General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEgyptian TV Host Riham Said REMOVES VEIL During Interview, CLASHES With Guest Cleric Yousuf Badri
" ..I would have accepted it if it was in order to make me please Allah, .But, off-the-air, YOU have NO problem talking to me without the Hijab ..and then, when the viewers can see, YOU make me wear it?!..."
" .I feel like I am playacting when I put this scarf on. - Let's start the show.
" .Change the subject, and put on that Hijab! .I'm not going to put it on. I will wear it for God, not for you ."
.
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)B-b-but hijabs are part of their culture! We must be hands-off when Muslims act like sexist doucheclowns because forcing women to wear sacks over their head liberates them!!!
Because we condemn the forced wearing of the hijab, that means we HATE ALL MUSLIMS!!!
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)backscatter712
(26,357 posts)A certain poster self-deleted her most entertaining posts though.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)It seemed as if you were trying to misrepresent the thoughts of many feminist here. Glad you cleared that up.
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)I have no problem with feminists. Just a small number of idiots that call themselves "feminist" while condemning a woman standing up for her rights.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Great info, and important issues raised. We like those kind of posts here.
So, what DO you plan to do about 2 billion people who practice Islam- insult them as you did this DUer?
How's that working out for you?
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)And I treat Islam no differently from Christianity, which I also insult because it insults women, among other things.
I am an athest. That means that I do not believe that religion gets immunity from criticism and ridicule when it becomes non-sensical or harmful. When Christian or Muslim religious people start behaving like misogynists, my inner asshole comes out to play!
And that poster insulted me by screaming that I was a bigot. Sorry, but claiming that I moonlight in white sheets isn't the way to make friends.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)ONE DUer, and thinking you can change the hearts and minds of billions of people by insulting them.
Interesting approach, let us know exactly how that works out helping women who are live in Islamic communities.
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)As well as the very juvenile notion that you can impact Islamic by hurling insults and offending them.
When that approach starts working, you let us all know, okay?
Insulting does not win people over. And some complain that religious people are intolerant...
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)nothing to do with boobs. Everything to do with throwing gas on a fire and calling the media instead of doing good work in the community. There are loads of Islamic feminists committed to improving their communities because they know there are wonderful people there, who's hearts and minds can be won. Such a shame they should be discounted because they are believers.
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)What did Amina do when she was confronted by her beautiful culture's repression? Oh, she insulted those Islams alright, by refusing to go around with a sack over her head, and instead taking her top off to demand freedom.
And what did FEMEN activists do? Oh, they insulted a whole bunch of misogynist fuckstains all over the world by taking off their tops and saying "FUCK YOUR MORALS!" on their bodies.
When a repressive structure won't listen to you at all when you're trying to be nice, it's time to stop being nice.
This approach worked for the LGBT community - they threw a fucking RIOT at Stonewall. Punched cops in the face. Where would they be today if they decided to only be nice. They'd still be in the closet. It worked for the black community, which refused to go to the back of the bus, marched in the middle of the street rather than the sidewalks, committed acts of trespassing when they sat down in restaurants and public places and refused to leave when the owners told them to get out.
Oh, wait, you're against civil disobedience and direct action - why those activities are rude and insulting!
Sometimes you've got to be fucking rude..
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)are hoping will change for the better? That is dumb as fuck. It will get you nothing aside from press clippings. Femen proves this daily.
Sorry, flashing your tits and yelling fuck you, has no parallel to American civil rights struggles. It will take allies within the larger community to foster change- and yelling fuck you at them isn't helping anyone.
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)Lying about my positions really makes you look like the bigger person.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)backscatter712
(26,357 posts)Talk about people saying there's a "right way and a wrong way to be feminist"...
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)You believe they're "feminists," as opposed to feminists. You don't think they're real feminists.
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)They were the ones questioning Amina's legitimacy to make such a protest, accusing her of faking her accusations against her abusive family, trying to discredit everything she said. Putting down and attacking a woman like that ain't feminism.
I stand my my statement.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)activists. That some here are *shocked I tells you* that all feminist women here do not think alike, or agree that it was helpful is hilarious. Such a naive attitude.
Tells us exactly how much of an activist they have been if they think that's how it works. "Feminist" my ass.
And the bullshit that anyone is telling anyone to sit down and shut up, oh please. Spare us this nonsense. Totally misrepresents those who are not impressed with Femen's self promotion and anti-Muslim approach.
redqueen
(115,186 posts)It's more like they're telling feminists who disagree with FEMEN's tactics to sit down and shut up! (In addition to the "feminists" bullshit.)
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)purity test. It would have helped them a great deal if they had any knowledge or history with ANY activism though.
It's painfully obvious who has never been there, or done that- isn't it? Yet they are handing out scare quotes. Funny!
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)Last edited Sat May 4, 2013, 04:50 PM - Edit history (1)
is and isn't "legitimate" protest and who can and can not engage in it.
That and "them pig-man want to look at TITTIES"!!!!!,,11,,,!!!
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Can't say I saw very many of you guys giving a flying shit about the status of Muslim women before there were breasts to look at.
During the period they were there, I didn't see any of you valuing the perspectives of anyone who was wearing a shirt.
Don't see many of you continuing the topic now that the breasts have vanished from the headlines.
I'm sure you've just been silenced by hte brutality of the *ahem* "feminists."
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)guys are actually gals? Or that there are a lot of gals who LOVE boobies, don't have problem with nudity and definitely don't give a fig about your morals?
Judging how spectacularly you failed at detecting the above, what does it say about rest of your deductive powers?
PS. If you (generic) don't know the gender of the poster you are talking to, its a good idea not to ASSume. Really. Makes you (generic) look very very foolish.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Wow! These folks really do not listen to themselves.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)want to be taken seriously.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)LiberalLovinLug
(14,756 posts)Just because the Tea Bagger xenophobes hate all things Islam and thinks everyone wearing a turban is a terrorist, doesn't mean we have to take the opposite view and ignore the injustices of that medieval patriarchal belief system. These women are way behind western women in their fight for equality. They need our support.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)did not say "all feminists". But you make it sound like they did. Very dishonest tactic.
aquart
(69,014 posts)backscatter712
(26,357 posts)I wouldn't want to give the impression that Islam is the only religion I roundly criticize. It's got a loooot of company.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)ancianita
(43,334 posts)I'm with you backscatter. Men's drive to make women SUBMIT to them hides behind this religion bullshit.
Apophis
(1,407 posts)That particular poster called me an Islamaphobe for pointing out all of the faults of the religion.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)men and women' and that 'the vast majority of American priests live openly as gay men, accepted by the church'.
It is offensive material.
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)Response to backscatter712 (Reply #7)
HiPointDem This message was self-deleted by its author.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)that went over the top.
other than that, there are two deletions by two completely different people.
i think it's kind of dirty pool to claim something was said, but deleted. maybe it was, maybe it wasn't, but there's no proof that people can go to & check.
besides which, i thought it was a violation to bring disputes from other threads into new ones.
Segami
(14,923 posts)Last edited Sat May 4, 2013, 11:57 AM - Edit history (1)
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)We rarely see a pointed exchange between women and clergy like this one in the use. We see discussions by proxy. Usually the title of a clergy is enough to invoke tones of deference.
This type of pushback and literal pulling back of the veil to reveal the hypocrisy of religions is essential to all cultures. Religion is about power and wealth and nothing more. I used to be married to a Muslim and lived in the ME for a period of time. The one thing the man said that made sense to me until this day is that priests make their livings from twisting words and they sell to the public whatever keeps them in business and are not to be trusted.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)That cool, I understand, because I always have to tell Jews how to be proper Jews. So annoying when they don't think about their faith right.
Oh wait, that's completely asinine! What the fuck was I thinking?!
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)Oh yeah, I was!
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)Women need to know the proper way to be feminists. By pointing out good examples and bad examples, women will eventually know how to live up to men's expectations of feminism.
Oh wait, that is also asinine. I'm not thinking very well today.
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)Did I make any comments telling them they were doing it wrong?
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)Putting the word feminists in quotes means they're not real feminists.
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)It was the "feminists" that were telling FEMEN to sit down and shut up.
Centuries of people being nice didn't do a damned thing to improve women's rights in Muslim regions of the world.
It took Rosa Parks being rude and refusing to go to the back of the bus to kick the civil rights movement into high gear. It took GLBT people punching cops in the face and starting a riot at Stonewall to get people to start thinking about their rights. It took ACT UP getting in people's faces to get something done about HIV/AIDS when Reagan was perfectly comfortable with letting HIV victims die.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)this time.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)naked.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)you should be ashamed of spreading this crap. Seriously.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)You are perfectly aware which OPs we are talking about. Stop pretending.
PS am not stupid enough to give you or one of your buddies (or their sock puppets) a chance to hide my post because I post a link to specific conversation.
muriel_volestrangler
(106,566 posts)Oh-so concerned about the 'stability' of Tunisia before the elections:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2625387
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I'm not shockingly grateful, I just doubt she took the best approach. Boo fucking hoooo.
Let's not pretend this is a free speech issue. That is bullshit.
muriel_volestrangler
(106,566 posts)DOES equal "shut up and sit down". And your head is in the sand if you genuinely believe otherwise.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)even if I think it was ill-advised, of course I think she has a right. It's a foolish leap to imagine otherwise.
What is so damned hard to understand about that?
muriel_volestrangler
(106,566 posts)to 'sit down and shut up'. ie a DUer saying they know better than Amina what she should have done, and saying why she shouldn't have done it. Which is what redqueen did, and what you seem to be supporting.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)If that were true, someone would actually SAY she should sit down and shut up. But they didn't.
Stop hurling the propaganda. It's embarrassing.
muriel_volestrangler
(106,566 posts)to conform to your approved form of protest. When you and redqueen had been accusing other westerners of telling Muslim women what to do, you must be very embarrassed to be shown to be so hypocritical.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)any sort of attempt to stifle her or Femen. Totally full of shit.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)despite professing how much they are paying attention.
Amina's action brought the situation in Tunisia into the forefront of discussion (at least on DU but also helped along internationally by FEMEN).
Many DUers like to call it a "stunt" but most activists would love to have as much attention paid to their cause as Amina received.
Anyway, here's my thread demonstrating the REALITY of those who purport to be paying attention... 8 responses only. Nobody's really paying attention to this stuff until it conveniently ties into their personal agenda (like slamming FEMEN or topless protesting or whatever). I can count the number of posters on two hands, like yourself, in LBN who really ARE participating in-depth on discussions about the Arab Spring (cough) situations.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022637203
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)the attention because they don't have nice tits, LOL. Seriously funny shit. I'm seeing a bit of projection here with this jealously angle. As if anything a woman thinks is based on some catty reaction. Look to yourself.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)In fact, I would have been (delightfully) shocked if it received more than 10 responses. It performed exactly as I thought it would, and almost exactly as I predicted it would.
That the point of that thread completely escapes you says more about you than anything.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)not getting attention.... gee- what a neat little coincidence!!
it happens, great threads sink, shitty ones get a lot of attention. you'd have to not have a life outside DU to feel a shred of responsibility about it. I know I don't.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)So no jealousy at all.
In fact, I'm pretty glad that I have that thread to point to as a stellar example vividly demonstrating the duplicity on the part of many who suddenly purport to "care" about the rise of Islamism in these conflict areas and the treatment of women and minorities post Arab Spring.
And who suddenly believe they have the "feminist credibility" to tell the rest of us off, even though they haven't said ONE word before hand about the situations there for the past two years. Even more so, they presume to have the "feminist credibility" to tell protesters how to do it "right" now, without ever having weighed in before.
And who provide crystal clear examples of how nuance is lost on these discussion boards and the pack mentality (yes even on DU) prevents productive discussion.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)and you think you know what people do or are concerned about based on some thread you created- as if we were all here just waiting for it, LOL. That's some pretty weird shit. Same as you thinking anyone gives a rats ass if you think they have some kind of cred with you. People here can and do feel comfortable expressing their opinions- and it doesn;t mean they are telling anyone else to sit down and shut up. Again, that is bullshit.
Maybe you are here 24/7 and watching every thread go by, thinking about judging other DUers based on whether they sink or fly.... but most of us have better things to do than be bitter and imagine the worst of others just because our thread sank. You might need to get out more!
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)we don't get the beads thrown at us. Oh wait, that's Mardi Gras.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)backscatter712
(26,357 posts)Distorting the views of those you're arguing with makes you look like such good sports!
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)idwiyo
(5,113 posts)(Generic) you and blasting it away like its real. My last encounter with this poster was real eye opener.
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)RainDog
(28,784 posts)You shouldn't try to paint this as an issue of women vs. men because that's not true. You should stop with this sort of dishonest argument.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)I'm saying women don't need men to tell how to be real feminists, just like Jews don't need non-Jews telling them how be real Jews, liberals don't need conservatives telling us how to be real liberals, etc.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)even when what they have to say is no different than what many woman also have to say.
personally, I don't think that accomplishes a whole lot. I would rather have people on my side who understand the long-standing misogyny that is part of revealed religion and support those who help to talk about this issue.
do you tell men to sit down and shut up on every issue related to feminism, or only those with which you disagree with them?
Should Obama sit down and shut up when he talks about rights for gblt people, since he is not one of them, too?
Should whites sit down and shut up when another white person engages in racist talk, or should blacks, only, be the ones to fight racism?
since gender is more aligned with issues related to racism, rather than religion (i.e. someone is born with certain characteristics) while those things you mention are cultural and behavioral issues, I have to wonder -
Where does the line begin and end, where someone may have an opinion?
I'm a white person but one of my biggest issues that concerns me is the treatment of minorities in this nation. I don't pretend I'm someone I'm not, but I can support those who are attacked merely because of the color of their skin. I don't presume to speak for them, but I can and do speak in support of them in a nation with a long history of racism that continues to play out in this society.
Should I sit down and shut up about those issues, too?
Would people who are impacted by racism prefer if I sit down and shut up, or would they prefer some solidarity for their struggle?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)True allies would not expect that we should, would they?
RainDog
(28,784 posts)What I saw was women attacking other women and men who had a different opinion and framing that opinion as sexism, when it isn't.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)time in their lives. It's cute they finally found a protest they can get behind.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)do you really believe this is true about men here?
wow.
I think the issue became far more problematic than need be here because some insisted that it was just wrong that men enjoy looking at female bodies.
I like to look at male bodies. I'm not a sexist because of this. I'm a heterosexual.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)and no, it was never about whether they enjoy looking at women's bodies. (I think that's a given. )
That was a twisted variation on the "feminists here are man haters" theme the same people like to put out there. We also got a good dose of the "white women's problems" BS. Do you think it's a coincidence that the same exact group of guys who disrupt threads discussing feminist issues here on a regular basis suddenly swarmed to celebrate this topless protest? I sure as hell don't. They saw some dissent over whether it was wise or effective, and jumped right in. It was because they'd like to administer a feminist purity test, and flunk us, demoting us to "feminists". LOL. No one told her to sit down and shut up, for fuck's sake. People merely though it was unwise or ineffective.
Talk about entitled bullshit, referring to women here as "feminists".
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)idwiyo
(5,113 posts)opponent that you made up and insisted it was me.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)these same feminists have referred to others who don't share their opinions as "fun feminists" - as though not constantly presenting anger as the dominant mode is somehow a negative - because the use of "fun feminist" was presented in a derogatory way.
Some of these same have said that only cisgender women could participate in a feminist forum.
I didn't follow all these fights - I was caught in the crossfire, many times, not realizing battle lines had been drawn. I had iverglas on ignore for a loooong time, for instance, because interacting with her was such a negative experience. But I've been here for a while, so I eventually began to see how these things do down, often.
But how many others come here unaware and get that same treatment, I wonder? And how does that frame their responses?
I don't think the anger is one-sided and I don't think that those who claim they speak for women speak for all women, yet, if you disagree, your POSITION is not what gets attacked. The actual things you say in relation to a subject are dismissed and you are labeled in such a way to dismiss what someone says.
When people finally get fed up and give back what they get... funny that one side is given a pass for all the things they said and did if they happen to have more conservative views of issues like free speech, etc.
And, in fact, I have, in effect, been told to sit down and shut up because of posts related to the value of free speech even in regard to the issue of pornography. I can provide a link if you'd like.
So, while you dismiss what people say has been their experience, others know it from their own experience.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)that came about because a few found a new way to air their grudges. What stinks is people being so dishonest about the whole thing-
the insults and lies came instantly. There were a few people having a pretty reasonable discussion about the pros and cons of this kind of protest, and a few immediately jumped on to pretend there as some monolithic anti sex or anti fee speech thing going on - which is ridiculous. It was NEVER about free speech. If anyone in a porn thread or whatever told you to *in effect* shut up, that stinks- but it wasn't a bunch of people (it was one asshole) and it wasn't the Femen threads, so let's stop spreading this bullshit. It wasn't anyone's experience in the thread we are talking about. If you have to reach back to other, older topics to find an instance where someone told you to shut up- why don;t you instead just admit it didn't happen?
RainDog
(28,784 posts)what I was doing was showing a pattern of behavior. I didn't respond to you in any hostile way in order to talk about this.
I don't need to admit anything. I have a record that demonstrates a pattern of behavior that gives me the proof to indicate that attacks on the person, not the position, is the sort of worthless argument that goes on in relation to issues of feminism too often, which is why I don't choose to associate with those who do this.
take care.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)i'm not going to say it's okay coming from anyone. but these lies about people telling Amina to sit down and shut up are just that- lies. And they are designed to divide DUers by those with personal grudges. Anyone who goes along with that nonsense is part of the problem.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)have damn awesome telepathic powers... Or is this more of your typical make up shit and pretend it facts?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)idwiyo
(5,113 posts)Now, how about that awesome telepathic power of yours that let's you know what those "dozens" of men think?
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)1) Chained cpi is unethical.
2) "Democrats" who support chained cpi are not real Democrats.
The first phrase is telling us how the speaker feels about chained cpi, while the second is telling people that they self identify wrong.
I am not saying people should sit down and shut up about civil rights, I am saying women don't need men to tell them how to be proper feminists, Christians don't need atheists to tell them how to be proper Christians, Democrats don't need Republicans to tell them how to be proper Democrats, Native Americans don't need white people to tell them how to be proper Native Americans, etc.
Would you tell a person from a minority demographic how to be a proper minority?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)they actually believe they are in a position to judge who's a real feminist and who is not.
Very telling behavior. Says it all.
redqueen
(115,186 posts)It is a lesson that more than a few could stand to learn.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)because I disagree with them on the issue of free speech, and even tho one of my thesis readers was one of the leading feminists in this nation who spoke out against Dworkin and MacKinnon's attack on free speech. This is also my position. They have attacked me by lying about what I've said. They've attacked me by claiming I am an apologist (as is Jennifer Granholm, apparently) because I don't accept the words of an anonymous blogger about pedophile accusations against someone.
I'm a woman. I don't think I should have to state my gender to have an opinion that differs from another woman's opinion.
I also don't think it's a feminist position to attack women who are engaging in political theater to bring attention to issues.
In the sixties, such actions had a big impact and brought many people's attention to the issue of Vietnam, for instance.
While some people disliked those actions, many did not.
While regressive political opponents were elected, they engaged in dirty tricks to do so, so I can't put the blame on those who were acting outside of the majority of society's approval, either. And, in any case, as soon as those dirty tricks were uncovered, America elected a progressive president who was shut down by the right wing...who, again, engaged in election fraud (and treason) to win an election.
I can look at history and see that those engaging in this political theater, etc. were on the right side of history, tho, and while many things are still problematic, over all change has moved toward societal disapproval of racism, sexism, wars of aggression, etc.
Few who were working within the system at that time held those positions, or were brave enough to stake political careers on them, and those who did were marginalized. But society changed without the powers-that-be accepting that change at the level of culture.
We're still dealing with those changes via religious fundamentalism in the U.S., which is many times a cover for racism and sexism, or, rather, intrinsic to them, but that's not the view of people in the majority in the U.S. anymore.
So, I look at history and see no need to condemn what Amina did, or to condemn what FEMEN is doing by confronting people in their comfortable spaces to ask them questions about their "freedom" to be under a religious system that oppresses them.
Since history indicates that religion and property ownership are the two most potent cultural norms that have contributed to women's oppression across the world, I see no problem with attacking religions that engage in sexism and homophobia too, for that matter, as part of their view of the world.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)There are at least two different issues here. One is discussing our viewpoints on different issues, and having honest disagreements, and the other issue is telling people who they are and who they are not. I am addressing the second issue in this thread.
The belief that each argument should be judged on its own, regardless of who made the argument, is a belief I generally enthusiastically adhere to. However, in my opinion, there is a big difference between a Wiccan telling Catholics how to be proper Catholics and a Catholic telling Catholics how to be proper Catholics. Both are undesirable, in my opinion, but one is more undesirable than the other.
One difficulty with discussing feminism is the fact that there is more than one type of feminism, but the various types are all generally simply called feminism. Because of this, two different people can hold opposite view points on a subject (e.g., FEMEN, Islam), yet both views can still be feminist views.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)what idiot thinks every feminist agrees on every issue?
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)Feminists don't always agree and that does not make them any less of feminist.
Some of us on DU don't always agree with some feminists either (while we do with others) - but when we don't agree it is because we are uneducated , hate women, hate feminism, etc.
What idiot thinks we all have to agree on every issue to be considered on the same side in general on the core ideals (equality for all, etc)?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)what her point was. Well they guessed but they were mostly wrong- for days. And that is an issue also with Femen- hazy messaging, but it gets press because it's such a great photo op.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)you just make up shit about other people and proceed to present it as facts?
RainDog
(28,784 posts)who talked about the racist application of the law in regard to things like stop and frisk - because Keyes is African-American, he has more authority to speak on this issue even when others who are African-American disagree?
But if Michelle Alexander were on the same program and called out Alan Keyes, since she has done a lot of excellent work on this subject...then it would be okay to tell Alan Keyes he's full of shit if he tried to claim law enforcement is not racist in its application in America?
I guess I don't have the same segregated view of who can have an opinion (backed up by data.)
Is Alan Keyes a person to tell African-Americans how to be a "proper minority" when he aligns with a party that is composed of homophobic and racist people - does the color of his skin confer automatic respect for his positions?
Martin Luther King's niece speaks out against abortion and claims his legacy to do so. MLK's wife disagrees and she supports planned parenthood.
But, if it's not another African-American, no one can disagree with MLK's niece because that's racist? Even tho others who are African-American disagree with her?
I guess that sort of logic sounds sort of like segregation. "Their" problems cannot be of importance to me because I don't have the proper skin tone.
I would not presume, again, to speak for any other minority's experience, but when people who are part of a minority have made statements on both sides of an issue - one side of the issue doesn't speak for all people who would be considered part of that minority.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)No, because this is about policy and I'm talking about self identity.
If he is talking about black identity in the US, then yes, he more authority than a non-black person in the US because he experience with that. If he is talking about policy, then no.
This is about policy, and not identity.
I think you should feel free to discuss the problems of other people, but you should not tell them how to self identify.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)about FEMEN are not engaging in a "pat on the back" if they come down on one side of an issue vs another.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)My argument in this thread has nothing to do FEMEN. Their tactics are complex due to cultural issues, so honest disagreements are going to occur.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)and speaks out about that - the issue, it seems, it not telling women how to be proper feminists, but rather stating that religious ideology is prohibiting women from creating their own consciousness regarding their identity as humans.
This is a classic "false consciousness" argument... Religion as a social construct that pretends it represents biological determinism as defined by a religion, with all the restrictions, such as dress, being a form of control to emphasize the "otherness" and second-class status put upon women because of various religious ideologies.
If this is the argument, and I think it is, it is not telling women how to be proper feminists to note when one religious culture or another doesn't allow women to decide what their proper feminism might be by the very nature of the belief itself.
Since religion has such a powerful effect upon people because of its claims to speak for an omnipotent reality, the struggle for an authentic voice reaches beyond the worries of a here and now - and this psychological reach - this manipulation of consciousness that begins at the moment of being, presents women with more difficulty than the gender that is privileged with attributes that are given to another gender, not their own.
That's how I understand the arguments concerning women and belief, no matter what religion, as long as that religion codifies biological determinism as part of its belief.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)he is attacking their identity. The other things are separate issues.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)because some people here were defending muslim women who said FEMEN didn't speak for them and they were applauded for this (they had signs saying extolling their modesty, etc.) and others noted the irony in the position that a woman was operating from true consciousness to wear the veil and attack FEMEN, but women who chose to be immodest were operating from false consciousness (this is not limited to FEMEN's actions, but also to issues of sex workers, etc.)
The back and forth was about men participating in a thread showing support for women who bared their breasts and making jokes about their interest in seeing the pictures and women saying these guys only care about women's issues if a woman bares her breasts.
Others noted that, agree or not, they brought attention to Amina. And, the reality is that they have also done things that are "blasphemous" regarding other religion, too, again, while topless.
So, the reason for the quotes was what some saw as selective approval of actions that, conveniently, aligned with previous disagreements about how women use their bodies, whether for protest, employment, etc.
Of course, the elephant in the room in all that is the reality that capitalism determines many people's choices and creates situations that replicate religious "whore/madonna" labels for women.
There were various threads, but this one pretty much laid out the airing of grievances portion of our DU celebration of women.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2663197
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)The various feminists movements have had very strong disagreements for over 100 years. In my opinion, these disagreements are beneficial for the movement. I like the debate on the rhetorical tactics of FEMEN. Both sides have some really valid points, and what is interesting to me is that many of those opposing points don't contradict each other. In my view, the debate weighs harms against benefits.
All that said, women don't need men telling them how to be proper feminists.
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)backscatter712
(26,357 posts)or of enjoying the FEMEN protests like they were a Mardi Gras parade.
Those are some serious accusations. Way to make friends and influence people.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)I laughed at a joke someone made about Mardi Gras, but the only thing I accused you of was telling some women how to be proper feminists.
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)to hurl garbage at Femen and their supporters.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)All I have argued is that women don't need men telling them how to be proper feminists. I have not seen a single argument from FEMEN that says women need men to tell them how to be proper feminists, so I don't think I am hurling garbage at them.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)Sadly that shameful attempt was initiated by some female DUers against other DUers and non-DUers.
But you are well aware of that.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)I said that women don't need men to tell them how to be proper feminists. The male DU member I was talking to disagrees with me on that subject. That doesn't mean he is a bad person, or anything like that, it just means we disagree.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)However, many aren't forced to. They want to wear it, because they feel it's part of their religion, like Amish wear what they wear.
kardonb
(777 posts)what a ridiculous conclusion , backscatter . We do not hate all muslims ; we may disagree with them on some points of religious conviction , but that does NOT constitute hate .
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)Because a certain group of dishonest people here on DU loves to twist people's words, then use that distorted meaning to label people as bigots.
It's not you, it's a different group of people.
efhmc
(16,959 posts)SamKnause
(14,942 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)backscatter712
(26,357 posts)If he was wearing a suit and tie, they'd look like identical twins!
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)Good comparison.
Though, he gives us old guys with beards who wear funny clothes a bad name.
Nothing really gives him any more authority than the rest of us have other than a title, a book and the beliefs that people are subjected to as ultimate truths.
He's just an old guy with a beard who wears funny clothes and has a real bad, authoritarian staff up his ass.
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)She should have balled up the Hijab in a tight ball and thrown it in his face!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)He's a kid playing dress up and demanding that others do the same.
randome
(34,845 posts)And then neckties. I hate neckties.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)I see modern fashion in the west as designed to slow women down. I loathe it.
randome
(34,845 posts)LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Some of us are more comfortable with than without.
randome
(34,845 posts)To each their own.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I'm an atheist, but I think that is an incredibly important point.
redqueen
(115,186 posts)I would make a snarky comment here about the things that have been said about Muslim women who choose to wear the hijab, but nah. Too easy.
JI7
(93,874 posts)and i mean ones who are open and in relationships with other women in public. it might seem kind of strange at first for those who have a certain view of muslim women and especially those who wear certain clothing. but it's an example that some women DO want to wear it.
i use to think it was only or mostly the right wing that was ignorant of other people but sadly that is not the case. even in this thread you have comments trying to give credit to other non muslims and trying to make it about themselves rather than seeing and accepting that muslim women have been and continue to fight for themselves.
and i don't even like religion but is it so hard to judge people individually ?
RainDog
(28,784 posts)What a courageous thing to do.
Liberal In Texas
(16,409 posts)Don't care what flavor the religion is, people should not give them the power to dictate how they live.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)GiveMeFreedom
(976 posts)I liked that. Right at the end. The cleric is a snake oil sales man, straight up.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)nag him for eternity telling him what they think of his attitude about women. I hope they all have the same determination that woman has.
Apophis
(1,407 posts)I hope more Islamic women take a stand against their sexist and patriarchal religion.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)dkf
(37,305 posts)Good for her.
Blue Palasky
(81 posts)good. for. her.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)I hope she stays safe from the fundamentalist assclowns!
rollin74
(2,328 posts)I love this video
Kali
(56,887 posts)Paulie
(8,464 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)What's not to love about this woman???? She's FANTABULOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)
We can see which person in the interview has a fine mind and isn't afraid to use it. Excellent points made there. The conservative nutnick needs a wahmbulance.
I'm
Sending kudos
Segami
(14,923 posts)idwiyo
(5,113 posts)Generic Other
(29,082 posts)She's beautiful. The cleric. He's ugly. Who needs to be covered?
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)BainsBane
(57,779 posts)Is the idea that SHE is making that choice instead of YOU really so difficult to comprehend?
RainDog
(28,784 posts)for not taking the bait that is the dishonest and disruptive way some here conduct themselves.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)Allergy med cocktail. I've been camping out in the Lounge until I can think straight again.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)and lost my temper because of the dishonest attacks she brings to others... as she just did, above.
but I was told she's considered a disruptor so, heads up.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)tied to a current controversy.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Bravo to them for doing so.
Response to Segami (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
JI7
(93,874 posts)and when she asked what kind of a cleric would demand money to go on a show.
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)Many countries will have their own iron jawed angels.
No army is big enough to free a single soul from bondage. No army is large enough to imprison a soul that will not be bound.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)and the people who push this scam for personal gain (1000 pounds?) and agendas is what I don't like. The male trying to dominate this woman in the name of religion is what this is all about. Amazing how fucked up religion can be. She's a fighter, I applaud her.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)And the thread is turned into a shitstorm ...... on a progressive message board.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)gtar100
(4,192 posts)All must conform to his interpretation of Islam or he can't deal with it.
I should rephrase that... Pathetic little man.
Phillip McCleod
(1,837 posts)..knows just where the buttons are and how to push them to pull the mask away, revealing him for the fraud he is.
classic. and now it's viral. i bet she just blew a few minds. and got herself a promotion or better job offer. who wouldn't want a journalist with that kinda spine? i mean, besides cable news?
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Divide & conquer?
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Protests for women's rights in Asia Minor, the Middle East and Africa by deliberately provocative acts. Amina did it, Femen did it and this newscaster did it.