Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge questions efforts of NYPD’s stop-and-frisk ‘all-star’ Kha Dang who was ‘wrong 95 percent time
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/05/10/judge-questions-efforts-of-nypds-stop-and-frisk-all-star-kha-dang-who-was-wrong-wrong-95-percent-of-the-time/Judge questions efforts of NYPDs stop-and-frisk all-star Kha Dang who was wrong 95 percent of the time
In late summer 2009, few New York City police officers could match Kha Dang in street stops. Working with an aggressive plainclothes unit in Brooklyns 88th precinct, the eight-year veteran of the force was among the NYPDs top four stoppers.
Dang racked up a total of 127 stops in the third quarter of that year. He performed 75 frisks and, on 37 separate occasions, searched inside suspects clothing or belongings. He was, in the words of one civil rights attorney, an NYPD all-star.
Despite his efforts, Dangs hit rate the number of times in which his stops led to an arrest or summons, or removed a gun from the streets was called into serious question in federal court this week.
Dang made a total of six arrests out of his 127 stops. He wrote one summons. He found contraband once. He never recovered any weapons and he only stopped people of color, primarily African Americans, 115 times to be exact. He never stopped a white person.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 2014 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (23)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge questions efforts of NYPD’s stop-and-frisk ‘all-star’ Kha Dang who was ‘wrong 95 percent time (Original Post)
xchrom
May 2013
OP
The fact that racism is at play here, is that someone who had a 95% failure rate was considered
Baitball Blogger
May 2013
#3
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)1. And cue the 'Bloomie can do no wrong' defender in 3..2..1.. n/t
bluedigger
(17,087 posts)5. Yeah, but if you combined this with camera surveillance, it would work.
It just needs to be fully implemented to be effective and make us all safe.
sarisataka
(18,792 posts)6. It is for our own good
and probably stopped 1,518,641 criminals who were afraid of getting caught.
Once it is in place everywhere white people will get stopped too. It just happens to be in areas where there are no white folks
bobclark86
(1,415 posts)8. But, but, but...
He was on the cover of Time with a woman who got shot and some dude from Delaware! He's such a left-wing guy! Sure, he doesn't like brown people, or hippies, or people who don't make millions of dollars a year... but c'mon! He sends NYPD officers to Arizona to make YouTube videos!
BlueToTheBone
(3,747 posts)2. DU rec nt
Baitball Blogger
(46,763 posts)3. The fact that racism is at play here, is that someone who had a 95% failure rate was considered
an all star.
joeunderdog
(2,563 posts)4. How many men in suits got stopped?
This is so wrong on every level.
uponit7771
(90,367 posts)7. A lot if they were black or brown...this guy seems a lil racist