Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 10:10 AM Mar 2013

Pentagon: Cuts Could Hamper Ability To Invade Countries For No Reason

WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—The spending cuts mandated by the sequester may hamper the United States’s ability to invade countries for absolutely no reason, a Pentagon spokesman warned today.

The Pentagon made this gloomy assessment amid widespread fears that the nation’s ability to wage totally optional wars based on bogus pretexts may be in peril.

“Historically, the United States has stood ready and able to throw billions of dollars at a military campaign with no clear rationale or well-defined objective,” said spokesman Harland Dorrinson. “Our capacity to wage war willy-nilly is now in jeopardy.”

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/borowitzreport/2013/03/pentagon-cuts-could-hamper-ability-to-invade-countries-for-no-reason.html#ixzz2Ma1igU00

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pentagon: Cuts Could Hamper Ability To Invade Countries For No Reason (Original Post) Generic Other Mar 2013 OP
Bummer pscot Mar 2013 #1
A very sad day indeed jsr Mar 2013 #2
The Pentagon doesn't go in unless the President tells them to. ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2013 #3
good thing we have you around to explain such complex issues frylock Mar 2013 #6
Somebody needs to point out to some posters that the military does what the President ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2013 #8
No need to tell me Generic Other Mar 2013 #14
Once upon a time, that was Congress' job. n/t bluedigger Mar 2013 #15
OMG! 99Forever Mar 2013 #4
This shit has to be stopped right fucking now!1!! pinboy3niner Mar 2013 #5
Tell that to the President ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2013 #9
Alas, the Pentagon and State Department have a whole closet full of Bogeymen to provied "reasons". Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2013 #7
Start with the Whitehouse ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2013 #10
Yep. It's a profitable protection racket for so many. Especially politicians. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2013 #13
Expected the Onion HarveyDarkey Mar 2013 #11
Too bad this is satire :( LeftInTX Mar 2013 #12
K&R woo me with science Mar 2013 #16
I propose a full reduction in force. valiberal26 Mar 2013 #17

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
8. Somebody needs to point out to some posters that the military does what the President
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 03:49 PM
Mar 2013

tells them to and does not act unilaterally.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
14. No need to tell me
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 11:21 PM
Mar 2013

I didn't just fall off the turnip truck. I was dragged down the street by that idiot Texan, his sneering mechanical henchman, and the gruesome warmed over Nixon holdover waving their yellow cake and running about like their hair was on fire. I still have the bruises to prove it.

I really don't care if they cut the military. It's high time.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
13. Yep. It's a profitable protection racket for so many. Especially politicians.
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 04:18 PM
Mar 2013
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. H.L. Mencken
 

valiberal26

(41 posts)
17. I propose a full reduction in force.
Tue Mar 5, 2013, 01:16 PM
Mar 2013

Our military has grown too large, too unsustainable. We need to cut it down to size, not with a scalpel, but with a chainsaw.

While I hesitate to do this, I'm going to directly quote my manifesto, "An American Reformation" on this topic. (Excuse the formatting, it didn't carry over well from the original document.)


Section Four:

The United States has failed in its responsibilities to the people of the Earth by waging wars of aggression; and as such it has proven to be unworthy of providing for its own defense. However as it is not practical to dismantle the armed forces of the United States it must be restructured for the benefit of the world and of the American people.

The United States Department of Defense shall become a division under the United States Department of State. The office of Secretary of Defense shall be abolished.

The manpower of the United States Armed Forces shall be capped at no more than 15,000 active service members; with a maximum of an additional 10,000 kept in reserve.

The United States of America shall keep no nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons; nor shall it seek to establish or maintain any research or manufacturing productions or facilities; and shall decommission all standing stockpiles of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons by the year 2020.

The Executive Branch of the United States of America shall relinquish command of the United States Armed Forces to the United Nations Security Council.

The United States Armed Forces shall not operate in any capacity outside the recognized borders of the United States of America without the approval of the United Nations Security Council.

The United States Navy and the United States Coast Guard shall merge into one entity; and operate a total not to exceed 200 ships; to include a maximum of two aircraft carriers; and a maximum of 150 aircraft, not to include those not intended to operate in combat operations.

The United States Marine Corp shall merge into one entity under the authority of the United States Army.

The United States Air Force shall not maintain long-range missiles; nor the ability to conduct offensive bombing operations.

The United States of America shall not conduct a draft, nor maintain the ability to do so.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pentagon: Cuts Could Hamp...