Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MaineLinePhilly

(72 posts)
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 11:01 PM Apr 2013

Will the surviving bombing suspect also be charged with murdering his brother?

Its been said that the younger suspect ran over his brother when he was trying to flee. If that is determined to be the cause of death by the medical examiner, will the younger brother also be charged with that death?

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Will the surviving bombing suspect also be charged with murdering his brother? (Original Post) MaineLinePhilly Apr 2013 OP
That could happen. madaboutharry Apr 2013 #1
In one article I read . . . markpkessinger Apr 2013 #2
He is toast without that charge anyway. 3 murders, bombs, attempted murder, etc. n-t Logical Apr 2013 #3
Well yeah but I still want to know MaineLinePhilly Apr 2013 #6
Well, he tried to run over cops also. So that is multiple felonys. But I agree, that would be..... Logical Apr 2013 #7
If you run over someone with a car, how is that involuntary? LisaL Apr 2013 #15
He was escaping. Not trying to kill his brother. n-t Logical Apr 2013 #20
So as long as you are escaping, you are allowed to run people over? LisaL Apr 2013 #22
A murder charge requires intent. There was none. n-t Logical Apr 2013 #23
Felony murder doesn't require intent to murder. LisaL Apr 2013 #27
Not in the case of second-degree murder anneboleyn Apr 2013 #35
The answer you seek is not as simple as you wish it to be. Jenoch Apr 2013 #17
As long as the contacts aren't dirty. krispos42 Apr 2013 #18
If he caused his brother's death death then I hope he is charged. n/t Tx4obama Apr 2013 #4
It's up to the DA - not murder though dballance Apr 2013 #5
You don't need intent for third degree murder MaineLinePhilly Apr 2013 #8
No intent needed for second degree murder either anneboleyn Apr 2013 #36
wow SmileyRose Apr 2013 #9
I thought about the missing work thing too MaineLinePhilly Apr 2013 #11
Great! longship Apr 2013 #24
The only thing crass and unthinking is to not consider it MaineLinePhilly Apr 2013 #38
They caught the guy after the shelter was lifted malaise Apr 2013 #44
Someone on the radio likened it to a snow day treestar Apr 2013 #43
Technically he could be Yo_Mama Apr 2013 #10
I want to know the same thing. Kalidurga Apr 2013 #12
Apparently, the brother wasn't yet dead when he arrived at the hospital. LisaL Apr 2013 #14
Did not know that. Kalidurga Apr 2013 #16
It sure didn't. LisaL Apr 2013 #19
I saw that too. I'm sure it was an FBI person - not just a witness n/t patricia92243 Apr 2013 #31
No, that was the guy living in the builiding next to the scene. LisaL Apr 2013 #32
See Comment #28 Tx4obama Apr 2013 #29
I think he was pronounced dead upon arriving at the hospital lunatica Apr 2013 #41
Well, if medical examiner determines he died because of being run over, then I fail to see why not. LisaL Apr 2013 #13
He probably could be, but why? bluedigger Apr 2013 #21
Its possible. HooptieWagon Apr 2013 #25
+1 . . . hope so! - n/t fleur-de-lisa Apr 2013 #26
Yes, MA has the felony murder rule. And fleeing the police in a vehicle is a felony. Loudly Apr 2013 #33
Tamerlan Tsarnaev Injuries: Doctor Says Dead Bombing Suspect Had Wounds 'Head To Toe' Tx4obama Apr 2013 #28
Being shot and then run over will do that. LisaL Apr 2013 #30
He also had a blast wound in his torso. HooptieWagon Apr 2013 #39
No. onenote Apr 2013 #34
All I know is defacto7 Apr 2013 #37
It would probably be manslaughter if they charged him lunatica Apr 2013 #40
Makes sense treestar Apr 2013 #42

markpkessinger

(8,935 posts)
2. In one article I read . . .
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 11:06 PM
Apr 2013

. . . one of the doctors who attended to him said he had serious puncture wounds from head to toe, and thus it would likely be impossible to determine precisely which wounds caused his death. Here's the link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/20/tamerlan-tsarnaev-injuires_n_3124612.html

 

MaineLinePhilly

(72 posts)
6. Well yeah but I still want to know
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 11:11 PM
Apr 2013

Of course he's toast but I'd still like to know from a legal standpoint.

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
7. Well, he tried to run over cops also. So that is multiple felonys. But I agree, that would be.....
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 11:14 PM
Apr 2013

an involuntary manslaughter charge also.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
17. The answer you seek is not as simple as you wish it to be.
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 11:25 PM
Apr 2013

The younger brother would likely be charged, if the prosecutor so chooses, with 'felony murder', that is he is part of a felony that causes the death of a co-conspirator of the felony. The fact that he may have driven over his brother in his attempt to escape is not a particularly important point in the case.

 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
5. It's up to the DA - not murder though
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 11:09 PM
Apr 2013

I doubt it would be a murder charge. For murder you need intent.

 

MaineLinePhilly

(72 posts)
8. You don't need intent for third degree murder
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 11:15 PM
Apr 2013

Third degree murder can be charged for negligence and recklessness. It varies by state though when it gets to third degree vs manslaughter.

SmileyRose

(4,854 posts)
9. wow
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 11:15 PM
Apr 2013

all I can think of is his mom ...... his parents must be insane with greif. Their boy killed 5 maimed 100 plus,..... how many will lose a roof because that one day shelter in place made the difference paying rent.... how many suffered missing critically needed medical appt,....and possibly killed his own brother.

 

MaineLinePhilly

(72 posts)
11. I thought about the missing work thing too
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 11:18 PM
Apr 2013

State workers will probably get administrative leave but I doubt McDonalds is going to cover your missed shift because of the shelter in place order. Believe me I definitely thought of the hourly wage workers when that happened. Estimates say the shelter in place cost a loss of $313 million. I'm sure some of it was made up in the bars last night though lol.

longship

(40,416 posts)
24. Great!
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 12:04 AM
Apr 2013

I can get to my minimum wage job while my whole city is quivering in their boots.


What a crass and unthinking post.

The people of Boston were not worried about their McJobs this week. They were worried about a couple of maniacal douchebags inflicting more death and destruction on their city.

So! Yes! They stayed home. Voluntarily!

Shelter in place is not a lockdown. Nor is it suspensions of freedoms. Anybody who wanted to have a street party was free to do so. Thankfully, Bostonians had more sense than some here on DU.

They complied with the request, and they caught the guy.

A good outcome, given the situation and the events. Thankfully, there were no street parties.

 

MaineLinePhilly

(72 posts)
38. The only thing crass and unthinking is to not consider it
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:03 AM
Apr 2013

I don't have a low wage job but at least I can think about how it surely must have pissed people off who do have one that they missed their shift that day to deal with this idiot. While it may have been voluntary, it wasn't presented that way. They didn't come on TV and say "this is voluntary". I'd never heard of a shelter in place order before so I would've thought it was mandatory, as I'm sure many others did.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
43. Someone on the radio likened it to a snow day
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:27 AM
Apr 2013

Logically, it would be no more of a loss than that.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
10. Technically he could be
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 11:17 PM
Apr 2013

Felony murder, not manslaughter.

But I doubt it. And, as you say, it depends on the results of the autopsy. Given all the concurrent injuries, the medical examiner might have difficulty assigning the responsibility for the death. Multiple trauma or something like that.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
12. I want to know the same thing.
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 11:21 PM
Apr 2013

It is very likely that because he ran over his brother that he is dead. But, I suppose it is possible his brother was dead before he hit the ground.

LisaL

(47,509 posts)
14. Apparently, the brother wasn't yet dead when he arrived at the hospital.
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 11:22 PM
Apr 2013

Last edited Sun Apr 21, 2013, 12:20 AM - Edit history (1)

So how would it be possible that he was dead before he hit the ground?

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
16. Did not know that.
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 11:25 PM
Apr 2013

Then it would be difficult indeed to figure out what ultimately killed him. But, being run over certainly did not help.

LisaL

(47,509 posts)
19. It sure didn't.
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 11:26 PM
Apr 2013

Just saw a witness interviewed on CNN. Not only was the brother run over, the body was dragged by a car.

LisaL

(47,509 posts)
32. No, that was the guy living in the builiding next to the scene.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 12:28 AM
Apr 2013

I don't think he has any connection to FBI.
He lives there with several roommates.
He was watching from the window.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
41. I think he was pronounced dead upon arriving at the hospital
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:23 AM
Apr 2013

He could have died anytime before that, or it could be that a doctor or coroner has to actually pronounce the death after ascertaining that the person is dead themselves.

LisaL

(47,509 posts)
13. Well, if medical examiner determines he died because of being run over, then I fail to see why not.
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 11:22 PM
Apr 2013

bluedigger

(17,449 posts)
21. He probably could be, but why?
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 11:34 PM
Apr 2013

It would just add a lot of work for the prosecutors and time and expense to the case with minimal escalation of the potential penalties. He was probably speeding and operating recklessly as well.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
25. Its possible.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 12:05 AM
Apr 2013

I am not familiar with Mass law, but in Florida if a person dies during commission of a felony, then accomplices in the crime can be charged with murder. Under those circumstances, not only can he be charged with his brothers death (even if he didn't run him over), but could also be charged with the cop's murder even if his brother pulled the trigger. I don't know if Mass law is the same though.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
28. Tamerlan Tsarnaev Injuries: Doctor Says Dead Bombing Suspect Had Wounds 'Head To Toe'
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 12:15 AM
Apr 2013


BOSTON — A doctor involved in treating the Boston Marathon bombing suspect who died in a gunbattle with police says he had injuries head to toe and all limbs intact when he arrived at the hospital.

Dr. David Schoenfeld said 26-year-old Tamerlan Tsarnaev was unconscious and had so many penetrating wounds when he arrived at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center early Friday that it isn't clear which ones killed him, and a medical examiner will have to determine the cause of death.

-snip-

The older Tsarnaev's clothes had been cut off by emergency responders at the scene, so if he had been wearing a vest with explosives, he wasn't by the time he arrived at the hospital, the doctor said.

"From head to toe, every region of his body had injuries," he said. "His legs and arms were intact – he wasn't blown into a million pieces" – but he lost a pulse and was in cardiac arrest, meaning his heart and circulation had stopped, so CPR, or cardio-pulmonary resuscitation, was started.

Schoenfeld did not address police's assertion that Tsarnaev was run over by a car driven by his brother as he fled the gunfire.

-snip-

Full article here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/20/tamerlan-tsarnaev-injuires_n_3124612.html



LisaL

(47,509 posts)
30. Being shot and then run over will do that.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 12:18 AM
Apr 2013

According to eyewitness, when he was run over, his body was dragged by a car.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
39. He also had a blast wound in his torso.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:12 AM
Apr 2013

There is a picture floating around on the internet...I won't link to it, but it's easy to find.
However, even if younger brother didn't run over him, he can still be charged in his death as they were committing felonies at the time.

onenote

(46,227 posts)
34. No.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 12:38 AM
Apr 2013

Could they? Sure. They also could charge him with speeding, trespassing, failing to signal when he made a turn and probably littering.

But they won't. The focus will be on proving the case for 4 counts of murder, 170 counts of attempted murder, 170 counts of maiming, more weapons and explosives charges than I know the names of, and conspiracy to commit pretty much all of the above. They won't devote a minute or penny of resources to trying to prove that his running over his brother was the cause of his brother's death or that it was an intentional act on his part.

So, no he won't be charged with murdering his brother. Bank on it.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
40. It would probably be manslaughter if they charged him
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:18 AM
Apr 2013

Murder is what he did when he made the bombs go off. It was pre-meditated, so therefore murder. Killing his brother, if he did, wasn't pre-meditated nor was it deliberate.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
42. Makes sense
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:24 AM
Apr 2013

Though he may be able to make out a case for manslaughter. May not have been intentional.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Will the surviving bombin...