Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Fri May 10, 2013, 08:16 AM May 2013

Judge questions efforts of NYPD’s stop-and-frisk ‘all-star’ Kha Dang who was ‘wrong 95 percent time

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/05/10/judge-questions-efforts-of-nypds-stop-and-frisk-all-star-kha-dang-who-was-wrong-wrong-95-percent-of-the-time/

Judge questions efforts of NYPD’s stop-and-frisk ‘all-star’ Kha Dang who was ‘wrong 95 percent of the time’


In late summer 2009, few New York City police officers could match Kha Dang in street stops. Working with an aggressive plainclothes unit in Brooklyn’s 88th precinct, the eight-year veteran of the force was among the NYPD’s top four stoppers.

Dang racked up a total of 127 stops in the third quarter of that year. He performed 75 frisks and, on 37 separate occasions, searched inside suspects’ clothing or belongings. He was, in the words of one civil rights attorney, an NYPD “all-star”.

Despite his efforts, Dang’s hit rate – the number of times in which his stops led to an arrest or summons, or removed a gun from the streets – was called into serious question in federal court this week.

Dang made a total of six arrests out of his 127 stops. He wrote one summons. He found contraband once. He never recovered any weapons and he only stopped people of color, primarily African Americans, 115 times to be exact. He never stopped a white person.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge questions efforts of NYPD’s stop-and-frisk ‘all-star’ Kha Dang who was ‘wrong 95 percent time (Original Post) xchrom May 2013 OP
And cue the 'Bloomie can do no wrong' defender in 3..2..1.. n/t X_Digger May 2013 #1
Yeah, but if you combined this with camera surveillance, it would work. bluedigger May 2013 #5
It is for our own good sarisataka May 2013 #6
But, but, but... bobclark86 May 2013 #8
DU rec nt BlueToTheBone May 2013 #2
The fact that racism is at play here, is that someone who had a 95% failure rate was considered Baitball Blogger May 2013 #3
How many men in suits got stopped? joeunderdog May 2013 #4
A lot if they were black or brown...this guy seems a lil racist uponit7771 May 2013 #7

bluedigger

(17,087 posts)
5. Yeah, but if you combined this with camera surveillance, it would work.
Fri May 10, 2013, 11:03 AM
May 2013

It just needs to be fully implemented to be effective and make us all safe.

sarisataka

(18,792 posts)
6. It is for our own good
Fri May 10, 2013, 11:13 AM
May 2013

and probably stopped 1,518,641 criminals who were afraid of getting caught.
Once it is in place everywhere white people will get stopped too. It just happens to be in areas where there are no white folks

bobclark86

(1,415 posts)
8. But, but, but...
Fri May 10, 2013, 11:40 AM
May 2013

He was on the cover of Time with a woman who got shot and some dude from Delaware! He's such a left-wing guy! Sure, he doesn't like brown people, or hippies, or people who don't make millions of dollars a year... but c'mon! He sends NYPD officers to Arizona to make YouTube videos!

Baitball Blogger

(46,763 posts)
3. The fact that racism is at play here, is that someone who had a 95% failure rate was considered
Fri May 10, 2013, 09:21 AM
May 2013

an all star.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge questions efforts o...