Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,077 posts)
Mon May 6, 2013, 09:52 PM May 2013

U.S. punishes India for placing public health before corporate profits

by Dr. Margaret Flowers


The U.S. Trade Report released yesterday continues to hold India in Priority Watch Status because India is not caving in to pressure from pharmaceutical corporations who want to sell high-priced patented medications in India. For the past decade, India has taken the lead in producing low-cost generic medications to meet important areas of need such as the treatment of infectious diseases. India also has a strict approval process for patented medications such that new pharmaceuticals must actually prove that they are more effective than current drugs before being approved.

India's actions mean that the people of India and their neighbors are able to afford life-saving medicines, but US pharmaceutical corporations are in an uproar because of barriers to making profit in India. The USTR also criticizes India for giving preferential treatment to local industries over international corporations. The report criticizes nations for not engaging in good faith negotiations with the U.S., but the Obama Administration is notorious for pressuring other nations to go against their own interests so that multinational corporations can profit.

Nations like India should not be punished for putting the needs of their populations first. And profit should not be made at the cost of suffering and preventable death. The development of more generic medicines and sharing of research that can improve or save lives rather than holding on to it as 'trade secrets' should be encouraged. .....................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://greenshadowcabinet.us/statements/flowers-us-punishes-india-placing-public-health-corporate-profits



29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. punishes India for placing public health before corporate profits (Original Post) marmar May 2013 OP
Bookmarking for second opinion, and b/c this is a new one to me. Thanks! nt babylonsister May 2013 #1
Heh, I love the quote you didn't have room to include... LooseWilly May 2013 #2
What do you know about your link? pscot May 2013 #3
They are caraher May 2013 #4
The disclaimer is not false. The Green Party does not sponsor this initiative. Luminous Animal May 2013 #12
The fact that the Green party presidential pscot May 2013 #17
Yes. Some people say. Luminous Animal May 2013 #20
I'm sure in legal terms there's no problem caraher May 2013 #26
India obviously has a superior medical care system FrodosPet May 2013 #5
Many Indian Docs were trained right here in the good ole USA >>> YOHABLO May 2013 #10
Did you see the show? At least the posted clip? FrodosPet May 2013 #15
Certainly the greediest pscot May 2013 #18
Nailed It! bvar22 May 2013 #24
and this has what to do with patenting drugs? La Lioness Priyanka May 2013 #29
Profit over People - thats our moto usGovOwesUs3Trillion May 2013 #6
Same could be said for India Mr. Blue Sky May 2013 #19
Right, our capitalist masters have 0 restraint now usGovOwesUs3Trillion May 2013 #22
Hop one step further from the link in the OP... DreamGypsy May 2013 #7
This makes me sick with fury KauaiK May 2013 #8
. blkmusclmachine May 2013 #9
oh my. Seems bad. nt limpyhobbler May 2013 #11
trade agreements. HiPointDem May 2013 #13
I believe this is probably an issue with GATT... ReRe May 2013 #14
2 sides to every story... Mr. Blue Sky May 2013 #16
Even if this side of the story is correct, I have no objection to protective trade practices. LiberalAndProud May 2013 #21
We would not be where we are today without them & usGovOwesUs3Trillion May 2013 #23
+200 Populist_Prole May 2013 #25
India and others who put the needs of their populations first instead of corporations stand a good indepat May 2013 #27
India and others who put the needs of their populations first ahead of corporations stand a good indepat May 2013 #28

LooseWilly

(4,477 posts)
2. Heh, I love the quote you didn't have room to include...
Mon May 6, 2013, 10:11 PM
May 2013

"The United States also shares the objective of continued improvement in the health and quality of life of its citizens, and the objective of delivering care in the most efficient and responsive way possible."

I find the use of the word "shares" with regard to health care in the US to be rather hysterical. "offers for sale" would have been more accurate, methinks.

pscot

(21,024 posts)
3. What do you know about your link?
Mon May 6, 2013, 10:16 PM
May 2013

They disclaim any party affiliation. Are they connected to the Green Party?

caraher

(6,278 posts)
4. They are
Mon May 6, 2013, 11:52 PM
May 2013
WHOIS results for the domain greenshadowcabinet.us

Registered to Ben Manski of Jill Stein for President

Edited to add: There must be some peculiar reason related to election laws for the transparently false disclaimer. It's pretty clear from their name who they really are; I don't really think they seriously don't expect people to make the connection!

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
12. The disclaimer is not false. The Green Party does not sponsor this initiative.
Tue May 7, 2013, 03:45 AM
May 2013

It is quite clear on their "about" page:


The Green Shadow Cabinet includes nearly 100 prominent scientists, community and labor leaders, physicians, cultural workers, veterans, and more, and provides an ongoing opposition and alternative voice to the dysfunctional government in Washington D.C.. As with shadow cabinets in other countries, the Green Shadow Cabinet of the United States responds to actions of the government in office and demonstrates that another government is possible. This cabinet is led by the 2012 Green Party presidential nominees of Dr. Jill Stein and Ms. Cheri Honkala and supports independent politics and policies. However, it is not a project of any political party.


http://greenshadowcabinet.us/about-green-shadow-cabinet-united-states

pscot

(21,024 posts)
17. The fact that the Green party presidential
Tue May 7, 2013, 10:45 AM
May 2013

candidate is president in this shadow cabinet does suggest a connection.

caraher

(6,278 posts)
26. I'm sure in legal terms there's no problem
Tue May 7, 2013, 01:45 PM
May 2013

However, imagine that Mitt Romney and a number of conservatives had an organization called "Republican Shadow Cabinet" whose web page, registered to his campaign manager, carried the disclaimer,

"The Republican Shadow Cabinet of the United States is a civic project not sponsored by or affiliated with any political party."

Legally that could be true, but realistically, to claim no "affiliation" does serious violence to the ordinary meaning of words.

I have no beef with the Green Party; I think they do a lot of good work trying to bring more balance to public discourse. I just doubt that even they regard the "shadow cabinet" project as truly unaffiliated with their party.

FrodosPet

(5,169 posts)
5. India obviously has a superior medical care system
Tue May 7, 2013, 12:11 AM
May 2013

You can go to the doctor for $5 in Dehli, as long as you are not worried about petty little things like "Is this doctor licensed?" and "What exactly does he want to inject me with?"

And if you want a medical excuse to extend your trip and get free airfare home, or perhaps a death certificate so you can cash in on your life insurance, they will hook you up with that as well.

http://natgeotv.com/za/scam-city/videos/delhi-doctor-scam

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
10. Many Indian Docs were trained right here in the good ole USA >>>
Tue May 7, 2013, 12:48 AM
May 2013

also many dual citizens of other countries go ''home'' for medical procedures simply because it costs so much less. Let's face it folks, US citizens are being gouged .. and mistakes with meds and hospital procedures happen all the time. Our health care system rates very low among nations .. according to the WHO organization: 37th. It could be inaccurate according to many factors: diet, exercise, stress, environment etc. But the U.S. doesn't even come close to the top 10 .. France and Italy rankings are higher. You can go to some quacks here in the U.S. just as well .. so don't go knocking the medical professions of other countries.

FrodosPet

(5,169 posts)
15. Did you see the show? At least the posted clip?
Tue May 7, 2013, 08:52 AM
May 2013

Even if you did, I guess it does not matter, because America is the cruelest, greediest, most backward nation on Earth.

(But I would still rather look for a doctor in Detroit than in Delhi).

pscot

(21,024 posts)
18. Certainly the greediest
Tue May 7, 2013, 10:50 AM
May 2013

Cruelist among developed nations.
Not so much backward, as lobotomized by TV.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
29. and this has what to do with patenting drugs?
Tue May 7, 2013, 05:18 PM
May 2013

besides an ugly dose of racism/xenophobia and a clear lack of knowledge about delhi, how is this relevant to the article

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
6. Profit over People - thats our moto
Tue May 7, 2013, 12:16 AM
May 2013

I wouldn't expect anything less... since the soviet union collapsed, we are going full bore to privatize everything, at home and abroad.

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
22. Right, our capitalist masters have 0 restraint now
Tue May 7, 2013, 11:56 AM
May 2013

Which will be there's, and ours, unfortunately, undoing.

DreamGypsy

(2,252 posts)
7. Hop one step further from the link in the OP...
Tue May 7, 2013, 12:28 AM
May 2013

...to the link at the end of the article: See: Obama Administration: Big Pharma Worth More Than Lives of People in India:

There have been two major intellectual property cases in India since USTR's (U.S. Trade Representative’s) last Special 301 list. The first occurred last year, when the Indian government approved the development of an affordable generic alternative to Nexavar, an expensive cancer drug patented in India by the German drugmaker Bayer AG. Bayer was charging more than $5,000 a month for standard doses of the medication — unthinkable in a nation with a per capita income of about $1,410.

A generic version, approved by the Indian government, cost just $157 a month (NB: that's still $1884/year, $474 above per capita income). Under the compulsory license issued by the government, Bayer received a 6 percent royalty on sales of the generic drug.

USTR maintained a low public profile domestically during the hubub that ensued, but other Obama administration officials lashed out at the Indian government, accusing it of violating World Trade Organization treaties.

In a July 2012 hearing, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Deputy Director Teresa Stanek Rea called the decision an “egregious” WTO violation. “This is front and center,” she said. “[We are] trying to stop the granting of further compulsory licenses.”

Compulsory licensing — the granting of a license to produce a generic version of a product — is explicitly protected by WTO treaties to help countries improve public health and ensure access to medicines.

USTR referenced the Nexavar case in its Special 301 Report, objecting to the Indian government decision for saying the country’s law allows a compulsory license on products that are not being manufactured in India three years after they are patented. The India court’s decision, however, primarily focused on Bayer’s failure to meet demand for the medication and the firm’s failure to offer the drug at “reasonably affordable price.”

James Love, director of the nonprofit group Knowledge Ecology International, told HuffPost the Obama administration, by focusing on India’s domestic drug production rules, neglected to admit it was trying to force India to accept a $65,000 annual price for a cancer drug.


Spend a buck to make a buck,
You don't really give a flying fuck
About the people in misery.


Thanks for the post, mm.

KauaiK

(544 posts)
8. This makes me sick with fury
Tue May 7, 2013, 12:31 AM
May 2013

The health care system in the US is dangerous to your health. India also banned GMO pesticides! I say good on them! Thank you to marmar for posting

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
14. I believe this is probably an issue with GATT...
Tue May 7, 2013, 04:07 AM
May 2013

... i.e. our world trade agreements. Probably a case that will end up in WTO (the World Trade Organization) Court. New World Order. Globalization. "Best thing since sliced bread not just for us but for the whole world." That's what they told us back around 1992-1993 when Clinton brought all the living Presidents to DC and had a big ceremony for those new trade agreements (Nafta and Gatt).

Here's what I think of those wonderful New World Order treaties: Hogwash. When a country signs on to one of those, they are giving their sovereignty away. Not only sovereignty, but they are more or less deep-sixing the Magna Carta. It's the biggest bait and switch known to man, pulled off by big multinational business corporations.

I believe what will happen now is the USA will bring suit against India in the WTO. India will lose and be fined into submission and be forced to allow our big pharma and their over-priced pharmaceuticals into their country.

Mr. Blue Sky

(33 posts)
16. 2 sides to every story...
Tue May 7, 2013, 10:22 AM
May 2013

India has historically invalidated U.S. pharma patents to protect the profits of it's booming generic drug industry and has used the threat of patent invalidation to intimidate foreign companies into supplying drugs at cut rate pricing...


Critics of the pharmaceutical industry contend that drug makers focus too much on profits, and in so doing, they don't fulfill their obligation to provide affordable access to their products. Novartis countered this notion by pointing out in its statement that it gives Glivec away for free to 95% of Indian patients who are prescribed the drug. The other 5% receive some sort of reimbursement, the company said.

Merck, which was also stung by a negative Indian patent ruling, has long talked up its "tiered pricing" plans for some drugs. In 2009, the company rolled out a tiered pricing strategy for some of its vaccines and HIV treatments in developing countries. A spokesman for Merck said in an e-mail that the company has a plan that includes "India-specific, responsible pricing" for its diabetes drugs. "We continue to believe our patents for Januvia and Janumet are valid and enforceable, and we are committed to exploring all legal options to defend them."

It's no surprise that India's government wants to protect the country's burgeoning drug business. PwC estimates that India's domestic pharmaceutical industry will grow from $11 billion in annual sales in 2009 to $30 billion by 2020. Much of that growth will be driven by India's famed generic drug manufacturers, such as Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Cipla and Aurobindo Pharma. "This is a matter of self interest for Indian industry," Gordon says. "The determining factor was India's generics industry -- made up of big companies run by rich families -- versus multinational companies. India frames this as 'our companies versus the rest of the world's companies.'"


http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=3231

LiberalAndProud

(12,799 posts)
21. Even if this side of the story is correct, I have no objection to protective trade practices.
Tue May 7, 2013, 11:47 AM
May 2013

Our country would be much better of with less "free trade" and more protectionism. Free Trade is a euphemism for Race to the Bottom in safety, wages and workers' rights. The only free thing about it, is freedom for corporations to permeate borders in search of the least restrictive business environment.

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
23. We would not be where we are today without them &
Tue May 7, 2013, 11:59 AM
May 2013

The military.

Of course, this is only in the interest of the elite owners.

Populist_Prole

(5,364 posts)
25. +200
Tue May 7, 2013, 12:15 PM
May 2013

"Protectionism" = Good, in that it's the polar opposite of "free trade" as the plutocrats practice and push. If that makes me an "isolationist", an "economic nationalist" who wants to "build a wall around the country" ( or any of the other canards the corporatists/globalists demagogue us with ) then so be it. Guilty as charged....and lovin' it.

Just like you say. "Freedom" = Money to a conservative or neoliberal.

indepat

(20,899 posts)
27. India and others who put the needs of their populations first instead of corporations stand a good
Tue May 7, 2013, 05:12 PM
May 2013

chance of being taught a good lesson by someone who knows how to use their big stick to teach others a good lesson.

indepat

(20,899 posts)
28. India and others who put the needs of their populations first ahead of corporations stand a good
Tue May 7, 2013, 05:15 PM
May 2013

chance of being taught a good lesson by someone who has often used its big stick to teach others a good lesson.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»U.S. punishes India for p...