Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
1. They were doing what they were hired to do...review applications.
Tue May 14, 2013, 05:54 PM
May 2013

This whole IRS thing is surreal. So... they actually do their jobs and reject applicants that do not comply to standards. Where is the crime? The crime is not giving cry baby rethugs what they want, regardless of if it's legal. Now who is going to fix this?

But just in case, keep up the good work! Maybe your next great idea will come to fruition as well!

TheKentuckian

(25,020 posts)
2. The problem is political targeting before you even get to who meets standards or doesn't
Tue May 14, 2013, 06:19 PM
May 2013

not rejecting anyone who didn't.

Process matters and equality under the law means not singling out folks for special focus because you don't like their politics or more likely here singling out people that you agree with their politics but don't want them knocking out your establishment preferred candidates since this was a Bushie running the show on this stuff.

Yup, what I think motivated this was TeaPubliKlans wanting to dull the long knives going for their establishment schmucks over the Tea variety schmucks and if the shit hit the fan, then blame the President.

Can't loose for winning like that, see.

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
3. It is already coming out that the left has had the same scrutiny.
Tue May 14, 2013, 06:28 PM
May 2013

Time will tell. Too bad we can't focus one minute on making things better. Always on the defensive...just the way the Rthugs like it!

TheKentuckian

(25,020 posts)
4. Balance isn't my concern, equality under the law is. Not tit for tat but equality.
Wed May 15, 2013, 08:39 PM
May 2013

Every group in the class should be under the exact same microscope be they left, right, middle, centrist (who I imagine are under the least despite being arms of corporations) or non-political and you can't be doing that hunting for particular ones with key phrases someone doesn't like in their name and/or mission statement.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»why is the IRS doing what...