Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BainsBane

(53,029 posts)
Tue May 7, 2013, 02:58 AM May 2013

'Girls Gone Wild' Founder, Convicted Of Assault And False Imprisonment

"Girls Gone Wild" founder Joe Francis was found guilty Monday of misdemeanor counts of assault and false imprisonment stemming from a dispute with three women after a night out at a Hollywood club in 2011.

Los Angeles City Attorney Carmen Trutanich said in a statement that after a two-week trial, a jury convicted the 40-year-old Francis of three counts of false imprisonment, one count of assault causing great bodily injury and one count of dissuading a witness. He faces a maximum of five years in prison. A hearing to schedule his sentencing was set for Wednesday.

Francis met the three women as they celebrated a college graduation at a the Supper Club in Hollywood on Jan. 29, 2011, took one of them by the hand as he left and took her to his limo, and the other two followed thinking Francis was giving them a ride to their car, prosecutors said.

Prosecutors said Francis took the women to his home and a dispute broke out when he tried to separate one from the other two, with Francis grabbing one of the women by the hair and throat and slammed her head into the floor."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/06/joe-francis-girls-gone-wild-founder-convicted-assault_n_3226730.html

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Girls Gone Wild' Founder, Convicted Of Assault And False Imprisonment (Original Post) BainsBane May 2013 OP
Wow, he seemed like such a class act who had nothing but the utmost respect for women! Electric Monk May 2013 #1
Shocking, isn't it? BainsBane May 2013 #2
For the win, lol! pinboy3niner May 2013 #3
Oh, yes, the very image of a gentleman! *snort* freshwest May 2013 #13
I know! Lunacee_2013 May 2013 #39
How many lives has this unfettered piece of shit ruined? The gallows seems more appropriate Gravitycollapse May 2013 #4
"Gallows Gone Wild?" Dash87 May 2013 #25
Since when is an 'assault causing great bodily injury' just a 'misdemeanor'? freshwest May 2013 #5
I wondered about that too BainsBane May 2013 #6
It probably doesn't. He was convicted of multiple crimes. The 5 year claim... Gravitycollapse May 2013 #7
which he won't get BainsBane May 2013 #8
Nope. He'll probably get probation and fines. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #9
but this should make civil lawsuits easier BainsBane May 2013 #10
His company filed for bankruptcy protection to avoid paying his victims. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #14
I'm waiting for someone to come along BainsBane May 2013 #15
I'll say one positive thing about Joe Francis: Orrex May 2013 #21
Yup. Scumbags of a feather stick together. Wait, what is grouping of scumbags? Oh, yeah, the GOP. freshwest May 2013 #32
I don't get it. Different states, I guess. I thought it went this way: freshwest May 2013 #11
in florida it does steve2470 May 2013 #30
Since they refused to charge him with a felony, I'll bet it'll be probation or less than a year. Ugh freshwest May 2013 #31
Post removed Post removed May 2013 #12
This is perhaps the worse thing I have ever read in DU Trajan May 2013 #16
I don't get it. CincyDem May 2013 #17
excellent point BainsBane May 2013 #23
Well, on the plus side Orrex May 2013 #24
I hope his stupid business goes bankrupt. DCBob May 2013 #18
I believe his business has already gone bankrupt. NCTraveler May 2013 #22
he already has declared bankruptcy BainsBane May 2013 #33
How could this paragon of virtuous capitalism do such a thing? Orrex May 2013 #19
Couldn't happen to a nicer guy. Glad to see him sufrommich May 2013 #20
POS douchebag Blue Owl May 2013 #26
Saw that, thought 'good' ismnotwasm May 2013 #27
Who didn't know this guy was an incredibly vile low-life asshole bullwinkle428 May 2013 #28
The most disturbing thing about this are the number of people who bought his crap and made him rich. Lint Head May 2013 #29
Yeah, even if the guy wasn't a complete piece of shit, what's the point of those videos? nomorenomore08 May 2013 #34
With porno you 'usually' have adults who know what they are getting into. Young girls who want Lint Head May 2013 #35
So then I guess I was right: "Not humiliating enough to the participants, is that it?" nomorenomore08 May 2013 #36
I don't know the mind of a person who does porno as a living. So I do not know if they Lint Head May 2013 #37
I guess I was thinking more of the viewer's perceptions than anything. nomorenomore08 May 2013 #38

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
5. Since when is an 'assault causing great bodily injury' just a 'misdemeanor'?
Tue May 7, 2013, 03:28 AM
May 2013

He needs five years locked up. I doubt he'll serve any time.

Since 'the district attorney declined to file felony charges' they didn't take an 'assault causing great bodily injury' seriously.

I hope she has recovered by now, but that injury may cause her trouble the rest of her life. Someone without a few million in the bank would have been sent up for felony assault.

What a disgusting, hateful POS.


Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
7. It probably doesn't. He was convicted of multiple crimes. The 5 year claim...
Tue May 7, 2013, 03:35 AM
May 2013

is probably a product of some journalist adding up the highest possible prison terms for the various convictions.

BainsBane

(53,029 posts)
10. but this should make civil lawsuits easier
Tue May 7, 2013, 03:51 AM
May 2013

I know he's already dealt with many. I don't really keep up on his activities. I just happened to come across this. His company went bankrupt, that much I know.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
14. His company filed for bankruptcy protection to avoid paying his victims.
Tue May 7, 2013, 03:53 AM
May 2013

I know. Such a great guy.

Like I said, the gallows seems more appropriate for such a vile human being.

Orrex

(63,199 posts)
21. I'll say one positive thing about Joe Francis:
Tue May 7, 2013, 09:57 AM
May 2013

He's a terrific litmus test

That is, anyone who doesn't think that Francis is a vile piece of shit is almost guaranteed to be a vile piece of shit him- or herself.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
32. Yup. Scumbags of a feather stick together. Wait, what is grouping of scumbags? Oh, yeah, the GOP.
Tue May 7, 2013, 02:47 PM
May 2013
As in: A GOP of Scumbags went to defend their own...

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
11. I don't get it. Different states, I guess. I thought it went this way:
Tue May 7, 2013, 03:52 AM
May 2013

Any sentence of a year or less is served in jail and is not a felony.

A felony is more than a year and is served in prison.

Not an attorney...

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
30. in florida it does
Tue May 7, 2013, 02:30 PM
May 2013

Misdemeanors = one year or less in county jail

Felonies = 366 days or more, in state prison

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
31. Since they refused to charge him with a felony, I'll bet it'll be probation or less than a year. Ugh
Tue May 7, 2013, 02:43 PM
May 2013

Response to BainsBane (Original post)

CincyDem

(6,347 posts)
17. I don't get it.
Tue May 7, 2013, 07:21 AM
May 2013

Rich white guy kidnaps a couple girls and assaults one of them = misdemeanor charges.

Not rich African American girl blows the top off a water bottle = 2 felony charges.

He ends up with a "funny" story to tell his buds around the campfire with some beers.

She ends up having her curiosity and sense of wondering about science ruined for life.

Yeah - that sounds fair.

Orrex

(63,199 posts)
24. Well, on the plus side
Tue May 7, 2013, 01:44 PM
May 2013

At least Francis the talking jackass didn't try to build and detonate an explosive device on school property.

Orrex

(63,199 posts)
19. How could this paragon of virtuous capitalism do such a thing?
Tue May 7, 2013, 09:20 AM
May 2013

And why the hell wasn't he in jail long before this?

bullwinkle428

(20,629 posts)
28. Who didn't know this guy was an incredibly vile low-life asshole
Tue May 7, 2013, 02:12 PM
May 2013

at least a dozen years ago?

And yes, the very idea that this crime could be labeled as a misdemeanor is utterly puke-inducing.

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
29. The most disturbing thing about this are the number of people who bought his crap and made him rich.
Tue May 7, 2013, 02:23 PM
May 2013

He's a cretin.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
34. Yeah, even if the guy wasn't a complete piece of shit, what's the point of those videos?
Tue May 7, 2013, 05:20 PM
May 2013

Far as I can tell - having only seen the commercials - the content isn't much more explicit than your average R-rated movie. I mean, if you want to get off, why not watch actual porno? Not humiliating enough to the participants, is that it?

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
35. With porno you 'usually' have adults who know what they are getting into. Young girls who want
Tue May 7, 2013, 06:17 PM
May 2013

to do something exciting and are slightly naive, possibly drunk and vulnerable marks seem to be what their cynical business model is.
Getting girls drunk and partying is what has led to some rather despicable recent headlines.

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
37. I don't know the mind of a person who does porno as a living. So I do not know if they
Tue May 7, 2013, 07:14 PM
May 2013

feel personal humiliation. Anecdotally, porno is exploitation but people who I've met who have actually 'done' porno do not feel taken advantage of or humiliated. I'm sure it can be for people who get into porno as a last resort or forced into it.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
38. I guess I was thinking more of the viewer's perceptions than anything.
Tue May 7, 2013, 07:38 PM
May 2013

Since the whole premise of "GGW" is young women/girls - "legal" but the younger the better - doing embarrassing things, which they'll presumably regret later, on camera. And since, to my knowledge, there's no actual intercourse/other full-on sex acts depicted, I assume the point (for the viewer) isn't so much sexual arousal, as it is reveling in that embarrassment and anticipated regret.

I hope that explains my meaning a little more clearly.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Girls Gone Wild' Founder...