Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Medieval Tea Party vs. Medieval Liberals (Original Post)
JaneyVee
Feb 2013
OP
NutmegYankee
(16,470 posts)1. Actually that would be ancient.
The medieval age began when the Rome collapsed.
Deep13
(39,157 posts)3. In the West.
The Roman state persisted in the East until the end of the Middle Ages.
NutmegYankee
(16,470 posts)4. I know. Constantinople 1453
Deep13
(39,157 posts)7. I was just reading about that last week.
Apparently, at that time it was just a husk of a city with maybe 30k villagers within the wall. Once the Ottomans took over, the city had a kind of rebirth. The Turks restored much of the infrastructure--fixing the damage caused by the 4th Crusade, among other things, and after about a century, the population was around 400k.
NutmegYankee
(16,470 posts)8. A lot of that downsizing was from the Ottomans.
They conquered the surrounding provinces first then moved onto the weakened capital. The "empire" had been starved of money and trade for many years.
Deep13
(39,157 posts)9. Yup, cities can't be isolated. nt
Deep13
(39,157 posts)2. ancient, not medieval
The Middle Ages did not really begin until the collapse of the Imperial slave state in Western Europe in the sixth century or so.
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)5. Hillarious!
Initech
(107,962 posts)6. If the Tea Party had been around during the revolution we'd still be under British rule.
