Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAttorney General Holder Claims Aaron Swartz Prosecution Was ‘Good Use of Prosecutorial Discretion’
Attorney General Holder Claims Aaron Swartz Prosecution Was Good Use of Prosecutorial DiscretionBy: DSWright - FDL
Thursday March 7, 2013 9:39 am
<snip>
Well it seems we got our White House response to the 50,000+ signed remove Carmen Ortiz petition. Attorney General Eric Holder of MERS and Fast and Furious fame, told the Senate yesterday that the Aaron Swartz prosecution was a good idea.
The Texas lawmaker Senator Cornyn asked: Does it strike you as odd that the government would indict someone for crimes that would carry penalties of up to 35 years in prison and million dollar fines and then offer him a 3- or 4-month prison sentence?
Attorney General Holder responded: I think thats a good use of prosecutorial discretion to look at the conduct, regardless of what the statutory maximums were and to fashion a sentence that was consistent with what the nature of the conduct was. And I think what those prosecutors did in offering 3, 4, zero to 6 was consistent with, with that conduct.
Attorney General Holder responded: I think thats a good use of prosecutorial discretion to look at the conduct, regardless of what the statutory maximums were and to fashion a sentence that was consistent with what the nature of the conduct was. And I think what those prosecutors did in offering 3, 4, zero to 6 was consistent with, with that conduct.
The whole process bore a striking resemblance to what the mafia does when they extort money from small businesspeople. They arrive at the persons shop for the first time and say the owner forgot to pay them protection money. Hey we could break you leg but instead well simply take 10% of the gross. The government charges Swartz under an absurd interpretation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act then says Hey we could send you to prison for 35 years but instead well simply take a 6 month sentence.
Department of Justice officials even told Congress that by the end the only reason the odious charges against Swartz would not be dropped was because it would be embarrassing...
<snip>
More: http://news.firedoglake.com/2013/03/07/attorney-general-holder-claims-aaron-swartz-prosecution-was-good-use-of-prosecutorial-discretion/
13 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Attorney General Holder Claims Aaron Swartz Prosecution Was ‘Good Use of Prosecutorial Discretion’ (Original Post)
WillyT
Mar 2013
OP
Maybe the Medal of Freedom too! He's probably already being paid by his corporate masters anyway.nt
Mnemosyne
Mar 2013
#7
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)1. Screw you, Holder. Proves he's an asshole more every day. nt
jsr
(7,712 posts)3. Give him the Employee of the Year award
A lucrative future awaits in corporate headquarters.
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)7. Maybe the Medal of Freedom too! He's probably already being paid by his corporate masters anyway.nt
frylock
(34,825 posts)2. fucking dickhead
WillyT
(72,631 posts)4. Yep... Compare This Story To THIS ONE:
It certainly was NOT. What an ass.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)6. Eric, you twit, you've consistently shown horrible judgement in deciding who to prosecute....
... this case is no exception.
Chisox08
(1,898 posts)8. So going after the Wall Street Banksters who crashed our economy
and are threatening to do it again is not a "Good use of Prosecutorial Discretion"? Are the banks to big to prosecute? Or do they own the Department of Justice?
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)9. What a sick, useless bastard.
Can someone fire this dickhead already?
KoKo
(84,711 posts)10. Saw a Clip of that...it was totally DISGUSTING....
I can't give further comment ....
is all I could do...
Jasana
(490 posts)11. Holder has no idea how to do his job...
He'd rather pick on one young genius Internet activist than take on the banks. He is simply too stupid to do his job properly. He should be removed.
(Pardon me while I walk off grumbling and shaking my head in disbelief.)
WillyT
(72,631 posts)12. Kick !!!
WillyT
(72,631 posts)13. Last Kick From Me...