Israeli Attacks Show Why Obama Must Step Up In Syria

[Purveyor]

Last weekend, Israel saw a threat to its interests and acted, staging aerial attacks on Syria’s military research facilities and on a shipment of Iranian missiles waiting to be sent from Syria to Hezbollah militants in Lebanon.

Israel’s action -- which it has yet to acknowledge -- and the retaliation it might trigger from Syria, Hezbollah or Iran are potent reminders of the dangers posed by Syria’s escalating conflict. Indeed, unless the U.S. works more resolutely to end the conflict, it risks a spiral into a wider regional war.

The Israelis had good reason for their Damascus raid. Hezbollah is intent on the destruction of Israel. During their 2006 war, Hezbollah fired thousands of rockets into Israel, and has since stockpiled thousands more. The shipment that was hit reportedly included solid-fueled missiles that can be deployed quickly and fired precisely to reach targets in Tel Aviv from Lebanon. For the Israelis, such weapons, along with the shipment of anti-aircraft weapons that it attacked in late January, would have been a “game-changer,” to use a phrase favored by U.S. President Barack Obama.

While Israel moved quickly to respond to this threat, the Obama administration was caught up in an unseemly debate about what extent of chemical weapons usage, and by whom, in Syria would constitute a crossing of the “red lines” it set for a more forcible intervention.

Israel’s Attack

Let’s clarify where things stand: Israel’s attack has increased the odds that Syria’s conflict will embroil the region; the U.S., France, the U.K. and the United Nations have all acknowledged credible reports of chemical weapons usage; more than a million Syrian refugees are putting pressure on Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey; and the al-Nusra Front, one of the more effective members of the Syrian rebel coalition against the regime of Bashar al-Assad, has declared its loyalty to al-Qaeda. Facing these realities, the U.S. has to understand that the situation isn’t going to improve.

MORE...

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-06/israeli-attacks-show-why-obama-must-step-up-in-syria.html

[MrSlayer]

1. He needs to step up and tell everyone to fuck off.

That we're not getting involved and let these people solve their own problems. Every move we make in that region is the wrong one. Leave it alone.

[geek tragedy]

2. It's not our job to pick the winner in Syria.

Or the region, for that matter.

Their destiny is their own.

[Comrade Grumpy]

3. Israel gets a free pass. As always.

It launched a military attack on a neighboring country with which it is not at war.

It has produced no evidence to back up the leaked assertions that it attacked a weapons system destined for a foe.

By the same logic, Syria could launch attacks on bases in Turkey or Jordan.

But I think the reaction would be different.

[Cali_Democrat]

4. How about we take an entirely different approach this time...

and do nothing?

[haikugal]

5. Neocons...

Like using 'first strike' self defense...you know, just in case Syria was thinking about ____ insert excuse. We need to stay the hell out of this, completely. I'd feel better if people quit saying they "understand why Israel" whatever....I don't condone what Israel does.

[pinboy3niner]

6. If Bloomberg's editors want boots on the ground, I nominate them

Get their boot sizes, get them fitted and suited up, locked and loaded, and then let's see how they feel about it.