2016-Hillary 65%, Joe Biden 13% Cuomo 4% -New quinnipac poll

[graham4anything]

http://politicalwire.com/archives/2013/05/02/no_one_close_to_clinton_for_democratic_nomination.html

No One Close to Clinton for Democratic Nomination
A new Quinnipiac poll finds Hillary Clinton has a huge lead over other potential 2016 candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination with 65%, followed by Joe Biden at 13% and Andrew Cuomo at 4%.

Said pollster Peter Brown: "Hillary Clinton has a rock-solid hold on the hearts of Democratic voters at this point. If she decides not to run, Vice President Joseph Biden does almost as well as she does against the rest of the field. There is a long way to go until 2016, but none of the other younger potential candidates for the Democratic nomination currently has anything approaching widespread support from party voters."

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes--centers/polling-institute/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=1891

Tot Men Wom

Clinton 65% 66% 65%
Biden 13 14 12
Cuomo 4 6 2
Patrick 1 1 1
Warner 1 - 1
O'Malley 1 1 1
SMONE ELSE(VOL) 1 1 -
WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) - 1 -
DK/NA 14 9 18

REGION...................
NEast MWest South West

Clinton 70% 59% 68% 62%
Biden 11 20 12 11
Cuomo 7 3 2 4
Patrick 1 3 1 1
Warner - - 2 -
O'Malley - 1 - 4
SMONE ELSE(VOL) - 2 1 -
WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) - - - -
DK/NA 11 13 15 17

[graham4anything]

1. Hillary has gained another 2% over the poll the other day

and don't forget-

Hillary didn't lose in 2008. She would have defeated John McCain, and this time Hillary has 100% of Barack Obama's CORE fans like myself and everyone else.

The only people who don't like him never wanted him or Hillary in 2008.

and their votes are NOT needed in 2016

to continue the agenda of Barack Obama and to make America 80-20 and render the 20% totally obsolete from the discussion.

[Tierra_y_Libertad]

2. I'm glad our votes are not needed.

Saves us from the inclination to hold our noses and vote for another triangulating, 3rd Way, centrist, hawk.

[graham4anything]

3. awwww how quaint, name calling democratic candidates on a democratic board

will make victory even that much sweeter

[Tierra_y_Libertad]

5. Name calling? I would call it a realistic description of a self serving centrist politiican.

[graham4anything]

7. The #1 most liberal populist of all time was LBJ, and the same old forced him out too

next they will say LBJ and FDR were those vile names you called Hillary.

Mainstream, is not an evil word. Mainstream just means WINNER.
fringe=whine and lazy, not actually having to do anything so the whine can flow forever

[Tierra_y_Libertad]

14. He was fairly "liberal" domestically. Then there was the matter of being a war criminal who should

have been tried for the deaths he instigated and approved of.

But, don't let that stop you adulation.

[graham4anything]

15. Truman, Eisenhower and Kennedy's war. Eisenhower was the #3 worst, I do agree with that.

[djean111]

4. What names were on the poll? Same old stuff?

At the link you gave us, there was a poll from 2006 and Obama wasn't even on it - and Hilary had a comfortable lead.
I am hoping for more of a Democrat to vote for, next time. I was a Hilary supporter, but was unaware of her Corporate persona. I guess, though, she won't really even sound progressive, so no disappointment or surprise.

[graham4anything]

11. only reason Hillary didn't win was because Barack Obama's fans. She has 100% of them this time.

all those stale anti-LBJ, anti-Obama, anti-Hillary soundbytes are quaint and getting quainter. Like a Norman Rockwell painting.
So 1950s.

History has passed it by.

[SunSeeker]

12. Clinton, Biden, Cuomo, Patrick, Warner & O'Malley. Here's the link:

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes--centers/polling-institute/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=1891

[bunnies]

6. Wasnt this the case last time too?

Primary season at DU. I can't wait.

[L0oniX]

8. Another poll up the ass. n/t

[SunSeeker]

9. Wow. The pollsters didn't even list Warren as an option, but "other" was only 1% anyway.

So much for my Warren fantasy.

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes--centers/polling-institute/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=1891

[JaneyVee]

10. Why bother. We don't even know who's running yet.

[graham4anything]

13. It's Hillary vs. Jeb. Come Labor Day 2016, everyone here will be 100% for Hillary I bet.

[Arcanetrance]

16. Well if it's so inevitable why have primaries hell why have elections let's just install her and be

done. Polls this far out are pointless especially since no one's announced they're running. How bout we worry about 2014 and keeping the senate and finding a way to grab more house seats. Otherwise it won't matter what will happen in 2016.

[graham4anything]

17. Should the Dallas Cowboys play in 2013 without a coach and a quarterback?

[Arcanetrance]

19. Lol that's a bad metaphor given the fact I'm a Giants fan

If she does become the nominee I will vote for her. I just don't think these polls are accurate and cause infighting for all anyone knows Hillary herself is done with it and won't run at all. It just seems the inevitability thing goes to far.

[HappyMe]

18. Good grief!

She has not said a single word about running.