General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAttorney General Holder Claims Aaron Swartz Prosecution Was ‘Good Use of Prosecutorial Discretion’
Attorney General Holder Claims Aaron Swartz Prosecution Was Good Use of Prosecutorial DiscretionBy: DSWright - FDL
Thursday March 7, 2013 9:39 am
<snip>
Well it seems we got our White House response to the 50,000+ signed remove Carmen Ortiz petition. Attorney General Eric Holder of MERS and Fast and Furious fame, told the Senate yesterday that the Aaron Swartz prosecution was a good idea.
Attorney General Holder responded: I think thats a good use of prosecutorial discretion to look at the conduct, regardless of what the statutory maximums were and to fashion a sentence that was consistent with what the nature of the conduct was. And I think what those prosecutors did in offering 3, 4, zero to 6 was consistent with, with that conduct.
The whole process bore a striking resemblance to what the mafia does when they extort money from small businesspeople. They arrive at the persons shop for the first time and say the owner forgot to pay them protection money. Hey we could break you leg but instead well simply take 10% of the gross. The government charges Swartz under an absurd interpretation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act then says Hey we could send you to prison for 35 years but instead well simply take a 6 month sentence.
Department of Justice officials even told Congress that by the end the only reason the odious charges against Swartz would not be dropped was because it would be embarrassing...
<snip>
More: http://news.firedoglake.com/2013/03/07/attorney-general-holder-claims-aaron-swartz-prosecution-was-good-use-of-prosecutorial-discretion/
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)jsr
(7,712 posts)A lucrative future awaits in corporate headquarters.
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)It certainly was NOT. What an ass.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)... this case is no exception.
Chisox08
(1,898 posts)and are threatening to do it again is not a "Good use of Prosecutorial Discretion"? Are the banks to big to prosecute? Or do they own the Department of Justice?
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Can someone fire this dickhead already?
KoKo
(84,711 posts)I can't give further comment ....
is all I could do...
Jasana
(490 posts)He'd rather pick on one young genius Internet activist than take on the banks. He is simply too stupid to do his job properly. He should be removed.
(Pardon me while I walk off grumbling and shaking my head in disbelief.)
WillyT
(72,631 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.