"Obama is the most left-wing President in US history"
Now, I haven't been around an awful long time (as indicated by my username 
), but I'm fairly certain that America's current POTUS is not nearly as "Left" as right-wingers give him "credit" for.
I remember, for example, from the 2008 presidential campaign, the President being a big-time "hawk"on Afghanistan and on going after al-Qaeda and similar groups as part of the Global War on Terror. The controversial drone strikes in Pakistan are a part of that hawkish foreign policy.
I also remember the conspicuous LACK of a public option in the Affordable Health Care Act.
In addition, I have been following the Obama administration's aggressive policies on cracking down on both medical marijuana dispensaries and undocumented (illegal) workers and immigrants.
Oh, and there's also the huge controversy over the Wall Street bank bailouts, or the way the auto bailouts have brought back the PRIVATE (capitalist) auto industry.
There's been a disturbing growth in income and wealth inequality since the recession "ended" and the "recovery" began. It look like most of that recovery is going to the wealthiest Americans.
The Bush tax cuts being extended. The creation of the "Cat Food" Commission. The administration's education policies. The relative lack of cuts to defense spending. The focus on deficit reduction and "entitlement reform" by the administration. The way in which ordinary Americans still struggle, while the business and Wall Street community are better than ever. And on and on...
If this is a scary left-wing socialist President, then his actions sure hide that well! 
= new reply since forum marked as read
...is noted.
FDR entered the 1936 election with a strong, but not invincible, hand. The economy remained sluggish and eight million Americans still were without jobs. Critics from various points on the political spectrum—such as Father Coughlin and Dr. Francis Townsend—had spent much of the previous two years attacking the President. (They supported Representative William Lemke of the newly formed Union Party in the 1936 election.)
http://millercenter.org/president/fdroosevelt/essays/biography/3
...before the 1936 election "early in his career (Fr. Charles) Coughlin (who was considered a liberal at the time though he later became a supporter of Hitler and Mussolini) was a vocal supporter of Franklin D. Roosevelt and his early New Deal proposals, before later becoming a harsh critic of Roosevelt as too friendly to bankers. In 1934 he announced a new political organization called the National Union for Social Justice. He wrote a platform calling for monetary reforms, the nationalization of major industries and railroads, and protection of the rights of labor. The membership ran into the millions, resembling the Populist movement of the 1890s."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Coughlin
Aware that Roosevelt had no intention to radically redistribute the country's wealth, (Louisiana Governor Huey) Long became one of the few national politicians to oppose Roosevelt's New Deal policies from the left. He considered them inadequate in the face of the escalating economic crisis. Long sometimes supported Roosevelt's programs in the Senate, saying that "whenever this administration has gone to the left I have voted with it, and whenever it has gone to the right I have voted against it." He opposed the National Recovery Act, calling it a sellout to big business. In 1933, he was a leader of a three-week Senate filibuster against the Glass-Steagal banking bill for favoring the interests of national banks over state banks.
In terms of foreign policy, Long was a firm isolationist. He argued that America's involvement in the Spanish-American War and the First World War had been deadly mistakes conducted on behalf of Wall Street. He also opposed American entry into the World Court.
In March 1933, Long offered a series of bills collectively known as "the Long plan" for the redistribution of wealth. The first bill proposed a new progressive tax code designed to cap personal fortunes at $100 million. Fortunes above $1 million would be taxed at 1 percent; fortunes above $2 million would be taxed at 2 percent, and so forth, up to a 100 percent tax on fortunes greater than $100 million. The second bill limited annual income to $1 million, and the third bill capped individual inheritances at $5 million.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huey_Long#Long_in_the_Senate_.281932.E2.80.931935.29
During his first term many on the left thought that FDR was, like Obama today, too friendly to bankers and a sellout to big business.
One can of course point to what FDR did accomplish and conclude that he was our most liberal president, but there were many on the left at the time who thought he did not go nearly far enough, especially since he had huge Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress.
I wonder how DU would have treated him is we had been around at the time.
...“People who just want stuff”: 1860.
Below is a conservative political cartoon from 1860, engraved by Currier and Ives and published in Harper's Magazine.
See if you recognize the playbook:
http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2003674590/
"The Republican Party Going to the Right House"
Lincoln rides on a fence rail, carried by Horace Greeley (anti-slavery editor of the New York Tribune), leading his followers into a lunatic asylum.
GREELY: "Hold on to me Abe, and we'll go in here by the unanimous consent of the people."
LINCOLN: "Now my friends I'm almost in, and the millennium is going to begin, so ask what you will and it shall be granted."
Younger Woman: "Oh! what a beautiful man he is, I feel a passionate attraction' every time I see his lovely face."
Bearded Man: "I represent the free love element, and expect to have free license to carry out its principles."
Man with trim beard and hat: "I want religion abolished and the book of Mormon made the standard of morality."
Caricatured black man: "De white man hab no rights dat cullud pussons am bound to spect' I want dat understood."
Older woman: "I want womans rights enforced, and man reduced in subjection to her authority."
Scruffy man with bottle: "I want everybody to have a share of everybody elses property."
Barefoot man: "I want a hotel established by government, where people that aint inclined to work, can board free of expense, and be found in rum and tobacco."
Seedy top-hat man: " I want guaranteed to every Citizen the right to examine every other citizen's pockets without interruption by Policemen."
Man at the end: "I want all the stations houses burned up, and the M.P.s killed, so that the bohoys can run with the machine and have a muss when they please."
Let’s go down the list, shall we?:
Supported by "liberal media": Check
Liberals will embark on profligate giveaways to THOSE PEOPLE? Check.
Flighty, emotional, entranced by charisma/celebrity? Check.
People conservatives consider sexual deviants? Check.
People conservatives consider religious deviants? Check (and how ironic, this particular turn).
Grasping minorities after special rights? Check.
"Feminazis"? Check.
There's a vast army of layabouts, thugs, and outright thieves who want to take your hard-earned stuff? Check, check, check, and check.
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.
Snort, choke, hiccup ..... 
Phew, what a side splitter. I needed that!
right-of center for all the reasons you list plus several others that could be added. Republicans hate and mis-label BHO because he is not a Republican and has a Kenyan father, i.e., for his temerity in having some black ancestry. 
