Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRobert Reich: Widening inequality is not inevitable
From Reich's public Facebook page:
Widening inequality is not inevitable. If we wanted to reverse it and restore middle-class prosperity, we could.
We could award tax cuts to companies that link the pay of their hourly workers to profits and productivity, and that keep the total pay of their top 5 executives within 20 times the pay of their median worker. And impose higher taxes on companies that dont.
We could raise the minimum wage to half the average wage.
We could increase public investment in education, including early-childhood -- especially in the poor and middle-class communities that now lack decent schools.
We could eliminate college loans and allow all students to repay the cost of their higher education with a 10 percent surcharge on the first 10 years of income from full-time employment.
We could expand the Earned Income Tax Credit.
And we could pay for all this by adding additional tax brackets at the top and increasing the top marginal tax rate to what it was before 1981 at least 70 percent.
But none of this will happen until the public understands why widening inequality is so damaging. Even the rich would do better with a smaller share of a rapidly-growing economy than a large share of one thats barely growing at all.
https://www.facebook.com/RBReich/posts/595249310487669
We could award tax cuts to companies that link the pay of their hourly workers to profits and productivity, and that keep the total pay of their top 5 executives within 20 times the pay of their median worker. And impose higher taxes on companies that dont.
We could raise the minimum wage to half the average wage.
We could increase public investment in education, including early-childhood -- especially in the poor and middle-class communities that now lack decent schools.
We could eliminate college loans and allow all students to repay the cost of their higher education with a 10 percent surcharge on the first 10 years of income from full-time employment.
We could expand the Earned Income Tax Credit.
And we could pay for all this by adding additional tax brackets at the top and increasing the top marginal tax rate to what it was before 1981 at least 70 percent.
But none of this will happen until the public understands why widening inequality is so damaging. Even the rich would do better with a smaller share of a rapidly-growing economy than a large share of one thats barely growing at all.
https://www.facebook.com/RBReich/posts/595249310487669
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1184 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Robert Reich: Widening inequality is not inevitable (Original Post)
unrepentant progress
Apr 2013
OP
byeya
(2,842 posts)1. We could except that the forces aligned against it happening are Big $$$, the RepubliKKKans,
the DLC Democrats and the courts(to a lesser degree).
When we can do is struggle to try and make these things right; expose the hucksters and Economic Bourbons; and find common cause with people and groups whenever possible.
When 400 people own more wealth than the bottom 120 Million people, the situation should not be tolerated.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)2. K&R
ProSense
(116,464 posts)3. Reich's suggestions
We could award tax cuts to companies that link the pay of their hourly workers to profits and productivity, and that keep the total pay of their top 5 executives within 20 times the pay of their median worker. And impose higher taxes on companies that dont...raise the minimum wage to half the average wage...increase public investment in education, including early-childhood...eliminate college loans and allow all students to repay the cost of their higher education with a 10 percent surcharge on the first 10 years of income from full-time employment...expand the Earned Income Tax Credit...pay for all this by adding additional tax brackets at the top and increasing the top marginal tax rate to what it was before 1981 at least 70 percent.
...are very good. They're similar to some of the proposals in the President's budget.
In Obamas Budget, Poverty Initiatives Face an Uphill Battle
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022674502
President's budget: Maintains Strong Support for Worker Protection.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022673679
President's budget: Excellent proposals that Congress should support.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022670043
pampango
(24,692 posts)4. Greater income equality is not rocket science. Every other rich country does better at it
than the US. Reich's suggestions are good plus there are many other policies that have proven to work in other countries.
The problem in the US is a lack of political will to deal with income inequality, rather than not knowing how to go about it.