Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Duer 157099

(17,742 posts)
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 08:51 PM Feb 2013

Why, when someone dies, are they spoken of as a "body" or "corpse"?

It really bothers me. Why not just say the name of the person and let it be? Why dissociate the person from their body, by saying things like "A corpse was found" rather than "So-and-so was found dead" etc?

"The body of..." WTF? Why not just "Jane Doe" or whatever their name was.

88 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why, when someone dies, are they spoken of as a "body" or "corpse"? (Original Post) Duer 157099 Feb 2013 OP
I've thought about that myself... Callmecrazy Feb 2013 #1
I usually refer to them as "the stiff" Katashi_itto Feb 2013 #15
When I was doing mountain rescue on the cascades we called them gumbys. defacto7 Feb 2013 #34
mt. hood? corneliamcgillicutty Feb 2013 #76
Rainier defacto7 Feb 2013 #88
Maybe they don't want to raise false hopes or prematurely Warpy Feb 2013 #2
Thank you! markpkessinger Feb 2013 #6
My mother was a nurse midwest irish Feb 2013 #28
okay, you got 3 verys in there so spill the beans! who's the "notable journalist" n/t orleans Feb 2013 #38
Id Rather not say midwest irish Feb 2013 #46
Cute. Sekhmets Daughter Feb 2013 #52
that's okay--i didn't really care anyway. i was just teasing you. n/t orleans Feb 2013 #64
Read my answer again. midwest irish Feb 2013 #67
Good clue.. My mother and my Irish twin are nurses.... When my Irish twin was in nursing school midnight Feb 2013 #83
Im sorry midwest irish Feb 2013 #84
It is good stuff... Right now my Irish twin and I are the same age.... We have lots of fun with this midnight Feb 2013 #87
Bingo! rustydog Feb 2013 #53
I'm an atheist. Warpy Feb 2013 #54
I'm agnostic, seen a lot of dying people too rustydog Feb 2013 #58
I realized that immediately when my mother died. I knew she was no longer there. CTyankee Feb 2013 #59
Religion Spider Jerusalem Feb 2013 #3
Philosophy, too Bad Thoughts Feb 2013 #41
The person is gone... Benton D Struckcheon Feb 2013 #4
Same here when my dad died. Nt newfie11 Feb 2013 #8
I've Noticed That Whenever I've Gone To An Open Casket Funeral ChoppinBroccoli Feb 2013 #22
Good question. And, elleng Feb 2013 #5
Pretty obvious... gcomeau Feb 2013 #7
And, many times the "news" of the deceased person gets out before SoCalDem Feb 2013 #19
+1 wickerwoman Feb 2013 #35
but that's not accurate either orleans Feb 2013 #39
No gcomeau Feb 2013 #45
"*They* do not" is your opinion based on your assumptions & what you've been told orleans Feb 2013 #55
Hallucinations are nothing to take lightly. gcomeau Feb 2013 #57
don't be a jerk by implying i don't know what hallucinations are. open your mind (it'll do you good) orleans Feb 2013 #63
I'm not being a jerk. That wasn't a joke. gcomeau Feb 2013 #66
Cool story Duer 157099 Feb 2013 #69
That's the regular term used by coroners and law enforcement. n/t Cleita Feb 2013 #9
Distance REP Feb 2013 #10
Pending notification of family? Ruby the Liberal Feb 2013 #11
Why not? MineralMan Feb 2013 #12
That's always bothered me too. I remember Auntie Bush Feb 2013 #13
I dunno, what if they're a skeleton? lonestarnot Feb 2013 #14
It makes sense to me. A corpse/body is different from "Jane Smith." Jane's essence is no longer ther Honeycombe8 Feb 2013 #16
Even without the religious baggage on this question ... surrealAmerican Feb 2013 #17
Nope, not buying it, nor any of the many other attempts Duer 157099 Feb 2013 #18
Comatose people are still alive..they exist as a living person even if they cannot SoCalDem Feb 2013 #20
Many many many people in a coma wake up. They aren't a body. loudsue Feb 2013 #29
In a coma, you have perfusion of tissues. It's very visible. LeftInTX Feb 2013 #33
when she died my mother was no longer in the physical body. She entered another realm CTyankee Feb 2013 #62
Philosophically, because that which made them a person is gone. Zephie Feb 2013 #21
Maybe part of it is that in our culture Jennicut Feb 2013 #23
Because that's what it is. alarimer Feb 2013 #24
Because when someone dies, it's the same as if they never existed. randome Feb 2013 #25
+1000 Taverner Feb 2013 #50
In the military we said "remains" Recursion Feb 2013 #26
Same reason a fetus is not a baby marshall Feb 2013 #27
Because a person is alive and dead flesh is not Yo_Mama Feb 2013 #30
Because "kangaroo" and "turnip" were already taken! Vinnie From Indy Feb 2013 #31
Dust to dust RedCappedBandit Feb 2013 #32
They also call people 'souls' if they are lost at sea. applegrove Feb 2013 #36
Because their energy, the thing that made them them, is gone. MADem Feb 2013 #37
i absolutely get what you're saying orleans Feb 2013 #40
The undertakers in my home town were always careful to refer to the deceased as 'Mr.' or 'Mrs.' LongTomH Feb 2013 #85
Custom and practice. dipsydoodle Feb 2013 #42
Latin NNN0LHI Feb 2013 #43
I agree with you malaise Feb 2013 #44
Question: 100 years later, is the dirt that's leftover from the corpse a person? Taverner Feb 2013 #49
As long as people still visit that dirt I guess so malaise Feb 2013 #65
Interesting Question. . . . BigDemVoter Feb 2013 #47
Can you tell the difference between a person who "temporarily" dies Duer 157099 Feb 2013 #61
To maintain objectivity Taverner Feb 2013 #48
I Hope That Question Isn't Making You Lose Any Sleep. (nt) Paladin Feb 2013 #51
Because the whole world is conspiring to make you religious Dreamer Tatum Feb 2013 #56
No, as a matter of fact, that is not what I'm trying to say Duer 157099 Feb 2013 #60
Because luminous beings are we, not this crude matter. TheKentuckian Feb 2013 #68
Message auto-removed year of the cat Feb 2013 #70
Immediately after? Yes, absolutely. Duer 157099 Feb 2013 #71
Message auto-removed year of the cat Feb 2013 #72
As I said, immediately after Duer 157099 Feb 2013 #73
Message auto-removed year of the cat Feb 2013 #74
I agree. And at that point Duer 157099 Feb 2013 #78
Message auto-removed year of the cat Feb 2013 #79
Well, like in a hospital bed? Duer 157099 Feb 2013 #80
Message auto-removed year of the cat Feb 2013 #82
I have no issue with the "body/corpse" thing etherealtruth Feb 2013 #75
What if you don't know the identity, or next-of-kin hasn't been notified yet? Hugabear Feb 2013 #77
Yeah, that is totally not what I'm talking about Duer 157099 Feb 2013 #81
Because it is a body? NYC Liberal Feb 2013 #86

Callmecrazy

(3,065 posts)
1. I've thought about that myself...
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 08:56 PM
Feb 2013

Maybe it carries back to the Christian belief that the you are the soul and the body is only a vessel.

Warpy

(111,267 posts)
2. Maybe they don't want to raise false hopes or prematurely
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 08:56 PM
Feb 2013

identify the body of the wrong person.

I was a nurse and I've seen a lot of death. After death, the person is gone, even though some individual body cells can remain alive for hours. If you've ever seen it, you know what I'm talking about. All that's there is a shell, whether the person has floated up to a heaven with a harp or just out of existence on a tide of happy hormones. They're gone. All that's left is an inert thing that was once a person.

markpkessinger

(8,401 posts)
6. Thank you!
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:05 PM
Feb 2013

I was at the bedside of both of my parents when each of them died, and I do indeed know exactly what you are talking about.

 

midwest irish

(155 posts)
28. My mother was a nurse
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 12:49 AM
Feb 2013

Last edited Thu Feb 21, 2013, 01:41 PM - Edit history (1)

and tagged plenty of toes (incuding the father of a very very very notable journalist). She had the same view about death. I suppose its different when you have been around it and see it every day.

midnight

(26,624 posts)
83. Good clue.. My mother and my Irish twin are nurses.... When my Irish twin was in nursing school
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 03:50 PM
Feb 2013

she told me she would never tag a toe, because none of her patients would die.... Bless her...

midnight

(26,624 posts)
87. It is good stuff... Right now my Irish twin and I are the same age.... We have lots of fun with this
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 04:44 PM
Feb 2013

until St. Patricks day eve when I become the older twin...

rustydog

(9,186 posts)
53. Bingo!
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 02:45 PM
Feb 2013

That is what our church wants us to believe, this is the vessel the soul used during it's "earthly visit" and now the vessel is no longer needed.
That is the shell, not the person you loved so dearly...

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
59. I realized that immediately when my mother died. I knew she was no longer there.
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 04:07 PM
Feb 2013

it wasn't her. I kissed her forehead and left. I couldn't have watched the collection of her body from the hospital bed to be taken to the funeral home.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
3. Religion
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 08:57 PM
Feb 2013

the soul animating the flesh is what makes the person, supposedly. John Smith is not John Smith's body. (and if you disregard the idea of a "soul", the personality and individuality that our brains impart goes away at death, as well.)

Bad Thoughts

(2,524 posts)
41. Philosophy, too
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 08:18 AM
Feb 2013

"I think, therefore I am." The cognitive process is identified with the self, the body less so.

Benton D Struckcheon

(2,347 posts)
4. The person is gone...
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 08:58 PM
Feb 2013

...the corpse isn't the person, it's just the container.
I remember when I looked at my dad right after he died, maybe a minute after, and I just burst out "That's not my dad!"
It wasn't. It was just what carried him around. My dad, he was gone.

ChoppinBroccoli

(3,784 posts)
22. I've Noticed That Whenever I've Gone To An Open Casket Funeral
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 12:04 AM
Feb 2013

The body in the open casket never looks like the person I knew when they were alive. I'm not a religious person (well, to be honest, I have certain religious beliefs, but I have a healthy disdain for all forms of organized religion), but something is definitely different after the person is dead.

elleng

(130,942 posts)
5. Good question. And,
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:03 PM
Feb 2013

my Dad and Mom still ARE; I don't say they 'were.'

Visiting their resting place shortly.

 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
7. Pretty obvious...
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:05 PM
Feb 2013
Why dissociate the person from their body, by saying things like "A corpse was found" rather than "So-and-so was found dead" etc?


Because that former is accurate and the latter is not. The person no longer exists. The body does.

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
19. And, many times the "news" of the deceased person gets out before
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:46 PM
Feb 2013

the family & friends are notified.

From a police/medical perspective, they are dealing with a body/corpse/remains, not a "person"..

wickerwoman

(5,662 posts)
35. +1
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 03:38 AM
Feb 2013

They may not know who it is for some time after finding the corpse/body and even if they do, it may not be sensitive to release that information.

orleans

(34,053 posts)
39. but that's not accurate either
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 05:33 AM
Feb 2013

the person most certainly does still exist
in the hearts and minds of those who loved them or cared about them
and their body was part of who they are

i think stating "a corpse was found" is an extremely cold way to phrase it
clinical
lacking warmth or compassion
harsh
unsympathetic to the bereaved

you wouldn't say to a grieving parent "where did the police find your son's corpse?"

 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
45. No
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 11:03 AM
Feb 2013

Their memory exists. Their legacy exists. *They* do not. Don't confuse flowery poetic language with reality please.

(And even if that statement had been accurate, unless the cops had found the hearts and minds of the deceased loved ones it wouldn't have altered the accuracy of their statement would it?)

orleans

(34,053 posts)
55. "*They* do not" is your opinion based on your assumptions & what you've been told
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 03:49 PM
Feb 2013

because it wasn't my aunt's "memory" or "legacy" that showed up a year after she passed, looking as solid and as normal as she had before, talking to me and giving me quite a scare one afternoon.

but i do agree that "their memory exists" because she knew who i was and called me by my name. so she definitely remembered me.

orleans

(34,053 posts)
63. don't be a jerk by implying i don't know what hallucinations are. open your mind (it'll do you good)
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 03:45 AM
Feb 2013

although i admit i also tend to be of the "if i can't see it then it doesn't exist" school of thought
meaning that if it hadn't happened to me i'd find it very hard to believe as well.

and in spite of what i was fortunate enough to see i still had the attitude of "when you're dead, you're dead" for years even though i had this incredible experience.

and as you suggest, i did see someone about it. i ran upstairs to my mom and grandmother, hysterical, and told them what had happened. and by doing that my aunt accomplished what she intended--letting them know we don't die.

i believe this is what is referred to as a visitation and most people, while open to this experience as children, tend to outgrow it by the time they are around nine or ten. i was about six years old.

maybe if you did a little reading on the subject you'd understand it a little more. just because you've never come across something in your own life doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
66. I'm not being a jerk. That wasn't a joke.
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 08:53 AM
Feb 2013

And I wasn't implying anything I was stating it straight out.

REP

(21,691 posts)
10. Distance
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:09 PM
Feb 2013

For some people, it's easier to think of what's lying in the coffin or contained in the crematorium container as not a person they knew and loved, but as a corpse or body.

No matter how old you are, or intellectually comfortable with the idea of death, or even if you've seen it a number of times, it can be disjointing to see someone you know dead.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
11. Pending notification of family?
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:10 PM
Feb 2013

I know I for one don't want to hear my mom's name on the news as "XYZ found dead" without having a heads up about it.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
12. Why not?
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:13 PM
Feb 2013

Body and corpse are essentially the same word. The person who inhabited either ha departed. The body is just a body. Meat, if you prefer.

Auntie Bush

(17,528 posts)
13. That's always bothered me too. I remember
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:15 PM
Feb 2013

after JFK was killed they referred him as the body. It was bad enough losing him and watching his funeral...but to have the media refer to him as the body was distressing.
I never could have thought of my husband or son as a body. Does anyone refer to those 20 slain children as 20 bodies? No, we respect them and still refer to them as children.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
16. It makes sense to me. A corpse/body is different from "Jane Smith." Jane's essence is no longer ther
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:19 PM
Feb 2013

A body is treated differently from "Jane Smith."

I've heard it referred to as "Jane Smith's body," but usually they aren't certain who it is when they find a "body." It also helps to avoid using the term "deceased person."

It's used in the industry, I suppose.

surrealAmerican

(11,361 posts)
17. Even without the religious baggage on this question ...
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:28 PM
Feb 2013

... so much of what we think of as a specific person is based on their behavior, that, once that behavior is gone, they no longer resemble who they were.


A pile of bones is not really Richard III, even though it's all that's left of him.

Duer 157099

(17,742 posts)
18. Nope, not buying it, nor any of the many other attempts
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:32 PM
Feb 2013

If someone is in a coma, or paralized and in a coma, such that they have absolutely NO behavior whatsoever, we still call them by their name.

I think it shows tremendous disrespect to stop speaking about somebody as a person when they die, as though their body is some kind of thing to be feared and dissociated from who the person was.

I feel strongly about this, even though I understand what everyone up thread is saying and what they mean. I just disagree with it.

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
20. Comatose people are still alive..they exist as a living person even if they cannot
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:48 PM
Feb 2013

communicate.. Once they have died, they are no longer a person..their body remains, but "they" are truly gone.

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
29. Many many many people in a coma wake up. They aren't a body.
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 12:49 AM
Feb 2013

They are still in there. And when they wake up, a lot of the time they remember people who came and sat and spoke with them.

LeftInTX

(25,363 posts)
33. In a coma, you have perfusion of tissues. It's very visible.
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 01:24 AM
Feb 2013

Perfusion of tissue can occur even if you are brain dead.
Once the heart stops all of that stops.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
62. when she died my mother was no longer in the physical body. She entered another realm
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 04:24 PM
Feb 2013

She was in my heart and my memory. And I came to know what Joe Biden said about
losing a beloved person that there comes a time that their memory brings a smile to your lips before it brings a tear to your eye.

That is the way it should be, IMO. That way you go on, not just crumble, eventually, to dust.

Zephie

(1,363 posts)
21. Philosophically, because that which made them a person is gone.
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 11:06 PM
Feb 2013

The things that made them a person, such as memories, thoughts, emotions... These are all things that a dead body has no access to. Being no longer living, they are not a "person" anymore. They have become something else, which is a corpse. It does not devalue who they were in life, just acknowledges that the person who they were is no longer in that vessel of skin and bone.

That's just my opinion though.

Jennicut

(25,415 posts)
23. Maybe part of it is that in our culture
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 12:19 AM
Feb 2013

we have somewhat of a fear of death. If that is just a body over there then it has less impact then Jane Smith is over there dead.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
25. Because when someone dies, it's the same as if they never existed.
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 12:40 AM
Feb 2013

How's that for tough love?

You might say the people who knew him/her somehow means they aren't truly gone but those people will soon be gone, too.

In a million years, do you think anyone will know who Beethoven was?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
26. In the military we said "remains"
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 12:42 AM
Feb 2013

I don't think the corpse "is" the person, so I get why that usage is what it is.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
30. Because a person is alive and dead flesh is not
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 12:59 AM
Feb 2013

No one who has ever been around a corpse doesn't recognize that. It's not the person. It's what is materially left of the person.

We do disassociate our "selves" from our bodies. If you lost a hand due to accidental amputation, you wouldn't think that you were permanently separated from a piece of yourself. You would experience it as a loss - of a limb, of function, not as a division.

The whole concept of brain death recognizes that the flesh is not the person. One may be living, but not "there" as a person. So don't blame this on religion. Science thinks the same.

RedCappedBandit

(5,514 posts)
32. Dust to dust
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 01:21 AM
Feb 2013

Rotting remains are no more a person than the ice cream your mother ate while you were being manufactured.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
37. Because their energy, the thing that made them them, is gone.
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 05:14 AM
Feb 2013

All that is left is the husk, the shell.

We are more than the sum of our parts, and the bit that could be called "more" is the person, the rest is just the parts (the corpse).

orleans

(34,053 posts)
40. i absolutely get what you're saying
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 05:48 AM
Feb 2013

and i feel the same way
(see my post #39)

example
it may be a "corpse" to some people
but to me that was my mother
those were the arms that held me and comforted me
those were the lips that smiled every day
those were the hands that pushed back my hair or opened a door for me
all a part of what made her her
all a part of how i had come to know her, see her,
and everything about her is precious to me
from her outwardly appearance
to her sharp mind
to her quick wit
to the bobby pins on her dresser

LongTomH

(8,636 posts)
85. The undertakers in my home town were always careful to refer to the deceased as 'Mr.' or 'Mrs.'
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 04:02 PM
Feb 2013

For a viewing: "There's someone here to see Mrs. Childress." (My grandmother) The sensitivity was appreciated.

 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
49. Question: 100 years later, is the dirt that's leftover from the corpse a person?
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 01:59 PM
Feb 2013

At what point does the corpse change from person to dirt?

I'm not trying to be difficult, but just trying to show why this detachment is needed

BigDemVoter

(4,150 posts)
47. Interesting Question. . . .
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 01:56 PM
Feb 2013

I'm an RN, and we frequently have patients who expire. It's really quite striking the first time you have to clean up a dead body. What really hits you is that whatever person who was inhabiting the body is no longer there, leaving just an empty shell, hence, just a body.

Duer 157099

(17,742 posts)
61. Can you tell the difference between a person who "temporarily" dies
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 04:09 PM
Feb 2013

and is resuscitated, a BHC, and a permanently dead person? I mean, not over hours, but over a few minutes. You can tell the difference? If so, you should write a paper about it because I'm sure the medical community would love to know about it.

 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
48. To maintain objectivity
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 01:58 PM
Feb 2013

When handing a corpse, the goal is not to celebrate a fallen human's life, but to find out why they died, how and when

If you call the corpse "Billy Smith" it adds emotion - you need detachment when performing an autopsy

Duer 157099

(17,742 posts)
60. No, as a matter of fact, that is not what I'm trying to say
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 04:07 PM
Feb 2013

I said what I'm trying to say. No more, no less.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
68. Because luminous beings are we, not this crude matter.
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 10:57 AM
Feb 2013

You could make a perfect clone of a loved one, full of life, and it would not be the same person but rather a new one in familiar flesh.

Identical twins are distinct beings despite every possible similarity. The being is more than the body.

How would you wrap your mind around the possibility of transferring one's mind to a different container be it a mechanical or a biological construction.
Will you lament a corpse when it's former owner is still there clothed in a new form with every bit of their personality, memories, whit, hopes, and dreams?

We are more than a collection of parts and more to being alive the working order of those parts.

Response to Duer 157099 (Original post)

Duer 157099

(17,742 posts)
71. Immediately after? Yes, absolutely.
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 01:42 PM
Feb 2013

And I've been there, so it isn't hypothetical for me.

I didn't mean to make this a philosophical discussion about the soul and the duality of being.

My intent was that it strikes me as utterly disrespectful to one minute call that piece of flesh by name, and then the next, to call it a corpse. Even if the lifeforce has left it.

I also think this dissociation we do makes dead bodies so creepy to us. I don't mean a decomposing body, but a recently dead person, it's like we are suddenly afraid of that which we used to hug and enjoy being with. Now they are something to be feared and avoided, to be covered up and taken away with haste.

I'm not saying I like being around dead bodies LOL... gosh I hope that isn't how this is sounding. I'm just wondering aloud why it is this way for us, and whether it is healthy or what. That's all.

It all started when I read a book called "The Undead", where the author discusses at length the whole field of organ donation, and so-called "beating-heart cadavers", and the fine line between life and death and how that line is drawn.

Response to Duer 157099 (Reply #71)

Response to Duer 157099 (Reply #73)

Duer 157099

(17,742 posts)
78. I agree. And at that point
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 03:26 PM
Feb 2013

I *do* consider it a body, a corpse.

I must not be able to get my point across well. Oh well.

Response to Duer 157099 (Reply #78)

Response to Duer 157099 (Reply #80)

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
75. I have no issue with the "body/corpse" thing
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 03:19 PM
Feb 2013

My issue is with the euphemisms for death.

(I guess we all have little peeves about the use of language)

Hugabear

(10,340 posts)
77. What if you don't know the identity, or next-of-kin hasn't been notified yet?
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 03:23 PM
Feb 2013

Many times when the body of a deceased person is found, the identity is not yet known, or the next-of-kin may not have yet been notified.

In these cases, how else should this be reported?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why, when someone dies, a...