General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGreat new law in New Jersey(wish it went further) NO tanning salons for 15 and under
this is a great first step. These should really be banned totally for underage, as should tatoos and ear piercings for that matter are akin to the gun and bullet issue for adults.
But skin cancer is on the rise, and the types gotten by tanning salons are some of the deadliest.
All other states should do the same.
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/06/nj_senate_committee_approves_t_3.html
TRENTON The Senate health committee approved a bill today that would ban kids 15 and younger from using tanning salons, in a move that appeased salons owners who warned that a competing Assembly version prohibiting all minors would put them out of business.
The amended bill bans kids 15 and younger from using tanning salons, which would raise the age a year from the current law. Parents would have to participate in the initial consultation before the sessions begin, and be present for any tanning session purchases, according to the bill sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Loretta Weinberg (D-Bergen) and Sen. Robert Singer (R-Ocean).
--snip--
Teens old enough to tan would not be able to visit the salon on consecutive days - a rule requiring salons employees to record all appointments in the clients personal file. Salon owners who do not comply with the law would be fined $1,000 for the first offense, $2,000 for a second offense, and a five-day license suspension for a third offense.
--snip--
Longtime cancer nurse practitioner and the mother of a teenage girl, Mary Vecchio, had urged the committee to drop the compromise and keep the tan ban for anyone under 18, as the Assembly approved last month. She said teenagers don't have the maturity to make decisions that could affect them for the rest of their lives, and rejected the idea that a tanning bed is a safe way to treat acne or psoriasis.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)grump3r
(7 posts)Piercings and tatoos should not be banned for adults. If it's not your body, then it's not your problem. There is this thing called personal freedom.
Now I agree minors aren't mature enough for some things, but some piercings (ears) are fine with parental permission.
ZOB
(151 posts)No tanning, no tattoos, no piercings...anything else you'd like to ban while you're at it?
Tell you what, make whatever decisions you want for YOUR body and let the rest of us make our own.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I'm betting those would be easy to get.
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)But you just jumped the shark.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)It's also good for depression/anxiety, especially in the winter months. I'm not sure how I feel about this.
Maine-ah
(9,902 posts)"nationwide epidemic"?
Back that up - post some valid research please.
Are you also suggesting that you think body modification (tats and piercings) should be banned for adults?
Response to Maine-ah (Reply #7)
graham4anything This message was self-deleted by its author.
Maine-ah
(9,902 posts)that body modification infections are a nationwide epidemic.
and aside from you answering my question on body modifications, you went in a completely different direction with the rest of your reply.
Response to Maine-ah (Reply #9)
graham4anything This message was self-deleted by its author.
Maine-ah
(9,902 posts)"These should really be banned totally, as should tatoos (sic) and ear piercings for that matter with infections from tatoos (sic) and ear piercings at a nationwide epidemic. "
We all know skin cancer kills, and Maine just banned minors from tanning as well. But if you're going to post things like what I have quoted from above, you should back it up. You claimed this as fact, now you're back tracking and claiming this as opinion?
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)Prove that a 12 year old never got a major ear infection from piercing
I know family members that got very ill because of bad piercings (by reputable places).
Those underage should not be doing this. Adults of course, as witness by all the
rebels who hate nannies can do what they want
It should be obvious this was about those underage, as the topic itself is about that.
It was suppose to be older, but the
I guess George Bailey should have not been stopped Clarence on the bridge.
and underage kids really should refrain from spur of the moment tattoos.
That name they tattoo might just be very embarrassing five years later
Having Justin Bieber's name tattoo'd will look silly when one is an adult
Maine-ah
(9,902 posts)is now a "nationwide epidemic" - and the only thing that was obvious about it relating to underage was the article that was posted - the commentary you posted was not.
It's not legal for underage kids to get tattoos. Nor is it legal for them to get pierced with out parental permission.
roll around laughing all you want...but so far you have nothing to back up your claims -
Response to Maine-ah (Reply #23)
graham4anything This message was self-deleted by its author.
Maine-ah
(9,902 posts)The article doesn't mention anything about piercing or tattoo infections. You're the one who brought that up - there's no confusion on my end.
Response to graham4anything (Reply #26)
Cal Carpenter This message was self-deleted by its author.
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)as well as garbled nonsense for logical debate.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)edited as such-
this is a great first step. These should really be banned totally for underage, as should tatoos and ear piercings for that matter are akin to the gun and bullet issue for adults.
But skin cancer is on the rise, and the types gotten by tanning salons are some of the deadliest.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)you seem to apply that every time someone doubts you.
premium
(3,731 posts)and when called on to provide proof, you come up with this George Bailey crap?
So, now I'll ask you, do you have any proof that infections from tatoos and piercings is a national epidemic?
And please, without going off on a tangent.
Just a simple yes or no, if yes, then please provide a link.
Thanks.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)That is the #1 tactic of the NRA
the constant minutia, splitting of words
BTW, so, you are saying and are you saying that George Bailey should jump?
It would of course have changed the whole movie, but then Capra had a dark side I suppose.
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)"I don't like ear piercings" = OPINION
"Ear piercings are dangerous to teens on an epidemic level" = FALSEHOOD
Btw, George Bailey is a fictional character, just want to make sure you are clear on that.
premium
(3,731 posts)you stated it as fact.
I could care less about George Bailey and
does George Baily, or for that matter, guns, bullets, the NRA, have to do with this thread?
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)re: tattoos and piercings.
With links.
I won't hold my breath.
Thanks.
MineralMan
(151,269 posts)Yes, tanning for minors should be either banned or require parents to be there and full disclosure of risks.
Tattoos are already highly regulated for minors, and prohibited in many places.
However, ear piercings? Really? Infections an epidemic? I don't think so.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)Causes of pierced ear infections
The most common cause of pierced ear infections is the introduction of germs, found on the surface of the skin, into the piercing site. This can happen when unsterile equipment is used during the piercing, or if the piercing is not cleaned regularly at home. Also, touching the new piercing with dirty fingers or sharing earrings can lead to an infection.
Other causes of pierced ear infections may include:
earrings clasped too tightly
a piece of the earring becoming embedded in the earlobe
an allergic reaction to inexpensive earrings made with nickel
An allergic reaction (contact dermatitis) to nickel is common among children and teenagers. Signs of an allergic reaction to nickel may include dry, itchy skin, rash, or blisters. Skin irritated by an allergic reaction to nickel is more likely to become infected so make sure your childs initial earrings are made from 14-karat gold or stainless steel
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)This does not constitute scientific research.
And your link is just an info page from a Canadian health site. It doesn't even have statistics on it.
It has nothing to do with this alleged 'nationwide epidemic' you claim exists.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)I applaud the Democratic NJ people who passed the law, but it did not go far enough.
but 10% of something is better than 100% of nothing, and it will be a nationwide model to stop guns in the streets applied forward.
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)and ear piercings.
And tattoos.
So where is evidence of this nationwide tattoo and ear piercing infection epidemic?
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)You do realize that don't you?
The best way to get QRS is to make sure you get ABC and the I's dotted and the T's crossed.
Which is why the NRA fights so hard to prevent anything, because they are sharp cookies.
And can read the handwriting Bart Simpson is writing on the wall
ABC=QRS
ABC=QRS
remember what Bing Crosby said "Everybody has an agenda".
and #6 said "That would be telling"
indeed.
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)and bullets off the streets?
I think I forgot to put the LSD in my coffee this morning.
Maine-ah
(9,902 posts)Fla_Democrat
(2,622 posts)tanning salon restrictions. I guess the email spam filter is working.
On a side note.. is anyone taking bets... how can I get in on the action.
Oh, post script.. did Bing Crosby say he was due beer and travel money?
premium
(3,731 posts)all over the place.
If I read you right, you say banning tatoos and piercings is the way to get guns and bullets off the streets?
Words fail me.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)Tree-Hugger
(3,379 posts)That's because ear infections are one of the most common illnesses in children. However, many of these 800,000 plus links deal with otitis media, which is what one normally thinks of when discussing ear infections in children. Otitis media is not the same as an infection from piercing. Not even close.
As for the link you quote, it is merely explaining how an infection may occur from a piercing in the ear. It does not give any rates to back up your claim of a nationwide piercing infection epidemic.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)You are becoming one of the most entertaining posters on DU.
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)