Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
2. Yup. A lot of the "aid" that goes to the Middle East is actually military assistance
Mon May 6, 2013, 08:17 PM
May 2013

Much of that "aid" is used to buy weapons of war from the US arms industry, benefiting the military industrial complex.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
3. True and a lot of Idealistic Young work for USAID..some military lawyers...etc..
Mon May 6, 2013, 08:29 PM
May 2013

who think they are doing "Good Work" on the civilian side...but they get swept up in to that MIC...and in many cases they are USED. But, it employ's them...and they still "hope" somehow they are "doing good." The quick learners know it's a "Boondoggle," and use it to further their careers.

Caveat: I have friend who have kids working for USAID. They graduated from "High Value Colleges" and some went to "Prep Schools..Undergrad".... And, they were nice kids...thought they were doing good...they TRAVEL a lot... They become accustomed to the "Perks" and they have families and learn NOT to question too much.

They are good kids...but, imho, many don't realize how they are being co-opted for stuff that really is against their principles. (at least as I knew them growing up)...but, then...things change when your life depends on income and you start to have a family that's dependent on you. Or, even if BOTH of YOU...work for USAID..

Not trashing USAID...but, just saying...it's not always what the idealists of us think it is in practice. Works well in some areas like "Peace Corps" ...but, if you are in a "Hot Country" you are open to manipulation for agendas you might not always be aware of until you are involved and ...it's a job...feeds your family...so, one learns to "look the other way" in some countries where you are assigned.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
4. Tea partiers are all over cutting foreign aid, though I'm not sure that's what you're proposing.
Mon May 6, 2013, 08:33 PM
May 2013
Americans who identify with the Tea Party movement are more likely than all other Americans to support reductions in foreign aid and the budget of the U.S. State Department. But they are less likely to back trimming military spending and anti-terrorism efforts. This may be because Tea Party sympathizers are generally more hawkish than their fellow countrymen.

About three-quarters of Americans believe that Washington should reduce the government’s budget deficit through a combination of spending cuts and tax increases, with the greater share coming from belt tightening, according to a mid-February Pew Research Center survey. But 57 percent of Tea Party leaning Republicans think all deficit reduction should come from spending cuts.

In particular, Tea Party sympathizers would like to see a cut back in aspects of American soft power. More than eight-in-ten would decrease aid to the world’s needy, compared with 43 percent of all other Americans who support such economizing. And 41 percent of Tea Party adherents would reduce the State Department’s budget.

But U.S. hard power continues to receive Tea Partyers’ backing. Only 15 percent want to cut the Pentagon’s budget (compared with 27 percent of all other Americans who favor such action) and just 13 percent support reducing spending on anti-terrorism defenses.

http://www.pewglobal.org/2013/03/04/will-budget-cuts-isolationism/
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
5. I'm absolutely suggesting we 'slash to the bone' foreign aid and I hope you are not suggesting
Mon May 6, 2013, 08:54 PM
May 2013

I'm a 'tea-partier'.

I've no problem with providing assistance in case of natural calamity to foreign peoples but I have no desire to build others 'war machines' so they can kill one another only to turn their sights on us.

Enough is enough and this country is on the path to bankruptcy should the fed's printing press run out of ink and China/Japan suspend our credit limit.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
6. If we support foreign aid, but not military aid then neither of us agrees with tea partiers.
Mon May 6, 2013, 09:02 PM
May 2013

"Enough is never enough" when it comes to taking care of the less fortunate regardless of where they were born, where they live, what they look like or what language they speak. It's time to look out for "Number 1"; I'm tired of looking out for poor people" is not my idea of liberalism. I hear enough of that from the right.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Billions In U.S. Aid Have...