General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTeen suspect indicted in Ga. baby slaying, also charged with 2nd shooting and robbery attempt
...
Elkins was also indicted on two counts in a second attempted robbery and shooting that happened 10 days before the baby was slain. On March 11, according to the indictment, Elkins tried to rob a person identified as Wilfredo Calix-Flores, pointing a gun at him while demanding his cellphone and wallet. Elkins shot Calix-Flores in the arm with the same caliber revolver used to kill the baby 10 days later, the indictment says. He is charged with attempted robbery and assault with a deadly weapon.
...
The suspects mother, Karimah Elkins, and older sister, Sabrina Elkins, were charged with evidence tampering. The indictment says they threw the revolver that police suspect was used in the shooting into a saltwater pond where investigators recovered it Tuesday. Doering said the gun is being tested to see if it can be linked to the childs slaying.
Karimah Elkins and the suspects aunt, Katrina Elkins, were also charged with making false statements to police. The indictment says the aunt told investigators her nephew was at her house when the slaying occurred which she also told The Associated Press and other news outlets. It says the suspects mother told police that her son was with her when the baby was shot.
...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/teen-suspect-indicted-in-ga-baby-slaying-also-charged-with-2nd-shooting-and-robbery-attempt/2013/03/27/32ad478a-9746-11e2-b5b4-b63027b499de_story.html
JI7
(93,617 posts)was not behind the shootings ?
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)UtahLib
(3,182 posts)That type of speculation, with no evidence to support it, should probably be kept to oneself. Hopefully, a lesson has been learned by those so quick to condemn based on what can only be described as intuition.
dkf
(37,305 posts)premium
(3,731 posts)Sickening.
Orrex
(67,111 posts)dkf
(37,305 posts)If they had succeeded he would have done this again.
Warpy
(114,615 posts)and it's a public safety issue that should keep them there.
I don't know what's wrong with the kid, but he apparently enjoys shooting people. He needs to be off the street for a very, very long time.
like the rest of his miserable fucking life if he's found guilty in a court of law.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)For no other reason, to stop them from bringing more criminals into the world.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)are true, this is an example of a HyperPunk, one who uses the instant crime (robbery, home invasion) as an opportunity to indulge his murdering.
He's gone feral. Time for the warehouse.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Obviously were concerned about her credibility her ability to accurately recall events and identify anybody, Gough said. If she suffers from any conditions that would do that, it would certainly be relevant to the case.
You don't get to violate doctor/patient confidentiality so you can put the victim on trial, you evil bag of pus.
premium
(3,731 posts)It's nothing more than a fishing expedition, and a vile one at that.
It's pretty damn obvious that scumbag lawyer is trying to implicate her because that's pretty much all he can do.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)extrajudicial statement under certain circumstances to influence a criminal proceeding.
Under Rule 3.6(a),
http://www.gabar.org/barrules/handbookdetail.cfm?what=rule&id=80
Comment 5A(d) indicates:
...
"d. any opinion as to the guilt or innocence of a defendant or suspect in a criminal case or proceeding that could result in incarceration;
It is reasonable to ask, if this particular lawyer has made a public statement with respect to his alleged personal belief of the innocence of his client, why is he making the statement except for a belief that his statement "will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding in the matter"?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)won't prejudice the opinion of anyone whose IQ is higher than room temperature.
Not sure that provision applies to defense counsel.
Statement about the victim's credibility are a different story.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)An issue is whether he intended to have an effect.
I suspect that he wanted to have publicity for himself, an opportunity to be in the limelight.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)or something like that.
Moreover, right to counsel and due process means at a bare minimum the right to repeat your "not guilty" plea outside of court.
I think the attorney is pond scum for going after the victim's medical/psychiatric records, but he's allowed to proclaim his client's innocence.