Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mercuryblues

(14,522 posts)
Tue May 14, 2013, 01:38 PM May 2013

Couple sues state over toddler's sexual-reassignment surgery

http://www.wistv.com/story/22246487/couple-sues-state-over-toddlers-sexual-reassignment-surgery?utm_source=buffer&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Buffer&utm_content=buffer9cc35

A Forest Acres couple is suing the state to challenge its decision to perform sexual-reassignment surgery on a toddler in its care who was born with both male and female internal sexual genitals. Mark and Pam Crawford, adoptive parents of the now 8-year-old child, spoke to the media Tuesday morning about the lawsuits filed in partnership with the Southern Poverty Law Center in federal and state courts.


The Crawfords say the child was born with intersex condition, which means a person is not born with a sexual anatomy that doesn't fit the definition of a typical man or woman.


The suit alleges the South Carolina Department of Social Services decided to perform "dangerous and mutilating surgery" in April, 2006 on the 16-month old to make the child a girl.


The child is now 8 and self identifies as a boy.
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Couple sues state over toddler's sexual-reassignment surgery (Original Post) mercuryblues May 2013 OP
Good for the SPLC. I hope they win. LiberalAndProud May 2013 #1
When is 8 years old considered a toddler? Initech May 2013 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author Chan790 May 2013 #3
It's clear in the link. Gormy Cuss May 2013 #14
The surgery was at 18 months Marrah_G May 2013 #4
The surgery was performed when the kid was a toddler. politicat May 2013 #5
16 months old at the time of the surgery, according to the article bike man May 2013 #6
At the link mercuryblues May 2013 #7
They didn't make that clear in the article when I read it. Initech May 2013 #8
I think the headline mercuryblues May 2013 #9
I just wish they would have waited AngryAmish May 2013 #10
Wow. Jenoch May 2013 #11
^^This!^^ n/t LeftofObama May 2013 #12
I don't know the whole situation gvstn May 2013 #13
When I was writing that post Jenoch May 2013 #15
Absolutely. LuvNewcastle May 2013 #16

Initech

(100,036 posts)
2. When is 8 years old considered a toddler?
Tue May 14, 2013, 01:47 PM
May 2013

I always thought that definition applied to 2 - 5 years old, not 8.

Response to Initech (Reply #2)

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
14. It's clear in the link.
Tue May 14, 2013, 03:35 PM
May 2013

Child was surgically reassigned to female as a toddler and is now an 8 year old who identifies as male.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
4. The surgery was at 18 months
Tue May 14, 2013, 01:51 PM
May 2013

Social services decided the child was to be made into a girl at 18 months.

The child is now 8 and identifies as a boy.

politicat

(9,808 posts)
5. The surgery was performed when the kid was a toddler.
Tue May 14, 2013, 01:52 PM
May 2013

Now, the child is old enough to articulate who he is.

 

bike man

(620 posts)
6. 16 months old at the time of the surgery, according to the article
Tue May 14, 2013, 01:54 PM
May 2013
"The suit alleges the South Carolina Department of Social Services decided to perform "dangerous and mutilating surgery" in April, 2006 on the 16-month old to make the child a girl."

mercuryblues

(14,522 posts)
7. At the link
Tue May 14, 2013, 01:54 PM
May 2013

The surgery was done when he was 16 months old. The child is now eight. He was adopted a few months after the surgery, which leads me to believe he was in DCYS custody at the time of the surgery.

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
10. I just wish they would have waited
Tue May 14, 2013, 02:04 PM
May 2013

The teenage years would have been pretty bumpy but this poor kid is mutilated.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
11. Wow.
Tue May 14, 2013, 02:04 PM
May 2013

The child was born with both male and female reproductive organs. The people in government just wanted to check this child off a list and be done with the situation. The obvious, common-sense solution was to wait to see which gender the child identified with and then do surgery.

gvstn

(2,805 posts)
13. I don't know the whole situation
Tue May 14, 2013, 03:24 PM
May 2013

But a family I know had the same situation and chose the surgery at a similar age. There were problems with urinating among others because neither set of reproductive organs were fully developed. They had to pick a gender to avoid further complications. Choosing female is easier.

I agree that waiting would be ideal but I'll wait to see why the doctors recommended doing it at the younger age. I know in hte case of the family I know this happened around 2007 so it may not be about attitudes to intersex children but genuine medical needs.

On Edit: I just read the article and apparently it wasn't medically necessary. My mistake. They should have waited since that is the new norm.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
15. When I was writing that post
Tue May 14, 2013, 03:37 PM
May 2013

it occurred to me that there might be practical medical reasons for at least some surgery (ie. the urinary tract) but I forgot to include it. I agree with your edit.

LuvNewcastle

(16,834 posts)
16. Absolutely.
Tue May 14, 2013, 04:08 PM
May 2013

If a baby is born and the sex is indeterminate, you should let the child decide who he or she is. Maybe the child identifies with both genders and doesn't want surgery at all, and that's just fine, too. I hope this case gets a lot of attention and this practice ends. It's a terrible tragedy when the wrong sex is chosen; I can't even imagine what this child is going through.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Couple sues state over to...