what the Republicans want, or else Republicans will get elected and they'll do what they want. The Third Way understands this, and is out in front, doing what Republicans want before Republicans even know they want it. Warren can learn something from these good people.
And, I hear she's against the badly-needed cuts to Social Security. Unbelievable! The Louis Gohmert of the Left!
Regards,
Third-Way Manny
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"when she was kicked out of Washington after her faux pas of instigating the CFPB"
...that allowed her to run for Senate, and now she's back in Washington.
"I am very pleased that the President has decided to re-nominate Rich Cordray as Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. I worked with Rich to set up the agency and believe he is a strong leader with a proven track record of fighting for consumers and pushing for a level playing field between big banks and smaller financial institutions like community banks and credit unions. The CFPB has had an extraordinary first year and a half - holding credit card companies accountable for cheating consumers and adopting the first set of rules to clean up the mortgage market. Senate confirmation of Rich's nomination will continue this momentum, benefitting families, establishing certainty, and safeguarding the economy as a whole from reckless and dangerous consumer lending."
http://www.warren.senate.gov/record.cfm?id=339361
By Steve Benen
President Obama made two interesting personnel announcements yesterday, nominating Mary Jo White to lead the Security and Exchange Commission, and Richard Cordray to continue leading the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The former is fascinating in its own right -- White's legal career makes her an interesting choice for the SEC -- but it's worth pausing to ponder Cordray's fate.
<...>
You'll recall that President Obama and congressional Democrats created the CFPB in 2010, over the fierce opposition of congressional Republicans and financial industry lobbyists. Elizabeth Warren, now a Democratic senator, helped establish the office, and Obama tasked Cordray with leading the agency.
But that proved to be trickier than it should have been. When Senate Republicans refused to allow a confirmation vote on Cordray's nomination, Obama gave him a recess appointment, along with new members of the National Labor Relations Board. This morning, a federal court said the NLRB appointments were improper since Congress wasn't technically in recess, and though the case didn't involve Cordray specifically, the court's decision creates some uncertainty about the status of his position.
While that's sorted out, the obvious question is straightforward: why can't Cordray get an up-or-down vote?
- more -
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/01/25/16698683-richard-cordrays-uncertain-future
Appeals court: Obama's recess appointments to labor board are unconstitutional
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022258065
malthaussen
(18,572 posts)And I hear she's not even a real American! Some kind of non-White blood in her background...
Fortunately, we won't need to worry about emasculating her in Congress, because, errr, she's a woman...
While it's still too early to talk about recall, we can be happy that she and that Socialist-Nazi-Commie Sanders are just single lonely voices in the wilderness, treated with the contempt they deserve by All The Right People.
Third-Way Manny for President!
-- Mal
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)If elected, I will serve the 99%.
Serve them to the 1%, grilled, with a side of mashed potatoes drizzled with black truffle EVOO.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Think of what Fox News would say?
American wine, only.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Since the Native Americans was in the US before Columbus "discovered" American, then this just might qualify her as an American, wonder how this got confused.
Meaniepants
(19 posts)If you haven't noticed the people have rejected the ideas of the Republicans. If they wish to go full blown tyranny by changing the way votes are counted let them. The road back to democracy will be much easier. The difference between Republican and third " railers" is brand name only. They serve the same masters.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)If Karl Rove's plan to "repair" votes in swing states hadn't been stopped by those awful Anonymous hoodlums, the people's will would have been done.
It wasn't a rejection of RepublicanThirdWay values so much as a failure of the Democrat Party to enforce the existing laws against Anonymous' Kenyan vigilante justice.
Meaniepants
(19 posts)Karl roves attempt a fixing the vote was stopped by the arc of justice not kenyen vigilantes. Third railers are the dccc clinton and Obama. The Republicans are eating their young right now soon to go the way of the wigs. Conservatives are all of a sudden saying we aren't republicans, republicans are those pesky tbaggers.
But in 2010 they were holding hands taking windy walks in the moon light.
The peoples will was done in 12 and you should prolly move on.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)but too many democratic politicians haven't. We cannot even rally up support for tougher gun laws even after all the public uproar. We are the ignored.
treestar
(82,383 posts)And she will not make Republicans vaporize, will she? Maybe she can do that when Obama can't, or something.
Maybe if she were elected President, the Republicans would just disappear in a poof and Nebraska and Idaho will send Senators that will vote along with her.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)"your" intentionally mispelled to make a point.
on edit: Misspelled misspelled because I cant spell.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Last edited Sun Feb 3, 2013, 10:06 PM - Edit history (1)
First there's the whole "Native American" debacle ---then there's the fact that she's too -I'll just say it= "Lefty". The American people are basic centrist-conservative leaning and although she might make it past the primaries pushed by the radical left, she would have no chance in the GE. She's basically Kucinich territory.
I would support Hillary over her for those reasons.
You've convinced me, Manny and I have decided to redub myself "Third-Way Bonobo" as a result. Baby steps. Baby steps.
CanonRay
(16,171 posts)very few others do. Or pretend that they don't.
dotymed
(5,610 posts)It would be a nightmare for the establishment. IF we started campaigning and raising grassroots money NOW then they would have a chance. Sadly, as always, our fellow DU'ers will tell us that unless we vote for the candidate we are allowed to choose from, an "r" will be elected...it happens every four years and it is a common meme on DU.
No matter who we really want to get elected, every four years all we hear is how great the chosen (for "us"
"d" candidate is and if you vote for a different "D" (or democratic socialist), we will be helping to elect the chosen "r" candidate.
The people we need are just "spoilers."
99Forever
(14,524 posts)I could easily vote for her for POTUS in 2016.
Grateful for Hope
(39,320 posts)mountain grammy
(29,035 posts)Along with Bernie Sanders and a few others. My 2 senators and my representative in the House are ok. They're Dems, not as liberal as I'd like, but they're not nuts. We also now have a thin majority in the Statehouse, so we are determined to drag Colorado kicking and screaming into the 21st century! It's a battle, but I'm determined to leave this world a better place for my children and grandchildren, and electing leaders like Elizabeth Warren will sure help.
farminator3000
(2,117 posts)just make an exception on human cloning, just this once...
so there'd be an E Warren haranguing every a-hole republican north of the rio grande!
ananda
(35,152 posts)Thanks.
libtodeath
(2,892 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)I love the way she gets a message across - pointy sharp and crystal clear - and her honesty and just plain courage.
yay Elizabeth - 2016!!!!!
I'm so glad she won that seat.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)The Story of America, 1980-present.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)Maybe DU could sell them?
brutus smith
(685 posts)Harry Reid, are you listening?
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Warren here on DU.
She's sharp1
loudsue
(14,087 posts)appointed by Nixon to the Supreme Court, understands how we came to be in this mess. It was the 1970's version of the PNAC put forth by Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and their ilk.
Fascists all.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)You never hear anyone else putting it quite that way.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Brigid
(17,621 posts)How about that?
treestar
(82,383 posts)People still think the Presidency is the only thing in play. If only she were President! Well, she'd still have only the powers of the Presidency and she'd get called a sellout at the first compromise she'd be forced to make.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Even when Obama had a favorable congress, it was still like eating glass getting anything through.
This is what I find fascinating because so many people attack Obama as if there was another option. The only other option in many of these cases was not to do anything.
His stimulus wasn't big enough - yet it was the largest in American history. Had he gone higher, at least to the point where the difference is more than marginal (1 million extra isn't substantially different - but one billion certainly would be), it would have gone nowhere in the congress. So, it was either scale it down or don't do it at all. You know, it's interesting because initially, some in the White House told Obama not to go big on the stimulus and he decided to go big. Was it big enough? Probably not. But it was as big as we could get.
On healthcare, he had to deal with moderate Democrats and a united Republican Party. Again, he could have conceded nothing and watched, as Bill Clinton did in '93, his healthcare bill flame out - damaging his presidency and the country. Instead, he took an approach which was fairly compromising - but it got done. No other president can say that.
As Mario Cuomo put it once: You campaign in poetry. You govern in prose.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Raster
(21,010 posts)THANK YOU and stay safe!!!
zentrum
(9,870 posts)....for President 2016.
Blue Owl
(59,107 posts)sakabatou
(46,149 posts)It's hard to read.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)with $2.4 trillion of that going to the richest 20%.
PatSeg
(53,214 posts)with so few words. I remember the first time I saw her on Bill Maher's show and in five minutes, she gave an overview of the history of the economy that blew me away. I actually understood it AND it was interesting as well.
tomp
(9,512 posts)capitalism has always tried to impoverish whomever it can. the only thing that changes is the degree of resistance to the natural motion of capitalism. capitalism is always demanding revolution. senator warren can try her best to legislate the evils out of capitalism and I wish her the best. I sincerely doubt her ability to achieve any significant or lasting change in the absence of a TRULY MAJOR mass movement.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)This is the turning point where the ultra crazy billionaires entered politics. That is when the nut -verse got a voice.
Jake2413
(228 posts)keep it coming......
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)We need more people like her.
joeunderdog
(2,563 posts)One of the only local pols I feel is authentic enough to get behind without a second thought. She's real, she's outraged and she's just getting started.
Catch2.2
(629 posts)Simple & straight to the point. Hopefully more will see this and understand. Go Warren!
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Every DEMOCRAT should sound like Elizabeth Warren.
Our current situation and HOW we got here is not hard to understand or explain.
Our current situation is the result of a 30 year long "Bi-Partisan" effort to kill the Working Class,
AND, "they" have WON.
Be careful, Elizabeth!
There are some Democrats who won't be happy with you making waves and rocking their boat.
We don't want to see you Wellstoned.
arikara
(5,562 posts)We need her in Canada too.
DakotaLady
(246 posts)but we kinda don't like to share.
I'm sure you will find a like Canadian among your fine people.
Initech
(108,783 posts)Rider3
(919 posts)I'm so glad she's my SENIOR senator now! YAY!
rocktivity
(45,006 posts)
rocktivity
eridani
(51,907 posts)--2 years in the Senate for national visibility? Oh, wait....
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)and wtf is the democratic going to do about it? it's not like they're powerless bystanders or something.
this party is a rotted piece of shit. we need more warren's.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Or, low IQ and in denial because of your prejudices and delusions.
kentuck
(115,407 posts)Just my own viewpoint.
Drew Richards
(1,558 posts)uponit7771
(93,532 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)That's like putting turpentine on your ice cream.
Skittles
(171,717 posts)what is different about Ms. Warren is she is willing to fight the thieving bastards
liberal N proud
(61,194 posts)Reagan!
Absolutely responsible for every problem we have today.
ReRe
(12,189 posts)...... that she is our ace in the hole. She does know what's happened in the last 40 years. She has studied it, taught it, and lived through it with the rest of us. What we really need is a Democratic House and a larger majority in the Senate in the 2014 mid-term to get something through before the end of Obama's 2nd term. Yes, Senator Elizabeth Warren gets it. She really does!
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)colsohlibgal
(5,276 posts)Well, almost. The slide down started when 3 charismatic liberal voices were brutally slain in the 60s. The big slide did indeed then come from Ronnie on.
Her message needs to be pounded into the heads of people who have been snowed under by pure media propaganda.
It's not rocket science and there are lot's more of us non wealthy than there are wealthy.
The clock is ticking, we need to shelf the Milton Friedman model quickly and for good.
onlyadream
(2,248 posts)AAO
(3,300 posts)smknz
(30 posts)She does indeed get it. I would love to see her as President. Better yet, let's clone her and make her President, Speaker of the house and Senate Majority leader oh and yes the Federal Reserve Chair.
Moostache
(11,179 posts)Clinton-Warren 2016-2023
Warren-Castro 2024-2031
I love Joe Biden and wish him well as a future Secretary of State in the Clinton-Warren Administration...
tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)Flatulo
(5,005 posts)yourout
(8,824 posts)Hope someday she is POTUS.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Eleanor, too.
yourout
(8,824 posts)wielded.
New Nationalism Speech
Theodore Roosevelt
1910
http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?document=501
I stand for the square deal. But when I say that I am for the square deal, I mean not merely that I stand for fair play under the present rules of the game, but that I stand for having those rules changed so as to work for a more substantial equality of opportunity and of reward for equally good service.....
Now, this means that our government, National and State, must be freed from the sinister influence or control of special interests. Exactly as the special interests of cotton and slavery threatened our political integrity before the Civil War, so now the great special business interests too often control and corrupt the men and methods of government for their own profit. We must drive the special interests out of politics. That is one of our tasks to-day. Every special interest is entitled to justice-full, fair, and complete-and, now, mind you, if there were any attempt by mob-violence to plunder and work harm to the special interest, whatever it may be, that I most dislike, and the wealthy man, whomsoever he may be, for whom I have the greatest contempt, I would fight for him, and you would if you were worth your salt. He should have justice. For every special interest is entitled to justice, but not one is entitled to a vote in Congress, to a voice on the bench, or to representation in any public office. The Constitution guarantees protection to property, and we must make that promise good. But it does not give the right of suffrage to any corporation.....
Vice President Warren?
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)moondust
(21,286 posts)I don't know how much she or anybody else can do to turn things around at this late juncture, but understanding the problem is a good first step.
K/R
SemperEadem
(8,053 posts)what does it say?
Scuba
(53,475 posts)"And then about 30 years ago, our country moved in a different direction. New leadership attacked wages. They attacked pensions. They attacked health care. They attacked unions. And now we find ourselves in a very different world from the one our parents and grandparents built. We are now in a world in which the rich skim more off the top in taxes and special deals, and they leave less and less for our schools, for roads and bridges, for medical and scientific researchless to build a future."
SemperEadem
(8,053 posts)idwiyo
(5,113 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)in the last few days, I LOVE THIS WOMAN! Please-oh-please-oh-please-oh-please run for president (Jumping up and down, keeping fingers crossed.) I would actually re-register as a Democrat if she does AND I'll work my ass off for her campaign. Let's see the Party Bosses just try and "Dean Scream" her. Let them just try.
