General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy is there so much negativity against religion in General Discussion?
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Turborama (a host of the General Discussion forum).
I see that there are groups here for the discussion of religion, or lack of, on the site. Yet, there are people posting things that are hurtful for many here on a Forum that clearly states no religion is to be discussed. The group that is being attacked is answering back and this is causing a feud.
It is of course just my opinion, but to say such hurtful things in a main forum where you know it will hurt fellow users that are of the same political though is non-productive. It is of no propose save to cause trouble.
Why is it being allowed?
Gman
(24,780 posts)who really seem to enjoy belittling people of faith. They're so damn smart, I"m so honored to be in their disgusting presence.
Response to Gman (Reply #1)
blkmusclmachine This message was self-deleted by its author.
but be careful, you and I will be blocked soon!!! Only the atheists are allowed to say believers are stupid around here; if a believer says it about an atheist, you get locked
Gman
(24,780 posts)I'm sure it will shortly. Go figure. Double standards abound here at DU.
It's great to be call disgusting just because I'm an atheist on DU.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Anti-Catholic diatribes will be allowed in GD for a few days until Francis fades from the headlines.
Knightraven
(268 posts)Yet to use language that is to hurt fellow users for their beliefs is not news. Why is hurting those with that belief allowed?
CAG
(1,820 posts)be snarky and turn the tables and question the intelligence of nonbelievers. Until then we just get blocked and locked.
When we finally get our own pope, I'll welcome your ridicule and scorn.
Aw, heck. I welcome it now!
pnwmom
(110,261 posts)They don't need any excuse.
JVS
(61,935 posts)RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)amuse bouche
(3,672 posts)are creepy and harmful to humanity
freshwest
(53,661 posts)amuse bouche
(3,672 posts)Juries have been on a witch hunt, even deleting threads in safe haven forums-Atheist group
The poutrage is phenomenal
Response to amuse bouche (Reply #44)
freshwest This message was self-deleted by its author.
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)and state collide. The churches should be taxed if they are going to determine political candidates, issues like gay marriage and birth control.
Knightraven
(268 posts)It is not a discussing of issues as much as it is an attack on members of the site. There have been many that has nothing to do with the issues but to attack believers of that religion. It is not right, in my opinion, to use issues to do that. Go after the issues not the believers.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Attack the south, atheists, gun owners, feminists, reality tv, hunters, ufos, Beyonce, pot, smoking, unions, etc. My question is why anyone would let a random poster on a Internet forum hurt their feelings? Why is religion off the list more than anything else?
quinnox
(20,600 posts)I guess since it is big news, they are allowing all the attacks on catholics and religion. And there are always some atheists who see this as an opportunity to religion bash, because their arrogance is at a breath taking level.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)And that's rationalized with superstition, homophobia, and misogyny, that's protected by the government?
--imm
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)And, having no self discipline in such matters, I swallow the hook every time.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)Because so many DUers have been harmed by religion. Some DUers live in very religious areas, and they have to hide their religious feelings while hearing everyone else's, so they come here to vent.
Knightraven
(268 posts)Not very logical.
Skittles
(171,720 posts)what you have to put up with is NOTHING compared to what the victims of religion have to put up with
Knightraven
(268 posts)Many are still assaulted for it.
Skittles
(171,720 posts)and honestly, if you have real faith you would not give a F*** what others think
Knightraven
(268 posts)Why do they make it a moral duty to put other down due to believing is something they do not? Why do they care that other believe? Why do they feel the need to bash those of faith in the public forum instead of keeping it in the Atheists & Agnostics group?
Skittles
(171,720 posts)GET IT RIGHT
and I am SICK of all them - the religious and the non-religious - STOP WHINING!!!
Knightraven
(268 posts)It is wrong to put down anyone due to faith (or lack of), lifestyle, or race. We are Democrats, we are better than this.
Skittles
(171,720 posts)do you expect everyone to respect an institution that openly practices and teaches misogyny, homophobia, over-population, etc.? WHY?
amuse bouche
(3,672 posts)have a strong 'faith' who cares what others think of your superstitions
Knightraven
(268 posts)Why are atheist so insecure they must pick on those of faith?
amuse bouche
(3,672 posts)it faith, others call it fraud.
Knightraven
(268 posts)Other call it eternity.
We, well I , can keep this up till dawn.
amuse bouche
(3,672 posts)You enjoy fiction...toodles
Knightraven
(268 posts)Atheists never have made sense.
amuse bouche
(3,672 posts)Religion does a great deal of harm to people and always has
People join it and use it to rationalize their bigotry and hate for others...like gay people and women
And as others have said...stop whining
Knightraven
(268 posts)Two wrongs never make a right, no mater what. To bash another belief/lifestyle is something we Democrats have fought for a long time. When we break down and start doing the same thing to different groups we loose the moral high ground.
So please stop making Democrats look bad.
amuse bouche
(3,672 posts)You defenders of religion make democrats look bad by being complicit with groups that promote hate and child abuse. So Republican like. Moral high ground?
Knightraven
(268 posts)What a narrow mind you have. That is similar thinking that put many citizens of Japanese decent into concentration camps.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)In many parts of the country, simply saying, "I'm a non-believer" or "I'm an atheist" will result in being ostracized from local society. Or worse. I love all this, "Oh, you talked bad about my religion and I have hurt feeling" crap when it's NON-PROFIT religion that keeps trying to ooze it's way into our Democratic society. And with the help of "believers" they've largely succeeded.
NBachers
(19,442 posts)Deep13
(39,157 posts)I feel rather flabby in the chest, but it is nice of you to say otherwise.
shokran kathir
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Knightraven
(268 posts)I am sure if you talk to many Conservatives about the ideas of Liberals, they may say the same thing. Why attack those with the same political beliefs? All you do is make a house divided.
Deep13
(39,157 posts)Besides, it's fraud. That alone is enough reason to be against it.
Knightraven
(268 posts)It is just your opinion.
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)However, lacking any evidence to support them they must be considered as such. At the very least they are not worthy of being considered. I have yet to meet any believer in an organized religion who wouldn't be just as well served to believe in Leprechauns, or Unicorns, or Bigfoot,or omniscient green tree frogs that rule the universe. I for one will respect the opinions of others in direct proportion to the amount of intellect they invest in arriving at said opinions. "Because I think so" is an argument which will earn you nothing but derision from my corner. It is the reasoning of a toddler, and deserves no extra consideration simply because it is called religion.
Knightraven
(268 posts)All I hear form them is "Because I think so".
+1
JVS
(61,935 posts)Ok the problem seems to be this. People are not being respectful of other people's boundaries.
pennylane100
(3,425 posts)The new guy that was chosen today was selected by a group of old men, many of whom have either participated in or condoned child abuse. Are we supposed to pretend, as the church has done so well for the last several hundred years, that this did not happen. Or maybe we can pay lip service their most ridiculous facade that this has been acknowledged and dealt with appropriately.
There are possibly hundreds of thousands of young lives that have been ruined by the sexual predators that have been allowed to commit these horrendous crimes while under the protection of the church. If the discussion of such crimes is no longer allowed as suitable for discussion in the general discussion forum of one of the web's leading progressive sites, we have certainly lost our way.
Knightraven
(268 posts)The sexual assaults are not being talked about. It is just pure meanness that has been posted in many. There is a line where one stops and that line is where one is made to feel bad about their religion or lifestyle. Especially when we are all here due to our political views.
And for the record I am not Catholic.
CAG
(1,820 posts)so I am going to assume (sorry if I'm wrong) that you are relatively new to DU. I wonder how many other people out there come to DU because they are either a lifelong Democrat, an independent who has recently turned left, or a republican convert who has seen the light, and who see the incredible amount of bigotry and snarkiness against anything or anyone regarding religion, and get turned off and think "well, democrats can be real a**&(les!"
Knightraven
(268 posts)I have been spending most of the time reading the post under Ancient Wisdom and Pagan Spirituality and Astrology, Spirituality & Alternative Healing.
However after reading post 7, I take it that attacks on many things often. It makes me happy MY religion/lifestyle has not been in the news as of late.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)The same reason a lot of things get dog-piled in GD.
akbacchus_BC
(5,830 posts)Not money so much!
amuse bouche
(3,672 posts)CAG
(1,820 posts)alittlelark
(19,139 posts)My experience to be sure.....
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)And many of us continue to be seriously harmed by religion.
![]()
Knightraven
(268 posts)I get bashed for my religion/lifestyle all the time. Yet I will not attack another's beliefs do to it.
reverend_tim
(105 posts)This one is supposed to be an advocate for the poor. Maybe he can do some good. Perhaps even apply a dose of the good old Catholic gilt on the income inequality issue. As a recovering Catholic, I hope so. He is 76 years old. He will not be Pope long.
BlueCheese
(2,522 posts)If someone said the things about, say, Islam (or any other religion that doesn't exactly promote equality between the sexes or liberal views on gay marriage) that are being said about Catholicism today, I think that person would be ostracized more or less immediately.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)islam & various forms of christianity are attacked here regularly.
buddhism, judaism, jainism, sikhism, wicca, native american religious practices, new age stuff -- are apparently ok.
socialindependocrat
(1,372 posts)Something like that - anyway.
I was watching all those people at the Vatican and they all had this look
of accomplishment and relief on their faces because a new pope was chosen.
Then I thought of all those people spending time praying and giving money to the church.
Then I thought, what is the difference between that and throwing a virgin into a volcano?
And you're right - that's just an opinion - but, religion is just an opinion, too.
The biggest waste I see right now are the people in the middle east who are killing each
other because they have some religious belief. They suppress women. They rape and
they blow themselves up and they even offer to pay money to kill people that make
cartoons using their religious leaders likeness.
It gets to a point where I can't see the sense of supporting the whole institution.
There is a thought that if we take all the money that is spent on war that we will be able to
feed all the poor in the world. Apply that same idea to the money given to all the religions of the world.
I would be willing to bet that the religions pull in more money that the war machines.
If people want to go to church it is their right to do so.
The same goes for those people who want to vote Republican't
Same idea but one or both ideas piss a lot of people off.
What's the answer?
Live and let live?
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)Or the Heavens Gate movement.
Or the fundamentalist lds.
Everyone knows someone's beliefs are beyond criticism so long as the came to believe them when they were impressionable children.
Response to Knightraven (Original post)
Hekate This message was self-deleted by its author.
Turborama
(22,109 posts)Whining about DU violates GD's SOP