General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhen will the USA dissolve?
I'm not saying any time soon, but all states fall, or morph into other states
How long does the USA have? 100 years? 1000 years? 10000 years?
zappaman
(20,627 posts)bank on it
Taverner
(55,476 posts)Asteroid destroys Bakersfield, the great Winemucca Quake and the Lake Ontario Tsunami...
zappaman
(20,627 posts)As someone who spent a few months there, how will we be able to tell?
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)zappaman
(20,627 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)How original.
zappaman
(20,627 posts)If so, you will see why it's called "The Taint of California."
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)and have met and known some wonderful people who live there. 'Course they were all brown so that might be the problem right there.
zappaman
(20,627 posts)The one that said "If you're black, go back!"
Lovely place.
And why do you have a problem with brown people?
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)"no wetbacks allowed" signs in Southern California and "no Chinese allowed" in the Bay Area so as much as you'd like to, literally, whitewash that history, racism wasn't confined to the San Joaquin Valley.
Racism is an inherent part of the denigration of the San Joaquin Valley whether you want to recognize that fact or not.
Maybe you're enlightened enough to learn a lesson here or maybe you're not but people don't appreciate the denigration of the area of the country in which they CHOOSE to live.
zappaman
(20,627 posts)Only sign I have ever seen in my life like that.
"racism wasn't confined to the San Joaquin Valley."
No one said it was, but again, this was the mid-90's...and I wonder if it is still there.
I like this song.
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)Taverner
(55,476 posts)And any friend of FR is not a friend of mine
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)zappaman
(20,627 posts)Vincardog
(20,234 posts)LiberalLoner
(11,467 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)greytdemocrat
(3,300 posts)RZM
(8,556 posts)Unless you have inside knowledge of an impending asteroid impact, you're probably wrong.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)to wonder about. I don't know. It would be neat to have a time machine and go into the future to find out. I think it could be a long time, maybe 500 years? Or maybe we will get someone really stupid as president in office and have a nuclear war, and that could mean it falls a lot sooner.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)If you choose to a point in the future which is past the time the world has ended you have to stay where you end up.
PETRUS
(3,678 posts)Just kidding, but have you read this:
http://thearchdruidreport.blogspot.com/2012/10/how-it-could-happen-part-one-hubris.html
Five part short story about the end of the USA.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Gun nuts will will break off into 'Whitetopia' long before the end of the century.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)PATRICK
(12,335 posts)If the people somehow develop a different political leadership, more derived from things like Facebook than any corporate media- which seems unlikely even if people naturally would.
Monumental planetary catastrophe to throw everything into chaos. Good or bad for residual nationalism?
What big non-nationalist money decides is the most likely and they can break up the USA according to profitability and ability to do it without losing too much and provoking the wrong reaction.
All the rest are tools in the toolbox and so far only the top scum of the earth is entitled to use them.
Warpy
(114,367 posts)We've racked up enough resentment across the planet that the next one will likely be fought here. What is left over after it ends will be carved up into administrative areas, very possibly under foreign control, and those will eventually morph into separate countries as foreign states lose their appetite for empire.
That's one scenario, at any rate.
Another would happen a little more peacefully if a global financial collapse causes the complete abandonment of the infrastructure needed to keep us connected--everything from electricity to highway bridges. That would also force areas to become self governing in order to preserve what they had left.
Similar events of both these scenarios have happened before.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)It's a different world out here. If everything east of the Sierra Nevada fell into the sea, we would carry on.
bluedigger
(17,387 posts)RantinRavin
(507 posts)So is the rest of the country.
villager
(26,001 posts)n/t
The government is already shot - an obvious kleptocracy.
The government (verb) of the country is proving to be untenable.
Deep divides in culture, with the right an obvious but desperate minority, will result in domestic uprising.
Just today, they arrested some nut in a otherwise quiet community near me for road rage, including racial slurs (the vic was an African-American with little kids in his car). They found a fully loaded AK47 in his car - ready to fire. He had a US Navy plate on his car. They're out there folks and they will go off eventually. This guy is driving around the same streets as you and me. Factor in the smaller safety net - coming soon to a mailbox near you - and you have issues.
The catalyst will probably be from outside the country - either and Act of War or a sustained terrorist attack. The banks will close, money stops, and the proverbial shit hits the fan. There's little "loyalty" anymore to anyone in government since they quit working for us. I don't see a happy ending here. I only wonder what role the military will play when the music stops.
tralala
(239 posts)mnhtnbb
(33,099 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)
RZM
(8,556 posts)Not sure why. But it is.
MineralMan
(150,557 posts)Run for your life.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)then the empty hull will be sold off piecemeal as scrap.
I thought we all learned Bain Capital's business model during the campaign last year.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)loose friendship.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)SCOTUS 2011 .
babylonsister
(172,558 posts)Respond here when you do!
Taverner
(55,476 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)riverbendviewgal
(4,387 posts)the next powers are China, India and Brazil.....
England is still around....It wasn't so long ago when the Sun never set on the Great English Empire.
The USA will be around and it might be like the Philippines are today....Watch the HBO new series VICE....The Philippines love their guns like Americans.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Bush v. Gore
To name just a couple...
mick063
(2,424 posts)Change.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)From what I have seen it went into a coma With President Reagan, from which it never recovered. The election of Bush saw it go from a persistent vegetative state to fertilizer for whatever came next.
Still waiting for something to grow.
Hope its good.
But I'm expecting weeds.
treestar
(82,383 posts)In fact it will combine with Mexico and Canada and the money will be called the Amero. Freeper gnashing of teeth for centuries.
Buffalo Bull
(138 posts)Requiring the USA to adopt Mexican wages working and environmental standards.
To play football on a 110x55 yard field. all is not lost...
We will be required to drink Canadian beer
treestar
(82,383 posts)The freepers would then die due to fear of the Spanish language.
Buffalo Bull
(138 posts)To be honest for at least a while the Canadian beer will still the peasants
RZM
(8,556 posts)Nothing lasts forever. But I'd guess we're not yet halfway done. So at least a few more centuries.
I see no compelling reason for a breakup. Even if something like that did happen it wouldn't be very soon. And some sort of rump state retaining the name would probably survive even if that did happen.
jimlup
(8,009 posts)I don't think that the primary power rests with the "nation states" anymore so in that sense the USA is dysfunctional already. I believe the facade that is the USA will remain in place as long as it serves the "masters of mankind" which may be quite a long time - at least a century or more. But rest assured that the real power lies with the multinational bankers and the "energy" companies like EXXON and BP and the "owners of life" like Monsanto. They prefer the facade of a "functional" democracy to cover the truth of their power. And they are in fact VERY powerful. Far more than most here are aware of or willing to believe.
As the next centuries past historians will look back at the "nation-state" as a failed experiment in democracy. Perhaps they will be lucky and we will actually achieve real democracy but we will have to find a way to wrestle power from the masters who would prefer that we remain ignorant and distracted.
Look, I know it is obvious that Bush and his clowns serve these interests but realize that Obama has just proved that he does too. It isn't rocket science and yes, we've deluded ourselves into believing this is a clique fantasy but that is our psychology and not the objective reality which is rather cruel and unforgiving. Particularly if we ignore it.
Sure the Obama/centrist democrat version of the social contract is a "kinder, gentler" version but make no mistake about who that social contract serves and why.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)June 10th at 3:36pm.
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)I keep thinking of it as Incorprea, land of the conglomerates.
Seriously though, in answer to the OP: tomorrow at Noon, or when you forget to think about it, which ever comes first.
patrice
(47,992 posts)Because all of the billions of little choices one makes that might add up to a change in direction are pre-determined by one's assumptions about them. Options are not perceived. Creativity does not happen. Solutions are not discovered.
Ask yourself are you validly perceiving what is likely to happen (without your assumptions about it) or are you perceiving what is likely to happen BECAUSE of your assumptions about it.
Personally, I consider the likely difference between those two general sets of conditions to be, for the most part, a matter of will/motive/desire.
If one cannot entertain options one is not free. Fundamentally, what frees one to discover options is the WILL to do so.
Your assumptions/biases about the future of the USA are, thus, fundamentally the product of your will/motives/desires.
This is why I am very quickly falling out of love with what calls itself "the Left". It's no freer than anyone else is. Like other oppressors it refuses to accept that freedom is necessary to live a real life and freedom is not limited to rebellion/negation/no; it also an EQUAL ability to unite/affirm/yes. This is also what keeps what calls itself "the Left" on the outside, where it bitches about its own choices in all matters as proof of why it is oppressed. It's a circular culture of victim-hood and learned helplessness, pretty much like the one it claims to be resisting. Nothing NEW going on here.
Will figures much more essentially in that thing that makes that EQUALITY between yes and no possible than what calls itself "the Left" wants people to believe. Will holds one at the crossroads between the known and the un-known. The REASON that fact is important is because that place is where our future generations NEED to be in order to discover REAL lives that solve THEIR own problems instead of being just another iteration of all of the sacrifices that make new generations "prove" to previous generations that we are right about our own BIASES/self-fulfilling-prophecies and that includes those about the dissolution of the USA into competing states/regions or its continued development as one common wealth with justice for ALL.
randome
(34,845 posts)datasuspect
(26,591 posts)it died in 2000 through judicial and corporate coup.
we're now a banana republic, except we don't have a proper strongman warlord.
we got stuck with a milquetoast little lord fauntleroy minus the compassion.
TeamPooka
(25,577 posts)Over there you can all talk about buying gold and guns for the zombie apocalypse with like minded zombies.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)Dissolution might be the best thing to happen to the US, economically
Places like New York and California would boom and become beacons of technology and industry
Of course it might not either....
We could Balkanize and devolve into state on state wars
OR...it could be as easy as being absorbed by a greater unit...
That One World Government that actually wouldn't be a bad idea (but the Conservatives fear for no reason)
Rex
(65,616 posts)nt.
theKed
(1,235 posts)The same body of land, under the same name, with the same governance system? Not a long time, in the grand scheme of things. Maybe as soon as mid-century. I think the name United States of America will linger long after what it is now has ceased to be.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)Long after Rome fell
cemaphonic
(4,138 posts)Even their decline (from Manzikert to the fall of Constantinople) lasted 400 years.
theKed
(1,235 posts)claimed ownership of the Roman legacy, even, into the 20th century (though that's a bit of a different can of worms)
TimberValley
(318 posts)I look at the United States today and I see very little that gives me any cause for optimism.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I don't think we have a lot of time left as the dominant power in the world.