Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
Sun Mar 3, 2013, 10:52 PM Mar 2013

There's a worrying trend within "moderate liberalism" nowadays...

We're seeing a fair amount of victories on the rights front, and that's a great thing.

But they're being accompanied by calls for austerity even among some "liberals", by continued efforts to weaken unions and lower wages, and by a general sense that working-class people are being cut loose.

This is a dangerous combination for the groups that are gaining rights.

When you have a situation in which it looks(unfairly, but that's how it looks)like a few groups are gaining while a large group is losing, the groups that are perceived to be gaining will be lashed out at and subject to campaigns to strip them of their rights.

The only way to prevent that is for "progressive" forces to be seen as fighting against the exclusion and against the marginalization of those on the lower end who feel left out.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There's a worrying trend within "moderate liberalism" nowadays... (Original Post) Ken Burch Mar 2013 OP
There is no such thing as a "moderate liberal". UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #1
and the republicans are a fascist party. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #6
True. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #10
Yeah. Just the other day they pulled my neighbors out of bed and shot them Recursion Mar 2013 #14
No one is pretending unfortunately Dragonfli Mar 2013 #15
i'm not pretending. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #17
I used that description to echo the way our party leaders describe themselves Ken Burch Mar 2013 #11
I agree. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #12
Social issues are the only place the parties differ. MrSlayer Mar 2013 #2
Very true actually :) Demo_Chris Mar 2013 #5
If President Obama will sacrifice vulnerable people on SS to get a "bargain" - forestpath Mar 2013 #3
He did a fine job protecting military spending Demo_Chris Mar 2013 #8
Those aren't "Liberals". They aren't even "Blue Collar Democrats".... Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2013 #4
True, Sir: 'Social Liberal/Fiscal Conservative' Is Not Really A Sound Position, Let Alone A Left One The Magistrate Mar 2013 #7
That would be more Libertarian (cont) Demo_Chris Mar 2013 #9
^ Wilms Mar 2013 #13
FDR is spinning in his grave. 99Forever Mar 2013 #16
I know people don't like to even consider this nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #18
 

UnrepentantLiberal

(11,700 posts)
1. There is no such thing as a "moderate liberal".
Sun Mar 3, 2013, 11:09 PM
Mar 2013

The Democratic party is now a conservative political party.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
14. Yeah. Just the other day they pulled my neighbors out of bed and shot them
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 08:51 AM
Mar 2013

Seriously, what does pretending they're "fascist" accomplish?

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
15. No one is pretending unfortunately
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 10:00 AM
Mar 2013

fas·cism

/ˈfaSHizəm/

Noun
An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
(in general use) Extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practice.


Didn't you just the other day have trouble with the definition of theft, specifically with reneging on a debt and then calling it revenue rather than the theft it was. It was sad when Enron stopped needed creative accountants that knew how to dodge debt and then creatively turn that debt into profit on the books. So many of their accountants now have little to do but post on forums.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
11. I used that description to echo the way our party leaders describe themselves
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 05:59 AM
Mar 2013

it's meant(on their part)to distinguish themselves from uppity peasant riffraff like us.

 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
2. Social issues are the only place the parties differ.
Sun Mar 3, 2013, 11:10 PM
Mar 2013

Fiscally, they're all ready to stick it up our asses to protect their sponsors and masters. It's only a matter of degree.

 

forestpath

(3,102 posts)
3. If President Obama will sacrifice vulnerable people on SS to get a "bargain" -
Sun Mar 3, 2013, 11:19 PM
Mar 2013

he will sacrifice ANYBODY.

It's made me take a cynical view of his sudden interest in gay rights, women's rights, immigration rights, etc., - all issues I care about - because I feel nobody who truly cared about anybody's rights would deliberately hurt people who already have little and have no way to earn money to buy more food or heat.

So because he has proven that he cannot be trusted on something as crucial as protecting the elderly and sick on SS, I can't trust him on anything else, either.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
4. Those aren't "Liberals". They aren't even "Blue Collar Democrats"....
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 01:57 AM
Mar 2013

They're "New Democrats" from the Clinton Era.

The types that BRAG that they can raise even MORE money from corporations than the Republicans.

The Magistrate

(96,043 posts)
7. True, Sir: 'Social Liberal/Fiscal Conservative' Is Not Really A Sound Position, Let Alone A Left One
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 04:12 AM
Mar 2013
 

Demo_Chris

(6,234 posts)
9. That would be more Libertarian (cont)
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 04:56 AM
Mar 2013

And I would have more use for it if it were. Libertarians are also horrified by things like Patriot, the wars, drones, and all that. The new Democrats don't have a huge problem with them. So really they are a kind of mixed bag.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
16. FDR is spinning in his grave.
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 10:08 AM
Mar 2013

Thanks President Obama and Friends, you've accomplished what the Republicans couldn't. Congrats.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
18. I know people don't like to even consider this
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 12:46 PM
Mar 2013

Mass strikes and the long haul s what is needed.

Alas unions negotiated the strike away, and now are negotiating the five day week.


We really need to wake up, the only way the political class will fear us again, and they did...are mass strikes, sit ins and mass civil disobedience

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There's a worrying trend ...