Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
Sun Mar 24, 2013, 01:17 AM Mar 2013

Health Insurers Warn on Premiums

Health insurers are privately warning brokers that premiums for many individuals and small businesses could increase sharply next year because of the health-care overhaul law, with the nation's biggest firm projecting that rates could more than double for some consumers buying their own plans.

The projections, made in sessions with brokers and agents, provide some of the most concrete evidence yet of how much insurance companies might increase prices when major provisions of the law kick in next year—a subject of rigorous debate.

The projected increases are at odds with what the Obama Administration says consumers should be expecting overall in terms of cost. The Department of Health and Human Services says that the law will "make health-care coverage more affordable and accessible," pointing to a 2009 analysis by the Congressional Budget Office that says average individual premiums, on an apples-to-apples basis, would be lower.

The gulf between the pricing talk from some insurers and the government projections suggests how complicated the law's effects will be. Carriers will be filing proposed prices with regulators over the next few months.

Part of the murkiness stems from the role of government subsidies. Federal subsidies under the health law will help lower-income consumers defray costs, but they are generally not included in insurers' premium projections. Many consumers will be getting more generous plans because of new requirements in the law. The effects of the law will vary widely, and insurers and other analysts agree that some consumers and small businesses will likely see premiums go down.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html?mod=djemalertNEWS
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Health Insurers Warn on Premiums (Original Post) HiPointDem Mar 2013 OP
Let me explain how this will work The Straight Story Mar 2013 #1
"Federal subsidies under the health law will help lower-income consumers defray costs" green for victory Mar 2013 #2
They'd better not be annual tax credits magellan Mar 2013 #3
They're scared shitless. They had to rebate 1.5 billion in 2012 jazzimov Mar 2013 #4
My wife and I pay $782 per month. Turbineguy Mar 2013 #5
That's not what they look at. They all have plenty of $ to pay executives. Honeycombe8 Mar 2013 #10
when you see the words onethatcares Mar 2013 #6
The shareholders need to suggest that they find cheaper executives then. Ruby the Liberal Mar 2013 #7
There is always single payer. jwirr Mar 2013 #8
At the LEAST, we NEED a public option. JaneyVee Mar 2013 #9

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
1. Let me explain how this will work
Sun Mar 24, 2013, 01:20 AM
Mar 2013

They will raise rates through the roof and use this as an excuse.

GOP will use this as a crutch for 2014 elections.

Eventually it will be shown they 'miscalculated' (lied) and they will keep 90% of the profits and pay a 10% penalty.

The GOP will not mention that when it happens.

We get screwed, they get richer and roll more money into gop.

 

green for victory

(591 posts)
2. "Federal subsidies under the health law will help lower-income consumers defray costs"
Sun Mar 24, 2013, 01:26 AM
Mar 2013

the subsidies are tax credits aren't they?

Do people think they're going to get a check to help with the monthly premium?

jazzimov

(1,456 posts)
4. They're scared shitless. They had to rebate 1.5 billion in 2012
Sun Mar 24, 2013, 02:23 AM
Mar 2013

because of the new MLR rules that kicked in during 2011.

In case you don't know about the MLR rules in the PPACA:

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42735.pdf

Turbineguy

(40,077 posts)
5. My wife and I pay $782 per month.
Sun Mar 24, 2013, 05:55 AM
Mar 2013

We have not exceeded our deductible. That means United Health care needs 11,616 customers like us just to pay the CEO.

We are however with Blue Cross who only need 1279 customers like us to pay the CEO.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
10. That's not what they look at. They all have plenty of $ to pay executives.
Sun Mar 24, 2013, 11:13 AM
Mar 2013

They look at amount of total claims paid.

They are prohibited by law from charging rates more than 15% above the total claims paid. If they collect more than that in premiums, they must refund that money.

I got a lettter last year from United HealthCare that they would be issuing a refund because they had collected more than 15% above the claims paid (the ACA provides that insurers must pay out 85% of premiums collected for claims, for group policies, and 80% for individual policies).

So executive compensation, compensation and benefits for total staff, other overhead expenses, are just cost of doing business and don't figure into the setting of premiums. They are rich enough that overhead isn't a problem for them.

onethatcares

(16,992 posts)
6. when you see the words
Sun Mar 24, 2013, 07:52 AM
Mar 2013

"projections" "brokers" "agents" in the same sentence as insurance companies you can bet your ass they aren't discussing how to better treat your health problem.

they're fucking jackals ripping the last of the meat from the carcass.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Health Insurers Warn on P...