General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOne thing NOBODY is talking aobut with Dorner, LAPD....
L.A.P.D. shot up the paper delivery truck 64 times. 64 times. With people (targets) inside the truck unable to flee or even move. Neither of the occupants are dead.
Then there's the surfer do0o0od who was fired on by Torrance Cops. Trapped in his truck as well. And he didn't even get hit. Over 30 shots. And they all missed.
Now it would seem to me that these are trained officers who have tons and tons of experience with firearms. But they can't hit anything in the heat of battle (For lack of a better word). 65 shots and not one kill shot (Thankfully). Where did all the rounds go? All over the neighborhood?
monmouth3
(3,871 posts)Bennyboy
(10,440 posts)If it weren't so tragic.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)One of the victims took two bullets in the back, the other got one in the hand.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Neighbors cars, trees were peppered, but not the intended victims.
On one level, thank God!
On the "serve and protect" level --
Seriously? You can't hit a damned thing?
And then there's the notion of more guns being the answer. These trained killers cannot hit a god damned thing even when no one is shooting at them. What about your average idiot on the street with a permit?
oldbanjo
(690 posts)put a deer in front of them and they can't hit it, the cops are the same their getting nervous. I have hunted a lot and never get nervous. Everybody is different.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)2% hit rate? Talk about spray and pray. These guys are a danger to the public.
randome
(34,845 posts)If they were shooting at the two individuals standing apart from the truck, they would likely have had better 'luck'.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)I'd say that is a good thing.
Though Zimmerman shot one person and killed him dead.
And Dorner shot those people dead.
that says the cops are not assasssinators.
Which is a good thing.
(now the NYC cops that shoot people 41, 50 times).
But collateral damage, injuries by non-enforcement all can be prevented if we only get rid of guns and bullets from the street.
legal and illegal.
farminator3000
(2,117 posts)did you see the pic of the truck?
were the tires even flat?
i think the prob. is that cops do 'target practice', but aren't trained mentally to stay calm under stress.
aren't they supposed to yell- 'stick both hands out the window' b4 starting to shoot? i should hope so...
and then perhaps notice that said hands are Caucasian?
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)That many rounds means that they were out of control, not that they were shooting to stop the vehicle.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)uponit7771
(93,532 posts)Hissyspit
(45,790 posts)MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)The pics I saw of the truck looked like they were sprayin and prayin.
I think the LAPD is scared shitless right now, and all of the officers are twitchy.
This Dorner guy may be insane, but the LAPD IS without a doubt, corrupt.
And they are likely wanting to kill him as opposed to catching him.
randome
(34,845 posts)But who is to really say?
MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)so far.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)pending the investigation into the newspaper truck shootings.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Police seeking Dorner opened fire in a second case of mistaken identity
Torrance police say the man was driving a pickup resembling the fugitive's. The incident happened just after the LAPD fired on women delivering newspapers nearby.
February 09, 2013|By Robert Faturechi and Matt Stevens, Los Angeles Times
David Perdue was on his way to sneak in some surfing before work Thursday morning when police flagged him down. They asked who he was and where he was headed, then sent him on his way.
Seconds later, Perdue's attorney said, a Torrance police cruiser slammed into his pickup and officers opened fire; none of the bullets struck Perdue.
These are the trained professionals supposedly protecting the citizens of Los Angeles and anyone having to drive through it?
Response to randome (Reply #32)
Marr This message was self-deleted by its author.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)UnrepentantLiberal
(11,700 posts)Always.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Also explains all the bullet holes through the rear window, right about where a human head will be.
I suppose a CNS hit on the driver would 'disable' the vehicle well enough.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Seriously, that statement about police intent when shooting is so far from reality, and demonstrably so. But you went straight to that rationalization.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)of people he is going to kill.
Agatha Christie's 10 little indians comes to mind.
exccept that was fiction and one cuoldn't figure the ending.
there is nothing noble about Dorner.
but of course, feel free to disagree and/or idolize Dorner.
anti-heroes are never someone to idolize.
BTW, a song applies
Waylon Jennings (c) "Don't you think this outlaw shit done got out of hand"
talking about fictional images/personaas, meshing with real people thinking that is a good thing.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Not revering the cops here does not mean you idolize Dorner. I think he's a nut who needs to be captured or killed as soon as possible.
I also think the LAPD is a thoroughly corrupt outfit that seems to view civilians as nothing but collateral damage, and that they have a gang-like mindset. They shot and killed a man just up the street from me last year who was watering his lawn, and said they thought he was holding a gun. Two years ago, they beat a homeless man to death just a few miles away.
I don't think you understand how badly the LAPD is regarded here in Los Angeles, or how well-earned is their reputation.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)that is 100% irrelevant to the last few days events.
Marr
(20,317 posts)It *is* about the LAPD's gang-like mentality, that has them brazenly firing on citizens, as if they're just collateral damage.
kudzu22
(1,273 posts)do they shoot to disable a vehicle. In real life, if you shoot, you mean to kill someone. These cops meant to kill the drivers of those vehicles. Thank God they are such horrible shots, but what if one of those stray bullets had gone through someone's window and killed a kid?
One thing they teach you in gun safety is that every bullet you fire has a lawyer attached to it.
ForgoTheConsequence
(5,186 posts)This is the lamest thing I've ever read on here.

That's the truck. Houses and other vehicles were also hit. Cops ALWAYS shoot to kill. Thankfully in this case these cops were poor marksmen.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)The LAPD (or some of them) have lost their ever lovin' minds. Panic, not plan.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)....and think they are receiving returning fire.
My question - Do they keep going until they are out of bullets?
That's really dumb. It leaves them vulnerable for ACTUAL returning fire.
Marr
(20,317 posts)"protecting themselves", which always seems to mean unloading their weapon into someone's car/chest/etc.
I would say that the whole "I felt like my life was in danger" is a pretty shitty defense when it turns out that their life was not in danger, and that it proves they're too chickenshit to be a cop. But the LAPD doesn't seem to agree.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)If you think that the cops were not trying to kill the occupants of that car well... I can think of no polite way to comment on your thinking processes but BULLSHIT.
All cops are trained from day one to shoot to kill. shoot to wound is nonsense. shoot to disable a car is nonsense. They shoot to KILL.
got it?
obamanut2012
(29,367 posts)There is no such thing as a warning/disabling shot. It doesn't exist, especially for LEOs. Doing so is unsafe and against all training.
These cops were just freaked out, and bad shots like most LEOs seem to be.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)backscatter712
(26,357 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Yes, I think I read where many houses were hit as well as other vehicles. It could have been very tragic. At least to the families hit.
Bennyboy
(10,440 posts)Anyway with three plaintiffs.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts).. and you'll find out that most of their training is about paperwork and the law, not firearms. Administrative changes, changes in interpretation of local, state, and federal law- those are the things cops spend a lot of time on.
Most only use their guns once a year to re-qualify under very controlled conditions.
Many officers can go their whole career without ever drawing their gun and shooting at a suspect. Their training and qualification are commensurate with that reality.
yellowcanine
(36,788 posts)It would seem that they must have missed a few lessons, to say the least. Not opening fire on the wrong color vehicle with people inside who look nothing like the suspects would be right up at the top of lessons to be learned, I would think.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)have the paperwork part aced.
Because you can hear them at the gun range 7 days a week.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)But your average cop? Gets more use out of their seat belt cutter than their firearm.
MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)but this is a Police only shooting range.
And it is busy.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)but most cops do the minimum for target practice and that's it. My SIL, a cop, went out and got her own handgun (here in Canada getting a handgun a few more steps than in the USA) so she could go to the range herself and get more practice as they leave their issued handguns at the station usually. She also talks about the amount of paperwork being totally overwhelming. She also spends a lot of time in court, testifying. She rarely draws her gun. Too much paperwork
(required every time their gun leaves the holster).
flobee1
(870 posts)uponit7771
(93,532 posts)plethoro
(594 posts)ddddddddd
loudsue
(14,087 posts)There need to be more Ron White videos.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)RC
(25,592 posts)yellowcanine
(36,788 posts)Kind of puts the lie to the NRA line about "the way to stop bad guys with guns is good guys with guns", doesn't it. If trained police officers can't hit a person who is not shooting back, how the heck is someone with minimal or no training going to stop a determined shooter in a school?
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)It is the reason that arming everyone in school or a mall or a theatre don't work.
But banning ALL illegal and ALL legal guns from a street would work
IMHO
sigh, that it won't happen.(yet)
flobee1
(870 posts)why would someone getting paid MINIMUM WAGE with NO BENEFITS lay their life on the line. These security guards get paid taco bell wages. Its only part-time work.
Where I work, I depend on that security guard as a first line of defense/screener to detect weapons that might be used on me when I do my job-Freakin PAY THE MAN!
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)that the two highest paid jobs in the country should be police officer and public school teacher. I can't think of two jobs where it's more important to have exactly the right person for the job, trained as well as humanly possible.
caseymoz
(5,763 posts)Armed good guys and gals could make it five times as bad. Like Colorado, imagine a crowded theater in the dark with gun panicky, gun toting amateurs trying to return fire.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)someone would be firing through 4+ layers of sheet metal into the back of a pickup with a handgun.
Ignoring the WTF shot grouping, this particular scenario should pretty much never happen in a legit self defense shooting.
LOL at the 'trained officers'. NYPD and LA are constantly competing for 'worst accuracy' in hit ratio, just out of nationwide police departments. Something like 24% or something. That's bad, compared to the police from other major metro areas nationwide. FBI released some statistics on this, and joe citizen actually fares better than either police department, likely because the scope of situations in which one legitimately uses lethal force in self defense precludes such 'law enforcement' apprehension type shootings like... this one.
NutmegYankee
(16,478 posts)In real life the accuracy of even trained personnel when reacting to an emergency (or a perceived one as in this case) is rather poor. The short barrel makes small adjustments in the wrist position send bullets several inches to feet off from the target, and that's assuming they were even aiming properly.
blueamy66
(6,795 posts)If you use a handgun for protection (i.e. emergencies), wherein "accuracy is poor", why keep one in your house or in a holster on your person? Just gonna shoot and hope you hit the bad guy?
NutmegYankee
(16,478 posts)I shoot in competition with handguns (Olympics style targets) and they can be quite accurate if you have the training and patience. I can hold a 3 inch pattern fairly consistently at 25 yards. The gun isn't inaccurate - the person is.
The reason they are popular in law enforcement is the size and the fact that most engagements are at close range, where a handgun is still highly effective. At distances of 15 feet or less, the average person will land a few rounds. But you have to aim. And as has been seen many times, the approach taken in these types of engagements is "spray and pray".
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)a number of years ago by some sort of firearms/personal security expert on TV and I have always wondered whether he was giving sound advice. The expert said if anyone was approached by someone holding a gun the best option was to run as it is actually hard to hit a running target. He said the worst thing to do is stay close to someone holding a gun. Your thoughts.
NutmegYankee
(16,478 posts)Running straight away would give the shooter a static target since you didn't move to him. Many people don't realize how hard it is to shoot accurately since we see action heros on TV made impossible shots constantly. It really is a sporting skill, hence the Olympics competitions in firearms and archery.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)they have adopted the "drone" approach for police work. Collateral damage is acceptable as long as they get their man.
randome
(34,845 posts)No one should be on the street with a gun who doesn't know how to use one.
kudzu22
(1,273 posts)for firing without warning at people who presented no threat. Sadly, I don't think they will be charged and probably won't lose their jobs either.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)These are actually low numbers. CHP are even worst shots.
SDPD are pretty good when compared. No police agency in the US is even close to movies. (though at a recent incident SDPD thankfully was, the theater was full to the gills, two shots fired, two shots connected to perp, perp on the way to the Hospital, the over penetrating round in the ceiling.
We designed a paper and pencil RPG which when first play tested was very accurate. (Shoot all day, get another box of ammo). But it was hardly cinematic in the Dirty Harry accuracy that Hollywood uses. Of course we had to futz it. We left those as an option in the hyper realistic rules...hyper realistic rules tended to incapacitate targets in one shot, maybe two as well.
The FBI has the statistics if you are ever curious.
This is why I laugh when average Dirty Harry wanna be sayz they can haz ht the target in a high stress situation.
eppur_se_muova
(41,938 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Like in real life, you don't want to get hit by one...no matter what rues were used...(ok the Hollywood ones you could, but they were highly unrealstic) you were an ex parrot. Take another character sheet and dice...
W T F
(1,188 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)This is conjecture on my part but I'm betting they didn't have much occasion to use their guns in the past and maybe they hadn't even been on the street that much.
Bennyboy
(10,440 posts)Law enforcement sources told The Times that at least seven officers opened fire. On Friday, the street was pockmarked with bullet holes in cars, trees, garage doors and roofs. Residents said they wanted to know what happened.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Unless the story is corrected again. There is so far one reference to 'law enforcement sources' in the middle of the article. I'm not disputing this, just wondering how ANY situation could occur in which not one of 7 officers would think to check the inside of the truck first. I mean, that's enough to completely surround the occupants.
If they are THIS incompetent, it boggles the mind. And of course it's quite possible for me to have my mind boggled.
yardwork
(69,364 posts)That's why all seven opened fire.
Why all seven were such terrible shots I don't know.
randome
(34,845 posts)That does not excuse them. Every one of them should, at the very least, be off the street since they do not know how to handle a gun.
yardwork
(69,364 posts)The spokesperson made it sound like the newspaper delivery women were at fault for driving erratically. It's similar to the other warning that black men should not wear hoodies right now. It's all about blaming the population and acting like the authorities have the right to do anything they want, no matter who dies.
Collateral damage.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)They were operating with a hair trigger (pun intended). If I understand correctly, these officers were patrolling some city official's neighborhood, which was a potential target based on early readings of the "manifesto".
Their fingers were itching to shoot someone, and a similar truck, idling through this neighborhood was a prime target for these idiots.
logosoco
(3,211 posts)it seems like they would also be under pressure to protect their students, whereas the cops in this case do not have that to think about.
Bennyboy
(10,440 posts)Cops cant kill what on earth makes you think you are gonna be able to kill when the need arises?
kudzu22
(1,273 posts)logosoco
(3,211 posts)and bullets don't always stop bad guys, no matter whose they are.
If people are in a job where arms are required and they make mistakes, how could anyone expect people whose job is NOT one that requires arms to be proficient at using arms?
riverbendviewgal
(4,396 posts)Explanation why so many shots and why shot as vehicles and occupants not matching description. And the inaccuracy of so many shots. More trading is needed for all of law enforcement agencies. Are the tested often?
Bennyboy
(10,440 posts)Law enforcement sources told The Times that at least seven officers opened fire. On Friday, the street was pockmarked with bullet holes in cars, trees, garage doors and roofs. Residents said they wanted to know what happened.
Fresh_Start
(11,365 posts)oh the hero fantasies of the gun nutters would crash and burn if they would merely engage in critical thought.
frylock
(34,825 posts)pertectin' their fambly and making swiss cheese out of the walls of their house as well as their neighbor's.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)in order to re-qualify.
There's your answer.
barbtries
(31,307 posts)(Daily Breeze) for my old home town, Torrance, CA, i would say yes, all over the neighborhood. it's some kind of miracle that nobody was killed.
NICO9000
(970 posts)barbtries
(31,307 posts)that said so the other day.
we're outliers aren't we?
ForgoTheConsequence
(5,186 posts)Its seems a lot of police officers are saying this is justified because they thought they were throwing grenades. Wonder if they would feel that way if it was there own family members shot? Guarantee if the people shot back they would be crying about it.
Bennyboy
(10,440 posts)Really? Grenades that weren't going off?
randome
(34,845 posts)...when it comes to thinking on their feet.
Blue Palasky
(81 posts)I'm starting to think dorner knows something that we can't yet imagine
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)of infallibility is often a very deadly and poisonous one.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)I don't know how many of those reached their mark. Indeed, LAPD need significant review and change ASAP. They protect and serve themselves.
Bennyboy
(10,440 posts)in all of 2011. Half were warning shots.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)I'm sure that wasn't your intention.
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)--when you have an endless supply of bullets, is easiest, especially if there are no pesky Constitutional rights to stop you.
obamanut2012
(29,367 posts)For real.