Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

YoungDemCA

(5,714 posts)
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 06:39 PM Apr 2013

Wait a minute...since when was proposing cuts to the safety net a step towards "the center"?

Cutting Social Security is a step towards the Right, especially the Far Right.

I keep reading about the President's supposed "political courage" in "going against the wishes of his base", which will endear him to "the center."

Let me be absolutely clear; there is nothing, nothing courageous about proposing cuts to Social Security-or any other social program, for that matter-when right-wing government policies have meant that the rich have gotten richer, the poor poorer, and the working and middle classes have seen a decrease in their standard of living for the last three decades.

There is also nothing "moderate" or "centrist" about agreeing with the Right that government benefits are "too generous" to the poor and middle class, and should therefore be "rolled back."

If we're going to talk about what is being done, let's at least have some semblance of intellectual honesty here.

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wait a minute...since when was proposing cuts to the safety net a step towards "the center"? (Original Post) YoungDemCA Apr 2013 OP
Only people with no skin in the game are saying that. ForgoTheConsequence Apr 2013 #1
Exactly right, it's all bullshit that the administration is trying to shove down our throats bowens43 Apr 2013 #2
Is it possible that... xtraxritical Apr 2013 #20
It could mean being equally intransigent treestar Apr 2013 #3
That picture puts nothing in perspective. ForgoTheConsequence Apr 2013 #5
+1 MNBrewer Apr 2013 #25
I saw this in the Tennessean this morning....... socialist_n_TN Apr 2013 #7
It doesn't matter, the capitalist pigs will lie Rex Apr 2013 #10
this is the "centrist" argument noiretextatique Apr 2013 #16
we'll just have to agree to disagree on that cartoon...n/t tokenlib Apr 2013 #8
Ah, it's only a small cut. rug Apr 2013 #11
Hair is a better metaphor treestar Apr 2013 #12
Hair is dead. The elderly and disabled are not. rug Apr 2013 #15
and you think that's just fine? noiretextatique Apr 2013 #18
So it lessens the ability for people on SS to keep up with inflation MNBrewer Apr 2013 #26
"Equally intransigent" would be true if those "small tax hikes" on the rich PA Democrat Apr 2013 #13
The moral underpinnings of this salib Apr 2013 #19
This has got to be one of the most disingenuous cartoons I've ever seen on DU Art_from_Ark Apr 2013 #22
Given the number of Republicans that are also opposed to cutting SS, it's a loser winter is coming Apr 2013 #4
i think it has something to do with electing a dem. xchrom Apr 2013 #6
It is not, our leaders got caught acting really stupid Rex Apr 2013 #9
bs MSM spin noiretextatique Apr 2013 #14
Left - Center - Right. Zorra Apr 2013 #17
Even 54% of REPUBLICANS !!! oppose cutting SS with chained CPI : Faryn Balyncd Apr 2013 #21
Check out this poll, even stronger opposition Babel_17 Apr 2013 #29
Since washington politicians started paying trolls to spout propaganda on DU fascisthunter Apr 2013 #23
K&R MotherPetrie Apr 2013 #24
See? That is the plan...propose radical stuff like Ryan's budget Evergreen Emerald Apr 2013 #27
Agreed. I've earned my credentials here for being a moderate (in the # of people ignoring me)... Honeycombe8 Apr 2013 #28

ForgoTheConsequence

(5,185 posts)
1. Only people with no skin in the game are saying that.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 06:41 PM
Apr 2013

The fact is both sides are starting their negotiations from the right. Which means we all get fucked.

 

bowens43

(16,064 posts)
2. Exactly right, it's all bullshit that the administration is trying to shove down our throats
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 06:41 PM
Apr 2013

Obama has betrayed the people who elected him.

 

xtraxritical

(3,576 posts)
20. Is it possible that...
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 07:48 PM
Apr 2013

if Republicons reject this budget (which includes 98% of what they asked for) the President and Democrats can squarely lay the pain of sequester at their feet. If they further refuse to raise the debt ceiling this summer, after rejecting this offer, the Democrats can hammer home the theme of RepubliCON obstructionism. I hope this will be the denouement.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
3. It could mean being equally intransigent
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 06:42 PM
Apr 2013

As the right wing is. If an R President proposed to a Dem Congress something like a small hike in taxes on the rich, causing Republicans to go off the rails, what would we think?

This puts it in perspective.

[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
25. +1
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 09:40 PM
Apr 2013

Cutting Social Security benefits is not the only way to improve the solvency of the program. There are others. Obama is cutting SS because that's his preferred method. He says it's not "optimal" to do so, but it's what he's preferring to do.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
7. I saw this in the Tennessean this morning.......
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 06:49 PM
Apr 2013

How many times does it have to be said? SOCIAL SECURITY IS A SELF FUNDED PROGRAM. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE BUDGET.

Unless you want to talk about the $2 TRILLION or so that's been "borrowed" from the Trust Fund for unpayed wars, tax cuts for the already wealthy and unfunded health care privatization of Medicare.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
10. It doesn't matter, the capitalist pigs will lie
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 06:52 PM
Apr 2013

day and night to destroy the program for their 1% masters.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
12. Hair is a better metaphor
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 07:00 PM
Apr 2013

Since it grows. The "cut" is applied only to raises based on inflation.

PA Democrat

(13,428 posts)
13. "Equally intransigent" would be true if those "small tax hikes" on the rich
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 07:10 PM
Apr 2013

caused as much pain as the chained CPI. You do realize that the chained CPI also raises middle class taxes at a greater rate for the middle class than for the wealthiest?

I think your perspective is skewed to say the least.





http://www.thenation.com/blog/173786/top-5-myths-about-chained-cpi-debunked#

salib

(2,116 posts)
19. The moral underpinnings of this
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 07:45 PM
Apr 2013

and right-wing austerity drenched memes are truly disgusting.

So, I guess we are just "clipping" or "trimming" some of that blue hair, huh?

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
22. This has got to be one of the most disingenuous cartoons I've ever seen on DU
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 08:37 PM
Apr 2013

Last edited Thu Apr 11, 2013, 10:01 PM - Edit history (1)

It gives the ridiculous impression that Granny will be getting way more in Social Security than she will need, but for the vast majority of Social Security recipients, that is just not the case.

A much more realistic cartoon would show Granny with almost no hair at all, with the barber still trying to cut it, and Granny desperately trying to get out of the chair and shouting, "No more cutting, dammit!"

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
4. Given the number of Republicans that are also opposed to cutting SS, it's a loser
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 06:44 PM
Apr 2013

move even for the right.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
9. It is not, our leaders got caught acting really stupid
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 06:51 PM
Apr 2013

and like all good megalomaniacs...decided to blame the weakest group in all this. It really shows how not only out of touch D.C. is with the rest of us, but how they never can admit to failure.

Sad really.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
14. bs MSM spin
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 07:20 PM
Apr 2013
it's absolutely ridiculous

So as a governing document, it’s dead on arrival. But it’s still useful: By taking a step toward the center on this one element, Obama demonstrates a willingness to go against his political base – and that base has helped him publicize that point by vocally and publicly objecting to his proposal. By extension, his move on chained CPI could be helpful in dealing with other elements of his agenda.

“Obama is cleverly using it as a bargaining chip to give himself wiggle room on other key agenda items like gun control and immigration reform, while still leaving open the minuscule possibility of reaching a budget grand bargain,” says Republican strategist Ford O’Connell.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/DC-Decoder/2013/0410/Obama-budget-changes-Social-Security-Are-Republicans-on-board?nav=655577-csm_article-leftColRelated

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
17. Left - Center - Right.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 07:27 PM
Apr 2013

The center is a blend of left and right. They blend half left wing ideology with right wing ideology.

That's why the center has so many right wing ideas and pushes so many right wing policies, like austerity and cutting social security.

Faryn Balyncd

(5,125 posts)
21. Even 54% of REPUBLICANS !!! oppose cutting SS with chained CPI :
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 08:13 PM
Apr 2013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022072768


and 56% of independents....

(and 68% of Democrats.)

This is a rare issue in which a broad majority of virtually EVERY ideology, party or group, other than the professional pseudo-"centrist" lapdog PUNDITRY and their right wight financiers are united.




Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
29. Check out this poll, even stronger opposition
Fri Apr 12, 2013, 01:33 AM
Apr 2013
http://www.aarp.org/work/social-security/info-03-2013/social-security-cola-chained-cpi.html

And I think the opposition is solidifying. Looking "serious" is all fine and well when locked arm in arm with other "serious" folks but not so popular when the villagers have leaders as well as pitchforks and torches.

Evergreen Emerald

(13,096 posts)
27. See? That is the plan...propose radical stuff like Ryan's budget
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 09:43 PM
Apr 2013

And in contrast, cutting the safety net becomes compromise, a "move to the center." And appears reasonable in comparison.

That has been the R plan all along.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
28. Agreed. I've earned my credentials here for being a moderate (in the # of people ignoring me)...
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 09:48 PM
Apr 2013

and even I am upset by this turn of events.

People over 50 have based their retirement plans on their Social Security benefits....not just the amount at first, but the amount as it supposedly sort of keeps up with inflation.

This changes the rules and will hurt millions of people, many who are too old to save more money to make up for the loss. It's simply too late for them.

Add to that the fact that we STILL have that provision that prevents Medicare from negotiating drug prices....and it all adds up to increased costs for the elderly. It stinks.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wait a minute...since whe...