Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
Fri May 10, 2013, 12:57 AM May 2013

I hope a very good lawyer represents Ariel Castro

I hope that Ariel Castro gets a highly competent and skilled advocate, who will zealously defend his rights, who will challenge every procedural step and every piece of evidence and how it was obtained. I hope that his case is heard by an impartial jury, and that he has a right to appeal any error made in his trial.

Or, if he pleads guilty, I hope he does so knowing that he has a right to a trial and fully understanding his options and likely consequences of that decision.

If he is convicted, I hope he is not subject to cruel and unusual punishment.

74 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I hope a very good lawyer represents Ariel Castro (Original Post) jberryhill May 2013 OP
Castrate Castro rightsideout May 2013 #1
Be carefull olddots May 2013 #6
And you are the reason why jberryhill May 2013 #9
No kidding. HappyMe May 2013 #58
I was just thinking his lawyer BainsBane May 2013 #2
It is among the best jobs for a criminal defense lawyer jberryhill May 2013 #8
Yes, I understand that BainsBane May 2013 #12
It's like looking at the Hoover Dam and saying... jberryhill May 2013 #20
Concrete wasn't "delivered" to the Hoover Dam, aggregate was brought via train snooper2 May 2013 #56
Dam! jberryhill May 2013 #60
It's probably worse to have an innocent client who's facing conviction. geek tragedy May 2013 #52
Anything short of the DP is a win for Castro's lawyer. Bake May 2013 #53
That should be within reach--the fetal homicide charge is going geek tragedy May 2013 #54
they should plead the case to life BainsBane May 2013 #73
except people always hate these guys lawyers BainsBane May 2013 #65
Lots of people hate all lawyers geek tragedy May 2013 #68
You are right about the ones that cause sleep loss. morningfog May 2013 #67
I'm betting law firms are lined up around the block to defend him Blue_Tires May 2013 #64
no pity upi402 May 2013 #3
What does pity have to do with the OP? RedCappedBandit May 2013 #5
Amazing, innit? jberryhill May 2013 #14
again, fuck that freak upi402 May 2013 #15
Again, the Constitution. Mr. X May 2013 #24
Here's an interesting item regarding things NOT in the Constitution bike man May 2013 #34
Thank you for posting that. Too many confuse real world guilt with legal "guilt" uppityperson May 2013 #61
Wow. That is more extreme than Scalia's textualism. morningfog May 2013 #69
So, wait... jberryhill May 2013 #72
Correct - that maxim sets the burden of proof at trial jberryhill May 2013 #71
Justice, not pity. Law, not vengeance... LanternWaste May 2013 #51
He needs someone that can cut a deal to avoid the death penalty Gman May 2013 #4
Perhaps if he pleads guilty and his attorney goes for life without parole ? steve2470 May 2013 #7
That's his best hope Gman May 2013 #11
From what I've heard, obviously just rumor etc., elleng May 2013 #13
I guess you'd have to be some kind of crazy to do what he did Gman May 2013 #16
Insanity? jberryhill May 2013 #17
Yes, agree, no more light of day. elleng May 2013 #19
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2013 #47
I don't see how an insanity defense could work vankuria May 2013 #48
I hope his brothers turn on him Warpy May 2013 #10
Yep jberryhill May 2013 #18
WHY???? 4 t 4 May 2013 #21
Because that is how justice is accomplished. RedCappedBandit May 2013 #22
Yeah, so do I jberryhill May 2013 #23
yea I also hope he gets a fair trial- NOT because 3 girls and one child must be mistaken! 4 t 4 May 2013 #25
that's right. talors511 May 2013 #43
Welcome to DU my friend! hrmjustin May 2013 #55
Very eloquently put Summer Hathaway May 2013 #26
Thanks, what is the lesson behind it when 3 girls where held for a decade 4 t 4 May 2013 #32
The lesson being Summer Hathaway May 2013 #38
That's nice. whathehell May 2013 #27
People tend to forget that they, too, may be accused of a crime one day and need counsel steve2470 May 2013 #28
That's when you say jberryhill May 2013 #29
I'm sure that would have been the winning answer ! steve2470 May 2013 #30
Either that or the Fifth Amendment jberryhill May 2013 #31
It passed through my mind to say that, but naw... steve2470 May 2013 #33
you guy's are a big fat joke 4 t 4 May 2013 #35
Ah, of course jberryhill May 2013 #37
No apostrophe is needed when you pluralize a word uppityperson May 2013 #63
Agreed. JDPriestly May 2013 #36
I agree GCP May 2013 #39
You hope he is not subject to cruel and unusual punishment. brush May 2013 #40
Ain't gonna be no trial. bravenak May 2013 #41
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Luminous Animal May 2013 #42
And then found guilty... ellisonz May 2013 #44
Agreed Sherman A1 May 2013 #45
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2013 #46
Yes. It's not about him so much as it is about our criminal justice system. cali May 2013 #49
Good point jberryhill May 2013 #59
K&R x 100 COLGATE4 May 2013 #50
Have to agree, and rec. lapislzi May 2013 #57
What do you consider "cruel and unusual"? brooklynite May 2013 #62
I believe the death penalty should be abolished jberryhill May 2013 #70
I hope this for every criminal defendant. morningfog May 2013 #66
This is the type of case I would love to defend. nt msanthrope May 2013 #74

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
2. I was just thinking his lawyer
Fri May 10, 2013, 01:01 AM
May 2013

has the worst job in America right now. Imagine having to defend him. Obviously someone has to, so good for her for taking on the case.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
8. It is among the best jobs for a criminal defense lawyer
Fri May 10, 2013, 01:08 AM
May 2013

Ensuring that our process of justice is served fully - in the most likely instances where it will not, and where the most overwhelming public sentiment is that it should not - is a noble calling.

If exceptions are made, then there is nothing between us and tyranny.

The criminal defense lawyer is what stands between the power of the state and our rights under the Constitution.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
20. It's like looking at the Hoover Dam and saying...
Fri May 10, 2013, 01:23 AM
May 2013

...man, this must have been an awful place to be a concrete delivery man.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
56. Concrete wasn't "delivered" to the Hoover Dam, aggregate was brought via train
Fri May 10, 2013, 11:39 AM
May 2013

from a couple miles away and it was made there. I believe it is still drying to this day-


You haven't watched this?



 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
52. It's probably worse to have an innocent client who's facing conviction.
Fri May 10, 2013, 10:03 AM
May 2013

That'll make a person lose sleep at night.

Losing a case with Ariel Castro as your client? Good publicity, and then you sleep like a baby.

Bake

(21,977 posts)
53. Anything short of the DP is a win for Castro's lawyer.
Fri May 10, 2013, 11:19 AM
May 2013

So there's that ... when your client is guilty as homemade sin, the best defense is to try to minimize the damages.

Bake

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
54. That should be within reach--the fetal homicide charge is going
Fri May 10, 2013, 11:21 AM
May 2013

to be easily the toughest one to make stick.

Not impossible--certainly he's going to lose a battle of witness credibility--but not a slam dunk for team prosecution either.

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
65. except people always hate these guys lawyers
Fri May 10, 2013, 01:46 PM
May 2013

Many don't understand how important the defense attorney's role is to our justice system.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
64. I'm betting law firms are lined up around the block to defend him
Fri May 10, 2013, 01:44 PM
May 2013

they get to make a name in this, too

 

Mr. X

(72 posts)
24. Again, the Constitution.
Fri May 10, 2013, 01:46 AM
May 2013

Because it does say things about this - That is, innocent until proven guilty.

 

bike man

(620 posts)
34. Here's an interesting item regarding things NOT in the Constitution
Fri May 10, 2013, 02:34 AM
May 2013
http://www.usconstitution.net/constnot.html#innocent


"Innocent Until Proven Guilty

First, it should be pointed out that if you did it, you're guilty, no matter what. So you're not innocent unless you're truly innocent. However, our system presumes innocence, which means that legally speaking, even the obviously guilty are treated as though they are innocent, until they are proven otherwise.

The concept of the presumption of innocence is one of the most basic in our system of justice. However, in so many words, it is not codified in the text of the Constitution. This basic right comes to us, like many things, from English jurisprudence, and has been a part of that system for so long, that it is considered common law. The concept is embodied in several provisions of the Constitution, however, such as the right to remain silent and the right to a jury."

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
72. So, wait...
Fri May 10, 2013, 02:05 PM
May 2013

If I walk up to you and slap you in the face, are you going to sit there and wonder whether or not I am guilty of assault?

Are you going to call the police and say, "Some innocent person may have just committed a crime, but of course I will not know that until a trial is held", or are you going to say, "Some SOB just hit me!"?
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
71. Correct - that maxim sets the burden of proof at trial
Fri May 10, 2013, 02:04 PM
May 2013

If there were some personal duty to consider anyone "innocent", as some matter of one's own opinion, it would be a ridiculous thing.

I'm pretty sure that at every trial there is at least one person, namely the prosecutor, who most certainly believes the accused to be guilty and indeed says so. The prosecutor must prove the state's case to the satisfaction of those who are to presume innocence unless guilt is proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

If I walk up to you in the street, mug you, and knock you down onto the pavement, you are not expected to get up and say, "Golly, that innocent guy just left with my wallet."
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
51. Justice, not pity. Law, not vengeance...
Fri May 10, 2013, 10:01 AM
May 2013

Justice, not pity. Law, not vengeance...

That very distinction is one of the few things that separates us... well, most of us, from the lower animals orders.

Gman

(24,780 posts)
4. He needs someone that can cut a deal to avoid the death penalty
Fri May 10, 2013, 01:04 AM
May 2013

He'll be lucky if anyone can do that.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
7. Perhaps if he pleads guilty and his attorney goes for life without parole ?
Fri May 10, 2013, 01:07 AM
May 2013

I would not be surprised if the Cleveland DA goes for the death penalty, no matter what.

Gman

(24,780 posts)
11. That's his best hope
Fri May 10, 2013, 01:11 AM
May 2013

I read earlier that because he made one of the women miscarry 5 different times they're considering the death penalty.

elleng

(130,901 posts)
13. From what I've heard, obviously just rumor etc.,
Fri May 10, 2013, 01:11 AM
May 2013

he may have an insanity defense, and a possible 'deal' to keep him incarcerated and/or held indefinitely, assuming he's competent enough to stand trial and/or agree to a deal.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
17. Insanity?
Fri May 10, 2013, 01:14 AM
May 2013

He's got to show a long stretch of legal insanity. I can't see plausible insanity as to culpability here, nor a competence issue.

But whatever deal he makes, as long as he doesn't see the light of day, that's fine with me.

Response to jberryhill (Reply #17)

vankuria

(904 posts)
48. I don't see how an insanity defense could work
Fri May 10, 2013, 06:20 AM
May 2013

in this case. Castro knew what he was doing was wrong and took great pains too hide it from everyone he knew, family, friends, neighbors, etc. I don't know what kind of defense this guy could possibly have, since all the victims are alive to tell their stories. His best hope is a plea deal to spare the victims further trauma of having to testify in court. I would imagine life in prison without parole.

In my humble opinion, the death penalty would be too good for him. He should be imprisoned for the rest of his life and given the nature of his crimes, that will be his own living hell.

Warpy

(111,256 posts)
10. I hope his brothers turn on him
Fri May 10, 2013, 01:08 AM
May 2013

and his very good lawyer convinces him of the wisdom of accepting a plea bargain that takes the DP off the table.

Then I hope he stays locked up where he can't hurt anyone ever again.

I also hope FBI psychiatrists learn enough from him that they can spot the next man who wants to kidnap human sex toys sooner.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
23. Yeah, so do I
Fri May 10, 2013, 01:37 AM
May 2013

Because it is the only way to get an outcome to stick.

You see, if he doesn't get good representation and counsel, then convicting him doesn't do any good.

*I* am not his counsel. *I* hope he never walks free again. I am entitled to that opinion.

But if he wants to make a deal, then helping him make and evaluate that deal is part of his lawyer's job too.

He doesn't have a ghost of a chance of winning a fair trial. But if he wants one, I hope he gets one.

4 t 4

(2,407 posts)
25. yea I also hope he gets a fair trial- NOT because 3 girls and one child must be mistaken!
Fri May 10, 2013, 02:01 AM
May 2013

. But if he wants one, I hope he gets one.

4 t 4

(2,407 posts)
32. Thanks, what is the lesson behind it when 3 girls where held for a decade
Fri May 10, 2013, 02:31 AM
May 2013

and a little girl , sorry I wasn't so elegant .

Summer Hathaway

(2,770 posts)
38. The lesson being
Fri May 10, 2013, 02:40 AM
May 2013

that the horrendous details of this (or any other) crime do not negate the defendant's right to competent counsel, who will advocate for his client to the best of his skill, talent, and ability.

In this particular case, I think we all know what the verdict will be, when all is said and done. But HOW all was said and done leading up to that verdict should be above reproach.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
28. People tend to forget that they, too, may be accused of a crime one day and need counsel
Fri May 10, 2013, 02:23 AM
May 2013

Not as bad a crime as Ariel Castro is accused of, of course, but perhaps falsely accused by the police of a crime.

Case in point (very trivial): My local gendarmes rousted me from a nap and questioned me about a "suspicious" scratch on my left front fender. There had been a hit and run accident in my neighborhood, and my car fit the description.

Long story short, the cops decided there wasn't sufficient evidence to go any further. Of course not, I had nothing to do with the accident. However, I was quite apprehensive they were going to arrest me for it or at least give me a huge ticket. If I had been arrested, I would have wanted the best defense lawyer I could afford.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
29. That's when you say
Fri May 10, 2013, 02:25 AM
May 2013

"No, I couldn't have hit that car. That scratch is from the old lady I ran over last month!"

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
33. It passed through my mind to say that, but naw...
Fri May 10, 2013, 02:32 AM
May 2013

I think these cops would have cuffed me on the spot and charged me. I was well and truly frightened of being arrested for the first time in my life. Now I have much more sympathy for defendants.

brush

(53,778 posts)
40. You hope he is not subject to cruel and unusual punishment.
Fri May 10, 2013, 02:57 AM
May 2013

He won't last long in prison. The cons will have the long knives out for him as soon as he gets there. What he allegedly did is the lowest of the low, along with child molestation and rape. They will take care of him quickly.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
41. Ain't gonna be no trial.
Fri May 10, 2013, 03:15 AM
May 2013

His type try for a deal. There is too much evidence, why let all those details come out at trial?

ellisonz

(27,711 posts)
44. And then found guilty...
Fri May 10, 2013, 03:29 AM
May 2013

...sentenced to death, and after choosing to not appeal his case any further, put twelve feet underground by the state.

Response to jberryhill (Original post)

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
49. Yes. It's not about him so much as it is about our criminal justice system.
Fri May 10, 2013, 06:24 AM
May 2013

That said, I hope he pleads guilty, sparing the women the ordeal of testifying and the circus that a trial will be.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
59. Good point
Fri May 10, 2013, 11:59 AM
May 2013

I don't know whether trials serve a public catharsis function, or prolong fixation on horrible things.

lapislzi

(5,762 posts)
57. Have to agree, and rec.
Fri May 10, 2013, 11:49 AM
May 2013

That's why we call it "civilization." We need to remove the uncivilized from society, for the good of all.

Whether that is accomplished by putting this individual to death, or by permanent incarceration in a secure and solitary facility is not for me to decide.

In a smorgasbord of sucky outcomes, maybe the best thing that could happen was that this miscreant finds religion in the prison from which he will never be released and works toward victim advocacy, or something similar.

Atonement doesn't fix anything, but it might be the only kind of justice (as opposed to punishment) society could reasonably expect to attain.

Thank you for this distasteful, but necessary, post.

brooklynite

(94,550 posts)
62. What do you consider "cruel and unusual"?
Fri May 10, 2013, 01:40 PM
May 2013

I personally don't agree with the death penalty, but neither do I believe that life in prison needs to be particularly comfortable.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
70. I believe the death penalty should be abolished
Fri May 10, 2013, 02:00 PM
May 2013

It remains the law in many jurisdictions and has been found many times not to be "cruel and unusual".

My personal belief is that it should be abolished, as it serves no useful purpose, deprives worthwhile research of subjects, is difficult to administer in view of the various mandatory reviews and safeguards, and nonetheless is prone to irremediable error.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I hope a very good lawyer...