Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(115,464 posts)
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 11:03 AM Feb 2013

Simpson and Bowes say there are $13 trillion dollars in tax loopholes.

They called them tax "expenditures".

If that is the case, is the best they can do is close it on only $650 billion over ten years?

Go back to the drawing board, Boys!

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

kentuck

(115,464 posts)
3. I understood it as $13 trillion dollars per year.
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 11:22 AM
Feb 2013

Even if over 10 years, they have recommended a pittance.

 

OceanEcosystem

(275 posts)
4. That doesn't make sense. Isn't the United States' GDP something like $15 trillion a year?
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 11:26 AM
Feb 2013

If the US government currently gets, say, $2 trillion in tax revenue every year, and then $13 trillion out of $15 trillion of GDP activity escapes taxation due to loopholes, then wouldn't that be saying that the US government collects $2 trillion in taxes off of $2 trillion in economic activity? That would be a tax of around 100%.


(If we're discussing how tax loopholes allow things to go untaxed).

kentuck

(115,464 posts)
6. You are correct. It is over a ten-year period.
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 11:31 AM
Feb 2013
http://news.yahoo.com/bipartisan-commission-proposes-2-4-trillion-deficit-reduction-143658525--business.html

<snip>
"We're going to have to push the White House on healthcare, we're going to have to push the Republicans on revenue," Bowles said on CNBC.

"Over the next 10 years, there's probably $13 trillion worth of tax expenditures in the tax code ... and we're talking about using about $500 billion of that to reduce deficit and the rest they can use if they want to reduce rates," Bowles said. "I think that's a pretty fair trade."

kentuck

(115,464 posts)
8. But why should there be a trade-off to get rid of loopholes??
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 11:34 AM
Feb 2013

Why not just close them? Loopholes do not sound aboveboard.

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
2. Buttons and Bows need to retire. Get the hell out of government. Old farts have messed up enough.
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 11:13 AM
Feb 2013

And I'm an old fart. I like what I hear from young liberals.

kentuck

(115,464 posts)
9. Close a few loopholes, minimal tax on stock transactions, and raise the payroll deduction for SS....
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 11:50 AM
Feb 2013

and we could balance the budget without any cuts to programs for people.

Ganja Ninja

(15,953 posts)
11. How about just go back to the old folks home boys and let ...
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 12:32 PM
Feb 2013

the people we elect and pay do their jobs and answer for their decisions.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Simpson and Bowes say the...