Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI have 2 questions about this year's CPAC
1. Why did they invite Romney (who was a 1-term governor and the loser of 2 presidential bids) to speak, but they haven't invited Bush ll (who was a governor, but was also their most recent candidate to "win" the presidency)?
2. Why is there a CPAC, but no LPAC (liberal political action conference)?
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I have 2 questions about this year's CPAC (Original Post)
Jamaal510
Mar 2013
OP
BainsBane
(57,779 posts)1. The GOP prefers losers
to winners. I don't know about number 2, but I have no desire to emulate them.
spanone
(142,049 posts)2. #3...why the f*ck did they invite sarah palin??????????????????????
Yavin4
(37,182 posts)3. To Answer #2, Liberals Don't Have Corporate Sponsors
CPAC attendees are sponsored by big money donors and corporations.
Berlum
(7,044 posts)4. Ya gotta be a bona fide Republican Chickenhawk
...any questions about your Chickenhawk status, and the Republican CPACers will shitcan you...
They DO after all have their, um, stanTards.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,270 posts)5. Clowns, Posing As Conservatives
That's what this is all about.