Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn Case You Missed This... 'S.E.C. Is Avoiding Tough Sanctions for Large Banks' - NYT
S.E.C. Is Avoiding Tough Sanctions for Large BanksBy EDWARD WYATT - NYT
Published: February 3, 2012
<snip>
WASHINGTON Even as the Securities and Exchange Commission has stepped up its investigations of Wall Street in the last decade, the agency has repeatedly allowed the biggest firms to avoid punishments specifically meant to apply to fraud cases. By granting exemptions to laws and regulations that act as a deterrent to securities fraud, the S.E.C. has let financial giants like JPMorganChase, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America continue to have advantages reserved for the most dependable companies, making it easier for them to raise money from investors, for example, and to avoid liability from lawsuits if their financial forecasts turn out to be wrong.
An analysis by The New York Times of S.E.C. investigations over the last decade found nearly 350 instances where the agency has given big Wall Street institutions and other financial companies a pass on those or other sanctions. Those instances also include waivers permitting firms to underwrite certain stock and bond sales and manage mutual fund portfolios.
JPMorganChase, for example, has settled six fraud cases in the last 13 years, including one with a $228 million settlement last summer, but it has obtained at least 22 waivers, in part by arguing that it has a strong record of compliance with securities laws. Bank of America and Merrill Lynch, which merged in 2009, have settled 15 fraud cases and received at least 39 waivers.
Only about a dozen companies Dell, General Electric and United Rentals among them have felt the full force of the law after issuing misleading information about their businesses. Citigroup was the only major Wall Street bank among them. In 11 years, it settled six fraud cases and received 25 waivers before it lost most of its privileges in 2010. By granting those waivers, the S.E.C. allowed Wall Street firms to have powerful advantages, securities experts and former regulators say. The institutions remained protected under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which makes it easier to avoid class-action shareholder lawsuits.
<snip>
More: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/03/business/sec-is-avoiding-tough-sanctions-for-large-banks.html?_r=1
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Case You Missed This... 'S.E.C. Is Avoiding Tough Sanctions for Large Banks' - NYT (Original Post)
WillyT
Feb 2012
OP
Too big to fail? Looks more like too big to obey the law. Or too big for their britches.
kestrel91316
Feb 2012
#2
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)1. This is the result of criminals running our government
It started with the criminals running RayGun and ends with the criminal SCOTUS appointing bush the lesser.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)2. Too big to fail? Looks more like too big to obey the law. Or too big for their britches.
jsmirman
(4,507 posts)3. Maddening
WillyT
(72,631 posts)4. Kick !!!
bvar22
(39,909 posts)5. Yes, Virginia,
There are indeed Two Americas.
You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.
[font size=5 color=green][center]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]
xchrom
(108,903 posts)6. Du rec. Nt