The dirty secrets of the CIA’s War on Terror
n April 1975, Sen. Frank Church, D-Idaho, impaneled a special investigative committee to look into shocking accounts of CIA dirty tricks. The Church Committee ultimately published 14 reports over two years revealing a clandestine agency that was a law unto itself plotting to assassinate heads of state (Castro, Diem, Lumumba, Trujillo), carrying out weird experiments with LSD, and suborning American journalists. As a result, President Gerald Ford issued an executive order banning the assassination of foreign leaders, the House and Senate established standing intelligence committees, and the United States set up the so-called FISA courts, which oversee request for surveillance warrants against suspected foreign agents.
But the war on terror unleashed the CIA once again to carry out dark deeds against Americas enemies torture, secret detention, and rendition to black sites across the world. How have Americans reckoned, this time, with the immoral and illegal acts carried out in their name? They have not: the CIA has retained control over the narrative. As the Constitution Projects Detainee Treatment report describes in great detail, the CIA falsely reported to the White House as well as to the public that torture worked in wresting crucial information from high-level detainees, and thus needed to be an instrument available to interrogators. Officials like Vice President Dick Cheney repeated ad nauseum that the CIAs dark arts had saved thousands of lives. Is it any wonder that a plurality of Americans think the United States should torture terrorists?
I wrote recently about the detainee treatment report, but I find it incredibly frustrating and all too telling that the findings were overwhelmed by the tidal wave of coverage of the Boston bombing. Because we fear terrorism far more viscerally than we feared communism certainly by 1975 we are all too susceptible to the view that America cannot afford to live by its own professed values. But of course thats what Chileans and Brazilians thought in the 1970s. Thats why Sri Lankans have granted themselves the right to slaughter homegrown terrorists wholesale, and react furiously to any hint of criticism.
People give themselves a pass unless and until they are forced to face the truth, which is why a public airing of history is so important and so politically fraught. Theres always a compelling reason to avoid facing the ugly truth. In early 2009, Vermonts Patrick Leahy, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, called for an independent commission to investigate allegations of torture. But President Barack Obamas spokesman said that the proposal would not be workable. We know what he meant: you can hardly blame the president for avoiding a colossal fight with Republicans over the past, especially, when he had so many fights he needed to wage over the future.
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/05/14/3395417/the-dirty-secrets-of-the-cias.html#storylink=cpy